Checkpoint — Codex cross-check Text-as-Code reuse audit — 2026-06-09
Checkpoint — Codex cross-check Text-as-Code reuse audit
Date: 2026-06-09
Production mutation: NO
Cross-check status: CODEX_CROSSCHECK_READY
Claude/T1 audit verdict: CLAUDE_AUDIT_UNSAFE_TO_USE_FOR_PLANNING
Revised recommendation: NEEDS_FRESH_BASELINE_FIRST
Confirmed findings
- The concern that DOT counting is incomplete is confirmed.
- No single canonical DOT total is currently supported by the reviewed evidence.
- Dated/surface-specific valid counts include 75/82, 93/95, 97, 272/256, approximately 287/288, 309, 54, 42, and local 163; they have different denominators and cannot be collapsed.
- June 5 evidence identifies 41 registry-no-file and approximately 18–19 file-no-registry records, plus substantial registry metadata/pairing gaps.
- T1 omitted the necessary multi-surface count ledger and reconciliation contract.
- T1 overstates
TRUE_NEWstatus for runner, manifest, selftest/hash, dead-link audit, and duplicate integration. fn_tac_log_checker_issueis not accepted as a universal logger authority.- Cloning/adapting
cutter_agent/dryrun.pyis rejected as a reuse strategy until a canonical callable/library boundary is established. - Directus DOT-only control is mandatory as law, but current 100% estate compliance remains unverified.
- Text-as-Code/IU current corpus/resolver authority remains unresolved.
- The T1 report's use of five parallel auditors conflicts with the main-process-only/no-background-agent rule.
Risk statement
The largest missing area is a fresh, dated, multi-surface baseline with explicit set identities and both-direction diffs.
The largest conflict risk is creating or cloning a runner, manifest, logger, duplicate checker, or graph checker before authority ownership is resolved, thereby creating a parallel engine under the label of reuse.
DOT confidence
- Unified DOT total:
LOW / UNSUPPORTED. - Individual dated snapshot counts:
HIGH WITHIN EXPLICIT DENOMINATOR. - Current production executable total:
UNRESOLVED.
Boundary
No implementation, production mutation, permit opening, REAL_RUN, Directus mutation, or execution-phase authorization occurred.
Exactly one minimal safe next step
Execute one read-only multi-surface baseline/reconciliation snapshot, preserving separate sets and both-EXCEPT diffs for DOT registry/files/catalog/runners, Directus routes, IU/TAC current resolver, issue writers, and graph/duplicate engines. Do not combine counts or implement tools.
Report
knowledge/dev/laws/tool-kiem-thu/reviews/codex-crosscheck-text-as-code-reuse-audit-2026-06-09.md