KB-4703 rev 2

dot-iu-cutter v0.2 — P0-6 + P0-5 Remainder Risk Review Note (r2, A-1 resolved) (2026-05-16)

5 min read Revision 2
dot-iu-cutterdieu44v0.2p0-6p0-5-remainderddl-authoringrisk-noter2a1-resolvedstandard

dot-iu-cutter v0.2 — P0-6 + P0-5 Remainder Risk Review Note

document_path: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.2-ddl-authoring/dot-iu-cutter-v0.2-p0-6-p0-5-remainder-risk-review-note-2026-05-16.md
revision: r2
supersedes: r1 (2026-05-16)
date: 2026-05-16
author: Agent (Claude Code CLI, Opus 4.7 1M)
phase: v0.2 — P0-6 + P0-5-remainder DDL AUTHORING REVISION (risk review note r2)
status: risk_class STANDARD (carried from GPT design review; unchanged by the A-1 fix)
a1_status: RESOLVED (RS-2 retired — see §2)
dry_run_allowed: false (until GPT r2 review PASS)
production_migration_allowed: false

⛔ r2 update: the A-1 PK assumption is resolved by direct production read-only observation (decision_backlog_entry PK = entry_id uuid). The r2 DDL renames child columns to the entry_id family. Risk class is unchanged: STANDARD — a column-name correction is not a risk-class event. r1 of this note is superseded.


§1 — Risk Class (carried, not re-opened)

ratified_risk_class: STANDARD            # GPT design review 2026-05-16
r2_reconfirmation: STANDARD              # A-1 fix is a name correction only
escalation_to_HIGH_council: NO
basis: 4 NEW EMPTY tables in live cutter_governance; no LIVE-table ALTER;
  in-schema FK only; no cross-schema FK / PG enum / lookup table / Đ24 lookup
  FK / CHECK / trigger / DEFAULT / INSERT / seed / backfill; additive + empty
  + DROP-rollback pattern proven 3× (v0.1, Phase α, P0-2).
r2_delta: child column renames (decision_id→entry_id;
  from_decision_id→from_entry_id; to_decision_id→to_entry_id) + FK targets →
  decision_backlog_entry(entry_id). Pure shape correction; risk-neutral.

§2 — DDL-Authoring Risk Surfaces (r2)

# Surface Risk Mitigation (r2)
RS-1 4 new tables in a live schema additive structural single BEGIN…COMMIT atomic; empty; DROP-table rollback
RS-2 A-1 assumption (PK guess) wrong FK type/name RETIRED — A-1 resolved by production read-only observation; r2 FKs target the confirmed decision_backlog_entry(entry_id). Residual = the pre-exec gate now confirms (entry_id,uuid) rather than guesses
RS-3 nullable composite FK (review→unit_block) NULL semantics MATCH SIMPLE documented; V-13 asserts
RS-4 review_decision self-FKs self-ref at create created within CREATE TABLE; NULLable; DROP removes them
RS-5 soft refs (escalation_ref, cut_change_set_ref) dangling possible intentional decoupling; app-layer/P1; verification asserts NO FK on them. Note: escalation_ref→decision_backlog_entry stays SOFT (uuid) — the A-1 name issue never touched it
RS-6 enum-class as text (BATCH-1) no PG value enforcement ratified; documented values + app-layer; V-18/19/20 assert no enum/lookup leak
RS-7 reviewer independence / cross-sign silent override / criterion-28 field-level HIGH but app-layer/P1 (RD-6) — NOT create-time
RS-8 dependency-graph cycles cyclic edges app-layer v0.2 (DBD-1); no trigger/CHECK — NOT create-time
RS-9 history-preservation across rollback losing trail N/A at create (empty); P1/post-backfill concern; flagged for Đ32
RS-10 collateral mutation of LIVE objects accidental ALTER / SSOT touch zero ALTER; r2 adds NO column/constraint to decision_backlog_entry; V-23..29 assert byte-stable
RS-11 no-DEFAULT on NOT NULL INSERT burden → P1 writer intentional, consistent with P0-2; empty table → inert
RS-12 (r2) residual decision_id-family name leak from r1 executing stale r1 r1 explicitly SUPERSEDED/ DO-NOT-EXECUTE; V-21a asserts no decision_id/*_decision_id column survives in r2

§3 — Special Đ32 Attention (deferred; not create-time)

Unchanged from r1: reviewer independence (RD-6, app-layer), cross_signed_by_dot_verifier (criterion 28, app-layer), reviewer_identity audience scope (G-5 internal-only), history/dependency backfill rollback semantics (P1; separate risk review).

§4 — Residual Risk Register (r2)

RR-1: app-layer enum drift (text vs documented values) — P1/app-layer; accepted (BATCH-1)
RR-2: app-layer cycle/independence/cross-sign enforcement — P1; accepted (RD-6/DBD-1)
RR-3: A-1 PK assumption — RETIRED (resolved by observation; r2 targets entry_id)
RR-4 (r2): r1 stale-execution risk — mitigated by explicit supersede + V-21a guard
status: all residuals app-layer / P1 / retired; none escalate STANDARD

§5 — Hard Boundaries

revision: r2
r1_superseded: TRUE
ddl_executed: FALSE
mutation_performed: FALSE
risk_class_re_ratified_here: FALSE (carried; unchanged by r2)
dry_run_allowed: FALSE (until GPT r2 review PASS)
production_migration_allowed: FALSE
output_form: p0_6_p0_5_remainder_risk_review_note_r2

End of P0-6 + P0-5-remainder risk review note (r2, A-1 resolved).

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.2-ddl-authoring/dot-iu-cutter-v0.2-p0-6-p0-5-remainder-risk-review-note-2026-05-16.md