dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — Constitution First Dry-Run Planning Report

Phase: v0_5_constitution_first_dryrun_planning_and_command_review · Nature: planning_and_command_review_only · Date: 2026-05-18 · doc 5 of 5

nothing_executed: true ; no dry-run ; no CUT ; no VERIFY ; no production IU ;
  no source_document/source_version mutation ; no schema/GRANT/Directus/deploy/git
decision_authority: GPT / User ONLY ; self_advance: PROHIBITED

---

1. Verdict

source_identity_foundation: READY    (R1..R8 PASS — B1/B5/B6/SC3 CLOSED per closeouts)
dry_run_command_path:       BLOCKED  (R9 GAP — no ratified snapshot-source MARK entrypoint)
overall_status:             NOT_READY_FOR_DRYRUN_EXECUTION_COMMAND_REVIEW
reason:                     the safe "snapshot → Constitution cut manifest" dry-run
                            command does not exist as a ratified, no-DB-write code path;
                            it is, per KB SSOT, undesigned/unauthorized upstream of the
                            cutter, and depends on unresolved rulings OD-MC1 / OD-G2 /
                            the group-vs-row enacted-marker rule

The package is complete (5 docs) and command-review-grade for the BLOCKED finding: it specifies exactly what command must exist, what it must enforce, what it may output, how it would be verified to mutate nothing, and what must be ruled before it can exist. It is not an authorization to run a dry-run, and no dry-run was run.

2. Quality-gate self-check

QG1 pinned_snapshot_not_live   : PASS — input = artifact 17660443e0f23e99 (rev1, write-once);
                                 live URL = discovery_only; rehash gate V-1/V-2 before parse
QG2 enacted_only_+_Dieu44_excl : PASS — scope enacted_only; 📋 Điều44 / 📝 Điều34 / ⛔ obsolete
                                 itemised as EXCLUDED with reason, never silently dropped
QG3 exact_command_or_missing   : PASS — required command contract specified AND clearly
                                 reported as MISSING/BLOCKED (no fabricated runnable command)
QG4 allowed_outputs_defined    : PASS — KB folder …/v0.5-constitution-first-dryrun/ (or
                                 throwaway scratch + KB summary); ALL DB writes forbidden
QG5 no_production_mutation_ver : PASS — V-14/V-15/V-16/V-17 prove net-zero; cleanup
                                 artifact-only; DB-backed dry-run tables out of scope
QG6 dry_run_not_executed       : PASS — nothing executed; planning/authoring only
QG7 stop_after_5_files         : PASS — exactly 5 docs uploaded, then STOP → GPT/User

3. What was grounded (KB SSOT, read-only)

read:
  - source-seed-from-snapshot production CLOSEOUT (B5 CLOSED; dry-run NOT authorized)
  - source-seed-from-snapshot production VERIFICATION-RESULT (2 rows; snapshot binding PASS)
  - parser refimpl GPT ruling (refimpl.r1 RATIFIED as canonical executor; N8 = drop empty lines)
  - status-marker amendment CLOSEOUT (4-marker map LIVE; enacted_only unchanged)
  - WS-Q5 seed+privilege CLOSEOUT (registry substrate LIVE/bootstrapped)
  - current operating objectives & principles (operations-first; no self-advance)
  - constitution source_document/version identity plan + grammar applicability review
  - the pinned normalized snapshot artifact (structure + marker placement analysed)
  - cutter methodology (MARK→REVIEW→CUT), v0.4 dry-run & CUT/VERIFY command-reviews,
    v0.5 dry-run-at-volume + scale/risk note (established the R9 ingestion gap)
no_live_DB_SELECT_run_this_phase: true (KB-grounded; live re-confirm is a PRE-gate at run time)

4. Key findings

F1 The source-identity foundation is genuinely closed and snapshot-bound; nothing in
   the dry-run may re-derive identity from the live page.
F2 The first dry-run = MARK(+REVIEW eval) over the pinned snapshot, hard-stopped before
   CUT/VERIFY; output is a cut MANIFEST + proofs, never an Information Unit.
F3 The blocking gap is NOT identity and NOT readiness R1–R8 — it is the absent,
   undesigned snapshot-source segmentation entrypoint (R9) plus open rulings
   OD-MC1 (matcher internals), OD-G2 (leaf granularity), and the group-vs-row
   enacted-marker application rule (the snapshot applies ✅ at group-header level for
   3 of 4 catalog groups, per-Điều only in "Quản trị").
F4 Exact IU count is unknowable pre-dry-run; an acceptable guardrail range [55, 78]
   with reconciliation (coverage/no-overlap/scope) is defined instead of a target.
F5 No sanctioned DB write exists for this dry-run; artifact-only; no production
   rollback is needed or designed (net-zero by construction).

5. Recommended next routing (for GPT / User decision — not self-advanced)

recommended_sequence:
  1 RULE OD-MC1 : ratify concrete matcher detection internals for
                  mc.icx.nguyen_tac / mc.icx.kien_truc / mc.icx.dieu
  2 RULE OD-G2  : fix which grammar level is THE leaf-IU
  3 RULE group-vs-row enacted-marker application for the 3 group-level ✅ groups
  4 DESIGN + GPT-APPROVE a no-DB-write `cutter_agent` snapshot-source MARK dry-run
    mode (code-pinned, iu-cutter mounted read-only, isolated env, fail-closed)
  5 THEN a true execution command-review for the first Constitution dry-run
  6 THEN (separately authorized) the dry-run execution itself
alternative_if_GPT_prefers:
  reclassify R9 as "design phase next" and open
  `v0_5_constitution_snapshot_source_mark_dryrun_capability_design` before any
  command-review — this package's §3 (doc 3) is the input spec for that design

6. Approval request

asking_GPT_User_to:
  - accept the BLOCKED finding + the specified missing command (doc 3 §2/§3)
  - rule OD-MC1 / OD-G2 / group-vs-row enacted rule (doc 2 §3.1, doc 3 §3)
  - choose the next phase (design the missing capability vs other routing)
NOT asking for: authorization to execute a dry-run (premature — command does not exist)

7. Explicit non-execution statement

• No dry-run executed. No CUT. No VERIFY. No production IU created. No source_document / source_document_version mutation. No schema change. No GRANT/REVOKE. No Directus mutation. No deploy/restart. No git commit. No live-page fetch. No live cutter_governance SELECT this phase. No self-advance.
• Exactly 5 docs authored under knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-constitution-first-dryrun-planning/.
• doc 5 of 5 — STOP. Route to GPT / User review. Self-advance PROHIBITED.

Companion docs: operational-framing (1), readiness-and-scope (2), command-package (3), verification-and-cleanup-plan (4).