KB-18F4

dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — Constitution CUT Command Review · Report (BLOCKED_WITH_EXACT_GAP; STOP → GPT/User) (doc 6)

8 min read Revision 1
dot-iu-cutterv0.5constitution-cut-command-reviewcommand-review-reportinvariantsblocked-with-exact-gapstop-route-gpt-userdieu442026-05-19

dot-iu-cutter v0.5 — Constitution CUT Command Review · Report

doc 6 of 6 · review_design_only__no_execution · 2026-05-19

result: BLOCKED_WITH_EXACT_GAP
production_mutation_performed: NONE
kb_read: confirmed · kb_upload: confirmed
self_advance: PROHIBITED — stopping, routing to GPT/User

1. Summary

The CUT command-review mandated after the first-snapshot MARK dry-run output-review (GPT duplicate-resume-guard R3 → READY_FOR_CUT_COMMAND_REVIEW) was performed. The CUT input identity was locked to the accepted pinned manifest (doc 1); a read-only investigation of committed code, the uncommitted S2 cut-plan entrypoint, and the live production schema was done (doc 2); the exact capability gap, an honest command contract, and the minimal gated unblock sequence were authored (doc 3); the pre-execution checks + VERIFY plan (doc 4) and the rollback/compensation + risk report (doc 5) were designed. No CUT, no VERIFY, no production DB write, no code change, no commit — zero mutation.

Outcome: BLOCKED_WITH_EXACT_GAP. A runnable production CUT command cannot be honestly authored: there is no committed snapshot-manifest→CUT entrypoint and no information_unit writer; even the safe no-DB cut-plan PREVIEW entrypoint (S2 cutplan.py) is uncommitted and pending a GPT/User commit-gate ruling; the production credential cycle and governed-ledger substrate/GRANTs are not built/confirmed; and no separate production-write approval exists.

2. Invariants — must hold for ANY future CUT (requirement)

I-1 source/version immutable: source_document_version icxconst-008a06… + snapshot region
    17660443… are read-only in CUT. Nothing here authorizes a source/version change.
I-2 no production DB/IU write without explicit separate approval + ratified entrypoint +
    credential cycle. None exist today.
I-3 Điều 44 + draft + obsolete stay EXCLUDED (the 4 excluded rows; N-3). No silent
    re-inclusion in any preview or CUT row-set.
I-4 cardinality == 60 == manifest candidate_count (NGUYEN_TAC 15 + KIEN_TRUC_SECTION 3
    + DIEU 42). No more, no fewer.
I-5 manifest digest == 9d908a62…dd324f (file sha 7d56f3ce…012179, 84157 B). Any
    deviation ⇒ ABORT before any write (N-1 C-3/C-4).
I-6 append-only: no DELETE/TRUNCATE; rollback = single-txn abort or forward-compensation.
I-7 separation of duty: CUT under cutter_exec/DOT-991; VERIFY under cutter_verify/DOT-992.
I-8 idempotent: re-CUT of the same digest is a no-op (G-CUT-ONCE).
I-9 canonical addresses fixed (N-4): reuse manifest ICX-CONST/<path> verbatim; no
    renumber/normalise/canonicalization-stub invocation.

3. Quality-gate mapping

QG1 CUT input/manifest locked (digest/version/count/scope/exclusions) : PASS (doc 1)
QG2 N-1..N-4 carry-forward notes handled                              : PASS (doc 1 §3;
     N-1 → C-3 precheck, N-2 → GAP-3/U-4 design ruling, N-3/N-4 → I-3/I-9 invariants)
QG3 read-only code/schema investigation (entrypoint/tables/txn/idem/
     rollback/verify)                                                  : PASS (doc 2)
QG4 capability sufficiency decision stated honestly                    : PASS (doc 3 —
     BLOCKED_WITH_EXACT_GAP; production command WITHHELD, not fabricated)
QG5 exact gap + minimal unblock phase (no invented command)            : PASS (doc 3 §1,§3)
QG6 pre-execution checks, fail-closed                                  : PASS (doc 4 §1)
QG7 VERIFY plan after CUT                                              : PASS (doc 4 §2)
QG8 rollback/compensation plan                                         : PASS (doc 5 §1)
QG9 risk report                                                        : PASS (doc 5 §2)
QG10 invariants enumerated                                             : PASS (this doc §2)
QG11 zero production mutation                                          : PASS (this doc §5)
QG12 STOP after upload, route GPT/User                                 : PASS (this doc §6)

