KB-7C6A

dot-iu-cutter v0.5 WS-3 Cross-source Topic Assembly Logical Proof — GPT Review

6 min read Revision 1
dot-iu-cutterv0.5fabric-addendumws-3topic-assemblylogical-proofgpt-reviewpass-with-blockersdieu44dieu382026-05-18

dot-iu-cutter v0.5 WS-3 Cross-source Topic Assembly Logical Proof — GPT Review

Date: 2026-05-18 Reviewer: GPT Reviewed package: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-fabric-addendum-scope/

Reviewed files:

files:
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-cross-source-topic-assembly-logical-proof-design-2026-05-18.md
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-sample-chain-collection-structure-2026-05-18.md
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-gap-and-readiness-review-2026-05-18.md
  - dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-report-2026-05-18.md

Verdict

ws3_cross_source_topic_assembly_logical_proof: PASS_WITH_BLOCKERS
agent_behavior: PASS_CORRECT
opus_review: CORRECT
forbidden_respected: true
self_advance_respected: true
execution_authorized: false

Agent completed WS-3 correctly. The logical proof stands. The blockers are for later schema / production / pilot phases, not defects in the WS-3 proof.


Accepted proof results

sample_topic: collection_structure
human_label: cấu trúc collection
sample_chain_nodes: 7
source_family_coverage:
  - internal_incomex_constitution
  - internal_incomex_law
  - internal_process
  - sql_entity
  - code_artifact
  - report
  - lesson

Accepted chain:

chain:
  N1: internal_incomex_constitution / normative_authority
  N2: internal_incomex_law / normative_authority + evidence_authority override on appendix span
  N3: internal_process / normative_authority
  N4: sql_entity / implementation_authority / raw_entity
  N5: code_artifact / implementation_authority / raw_entity
  N6: report / evidence_authority
  N7: lesson / evidence_authority

The proof correctly uses three mechanisms:

mechanisms:
  universal_edges:
    count: 3
    examples:
      - governed_by candidate
      - implements core
      - derived_from candidate
  iu_entity_binding:
    count: 2
    examples:
      - process -> sql_entity
      - process -> code_artifact
  assembly_local:
    count: 2
    examples:
      - raw<->raw adjacency
      - evidence annotation alternative to evidenced_by

Key rulings

1. evidenced_by handling

evidenced_by:
  status: APR_GATED_NOT_APPROVED
  WS3_usage: assembly_local_alternative_B_only
  ruling: ACCEPTED

Agent chose the correct route: do not pretend evidenced_by exists as an approved edge. The proof remains valid using assembly-local evidence annotation, while preserving the future value of a durable evidenced_by edge for compliance_matrix and production evidence chains.

2. Mixed-authority override

mixed_authority_override:
  node: N2
  default: internal_law body = normative_authority
  override: explanatory appendix span = evidence_authority
  ruling: ACCEPTED

This satisfies the required WS-2 D4 test. The proof demonstrates that a single source can carry multiple authority roles without adding an IU core field.

3. Compliance matrix defer

compliance_matrix_proof:
  status: DEFERRED
  ruling: ACCEPTED

Agent correctly did not expand WS-3 into a full compliance_matrix proof. This prevents scope creep and avoids relying on an unapproved evidenced_by edge.

4. Candidate edge dependencies

governed_by_and_derived_from:
  status: P44_4A_CANDIDATE_DEPENDENCIES
  blocker_for_WS3_logical_proof: false
  blocker_before_production: true_if_never_activated
  ruling: TRACKED_NOT_BLOCKING_NOW

This remains a tracked dependency for any future execution/pilot, but it does not block acceptance of the WS-3 paper proof.

5. Canonical address and schema blockers

must_resolve_before_schema:
  - BR-A1 canonical address separator final lock
  - BR-FA1 assembly_profile physical storage
  - BR-FA3 topic registry physical storage

Note: GPT has already ruled OD-A1 separator as <DOCPREFIX>/<L1>-<L2>-...-<Lk>. Before any schema cycle, this should be restated as locked in the schema prompt.


Promotion ruling

promote_WS3_authority: YES

The current Information Unit Fabric authority set is now:

authority_files:
  WS1: 6
  WS2: 4
  WS3: 4
  total: 14
folder: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-fabric-addendum-scope/

These 14 files form the accepted logical design authority for the Information Unit Fabric addendum.


Next routing decision

GPT accepts Opus's primary recommendation: open a narrow evidenced_by APR draft phase next.

next_phase: v0_5_evidenced_by_edge_APR_draft
nature: design_only_APR_draft

Reason:

reason:
  - evidenced_by is the smallest remaining true new-edge candidate
  - it unblocks durable compliance/evidence chains
  - it is a prerequisite for a stronger future compliance_matrix proof
  - APR-ready wording already exists from WS-1 edge minimization note
  - this phase can stay narrow and does not require schema/code execution

The APR draft must not approve the edge. It must produce a clean proposal for GPT/User sovereign decision.

Alternative routes remain possible later:

later_or_parallel:
  source_grammar_ratification_for_actual_constitution_fixture: independent and can run after APR draft
  schema_design_Q5: should wait until evidenced_by APR path and schema blockers are clearer
  WS4_edit_amend_supersede: after WS1+WS2 and 23-P2 prerequisite

Still forbidden

still_forbidden:
  - schema migration
  - table/view/function creation
  - edge type creation
  - production write
  - code change
  - index DDL execution
  - CUT
  - VERIFY
  - dry-run
  - Directus mutation
  - vector/NoSQL integration
  - git commit
  - Agent self-advance

Final status

status: WS3_PASS_WITH_BLOCKERS__WS1_WS2_WS3_AUTHORITY_PROMOTED
next_action: open_evidenced_by_APR_draft_design_only_phase
Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/reviews/dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-cross-source-topic-assembly-gpt-review-2026-05-18.md