dot-iu-cutter v0.5 WS-Q5 Registry Substrate — DDL Authoring Report

Phase: v0_5_WS_Q5_registry_substrate_DDL_authoring · Nature: executable_DDL_authoring_only__no_execution · Date: 2026-05-18 Package (5 files, this is #5):

1. …-WS-Q5-registry-substrate-DDL-draft-2026-05-18.sql.md
2. …-WS-Q5-registry-substrate-rollback-draft-2026-05-18.sql.md
3. …-WS-Q5-registry-substrate-verification-plan-2026-05-18.md
4. …-WS-Q5-registry-substrate-design-delta-and-open-decisions-2026-05-18.md
5. …-WS-Q5-registry-substrate-DDL-authoring-report-2026-05-18.md (this file)

---

1. Executive summary

deliverable: executable-for-review SQL DDL + exact-inverse rollback +
  catalog-level verification plan + design-delta for the WS-Q5 registry
  substrate (12 cutter_governance tables)
input_ruling: GPT review 2026-05-18 PASS_WITH_RULINGS
  (BR-A1 LOCKED; OD-SEQ1 source_document=Step0; FULL_REGISTRY_SUBSTRATE_FIRST;
   index/vocab/checker excluded; KEEP_DISTINCT authority_semantics/owner_law)
sql_executed: none                 # authored for command-review ONLY
migration_applied: false
dml_seed_executed: false
forbidden_respected: true
quality_gates: QG1–QG8 addressed (§6)
self_advance: PROHIBITED
verdict_requested_from: GPT / User (command-review of the DDL package)

2. What was read

#	Document	Used for
1	GPT review …schema-Q5-command-review-planning-gpt-review-2026-05-18	Rulings: BR-A1 LOCK, OD-SEQ1/2/3, OD-VC1/2/3/6, scope include/exclude, authoring constraints
2	Planning package (5 files)	Object inventory, sequencing, verification doctrine, OD register
3	WS-2 D1 / D2-D3-D4 / D5-D6 designs	Concrete pseudo-schemas for all 12 objects (not redesigned)
4	Handoff 2026-05-17 §4.2 + closeout memory	source_document fields; existing 12 cutter_governance table names (collision check)

3. What was authored

file_1 DDL draft: 12 CREATE TABLE (cutter_governance.*), 12 PK, 8 FK,
  4 UNIQUE, COMMENT mapping; additive-only; no CASCADE/CHECK/trigger/
  DEFAULT/DML; plain CREATE TABLE (collision aborts loudly); schema-qualified
file_2 rollback draft: 12 DROP TABLE in exact reverse dependency order, no
  CASCADE; data-exists case routes to deprecate/escalate (no hard delete)
file_3 verification plan: catalog-level only (pg_catalog/information_schema),
  TV/CV/KC/NM/AC/NH/AO + negative NG checks; KC-3 schema-qualified FK compare
  to prevent C-07 false-negative recurrence
file_4 design-delta: object→authority map; included/excluded; conflict check
  (none); deferred ODs + new authoring decisions AD-1..AD-4 flagged
file_5: this report
nothing_executed: true

4. Objects included / excluded

included (12): matcher_config_registry, address_template_registry,
  grammar_profile, grammar_profile_level, grammar_profile_status_marker,
  source_family_registry, source_document_registry,
  source_document_version_registry, entity_kind_registry,
  entity_reference_registry, authority_override, metadata_key_registry
excluded (GPT ruling): evidenced_by vocab, Cap-4 checker, 7 indexes,
  topic_vocab physical, assembly_profile physical (both proven NON-mandatory
  for first substrate — design-delta §2.1), reverse-index, release_bundle,
  Constitution dry-run, CUT/VERIFY
excluded (authoring decision, flagged): CHECK/trigger/DEFAULT, GRANT/role,
  DML seed (AD-1/AD-2/AD-3)

