GPT Operating Principle — Automation First / No Human Work When Machine Can Do It
GPT Operating Principle — Automation First / No Human Work When Machine Can Do It
Date: 2026-05-08
Recorded by: GPT-5.5 Thinking / Incomex Hội đồng AI
Source: User directive during P3D4C2U Option D execution window.
Principle
Những gì máy móc làm được thì không dùng con người.
All infrastructure and operation work should be designed as automation-first:
machine-verifiable
DOT/API/script-driven
repeatable
rollbackable
report-generating
no click UI
no manual checklist unless truly unavoidable
Governance implication
When a task includes a manual step, GPT/Opus/Agent must treat it as a possible system gap, not as a normal final state.
Manual steps are acceptable only when:
- the system currently lacks the machine interface;
- the gap is explicitly reported;
- the object remains safe/draft/not-published if verification is incomplete;
- the next pack proposes an automation or shared-module fix.
Apply to P3D4C2U
Current prompt allows route smoke to be CANNOT_VERIFY, in which case tbl_event_outbox must remain draft.
Under this principle, that outcome is not a final success. It means:
route_smoke=CANNOT_VERIFY
→ keep draft
→ identify missing automated route-smoke mechanism
→ next pack should automate route smoke or repair shared Table Module verification
Do not normalize human manual smoke as the long-term path.
System breakpoints to watch
For P3D4C2U and future packs, actively look for these gaps:
- DirectusTable route rendering cannot be smoke-tested automatically.
- Directus permission safety cannot be proven by intended-role token.
- Table Module field selector cannot be verified by code or request trace.
- DOT/API operation requires click-config in Directus UI.
- Publishing requires human visual confirmation when a machine-readable route check is feasible.
- Rollback relies on a human remembering what was changed.
- Report lacks machine-verifiable evidence.
Any of these should produce a follow-up shared-infrastructure repair pack, not a one-off workaround.
Rule for next directives
GPT should direct Opus/Agent to prefer:
automated smoke > manual smoke
API/DOT proof > visual inspection
field-level machine test > human trust
scripted rollback > hand rollback
shared module repair > local workaround
Boundaries
This principle does not eliminate legitimate human checkpoints for business decisions, approvals, or governance sign-off. It applies to operations that a system can verify or perform mechanically.
Humans decide policy. Machines execute and verify.