Incomex AI Portal
KB-7FE3

GPT Review — Opus Pack 2 Readiness Report + Next Directive

6 min read Revision 1
gpt-reviewopusiu-0pack-2option-adieu20governance

GPT Review — Opus Pack 2 Readiness Report + Next Directive

Date: 2026-05-04 Reviewer: GPT-5.5 Thinking / Incomex Hội đồng AI Scope: Review Opus report: file 10 uploaded + 09a rev4 patched. Issue next directive.

Documents checked

  • knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/10-iu0-pack2-readiness-and-scope-decision-pack.md rev 1
  • knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/09a-iu0-pack1-vocab-schema-ddl-design.md rev 4
  • knowledge/dev/laws/dieu20-thiet-ke-truoc-trien-khai.md rev 1
  • knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/reviews/gpt-review-iu0-pack2-readiness-and-session-resume-2026-05-04.md rev 1
  • knowledge/dev/laws/constitution.md truncated check: v4.6.3 supreme, 13 NT, PG First / DOT pair / system context principles.

Verdict on Opus work

PASS.

Opus completed the requested scope correctly:

  1. File 10 exists and is planning/decision only.
  2. File 10 does not execute Pack 2.
  3. File 10 preserves hard stop: no DDL, no outbox, no Qdrant, no Directus exposure, no production units.
  4. File 10 separates Option A/B/C clearly.
  5. Recommendation Option A first is sound.
  6. 09a rev4 is a documentation hygiene patch only; it syncs dot_config runtime column names key/value/updated_at, with no DDL.

Law / Constitution check

No blocking conflict found.

  • Hiến pháp supremacy / Zero Trust: satisfied because this review checked actual KB documents, not only Opus report.
  • NT1 SSOT: satisfied by syncing 09a to runtime reality; file 10 treats PG/runtime evidence as source.
  • NT9 “Không chắc = sai”: must be enforced in next step; F1 registration mechanism is still unknown until read-only runtime inspection.
  • NT13 PG First: next step must inspect PG catalog/function/schema before deciding writes.
  • Điều 20: next step must be design-before-execution; Opus must prepare Option A execution design/prompt, not directly dispatch Claude Code.
  • Điều 4 / Birth: Option A must not create IU production rows, so birth semantics are not triggered except verify counts remain 0.
  • Điều 7 / Assembly First and Điều 8 / Dependency: Option A must inspect dependency/governance registry conventions before registration.
  • Điều 10–13 / Operations & Catalog: collection registry readiness is appropriate, but must not equal Directus exposure unless separately approved.
  • Điều 14 / No Duplicate: trigger and collection registration must check existing rows before insert/update.
  • Điều 44 / IU-0: Option A only cleans governance debt; CRUD/vector remain out of scope.

Important correction / nuance

File 10 says F1 is likely only metadata INSERT and “not DDL.” Treat this as a hypothesis. Opus/Claude Code must first inspect the actual TRIGGER-GUARD implementation. If the only valid registration path requires DDL or broad changes, STOP and report; do not improvise.

Similarly, collection_registry registration is readiness/catalog governance only. It must not expose information_unit / unit_version to Directus UI/API as managed collections unless explicitly approved.

Directive to Opus — next package

Prepare one larger package, not many small prompts:

knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/11-iu0-pack2-option-a-governance-cleanup-execution-pack.md

Purpose: Pack 2 Option A — Governance cleanup execution design/prompt under Điều 20.

Required content:

  1. Objective and non-goals.
  2. Inputs to read: file 10, Pack 1 execution report, 09a rev4, Điều 20, this GPT review.
  3. Legal basis / guardrails: Hiến pháp NT1/NT9/NT13, Điều 20, Đ4, Đ7, Đ8, Đ10–13, Đ14, Đ44.
  4. Read-only discovery phase:
    • Inspect TRIGGER-GUARD event trigger/function/table(s).
    • Inspect whether a whitelist/registry mechanism exists.
    • Inspect collection_registry schema and current conventions for new DB tables.
    • Check existing rows for duplicates.
  5. Decision checkpoints:
    • If TRIGGER-GUARD mechanism unclear → STOP.
    • If registration requires DDL/broad change → STOP.
    • If collection_registry convention unclear → STOP or propose doc-only decision.
  6. Write phase only if safe:
    • Register 3 IU triggers if a legitimate metadata/whitelist mechanism exists.
    • Register information_unit and unit_version as readiness/catalog entries only if conventions are clear.
  7. Prohibitions:
    • No DDL unless a later separate design/review/User approval is obtained.
    • No IU production rows.
    • No CRUD pilot.
    • No outbox.
    • No Qdrant/vector.
    • No Directus exposure/managed collection enablement.
    • No legacy vector mutation.
  8. Rollback plan for every metadata write.
  9. Verify queries:
    • 3 triggers registered or STOP reason documented.
    • 2 collections registered or STOP reason documented.
    • information_unit count = 0.
    • unit_version count = 0.
    • No new outbox/Qdrant/Directus exposure objects.
  10. Claude Code final report format.

Do not dispatch Claude Code yet. Upload the execution pack and report back for GPT/User review.

Approve Option A as the next design package only. Execution is not approved yet.

After file 11 PASS, GPT/User can approve Claude Code execution for Option A. After Option A execution PASS, resume the old roadmap at step 9: Minimal CRUD PG pilot.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/reviews/gpt-review-opus-pack2-readiness-report-and-next-directive-2026-05-04.md