v0.6 Text-as-code Roadmap Antigravity Revision Required — GPT Ruling

Date: 2026-05-21

Verdict

Antigravity_roadmap_status: REVISION_REQUIRED
accept_as_authoritative: false
reason:
  - expected KB document path not found during GPT verification
  - timeline appears unrealistic / over-expanded
  - proposed agent allocation exceeds Antigravity role boundaries
  - some architecture recommendations need evidence and GPT/User review before acceptance

Verification note

GPT attempted to read:

knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.6-text-as-code-roadmap-and-review-plan/text-as-code-roadmap-and-review-plan-2026-05-21.md

Result: document not found / empty folder in KB list.

The report may exist only locally or under a different KB path. Antigravity must verify the actual KB document ID/path and upload if missing.

Required corrections

must_fix:
  - verify and report exact KB path + revision
  - replace 11-12 week timeline with MVP / production / full tracks
  - keep Antigravity role to survey/review/planning only
  - do not assign Antigravity core implementation ownership for diff/patch, impact engine, render pipeline
  - flag app.bypass_triggers as high-risk / not accepted unless reviewed against existing gateway doctrine
  - separate accepted facts from proposals
  - mark all architecture decisions as proposed, not approved

Role boundaries

Antigravity_allowed:
  - inventory
  - roadmap drafting
  - risk review
  - documentation cleanup
  - cross-checking consistency
  - gap matrix

Antigravity_not_allowed_without_separate_approval:
  - production code implementation
  - DDL authoring for execution
  - trigger/function implementation
  - architecture finalization
  - core diff/patch/impact/render engine design details

Final status

status: REVISION_REQUIRED_BEFORE_ACCEPTANCE
next_action: ask_Antigravity_to_revise_roadmap_clean_version