GPT Review — G-Pilot-2 Tracking Report + Next Directive

Date: 2026-05-04 Method: GPT verified actual KB report: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/reports/iu0-pilot-round1-g-pilot-2-tracking-report.md rev 1.

Verdict

PASS. G-Pilot-2 tracking metadata is valid.

Evidence checked:

• 9 slices are present: 6 IU-0 slices and 3 P38-XC slices.
• Each slice has canonical_address, title, source_doc, estimated_chars, MUP status, boundary note, risk note, and vocab placeholder.
• 3 vocab values are correctly marked proposed_pilot, not written into production registry.
• No DDL/code/Qdrant/outbox/P44-6/source-content mutation is claimed.
• MUP status is consistent: 12/15 actual, 3/15 proposed_pilot.

Legal / guardrail check

No conflict detected with current IU-0 guardrails if the next step remains a controlled writable pilot on one safe slice only.

The next writable step must not create PG IU tables, Qdrant collections, outbox jobs, migrations, or P44-6 implementation. It may only perform a controlled KB-document patch on a pilot-owned planning artifact or a pre-approved IU-0 slice patch, with rollback and before/after diff.

Directive to Opus

Proceed to G-Pilot-3: single-slice writable pilot, but keep scope extremely narrow and finish it in one consolidated agent task.

Objective: prove the slice-edit workflow on one safe slice without opening real infrastructure implementation.

Approved pilot slice:

• IU-0.§2 from knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/design/07-iu0-index-and-core.md.

Approved edit type:

• Small content patch only: add one candidate unit_kind line or refine wording inside §2, based on existing IU-0 vocabulary policy.
• The edit must not change the meaning of UMC/Profile inheritance and must not introduce a new schema family.

Required flow:

1. Read current 07-iu0-index-and-core.md.
2. Extract only IU-0.§2 as the working slice.
3. Produce before/after diff for §2 only.
4. Patch only that slice in the KB document.
5. Verify no other sections changed.
6. Record metrics: chars read, chars edited, estimated token savings, turn count, MUP impact, and rollback note.
7. Upload one report: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/reports/iu0-pilot-round1-g-pilot-3-single-slice-writable-report.md.

Hard boundaries:

• Do not edit 07b/07c/P38-XC.
• Do not create IU tables, Qdrant collections, outbox jobs, or code.
• Do not open P44-6.
• Do not mutate legacy vector except the normal KB vectorization caused by updating a KB document; if possible, note that this may trigger legacy KB vector pipeline and is acceptable because Track A stabilized legacy vector.
• If the patch would require vocabulary registration beyond proposed_pilot, stop and report.

Gate after completion:

• If G-Pilot-3 passes, next step is G-Pilot-4: repeat on one P38-XC safe slice (P38-XC.§4) as a second controlled writable pilot.
• If G-Pilot-3 fails, rollback the §2 patch and report root cause.

Status

Opus should dispatch/execute G-Pilot-3 as one task. No need to ask User unless the proposed edit changes schema authority, creates infrastructure, or affects more than one slice.