5. Risks

RK-1 seed-not-yet-authored: registries empty until a separate seed cycle;
  BR-A1 separator policy is value-level (AC-2) so it is enforced at seed
  command-review + verification, NOT by DDL. Mitigation: AD-1/AD-3 flagged;
  verification AC-2/NG-* will catch a wrong-value or premature seed.
RK-2 source_document/parser soft refs: default_parser_profile_ref and
  authority_override span_ref/iu_id are soft refs (ingestion/cross-schema not
  created) — intentional (v0.2 no-cross-schema-FK doctrine); risk = no DB-level
  referential guard, accepted + documented.
RK-3 doc count discrepancy: DDL-draft §2 summary said "7 FK/3 UNIQUE"; true =
  8 FK / 4 UNIQUE (AD-4). Verification enumerates by name so the apply gate is
  unaffected; flagged for GPT to confirm canonical counts.
RK-4 collision-on-apply: if any of the 12 names pre-exists differently, a
  future run aborts (no IF NOT EXISTS) — desired fail-loud; STOP + escalate.
RK-5 privilege gap: tables ungranted until a separate privilege cycle (AD-2);
  cutter_ro/exec/verify cannot see them until then — intended sequencing.
overall: LOW–STANDARD (additive, empty, no CASCADE, no existing-schema ALTER).

6. Quality gates

Gate	Requirement	Status
QG1	DDL covers only approved WS-Q5 substrate	PASS — 12 objects, GPT scope exact
QG2	Not executed	PASS — zero SQL run; authored for review
QG3	Rollback exact inverse, no CASCADE default	PASS — reverse order, no CASCADE, data-exists→deprecate
QG4	Verification catalog-level	PASS — pg_catalog/information_schema; no rendered-string equality; negatives included
QG5	No evidenced_by vocab/checker/index execution	PASS — all excluded per ruling
QG6	Design-authority mapping clear	PASS — design-delta §1 per-object map
QG7	Conflict → flag, no self-fix	PASS — no collision; fail-loud + escalate documented
QG8	Report states ready/not-ready for GPT command review	PASS — §7

7. Readiness for GPT command review

ready_for_GPT_command_review: YES (as a DDL command-review INPUT — not an
  authorization to execute)
rationale:
  - executable-for-review SQL + exact-inverse rollback + catalog-level
    verification + authority mapping are complete and internally consistent
  - all GPT rulings (BR-A1, OD-SEQ1/2/3, OD-VC1/2/3/6) honored
  - scope boundaries and authoring decisions (AD-1..AD-4) explicitly flagged
    for GPT confirmation rather than self-resolved
NOT ready to execute: execution (dry-run → command-review → sovereign →
  production apply → structural verification) remains a SEPARATE gated cycle.
  AD-1..AD-4 should be confirmed by GPT/User before or within that cycle.
recommended_smallest_next_step (advisory): GPT/User command-review of this
  package + ruling on AD-1..AD-4; if PASS, the next phase is an isolated
  dry-run of the DDL (own command-review + sovereign prompt) — NOT a direct
  production apply.

8. SQL execution statement

sql_executed: none
migration_applied: false
dml_seed_executed: false
dry_run: none
production_write: none
directus_mutation: none
vector_nosql: none
cut: none ; verify: none
deploy_or_restart: none
git_commit: none
self_advance_to_execution: none
the_two_.sql.md_files_are: review artifacts — syntactically executable so GPT
  can audit them, deliberately NOT run.

9. Git / repo access note

repo_vps_access: NONE in this session
basis: cwd /Users/nmhuyen is not a git repo (`git rev-parse` -> fatal: not a
  git repository); /opt/incomex/dot/iu-cutter absent (ls -> No such file)
branch / HEAD / `git status --short -- iu-cutter`: UNAVAILABLE (no repo/VPS access)
write_operations: none beyond KB doc upload
note: last accepted code HEAD per handoff (informational, NOT verified here):
  e93424b5ff7fa5e4b8406131977ce4339cd0856a (branch main). No code change
  expected or made (DDL authoring is KB-only).

10. Routing

status: WS_Q5_REGISTRY_SUBSTRATE_DDL_AUTHORING_COMPLETE__SQL_NOT_EXECUTED
package: 5 files uploaded to
  knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-ws-q5-registry-substrate-ddl-authoring/
next_action: ROUTE TO GPT / USER — command-review the DDL package + rule
  AD-1..AD-4; on PASS, open a separate isolated dry-run cycle (NOT production)
agent_next: STOP — execution NOT authorized; self-advance PROHIBITED

STOP. WS-Q5 registry-substrate DDL authoring complete. 12 registry tables authored as executable-for-review SQL with exact-inverse rollback and catalog-level verification. No SQL executed, no migration applied, no seed run, nothing mutated. Awaiting GPT/User command-review.

---

End of report. Companion files: DDL-draft, rollback-draft, verification-plan, design-delta-and-open-decisions.