dot-iu-cutter v0.5 evidenced_by Vocab + Cap-4 Extension Design — GPT Review

Date: 2026-05-18 Reviewer: GPT Reviewed package: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-fabric-addendum-scope/

Reviewed files:

files:
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-evidenced-by-vocab-amend-design-2026-05-18.md
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-evidenced-by-cap4-checker-extension-design-2026-05-18.md
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-evidenced-by-verification-and-rollback-plan-2026-05-18.md
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-evidenced-by-vocab-cap4-design-report-2026-05-18.md

Verdict

evidenced_by_vocab_cap4_design_package: PASS
agent_behavior: PASS_CORRECT
opus_review: CORRECT
forbidden_respected: true
self_advance_respected: true
design_supplement_status: COMPLETE
execution_authorized: false

Agent completed the vocab-amend + Cap-4 checker extension design correctly. This package translates the already-approved evidenced_by APR semantics into a concrete design for a future command-review phase, without executing anything.

---

Accepted design contents

accepted:
  vocab_amend_design:
    - edge_type: evidenced_by
    - reverse_type: evidences
    - owner_law_code: NRM-LAW-44
    - edge_family: relation / Cap-4
    - lifecycle default: proposed
    - fits as 8 core + 3 candidate + 1 extension

  cap4_checker_extension_design:
    rule_families:
      - R_EP endpoint/OQC validation
      - R_AU authority validation
      - R_NO non-overlap validation
      - R_PV provenance validation
      - R_LC lifecycle validation
      - R_AD anti-drift validation

  verification_and_rollback:
    structural_checks: SV-1..SV-10
    negative_tests: NT-1..NT-12
    rollback_scenarios:
      - vocab wrong
      - checker wrong
      - bad rows later

The evidenced_by ↔ iu_entity_binding boundary remains correctly preserved:

registered_IU_to_registered_IU_attestation: evidenced_by
IU_to_raw_evidence_entity: iu_entity_binding(binding_kind=evidences)

---

Open decisions acknowledged

The seven OD-VC items are correctly flagged and are not blockers for accepting the design package.

OD_VC_items:
  OD_VC1: P44-4-alpha namespace scheme
  OD_VC2: vocab physical shape
  OD_VC3: checker deploy strategy
  OD_VC4: governed_by / derived_from candidate ratification
  OD_VC5: reverse-index P1/P2/P3 for evidenced_by
  OD_VC6: authority_semantics vs owner_law alignment
  OD_VC7: INV-E5 audit obligation

Ruling:

open_decisions_status: ACCEPTED_AS_COMMAND_REVIEW_INPUTS
must_be_addressed_before_or_with_execution_command_review: true

These are command-review/schema concerns, not reasons to reopen high-level design.

---

Design supplement completion ruling

design_supplement: COMPLETE

The Information Unit Fabric addendum now has the required logical design authority to move out of broad design and into tightly gated command-review / schema-design work.

Current authority set:

authority_files:
  WS1: 6
  WS2: 4
  WS3: 4
  evidenced_by_APR_draft: 3
  evidenced_by_vocab_cap4_design: 4
  total_design_files: 21
plus_reviews_and_rulings:
  - WS1 reviews
  - WS2 review
  - WS3 review
  - evidenced_by APR sovereign ruling
  - this review

This does not mean production execution is authorized. It means the supplemental design phase is complete.

---

Next routing decision

GPT partially agrees with Opus: the project may now transition toward implementation, but the next step must still be a gated command-review/design phase, not direct execution.

Recommended next phase:

next_phase: v0_5_schema_Q5_and_evidenced_by_command_review_planning
nature: design_only_command_review_preparation

Reason:

reason:
  - schema Q5 is required for the registries and assembly/profile contracts to become real
  - evidenced_by vocab/checker design is now ready to be included in command-review planning
  - running vocab/checker implementation alone before schema Q5 may create an edge type without the surrounding registry/fabric substrate
  - source/grammar ratification for the Constitution fixture should follow or run after the schema command plan is clear

This phase should combine planning, not execution:

phase_should_produce:
  - implementation sequence plan
  - schema objects list for registries and contracts
  - command-review checklist for vocab amend and Cap-4 checker
  - dry-run/isolated validation plan
  - rollback/compensation plan across schema + vocab/checker
  - decision gates separating design, dry-run, command approval, and production execution

Alternative acceptable route:

alternative: source_grammar_ratification_for_actual_constitution_fixture
when_to_choose: if User wants to validate the real Constitution source before schema work

GPT recommendation: open schema_Q5_and_evidenced_by_command_review_planning first, because it converts the now-complete design into a safe implementation path without executing it.

---

Still forbidden

still_forbidden:
  - schema migration
  - table/view/function/index creation
  - vocab amendment execution
  - Cap-4 checker code modification
  - production write
  - backfill
  - data migration
  - CUT
  - VERIFY
  - dry-run
  - Directus mutation
  - vector/NoSQL integration
  - git commit
  - Agent self-advance

Final status

status: DESIGN_SUPPLEMENT_COMPLETE__READY_FOR_GATED_COMMAND_REVIEW_PLANNING
next_action: open_schema_Q5_and_evidenced_by_command_review_planning_phase