dot-iu-cutter v0.5 WS-3 Cross-source Topic Assembly Logical Proof — GPT Review
dot-iu-cutter v0.5 WS-3 Cross-source Topic Assembly Logical Proof — GPT Review
Date: 2026-05-18
Reviewer: GPT
Reviewed package: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-fabric-addendum-scope/
Reviewed files:
files:
- dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-cross-source-topic-assembly-logical-proof-design-2026-05-18.md
- dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-sample-chain-collection-structure-2026-05-18.md
- dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-gap-and-readiness-review-2026-05-18.md
- dot-iu-cutter-v0.5-WS3-report-2026-05-18.md
Verdict
ws3_cross_source_topic_assembly_logical_proof: PASS_WITH_BLOCKERS
agent_behavior: PASS_CORRECT
opus_review: CORRECT
forbidden_respected: true
self_advance_respected: true
execution_authorized: false
Agent completed WS-3 correctly. The logical proof stands. The blockers are for later schema / production / pilot phases, not defects in the WS-3 proof.
Accepted proof results
sample_topic: collection_structure
human_label: cấu trúc collection
sample_chain_nodes: 7
source_family_coverage:
- internal_incomex_constitution
- internal_incomex_law
- internal_process
- sql_entity
- code_artifact
- report
- lesson
Accepted chain:
chain:
N1: internal_incomex_constitution / normative_authority
N2: internal_incomex_law / normative_authority + evidence_authority override on appendix span
N3: internal_process / normative_authority
N4: sql_entity / implementation_authority / raw_entity
N5: code_artifact / implementation_authority / raw_entity
N6: report / evidence_authority
N7: lesson / evidence_authority
The proof correctly uses three mechanisms:
mechanisms:
universal_edges:
count: 3
examples:
- governed_by candidate
- implements core
- derived_from candidate
iu_entity_binding:
count: 2
examples:
- process -> sql_entity
- process -> code_artifact
assembly_local:
count: 2
examples:
- raw<->raw adjacency
- evidence annotation alternative to evidenced_by
Key rulings
1. evidenced_by handling
evidenced_by:
status: APR_GATED_NOT_APPROVED
WS3_usage: assembly_local_alternative_B_only
ruling: ACCEPTED
Agent chose the correct route: do not pretend evidenced_by exists as an approved edge. The proof remains valid using assembly-local evidence annotation, while preserving the future value of a durable evidenced_by edge for compliance_matrix and production evidence chains.
2. Mixed-authority override
mixed_authority_override:
node: N2
default: internal_law body = normative_authority
override: explanatory appendix span = evidence_authority
ruling: ACCEPTED
This satisfies the required WS-2 D4 test. The proof demonstrates that a single source can carry multiple authority roles without adding an IU core field.
3. Compliance matrix defer
compliance_matrix_proof:
status: DEFERRED
ruling: ACCEPTED
Agent correctly did not expand WS-3 into a full compliance_matrix proof. This prevents scope creep and avoids relying on an unapproved evidenced_by edge.
4. Candidate edge dependencies
governed_by_and_derived_from:
status: P44_4A_CANDIDATE_DEPENDENCIES
blocker_for_WS3_logical_proof: false
blocker_before_production: true_if_never_activated
ruling: TRACKED_NOT_BLOCKING_NOW
This remains a tracked dependency for any future execution/pilot, but it does not block acceptance of the WS-3 paper proof.
5. Canonical address and schema blockers
must_resolve_before_schema:
- BR-A1 canonical address separator final lock
- BR-FA1 assembly_profile physical storage
- BR-FA3 topic registry physical storage
Note: GPT has already ruled OD-A1 separator as <DOCPREFIX>/<L1>-<L2>-...-<Lk>. Before any schema cycle, this should be restated as locked in the schema prompt.
Promotion ruling
promote_WS3_authority: YES
The current Information Unit Fabric authority set is now:
authority_files:
WS1: 6
WS2: 4
WS3: 4
total: 14
folder: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/v0.5-fabric-addendum-scope/
These 14 files form the accepted logical design authority for the Information Unit Fabric addendum.
Next routing decision
GPT accepts Opus's primary recommendation: open a narrow evidenced_by APR draft phase next.
next_phase: v0_5_evidenced_by_edge_APR_draft
nature: design_only_APR_draft
Reason:
reason:
- evidenced_by is the smallest remaining true new-edge candidate
- it unblocks durable compliance/evidence chains
- it is a prerequisite for a stronger future compliance_matrix proof
- APR-ready wording already exists from WS-1 edge minimization note
- this phase can stay narrow and does not require schema/code execution
The APR draft must not approve the edge. It must produce a clean proposal for GPT/User sovereign decision.
Alternative routes remain possible later:
later_or_parallel:
source_grammar_ratification_for_actual_constitution_fixture: independent and can run after APR draft
schema_design_Q5: should wait until evidenced_by APR path and schema blockers are clearer
WS4_edit_amend_supersede: after WS1+WS2 and 23-P2 prerequisite
Still forbidden
still_forbidden:
- schema migration
- table/view/function creation
- edge type creation
- production write
- code change
- index DDL execution
- CUT
- VERIFY
- dry-run
- Directus mutation
- vector/NoSQL integration
- git commit
- Agent self-advance
Final status
status: WS3_PASS_WITH_BLOCKERS__WS1_WS2_WS3_AUTHORITY_PROMOTED
next_action: open_evidenced_by_APR_draft_design_only_phase