dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — Đ44 + Đ24 P0 Gate Ratification Outcome

Date: 2026-05-15 Status: P0_GATE_OPEN_PENDING_EXPLICIT_PROMPT_APPROVAL Trigger: GPT PASS on Đ44 Family Registry Closure Package + Đ24 Vocabulary Closure Package; consolidated outcome record per User delegation Mode: Consolidated single-session outcome; GPT acting as delegated governance reviewer with User delegation in conversation Scope: RATIFICATION OUTCOME DOCUMENTATION ONLY. No code, no DDL, no SQL, no migration, no PG mutation, no Qdrant mutation, no schema change, no P0 Migration Design started.

1. Hard Boundaries Honored

no_code: true
no_ddl: true
no_sql: true
no_schema_change: true
no_migration: true
no_pg_mutation: true
no_qdrant_mutation: true
no_ui_build: true
no_implementation: true
no_p0_migration_design_started: true
no_previous_file_modified: true
no_design_or_planning_or_closure_or_ratification_package_file_modified: true
purpose: ratification_outcome_documentation_only

2. Provenance

Artifact	Path
Đ44 Family Registry Closure Package	`closures/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-dieu44-family-registry-closure-package-2026-05-15.md`
Đ24 Vocabulary Closure Package	`closures/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-dieu24-vocabulary-closure-package-2026-05-15.md`
GPT review of Đ44 + Đ24 packages	`reviews/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-dieu44-dieu24-closure-packages-gpt-review-2026-05-15.md`
Council Ratification Outcome (5 governance gaps)	`ratification/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-council-ratification-outcome-2026-05-15.md`

None of the above are modified by this outcome record.

3. Ratification Mode

mode: consolidated_single_session_outcome
proxy: GPT_acting_as_delegated_governance_reviewer
delegation_basis: explicit User delegation in conversation thread (2026-05-15) — same delegation as Council Ratification Outcome
record_authority: this document is the authoritative ratification outcome for Đ44 P0-blocking families + Đ24 P0-blocking vocabulary
operational_authority_seating: deferred to future operational phase
dieu44_status_marker: CONTROLLED_DRAFT (compatibility target; not enacted schema)
dieu24_status_marker: existing operational vocabulary authority; ratifications via standard Đ24 channel

This is planning-phase ratification mirroring the Council Ratification Outcome model. Operational seating + actual Family Registry entries in Đ44 / actual Đ24 vocabulary table inserts are FUTURE operational steps.

A. Đ44 Family Registry Ratification Outcome

A.1 Summary

dieu44_ratification_summary:
  total_steps: 4
  p0_blocking_steps_ratified_with_notes: 3 (Steps 1, 2, 3)
  p2_deferred_step: 1 (Step 4 semantic_thread)
  step_1_outcome: ratify_with_notes
  step_2_outcome: ratify_with_notes
  step_3_outcome: ratify_with_notes
  step_4_outcome: deferred_to_P2
  dieu44_status_after_outcome: CONTROLLED_DRAFT_with_proposed_families_recorded
  no_schema_created: true

A.2 Step 1 — `manifest_envelope` + `manifest_unit_block` (joint)

step_id: dieu44_step_1
families: [manifest_envelope, manifest_unit_block]
joint_ratification: true (composite identity pattern)
outcome: ratify_with_notes
oqc_check: PASS (both)
g1_g12_mapping_drafted: PASS (both)
maturity_proposed: M1 (defined, not yet enacted)
related_p0_item: P0-2
risk_class: Standard
cross_law_signatures:
  dieu24: required (header vocabulary + section_type/unit_kind/body_source_policy/collision_status/risk_class) — pending Đ24 Step 1 (see Part B)
  dieu32: required (risk_class enum) — pending Đ32 cross-law signature on Đ24 group 4
  dieu37: required (role mapping for emitted_by + reviewer_identity) — covered by Council Ratification Outcome (G-1, G-3)
  dieu38: required (manifest-as-code) — already authoritative
  dieu39: required (candidate_edges → universal_edges first) — already authoritative for manifest_unit_block
  dieu0g: check (birth gate readiness field on manifest_unit_block) — covered by Đ24 authority vocab ratify

