dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — WS-3 Report

Date: 2026-05-18 Phase: v0.5 WS-3 — Cross-source Topic Assembly Logical Proof Nature: design_only_logical_proof. No schema, no table/view/function/index, no code, no dry-run, no production write, no Directus mutation, no edge creation, no APR approval, no git commit, no self-advance.

1. Executive summary

WS-3 set out to prove, on paper only, that the WS-1 + WS-2 logical contracts are jointly sufficient to assemble a single topic across many different source families — without building anything physical and without taking any gated decision.

Result: PASS_WITH_BLOCKERS. The cross_source_topic_thread logical proof for sample topic collection_structure ("cấu trúc collection") completed end-to-end through the P11D GATHER → ENRICH → GROUP → QUALITY → PROVENANCE pipeline. Every node received exactly one authority role (normative / evidence / implementation), every relation was assigned one of the three mechanisms (universal_edges / iu_entity_binding / assembly-local), one mixed-authority node was proved via WS-2 D4 authority_override, and evidenced_by was kept strictly as an APR-gated, not-approved logical example with stated alternatives. The "blockers" are not blockers of the paper proof; they are items that must be resolved before a schema cycle, before production, or after the pilot — all flagged, none self-resolved.

WS-1 + WS-2 are confirmed sufficient as authority for WS-3. Nothing in WS-1/WS-2 was redesigned (QG1).

2. What was read

Read in full (read-only) and used purely as authority:

gpt_review:
  - reviews/dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS2-metadata-source-profile-gpt-review-2026-05-18.md   # verdict: WS-2 PASS, authority promoted
ws1_authority_package (6):
  - fabric-addendum-existing-design-map-and-workstreams-2026-05-18.md
  - WS1-relation-topic-assembly-design-brief-2026-05-18.md           # assembly_profile G1, cross_source G4
  - fabric-addendum-open-decisions-2026-05-18.md                     # OD-FA1..8 + inherited ODs
  - fabric-addendum-report-2026-05-18.md
  - WS1-edge-APR-minimization-note-2026-05-18.md                     # {evidenced_by} minimized set
  - WS1-binding-authority-clarification-note-2026-05-18.md           # universal_edges vs iu_entity_binding boundary
ws2_authority_package (4):
  - WS2-metadata-key-registry-design-2026-05-18.md                   # D1
  - WS2-source-family-grammar-authority-design-2026-05-18.md         # D2/D3/D4 (override)
  - WS2-entity-registry-and-address-namespacing-design-2026-05-18.md # D5/D6 (canonical address)
  - WS2-report-2026-05-18.md
references (2):
  - design/05-relation-edge-conformance-design.md                    # P44-4A 8 core + 3 candidate edges
  - dieu38-trien-khai/closure/p11d-logical-topic-view-proof-design.md # P11D pipeline + Q-T1..Q-T5
total_authority_files: 10 (6 WS-1 + 4 WS-2) + 1 GPT review + 2 references

3. What was designed / proved

deliverables (4 files, all uploaded to v0.5-fabric-addendum-scope/):
  1. WS3-cross-source-topic-assembly-logical-proof-design-2026-05-18.md
     - cross_source_topic_thread assembly_profile logical instance (WS-1 G1 fields verbatim)
     - input_selector / ordering_rule / inclusion_rule / exclusion_rule / relation_filter /
       source_family_filter / provenance_policy all specified
     - full P11D GATHER→ENRICH→GROUP→QUALITY→PROVENANCE logical run (pseudo-query, no SQL)
     - explicit mechanism map (universal_edges / iu_entity_binding / assembly-local)
     - evidenced_by APR-gated handling + alternatives
  2. WS3-sample-chain-collection-structure-2026-05-18.md
     - 7-node chain: internal_incomex_constitution → internal_incomex_law →
       internal_process → sql_entity/Directus/PG → code_artifact → report → lesson
     - each node: source_family, authority_semantics, canonical_address/entity_ref,
       relation, mechanism, provenance note
     - canonical scheme <DOCPREFIX>/<L1>-<L2>-...-<Lk> applied (placeholders, QG6)
     - mixed-authority node N2 with WS-2 D4 span-level authority_override (QG8)
     - per-relation mechanism table (QG4)
  3. WS3-gap-and-readiness-review-2026-05-18.md
     - sufficiency verdict + must_resolve_before_schema / before_production /
       can_defer_post_pilot classification
     - mandated checks (evidenced_by, governed_by/derived_from, source_family,
       grammar, authority override, entity binding, topic registry)
     - compliance_matrix proof explicitly DEFERRED (QG9) + scope-creep guard
     - conflicts flagged, not self-resolved
  4. WS3-report-2026-05-18.md  (this file)

proved:
  - WS-1 assembly_profile (cross_source_topic_thread) field set is sufficient.
  - WS-2 source_family + authority_semantics default + D4 override is sufficient,
    including a source that cannot take a single authority role (mixed-authority).
  - 3 mechanisms cover every relation with NO new edge and NO evidenced_by approval.
  - P11D pipeline runs logically end-to-end with §5.3.1 whitelist respected.
  - canonical address scheme expressible for every IU node.

