GPT Review — Đ44 UOSL v0.1.1

Date: 2026-05-01

Verdict

Opus v0.1.1 is materially improved and directionally correct. The 8 GPT patches plus 3 self-review patches are valid. The draft is close to Council Review level, but should receive a short P4 polish before formal Council review.

Main points

1. Keeping Đ44 as a cross-cutting logical schema law is correct.
2. Keeping physical table names out of the law is correct.
3. OQC, Object Family Registry, Authority Map, and Conflict Resolution are necessary.
4. Splitting edge types into sourced core and candidate additions is correct.
5. Treating maturity levels as provisional is correct.
6. Legacy edge provenance grace period is necessary.

Required P4 polish

1. Remove implementation commitments from the law body: G2 segmentation, G3 registry seed, G4 SCMR seed, and G5 DOT enforcement should be moved to an appendix/roadmap, not legal requirements.
2. Change “After Council PASS → pilot G2/G3 → upload KB” ordering. The law must be uploaded/recorded as the controlled draft before segmentation; segmentation should operate on the controlled draft, not a floating chat artifact.
3. Reword “LSL-01 still ưu tiên” to avoid undermining Đ44. Better: LSL-01 governs text-as-code procedure; Đ44 governs object schema logic. Neither overrides the other outside its scope.
4. Clarify that SCMR and Family Registry are mandatory logical capabilities, while physical implementation names and shapes are design-phase decisions.
5. Add a short Non-goals section: Đ44 does not define table DDL, vector payload schema, DOT names, profile field lists, or migration scripts.
6. Add one explicit conformance clause: every future object-family design must include a Đ44 conformance section.
7. Keep P4 short. Do not expand the law.

Recommended next direction to Opus

Perform P4 polish only, producing v0.1.2. No new research unless a direct contradiction is found. Then submit v0.1.2 for User/GPT Council review. Do not cut into PG yet.