4. Relationship to prior packages (consolidation, not duplication)

supersedes/consolidates (current-state, evidence-grounded, one decision package):
  - v0.5-constitution-first-snapshot-cut-command-review/ (5 docs, BLOCKED) — re-verified
    from live source; conclusion unchanged and sharpened (GAP-3 information_unit writer
    absence + live schema evidence are NEW here).
  - S1 cut-plan-dryrun command-review (ratified contract) — folded into doc 3 §2/§3.
  - S2 cutplan implementation (15/15 GREEN, uncommitted, escalated) — folded into GAP-2/U-1.
  - S2E commit-gate recommendation (R1 recommended) — folded into U-1.
new_evidence_added: live read-only schema probe (information_unit present with concrete
  schema; governed-ledger tables + source_document_version not visible to the read-only
  role); committed phases.cut()/ledger.py have NO information_unit writer (GAP-3).
target_folder_was_empty: confirmed before authoring (no duplicate-overwrite of ratified
  deliverables; duplicate-resume discipline observed).

5. Did any write/mutation occur? — explicit

this_package: ZERO write, ZERO mutation. No CUT · no VERIFY · no DB/IU/Directus/vector ·
  no source/version change · no code change · no commit/push/merge/tag/deploy · no dry-run
  re-run. Only 6 KB documents were created in
  knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-constitution-cut-command-review/.
read_only_actions_performed: KB reads; git read-only inspection (log/status/branch/cat);
  PostgreSQL information_schema SELECTs via the read-only role. No state changed.
future_production_CUT (NOT in scope, BLOCKED): WOULD write 60 information_unit + ledger/
  governance/signature rows (append-only). Explicitly forbidden here.

6. Disposition — STOP → route GPT/User

result: CUT_COMMAND_REVIEW_AUTHORED__BLOCKED_WITH_EXACT_GAP
kb_path: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-constitution-cut-command-review/
docs: [cut-input-and-manifest-lock(1), cut-readiness-investigation(2),
       cut-gap-report-and-command-contract(3), cut-verification-plan(4),
       cut-rollback-risk-plan(5), cut-command-review-report(6)]
controlling_blocker: GAP-1 (no committed snapshot-manifest→CUT entrypoint) + GAP-3 (no
  information_unit writer) ; GAP-2 (S2 cut-plan entrypoint uncommitted, no GPT commit-gate
  ruling) ; GAP-4 (credential cycle/substrate not built) ; GAP-5 (no production-write
  approval).
decisions_required_from_GPT_User (each its own separate gate; NOT self-advanced):
  U-1 S2 commit-gate ruling (recommended R1 per S2E evidence)
  U-2 commit S2 cutplan (feature branch only) after U-1=R1
  U-3 first cut-plan dry-run execution command-review (N-1 = its C-3 gate)
  U-4 snapshot-manifest→CUT entrypoint + information_unit writer: design→author→CI→commit
  U-5 cutter_exec/cutter_verify credential cycle build + substrate/GRANT confirmation
  U-6 production CUT command-review + separate explicit production-DB-write approval
forbidden_and_not_performed: CUT · VERIFY · DB/IU/Directus/vector writes · source/version
  mutation · code change · commit/push/merge/tag/deploy · dry-run re-run · self-advance.
next_action: STOP. Route to GPT/User for the U-1 commit-gate ruling and the capability track.

doc 6 of 6. Nothing executed. Self-advance PROHIBITED.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-constitution-cut-command-review/dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-cut-command-review-report-2026-05-19.md