Main FF After Hardcode Clean · 02 Check Result

doc 2 of 5 · 2026-05-20 · G2 gate

phase                : G2 — lightweight static + test confirmation
outcome              : G2 PASS — YAML parse OK, full discover 265/265 OK
production_mutation  : NONE

1. Changed-file presence

The two new commits between 1cd286e and 0a64a61 touch only three files (documentation + one test file):

$ git diff --stat 1cd286e..0a64a61
 sql/lifecycle/fingerprints.yaml   | 8 +++++++-
 tests/test_security_boundaries.py | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

(Across the 2 commits combined.)

2. YAML parse

$ python3 -c "import yaml; d=yaml.safe_load(open('sql/lifecycle/fingerprints.yaml')); \
                assert 'prior_md5_prosrc_display_only' in d['functions']['fn_iu_create']; \
                print('yaml parse OK; rename present')"
yaml parse OK; rename present

Confirms the audit fix (prior_md5_prosrc → prior_md5_prosrc_display_only) is in the working tree and the YAML manifest is still valid.

3. Full discover

$ python3 -m unittest discover -s tests
Ran 265 tests in 0.169s
OK

265/265 PASS — matches the audit-time baseline (and the prior d7ea6d1 light-followups baseline). No regression.

4. Why this is sufficient (no new code path)

• Of the two commits being FF-merged, zero touch cutter_agent/*.py or cli.py (i.e. zero runtime code paths change).
• d7ea6d1 modifies tests/test_security_boundaries.py (test logic only) and sql/lifecycle/fingerprints.yaml (operator runbook manifest, not consumed at runtime).
• 0a64a61 modifies only sql/lifecycle/fingerprints.yaml (one key rename).
• The full discover at 0a64a61 reproduces 265/265 OK, identical to the discover at d7ea6d1 and post-1cd286e.

A heavier check (e.g. py_compile, integration) is unnecessary because no Python module's bytecode is affected.

5. Verdict

g2_outcome             : PASS
yaml_parse             : OK
audit_rename_present   : YES
full_discover          : 265/265 OK
runtime_code_changed   : NO (across both commits)