KB-6923
dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — S2→CUT Capability Readiness · Commit-or-Gap Readiness Report (doc 5; STOP → GPT/User)
6 min read Revision 1
dot-iu-cutterv0.5s2-to-cut-capability-readinessreadiness-reportready-for-s2-commit-reviewblocked-with-exact-implementation-gapstop-route-gpt-userdieu442026-05-19
dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — S2→CUT Capability Readiness · Commit-or-Gap Readiness Report
doc 5 of 5 · 2026-05-19 ·
investigation + local CI only· STOP → route GPT/Userkb_read: confirmed · kb_upload: confirmed (5/5 docs created) production_mutation: NONE · committed: NO · self_advance: PROHIBITED
1. Dual result (both PASS-criteria branches resolved honestly)
CAPABILITY_1_CUT_PLANNER (S2/cutplan):
result: READY_FOR_S2_COMMIT_REVIEW (== READY_FOR_CUT_PLANNER_COMMAND_REVIEW —
S2 is a planner, not a writer)
evidence:
- tests.test_cutplan_snapshot 15/15 GREEN (this session, no DB env, net-zero)
- reproduces the accepted pinned identity (manifest digest 9d908a62…, file sha
7d56f3ce…, candidate_count 60, Điều 44 excluded, reconstruction_ok, 60 distinct
OD-1 idempotency keys) from the byte-exact fixture
- fail-closed guard + determinism + stdlib import-isolation all proven by tests
- py_compile OK; files byte-exact (cutplan 548eabc5… / test 06e871e7…)
- the lone full-discover failure is PRE-EXISTING at ratified baseline afb7bfc
(re-proven by moving S2 aside → still fails on dryrun.py:474); MARK was ratified
on the targeted-suite gate (21/21, re-confirmed) with this same latent failure
recommended_gate: R1 — ratify the targeted-suite commit gate; commit the 2 files
as-is on the feature branch; track the security-test heuristic as a SEPARATE
pre-existing remediation. (R2 remediate-first acceptable if GPT prefers.)
CAPABILITY_2_PRODUCTION_CUT_WRITER:
result: BLOCKED_WITH_EXACT_IMPLEMENTATION_GAP
exact_gap: GAP-W1 no manifest→information_unit/unit_version writer exists (cutplan is a
planner whose preview targets the v0.4 ledger families, NOT the real schema);
GAP-W2 manifest→IU field mapping undefined for the governed birth gate + N-2 unruled;
GAP-W3 dot_config vocab prerequisites for ICX-CONST not confirmed/seeded;
GAP-W4 cutter_exec/cutter_verify credential + production signing not built;
GAP-W5 no separate production-write approval / governed VERIFY for birth model.
gap_class: IMPLEMENTATION (schema now fully known — doc 3); not missing information.
2. Direction & answers to the macro-goal questions
direction: D (split: planner now, governed birth-gated writer next) — doc 4 §1.
S2_receives_manifest_9d908a62: YES (digest+file-sha+self-digest gated)
S2_identifies_60_candidates: YES (count gate + happy-path identity)
S2_granularity_NT/KT/DIEU: PASS-THROUGH only; N-2 IU-vs-container UNRULED (writer-design input)
S2_keeps_Dieu44/draft/obsolete_excluded: YES (mandatory flag + candidate guard + excluded-only)
S2_fixed_canonical_DIEU_addresses: YES (verbatim, dup-guarded; N-4 satisfied)
S2_output_sufficient_for_production_row_set: NO (wrong target schema — GAP-W1/W2)
S2_writer_or_planner: PLANNER (net-zero, preview-only)
S2_signing/credential/idempotency/rollback/verify: idempotency YES (OD-1);
signing/credential/rollback/verify NONE (by design — a planner needs none)
production_information_unit: governed two-layer birth gate (L1 BEFORE field/vocab,
L2 DEFERRED anchoring) + unit_version FK + dot_config vocab + UNIQUE(canonical_address)
collision guard; 0 ICX-CONST rows today (clean insert)
3. Quality-gate mapping
QG1 current code/S2 state reconstructed : PASS (doc 1)
QG2 S2/cutplan capability reviewed from source : PASS (doc 2)
QG3 production schema + writer gap (read-only) : PASS (doc 3)
QG4 minimal-unblock direction chosen (A–E) + sequence : PASS (doc 4 — Direction D)
QG5 progressed w/o production mutation (local CI run) : PASS (15/15·21/21·128-1·py_compile;
baseline-failure re-proven; S2 files byte-exact restored)
QG6 no invented production command / no pseudo-as-real : PASS (only the existing S1
contract shape referenced; production CUT WITHHELD)
QG7 commit-or-gap readiness stated clearly : PASS (this doc §1)
QG8 STOP after upload, route GPT/User : PASS (this doc §5)
4. Explicit no-mutation statement
this_phase: ZERO production mutation. No CUT · no VERIFY · no DB/IU/Directus/vector write ·
no source/version mutation · no code edit · no commit/push/merge/tag/deploy · no
self-advance · no invented command. Local unittest runs were net-zero (no DB env).
Only 5 KB documents created in v0.5-s2-to-cut-capability-readiness/. S2 files restored
byte-exact (move-aside baseline proof only).
5. Disposition — STOP → route GPT/User
result: PLANNER_READY_FOR_S2_COMMIT_REVIEW + PRODUCTION_WRITER_BLOCKED_WITH_EXACT_GAP
kb_path: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-s2-to-cut-capability-readiness/
docs: [current-code-and-s2-state(1), s2-cutplan-capability-review(2),
production-schema-writer-gap-review(3), recommended-minimal-unblock-path(4),
commit-or-gap-readiness-report(5)]
decisions_required_from_GPT_User (each its own gate; NOT self-advanced):
P-1 S2 commit-gate ruling (recommended R1, targeted-suite precedent)
P-2 commit S2 (feature branch only) after P-1=R1
P-3 first cut-plan dry-run execution command-review
W-1 manifest→IU mapping + N-2 design ruling (re-bind preview to real birth model)
W-2 dot_config vocab prerequisite review/seed plan
W-3 birth-gate-compliant manifest→IU writer: design→author→CI→commit
W-4 cutter_exec/cutter_verify credential + production signing cycle
W-5 production CUT command-review + separate explicit production-write approval
forbidden_and_not_performed: CUT · VERIFY · production DB/IU write · deploy/restart ·
merge/push/tag · source/version mutation · invented pseudo-command · self-advance.
next_action: STOP. Route to GPT/User for the P-1 commit-gate ruling and the W-track.
doc 5 of 5. Nothing committed/executed against production. Self-advance PROHIBITED.