KB-5549
dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — Implementation Readiness Audit Report (consolidated; one recommended path: ratify 454d9fc8 → base64 fixture blob → 21/21 → commit approval → dry-run cmd-review; QG1–8 PASS; STOP→GPT/User)
7 min read Revision 1
dot-iu-cutterv0.5implementation-readiness-audit-reportconsolidated-pathroute-gpt-userqg-passno-mutationdieu442026-05-18
dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — Implementation Readiness Audit Report
Phase:
v0_5_implementation_readiness_audit_and_byte_artifact_transport_standard· Nature:analysis_only__no_commit__no_dryrun__no_mutation· Date: 2026-05-18 · doc 5 of 5audit_status: COMPLETE — readiness consolidated; one recommended path proposed decision_authority: GPT / User ONLY ; self_advance: PROHIBITED
1. Executive summary
implementation_code: READY — cutter_agent/dryrun.py byte-exact f1f42e83…
(ACCEPTED by GPT); 7/7 fixture-independent PASS;
AST import-isolated (no DB/CUT/VERIFY reachable).
test_suite: SEMANTICALLY READY — 454d9fc8 ≡ KB doc-2 verbatim
line-for-line; hash-of-record (31143968) unrecoverable.
fixture: BLOCKED — pinned identity 17660443 not byte-reproducible
through markdown/MCP text transport (region 86d6aea7,
same-width U+2013 substitution; len/markers invariant).
production: UNTOUCHED — no commit/deploy/dry-run/CUT/VERIFY/DB.
core_finding: all recurring blockers = byte-sensitive artifacts
transported as ordinary markdown. Fix is a transport
STANDARD (base64/content-addressed), not another retry.
2. Audit answers to GPT's required questions
which_artifacts_byte_sensitive: dryrun.py (A1, but transports faithfully),
test file (A2, NOT faithful), pinned fixture (A3, NOT faithful, critical),
refimpl.r1 (A5, if used). No golden manifest files exist (A4 n/a). [doc 2]
which_must_be_base64: A2 (required), A3 (mandatory), A1 (recommended for
durability), A5 (if strategy C used). [doc 2 §2]
which_files_allowed_in_repo_for_tests: exactly the 2 authorized additive files
(cutter_agent/dryrun.py, tests/test_dryrun_snapshot_mark.py) + one
byte-identity pinned fixture at the test-resolved path. No others. [doc 1/3]
ratify_454d9fc8: YES — recommended (side-by-side ≡ verbatim; dryrun.py
byte-exact; 7/7 pass; 31143968 unrecoverable). [doc 3 §1.3]
fixture_storage_without_corruption: strategy A — base64 content-addressed blob
in KB, gated decode, mandatory post-decode region rehash == 17660443. [doc 3 §2.3]
sufficient_CI_before_commit: full 21/21 (incl. TestGate+TestManifest over the
real pinned region) + sha checks + py_compile; 7/7 is interim-only. [doc 4 §1]
remaining_blockers: B-AUDIT, B-TEST-HASH, B-FIXTURE-IDENTITY, B-FIXTURE-PATH,
B-CI-GREEN, B-COMMIT, B-DRYRUN-CMDREVIEW, B-RETRY-FREEZE. [doc 4 §2]
3. One consolidated recommended path (NOT executed — for GPT/User ruling)
Step 0 GPT/User ratify THIS audit + the byte-artifact transport standard
(doc 2); lift B-RETRY-FREEZE under the new standard.
Step 1 GPT/User RATIFY test hash 454d9fc8…f2843a4a as canonical; update KB
hash-of-record 31143968 → 454d9fc8. (Resolves B-TEST-HASH.)
Step 2 Produce a BYTE-TRUSTED base64 blob of the pinned snapshot artifact —
base64-encode the on-disk pinned file (NOT retyped text) — store as a
KB content-addressed blob with decoded_sha256 + region_sha256
(17660443, len 17522, markers 19/1/1/1) + base64_sha256. Also publish
the ratified test file (and, recommended, dryrun.py) as base64 blobs.
(Resolves the transport root cause; enables B-FIXTURE-IDENTITY.)
Step 3 GPT/User rule fixture placement: repo-root path vs tests/fixtures/ +
matching ART in the ratified test bytes. (Resolves B-FIXTURE-PATH.)
Step 4 In a SEPARATE gated apply phase: on the existing feature branch,
sha-verified-decode the blobs into the repo; recompute all hashes
(module f1f42e83 / test ratified / fixture region 17660443) —
STOP_AND_REPORT on any mismatch (no guessing).
Step 5 Run full CI: python3 -m unittest tests.test_dryrun_snapshot_mark —
require 21/21 PASS + sha checks + py_compile + no-DB env/AST proof.
(Resolves B-CI-GREEN.)
Step 6 Request explicit commit approval (only after Step 5 green).
(Resolves B-COMMIT.)
Step 7 Separately, command-review + explicit authorization for the FIRST
Constitution dry-run. (Resolves B-DRYRUN-CMDREVIEW.)
note: Steps are sequential and EACH separately gated. Strategy C
(regenerate from refimpl.r1) is the documented fallback for Step 2
ONLY if a byte-trusted base64 cannot be produced.
DO NOT EXECUTE these steps. This is a proposed path for GPT/User ruling.
4. Quality gates
QG1 no mutation : PASS — read-only git/shasum, KB reads,
in-memory hash recompute; 0 repo files written/edited; HEAD 4367c83 & main
byte-unchanged; the 3 untracked paths untouched.
QG2 all byte-sensitive artifacts classified : PASS — doc 2 table A1–A6 + standard.
QG3 test-hash decision recommendation clear : PASS — ratify 454d9fc8 (doc 3 §1.3).
QG4 fixture strategy recommendation clear : PASS — strategy A base64 blob,
tradeoff stated, C fallback (doc 3 §2.3).
QG5 CI standard clear : PASS — exact cmds, PASS criteria,
fixture-bound required, 7/7 interim-only, no-DB proof (doc 4 §1).
QG6 remaining blockers listed : PASS — 8 blockers (doc 4 §2).
QG7 one consolidated path proposed : PASS — §3 (7 gated steps).
QG8 stop after uploading 5 files : PASS — exactly 5 docs; STOP here.
5. Explicit non-execution statement
- No file modification. No patch apply. No fixture write. No git add/commit. No deploy/restart. No first Constitution dry-run. No CUT. No VERIFY. No production DB write. No self-advance.
cutter_agent/dryrun.py(f1f42e83…) andtests/test_dryrun_snapshot_mark.py(454d9fc8…) and the quarantined non-identity fixture were read only. Only actions: read-onlygit/shasum, KB document reads, in-memoryhashlib/unicodedatarecompute (no repo write). Baselinemain& HEAD4367c83byte-unchanged; fully reversible.- Exactly 5 docs under
…/v0.5-implementation-readiness-audit-byte-artifact-transport/. - doc 5 of 5 — STOP. Route to GPT / User review for: (R0) ratify audit + transport standard, (R1) ratify test hash 454d9fc8, (R2) authorize Step 2 base64 blob production, (R3) fixture placement ruling. Self-advance PROHIBITED.
Companion docs: current-state (1), byte-artifact-transport-standard (2), test-fixture-mismatch-analysis (3), final-ci-and-blocker-review (4).