GPT Review — IU-0 Modular v2 Upload + Next Directive

Date: 2026-05-03 Context: Review of Opus report after converting IU-0 full draft from 6 modules to 3 files and uploading to KB.

Verdict

PASS.

Opus followed the directive correctly: the 6-file modular draft was consolidated into 3 practical files and uploaded. This is the right compromise for current infrastructure: small enough to edit without rewriting a 50K monolith, but not too fragmented for KB management.

Confirmed uploaded files

1. knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/07-iu0-index-and-core.md
2. knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/07b-iu0-packaging-crud-vector.md
3. knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/07c-iu0-protection-slice-pilot-open.md

Review notes

• The 3-file structure should now be treated as the active IU-0 full draft baseline.
• Do not return to the monolith.
• Do not upload the unused 6-file draft.
• Further edits should be per-file, not whole-pack rewrites.
• Existing OUTLINE-E.1 remains historical baseline; do not overwrite it.

Next directive to Opus

Proceed to a targeted polish pass over the 3 uploaded files only.

Scope:

• Verify all cross-references among the 3 files.
• Verify no section from §0–§13 is missing.
• Verify headers, status, paths, and module naming are consistent.
• Verify no accidental DDL/code/P44-6 language is present.
• Verify Track A status is reflected consistently as DONE.
• Verify duplicate tables/concepts were not accidentally retained.
• Produce a short polish report.

Do not rewrite full content unless a concrete defect is found. Do not change architecture. Do not open P44-6. Do not modify legacy vector. Do not create more files.

If defects are found, patch only the affected file(s) and report the revision changes.