05 — Điều 39 rerun MARK result

Pre-rerun state transitions

marked → mark_rejected             (actor: dieu39_remark_cut_request_transition, via fn_cut_verify_mark(approve=false))
mark_rejected → mark_in_progress   (actor: dieu39_remark_with_schema_v1, via new fn_cut_mark_staged_file)
mark_in_progress → marked          (actor: dieu39_remark_with_schema_v1, via new fn_cut_mark_staged_file)

Staging record 3d9d0388-… was first marked lifecycle_status=rejected via fn_iu_verify_mark(p_apply=true) for an audit trail (problems recorded in metadata.verify_mark_problems).

Piece construction

Derived from the previous bad manifest's pieces. Mapping rules:

new field	source
local_piece_id	`'P'
source_position	piece_index::int
piece_role	'section_body' (uniform — no vocab yet)
section_type	normative_section → section (vocab membership); other values kept as-is
content_text	unchanged
canonical_address	unchanged
parent_local_id	null (flat structure)
title, unit_kind, source_ref, piece_index	preserved verbatim (informational)

Re-mark invocation

SELECT public.fn_cut_mark_staged_file(
  p_cut_request_id := '146f1520-aaa2-4bda-af2c-06a8f76cd36a'::uuid,
  p_pieces         := <16 v1-schema pieces>,
  p_actor          := 'dieu39_remark_with_schema_v1',
  p_mark_report_md := '...'
);

Result

{
  "status": "marked",
  "cut_request_id": "146f1520-aaa2-4bda-af2c-06a8f76cd36a",
  "manifest_staging_record_id": "9fa4685e-d35a-45d4-aee7-aa2836785ca5",
  "manifest_digest": "aded6af91fb9643fb2ea99ff024a1ede",
  "pieces_count": 16,
  "piece_schema_validated": "cut_manifest_piece_schema_v1",
  "alias_result": {
    "alias": "fn_iu_op_mark_file",
    "source_hash": "a732962665691c620a050265de246050",
    "source_bytes": 23394,
    "idempotency_key": "cut-mark-146f1520-aaa2-4bda-af2c-06a8f76cd36a-a12e85d0cc07a3a5fd9dd5e9f9f78753",
    "inner_result": {
      "ok": true,
      "expires_at": "2026-06-11T02:51:13.561188+00:00",
      "lifecycle_status": "pending_review"
    }
  }
}

Manifest field-completeness AFTER rerun

field	count
local_piece_id	16/16
content_text	16/16
canonical_address	16/16
source_position (integer-like)	16/16
piece_role	16/16
section_type (in vocab)	16/16

source_hash (a732962665691c620a050265de246050) and source_bytes (23394) unchanged from the original COPY — confirming COPY_TO_CUT_ZONE was correct all along; only the MARK output contract had been wrong.

No manual jsonb_set was used — pieces were correct at the boundary entry, MARK validated and accepted, staging record + payload created cleanly.