dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — First Snapshot MARK Dry-run Output Review · Report

phase: v0_5_first_snapshot_MARK_dryrun_output_review_and_cut_readiness
nature: review_only — no re-run, no CUT, no VERIFY, no DB write, no code/schema change
authority: GPT duplicate-resume-guard ruling 2026-05-19 (R3: review existing outputs, decide CUT readiness)
result: A — READY_FOR_CUT_COMMAND_REVIEW
self_advance: PROHIBITED — stopping, routing to GPT/User

Summary

The existing 2026-05-19 first Constitution snapshot MARK dry-run PASS package (accepted as authoritative by the GPT duplicate-resume-guard ruling) was reviewed from KB only. All 5 artifacts + 3 reports + preflight are present and mutually consistent. Every required dry-run fact validated. Manifest structure, scope (enacted_only + Điều 44 exclusion), coverage/reconstruction, and determinism are all correct. No parser/matcher/manifest/address/provenance/coverage defect was found, and no entrypoint fix or dry-run re-run is needed. Recommendation: A — READY_FOR_CUT_COMMAND_REVIEW, carrying four advisory notes into that separately-gated next phase.

Deliverables (this review phase)

output_folder: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-first-snapshot-mark-dryrun-output-review/
files:
  1: dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-first-snapshot-mark-output-inventory-2026-05-19.md
  2: dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-first-snapshot-mark-manifest-review-2026-05-19.md
  3: dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-first-snapshot-mark-coverage-scope-review-2026-05-19.md
  4: dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-first-snapshot-mark-cut-readiness-assessment-2026-05-19.md
  5: dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-first-snapshot-mark-output-review-report-2026-05-19.md  (this doc)

Findings (consolidated)

inventory:        COMPLETE — 5 artifacts + 3 reports + preflight, all consistent
dryrun_facts:     ALL CONFIRMED — status PASS, exit 0, db_write NONE, production_touched false,
                  candidate_count 60, manifest_digest 9d908a62…, re_run_equal true,
                  P-1..P-8 PASS, V-1..V-20 PASS, QG1..QG7 PASS
manifest:         PASS — levels {NGUYEN_TAC=15, KIEN_TRUC_SECTION=3, DIEU=42}=60;
                  addresses ICX-CONST/<path> unique; status never in address;
                  source_document_version_id icxconst-008a06… on 100% rows; header reconciles
scope:            PASS — enacted_only purity 60/60; Điều 44 controlled_draft EXCLUDED
                  (controlled_draft_deferred, tier_2_explicit_row_marker); draft + 2 obsolete
                  excluded; all 4 exclusions itemised with reason/basis/span, none silently dropped
coverage:         PASS — reconstruction_ok=true; 229 + 10 + 69 = 308 = lines_total (exact);
                  coverage_closed, no_overlap; region_length 17522 consistent across docs
determinism:      PASS — re_run_equal=true, digest stable
defects:          NONE
blockers:         NONE

Carry-forward notes (advisory inputs to the CUT command-review; NOT blockers)

• N-1 Full manifest.json (84,157 B, sha256 7d56f3ce…012179) is only in KB as summary+digests; the CUT command-review must obtain and sha-verify the full per-unit manifest (deterministically regenerable from the pinned command) before designing the CUT row-set.
• N-2 Level granularity for CUT — whether NGUYEN_TAC / KIEN_TRUC_SECTION become production IUs or structural containers — is a CUT-command-review design decision (the MARK manifest correctly emits all three levels; not a defect).
• N-3 Điều 44 (and all draft/obsolete) must remain excluded through the CUT row-set; no silent re-inclusion.
• N-4 Manifest canonical addresses (heterogeneous/non-contiguous DIEU keys) are intentional and reconstruction-closed; CUT must treat them as fixed (no renumber/normalise).

Quality gates (this phase)

QG1 use existing dry-run outputs only        : PASS (KB-only, no re-run)
QG2 must not re-run dry-run                   : PASS (no execution, no repo access)
QG3 review manifest / scope / coverage        : PASS (files 2 & 3)
QG4 state CUT readiness clearly               : PASS (A — READY_FOR_CUT_COMMAND_REVIEW, file 4)
QG5 list blockers if any                      : PASS (blockers: NONE; 4 advisory notes listed)
QG6 STOP after uploading 5 files              : PASS (stopping; routed to GPT/User)

Forbidden actions — none performed

No dry-run re-execution · no CUT · no VERIFY · no production IU creation · no production DB write · no source_document/source_version mutation · no code change · no schema change · no Directus/vector mutation · no deploy/restart · no merge/push/tag/remote · no self-advance.

Disposition

result: FIRST_SNAPSHOT_MARK_DRYRUN_OUTPUTS_REVIEWED__READY_FOR_CUT_COMMAND_REVIEW
recommendation: A
next_action: STOP → route to GPT/User. The CUT command-review is a SEPARATE GPT/User-gated
             phase and is NOT opened or authorized by this review. CUT and VERIFY remain
             GPT-gated and NOT authorized.