4. WS-3 logical proof result

ws3_logical_proof: PASS_WITH_BLOCKERS

rationale:
  - The logical proof itself is complete and internally consistent on paper.
  - "Blockers" are downstream-phase items (schema / production / pilot), not defects
    of the proof:
      must_resolve_before_schema:     BR-A1 (address separator final lock),
                                      BR-FA1 (assembly_profile physical shape),
                                      BR-FA3 (topic registry physical)
      must_resolve_before_production: BP-FA4 (evidenced_by APR), BP-WS2-2
                                      (governed_by/derived_from candidate activation),
                                      BP-FA8 (generic executor code)
      can_defer_post_pilot:           OD-FA2/3/5 physical, OD-G1, OD-S1, OD-L1..L5,
                                      P11D-α/β/γ/δ/ε/ζ, reverse-index, span-override detail
  - No blocker prevents the paper proof from standing; each is flagged for its owner.

5. Recommended next step

Presented as recommendations only — WS-3 does not self-advance and does not pick.

options:
  A_evidenced_by_APR_draft:
     authoring an APR-ready proposal for the single minimized edge { evidenced_by }
     (Đ32 medium + edge_type vocab amend NT4). Unblocks future compliance_matrix.
     Note: APR approval itself is reserved for GPT/User; WS-3 would only draft.
  B_schema_design_cycle_Q5:
     open the v0.5 Q5 schema-design cycle (sovereign gate) to resolve
     BR-FA1 / BR-FA3 / BR-A1 and physicalize assembly_profile + registries.
  C_source_grammar_ratification_for_real_constitution_fixture:
     ratify OD-G1 / OD-S1 — the real internal Architecture Constitution fixture,
     its grammar profile, and KB-7294 rev44 / 📋 controlled-draft authority —
     before any real ingestion.
  D_WS4_amend_split_merge:
     proceed to WS-4 (amend / split / merge — OD-R1, TD-P1).

recommended_primary: A (evidenced_by APR draft) — it is the narrowest unblocking
   step, directly addresses conflict C1, and is a prerequisite for the deferred
   compliance_matrix proof. B is the natural follow-on once gated decisions land.
sequencing_note: A and C are independent of each other; B should follow A or run
   in parallel only after GPT/User direction. NONE selected by WS-3.

6. Quality gates self-audit

QG1  no redesign of WS-1/WS-2, used as authority only ......... PASS
QG2  no executable SQL (YAML / pseudo-query only) ............. PASS
QG3  sample chain distinguishes normative/evidence/impl ....... PASS (3+2+2 tiering + override)
QG4  every relation states mechanism .......................... PASS (R1..R7 table)
QG5  evidenced_by marked APR-gated, not approved ............... PASS
QG6  no real production data; placeholders declared ........... PASS (explicit QG6 banner)
QG7  files self-standing, plain-language for hard concepts .... PASS
QG8  ≥1 mixed-authority node with logical authority_override .. PASS (node N2, span-level)
QG9  compliance_matrix proof deferral stated; no full proof ... PASS (gap file §4 + scope guard)
QG10 evidenced_by not used as approved edge; alternatives given  PASS (alt A/B/C; B chosen)

7. Forbidden respected

design_only: true
schema_migration: none
table_view_function_index_created: none
production_write: none
code_change: none
cut_verify: none
dry_run: none
directus_mutation: none
vector_nosql_integration: none
edge_type_created: none
evidenced_by_apr_approved: false
candidate_edge_activated: false
compliance_matrix_full_proof: NOT done (deferred — QG9)
git_commit: none
self_advance_to_APR_schema_WS4: PROHIBITED — respected

8. Git / repo access note

repo_vps_access_this_session: NONE
checks_performed:
  - git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree  -> not a git repo (working dir /Users/nmhuyen)
  - /opt/incomex/dot/iu-cutter           -> not present
  - ~/iu-cutter                          -> not present
branch / HEAD / git status --short -- iu-cutter: not available
statement: no repo/VPS access in this session.
write_operations_performed: none (read-only knowledge-base reads + 4 new doc uploads only)

9. Routing

status: WS3_LOGICAL_PROOF_PASS_WITH_BLOCKERS
files_uploaded: 4 (to knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-fabric-addendum-scope/)
next_action: STOP — route to GPT/User review
self_advance: PROHIBITED (no APR, no schema, no WS-4 without explicit authorization)