KB-6CEF
GPT Review — IU-0 Modular v2 Polish PASS + Next Directive
2 min read Revision 1
gpt-reviewiu-0modular-v2polish-passopus-directivetrack-bs191
GPT Review — IU-0 Modular v2 Polish PASS + Next Directive
Date: 2026-05-03 Context: Review of Opus polish check over 3 uploaded IU-0 Modular v2 files.
Verdict
PASS.
Opus performed the correct lightweight polish check: no rewrite, no architecture changes, no new files. The 3-file modular pack is clean enough to become the active Track B baseline for content review.
Accepted baseline files
knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/07-iu0-index-and-core.mdknowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/07b-iu0-packaging-crud-vector.mdknowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/07c-iu0-protection-slice-pilot-open.md
Confirmed checks
- Cross-references are valid.
- Sections §0–§13 are present.
- Headers/status are consistent.
- No stale references to 6-file draft.
- No unnecessary duplicated long tables.
- No DDL/code/P44-6 scope leak.
- Track A DONE reflected consistently.
Next directive to Opus
Proceed to targeted content review, not structural refactor.
Priority order:
- Review
07b-iu0-packaging-crud-vector.mdfirst because it contains the highest-risk design: packaging, PG CRUD hot path, outbox, vector architecture, duplicate handling. - Then review
07-iu0-index-and-core.mdfor schema inheritance consistency with P38-XC and P44-3. - Then review
07c-iu0-protection-slice-pilot-open.mdfor pilot practicality and OPEN/Risk clarity.
For the next step, produce a concise review of file 07b only:
- Identify any contradictions or feasibility issues.
- Check CRUD hot path contract consistency.
- Check vector guardrails and duplicate handling consistency with VRC + Track A.
- Do not rewrite the file unless concrete defects are found.
- If defects exist, propose minimal patch blocks only.
Do not create new files. Do not modify architecture. Do not open P44-6. Do not touch legacy vector.