dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — First Constitution Snapshot CUT · Command Review Report

doc 5 of 5 · review_design_only__no_execution · 2026-05-19

1. Invariants (required item 8) — every one must hold for ANY future CUT

I-1 no source mutation unless explicitly listed: the pinned snapshot/source_document_version
    (icxconst-008a06…, region 17660443…) is IMMUTABLE in CUT. Zero source-file mutation.
    Nothing listed here authorizes a source change.
I-2 no production DB/IU writes unless explicitly approved: production CUT writes are FORBIDDEN
    in this review and require a separate explicit production-write approval + ratified
    entrypoint + credential cycle. None exist today.
I-3 no Điều 44 inclusion: Điều 44 (UOSL controlled_draft, tier_2_explicit_row_marker, reason
    controlled_draft_deferred) stays EXCLUDED. It is absent from candidates[] in the pinned
    manifest and must never enter the cut set unless separately + explicitly authorized.
I-4 candidate_count must match accepted dry-run identity: created-IU cardinality == 60
    == manifest candidate_count (NGUYEN_TAC 15 + KIEN_TRUC_SECTION 3 + DIEU 42). No more/fewer.
I-5 manifest digest must match accepted dry-run digest: the CUT input manifest digest MUST
    equal 9d908a62fcf01bb88e05a1af4335b960710006ddcfd21c811ca63efb33dd324f (file sha256
    7d56f3ce…012179, 84157 B). Any deviation ⇒ ABORT before any write.
I-6 append-only: no DELETE/TRUNCATE; rollback = single-txn abort or forward-compensation.
I-7 separation of duty: CUT under cutter_exec/DOT-991; VERIFY under cutter_verify/DOT-992.
I-8 idempotent: re-CUT of the same digest is a no-op (G-CUT-ONCE).

2. Quality-gate mapping

QG1 CUT objective & exact scope defined            : PASS (doc 1 §1)
QG2 proposed command stated honestly               : PASS (doc 2 — contract + safe dry-run;
      runnable production command correctly WITHHELD: no ratified entrypoint)
QG3 pre-execution checks, fail-closed              : PASS (doc 3 §1, C-0..C-9)
QG4 expected mutations stated                      : PASS (doc 2 §2)
QG5 explicit write-vs-artifact statement           : PASS (doc 2 §3 — production CUT WRITES
      IU/DB; dry-run is artifact-only)
QG6 rollback / restore plan                        : PASS (doc 4 §1 — append-only forward-comp)
QG7 VERIFY plan after CUT                           : PASS (doc 3 §2, VR-1..VR-10)
QG8 invariants enumerated                           : PASS (this doc §1, I-1..I-8)
QG9 risk assessment                                 : PASS (doc 4 §2)
QG10 STOP after upload, route GPT/User              : PASS (this doc §4)

3. Does any write/mutation occur from this package? — explicit answer

this_command_review_package: ZERO write, ZERO mutation. No CUT, no VERIFY, no DB/IU/
  Directus/vector, no source-file change, no code change, no commit/push/merge/tag/deploy.
  Only KB documents were created (this package).
future_production_CUT (NOT in scope, BLOCKED): WOULD write IU + ledger/governance/signature
  rows into governed PostgreSQL (append-only). Explicitly forbidden here.

4. Disposition — STOP → route GPT/User (required item 10)

result: CUT_COMMAND_REVIEW_PACKAGE_AUTHORED__PRODUCTION_CUT_BLOCKED_ON_MISSING_CAPABILITY
kb_path: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-constitution-first-snapshot-cut-command-review/
docs: [capability-assessment(1), command-contract(2), prechecks-and-verify-plan(3),
       rollback-and-risk(4), command-review-report(5)]
controlling_blocker: no ratified snapshot-manifest→CUT entrypoint in committed afb7bfc; v0.4
  skeleton is dry-run-only and refuses production; cutter_exec/cutter_verify credential cycle
  not built; no separate production-write approval.
recommended_next_separately_gated_subphases (each its own GPT/User gate; NOT self-advanced):
  S1 GPT/User ruling: approve the CUT capability track + whether to start with the
     artifact-only cut-plan dry-run (doc 2 §1a) as the first reviewable step (recommended).
  S2 design → author → CI → commit a snapshot-manifest→CUT-plan entrypoint (no-DB), mirroring
     the ratified MARK entrypoint lineage.
  S3 cutter_exec / cutter_verify credential cycle build + GPT review (separation of duty).
  S4 production CUT command-review + explicit separate production-write approval.
forbidden_and_not_performed: CUT · VERIFY · DB/IU/Directus/vector writes · source mutation ·
  code change · push/merge/tag/deploy · self-advance.
next_action: STOP. Route to GPT/User for the capability ruling.

doc 5 of 5. Nothing executed. Self-advance PROHIBITED.