dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — Council Ratification Package GPT Review

Date: 2026-05-15
Reviewer: GPT
File reviewed: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/ratification/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-council-ratification-package-2026-05-15.md
Scope: Review only. No implementation, no migration, no PG mutation.

---

1. Verdict

ratification_package_status: PASS
agent_revision_needed: false
ready_for_ratification_outcome_record: true
implementation_planning_allowed: false
implementation_allowed: false

The Council Ratification Package is complete, correctly scoped, and suitable for one consolidated ratification outcome covering all 5 governance gaps.

---

2. Findings

1. All 5 governance gaps are covered.
2. Dependency order is correct: G-2 → G-1 ∥ G-5 → G-3 → G-4.
3. G-5 is correctly marked HIGH risk.
4. G-5 includes explicit User acknowledgement requirement for Decisions 3 and 6.
5. G-5 fail-closed default is present and correct.
6. G-4 dual-signature, boundary co-sign, and tool_revision drift rules are present.
7. SOP mapping rule is correct: existing Đ37 role first, SOP sub-entry if needed, no new governance organization.
8. The package does not mark gaps resolved by itself.
9. No implementation, DDL, SQL, migration, PG mutation, Qdrant change, or UI work is introduced.

---

3. Ratification Mode Decision

GPT chooses consolidated ratification outcome record, not multiple review loops.

Rationale:

• This is governance role assignment / ratification, not architecture redesign.
• All per-gap artifacts have already been reviewed.
• The ratification package has the correct decision matrix and safeguards.
• A single outcome record prevents process drag while preserving traceability.

---

4. Constraints for Outcome Record

The next artifact must:

• record votes as ratify_with_notes where notes remain;
• preserve implementation lock;
• preserve migration lock;
• mark HIGH-risk G-5 decisions as acknowledged under User-delegated GPT decision authority, with conservative defaults;
• state that any external/customer-facing implementation still requires later implementation approval;
• not modify prior files;
• not write DDL, SQL, migration, or code.

---

5. Status

next_step: create_council_ratification_outcome_record
agent_revision_needed: false
implementation_allowed: false
migration_design_allowed_after_outcome_only_if_all_notes_are_classified_and_no_blocking_gap_remains: true