<!-- DOC_STATUS: ACTIVE_AUTHORITY -->

v0.2 Codex-Found File-Completeness — Object Registry Addendum (2026-06-11)

Authority of THIS doc: KB-level governance record (NOT a production registry insertion). No PG/Directus/birth_registry/system_issues row was created. Macro: TKT_V02_CODEX_FOUND_LOADBEARING_FILE_COMPLETENESS_REPAIR_MACRO_2026_06_11 (T2) Codex consulted: NO · v0.2: NON_AUTHORITY / NOT_PROMOTED · FIX7: not mutated

1. Why an addendum (no 60KB rewrite)

Following the established pattern (real-N6 lane registered 241..253 via addendum), this lane's objects are registered here to avoid rewriting the ~55KB registry MD / ~60KB registry JSON. The main registry JSON (objects max id 224) is not rewritten; addenda carry 225..253 (T1) and 254..262 (this lane).

2. Live collision check (performed before reserving)

Scanned governed registry JSON + MD + 00-index on 2026-06-11:

Range	Owner / lane	Status
182..200	FIX7 final authority-seal (T1)	reserved, intact
201..207	v0.2 self-codex-proof (T2)	registered
208..216	FIX7 N-Node clarification (T1)	reserved, intact
217..224	v0.2 pre-codex-review (T2)	registered
225..240	FIX7 authority/N-node alignment (T1)	reserved (addendum), intact
241..253	FIX7 real-N6 provenance (T1)	reserved (addendum), intact
254..262	v0.2 file-completeness repair (T2, this lane)	reserved here

Highest prior reserved id was 253; this lane takes 254..262. No collision with any T1 (182..200, 208..216, 225..253) or T2 (201..207, 217..224) range. Current max object id after this addendum: 262.

3. Objects registered (TKT-OBJ-254..262)

ID	Object	Path	Kind
TKT-OBJ-254	File-completeness repair report	…/reports/v02-codex-found-loadbearing-file-completeness-repair-2026-06-11.md	report
TKT-OBJ-255	Missing-file adversarial probes report	…/reports/v02-codex-found-missing-file-adversarial-probes-2026-06-11.md	report
TKT-OBJ-256	mf_probes.py missing-file probe suite (77ecd034…)	…/reports/v02-mf-probes-2026-06-11.py	runnable script
TKT-OBJ-257	Review-packet completeness republish fileset (6 byte-identical files)	…/review/v02-pre-codex-review-packet-2026-06-10/{content_bind_oracle.py,content_bind_verify.py,content_bind_regression.py,content_bind_rerun.sh,content_bind_oracle.json,real-sut/fix7_canon_v1_ssot.py}	packet files (copies)
TKT-OBJ-258	Review-packet integrity re-pin (README §3a + HASH_MANIFEST README line + packet_tree 08a17307…)	…/review/v02-pre-codex-review-packet-2026-06-10/{README_FOR_OWNER_AND_CODEX.md,HASH_MANIFEST.txt,packet_tree.sha256}	integrity update
TKT-OBJ-259	Report-vs-file audit update (§8 file-existence check)	…/reports/v02-report-vs-file-consistency-audit-2026-06-10.md (rev2)	report update
TKT-OBJ-260	Checkpoint — file-completeness repair	…/checkpoints/checkpoint-v02-codex-found-file-completeness-repair-2026-06-11.md	checkpoint
TKT-OBJ-261	Current-state — file-completeness repaired	knowledge/current-state/reports/tkt-v02-codex-found-file-completeness-repaired-2026-06-11.md	current-state
TKT-OBJ-262	This governance addendum	…/governance/v02-codex-found-file-completeness-object-registry-addendum-2026-06-11.md	governance

4. Orphan check

Every artifact produced by this macro has a registry object above or is byte-pinned in the review packet's HASH_MANIFEST.txt. The 6 republished files are both packet-pinned (manifest) AND collectively registered (254-257). Raw run logs remain intentionally not in vector KB (no-vector rule; V02-PB-NVSZ-1 open) — local + hashed + regenerable by bash commands.sh. Zero KB orphans.

5. No-mutation statement

No Codex call, no owner-ask, no real seal, no v0.2 promotion, no FIX7 mutation, no production / PG / Directus / registry-row / system_issues mutation, no REAL_RUN / QT001 / permit / activation / repoint / cutover. KB-level governance only.