Notes / follow-ups:

Composite identity pattern (envelope_id + unit_local_id) for manifest_unit_block — accepted at design ratification level; operational Đ44 Family Registry entry must record composite-identity allowance explicitly.
Child-row + JSONB hybrid shape (per Decision 5) — accepted; JSONB acceptance for review_flags, edge_readiness_notes, candidate_edges, three_question_test_result, C1A_rule_refs awaits Đ44 cross-family decision #3 (see §A.6).
risk_class field on manifest_envelope is first-class column; cross-law dependency on Đ32 enum (carried via Đ24 group 4 ratify).
Joint ratification means P0-2 migration design must treat envelope + unit_block as a paired schema unit.

A.3 Step 2 — `cut_change_set` + `verify_result` (joint)

step_id: dieu44_step_2
families: [cut_change_set, verify_result]
joint_ratification: true (share DOT-pair signature schema)
outcome: ratify_with_notes
oqc_check: PASS (both)
g1_g12_mapping_drafted: PASS (both)
maturity_proposed: M2 (operational, in pilot)
related_p0_items: P0-3 (cut_change_set), P0-4 (verify_result)
risk_class: Standard (HIGH for actual rollback / revocation events downstream)
cross_law_signatures:
  dieu24: not required for these families' structural fields; but event/signal names dot_pair_drift, signature_failure carried via Đ24 group 11 Step 1 ratify
  dieu32: required (rollback risk surface; verify failure risk) — covered by Council Ratification Outcome G-4 ratification
  dieu37: required (DOT-pair signing authority per G-4) — covered by Council Ratification Outcome G-4
  dieu38: required (change-set-as-code, verify-as-code) — authoritative
  dieu0g: check (verify enforces birth gate) — authoritative

Notes / follow-ups:

DOT-pair dual signature schema — accepted at conceptual level (Custodian + Council co-sign per G-4); shape (separate signing row vs columns) deferred to P0 Migration Design phase as an open decision in P0-3 §5.3.
rollback_key semantics + change-set cascade rules — Đ44 confirms field existence; operational rules ratified at Council level (G-4 closure).
verify_result axis-1 drift count semantics (byte vs line vs AST) — deferred to P0 Migration Design (canonical-form spec out of Đ44 scope).
verify_result axis-2 coverage score semantics (numeric vs banded) — Đ44 G6 group accepts JSONB findings; specific score shape deferred to P0 Migration Design.
Cross-link to Council Ratification Outcome §5.5 — G-4 executor/verifier boundary policy via G-3 D4 intake remains a downstream operational dependency, NOT a Đ44 family-registry blocker.

A.4 Step 3 — `governance_event` (umbrella family)

step_id: dieu44_step_3
family: governance_event (umbrella with event_kind sub-class discriminator)
outcome: ratify_with_notes
oqc_check: PASS
g1_g12_mapping_drafted: PASS
maturity_proposed: M1 (defined; sub-kinds at varied maturity)
sub_kinds_ratified_at_this_step:
  - review_decision (P0-6)
  - decision_backlog_entry (P0-5)
sub_kinds_proposed_for_future_governance_event_extension_NOT_blocking_P0:
  - thread_health_signal (P2)
  - search_gap_signal (P3)
  - wrong_audience_result_event (P3; HIGH risk class) — gates G-5 operational handoff
  - sweep_overdue (P2; custodian audit)
  - dot_pair_drift (P2; DOT registry)
  - signature_failure (P2; DOT registry; HIGH risk)
risk_class: Standard (umbrella); HIGH for wrong_audience_result_event sub-kind
cross_law_signatures:
  dieu24: required (event_kind vocabulary) — P0 subset covered by Đ24 group 11 Step 1; P2/P3 covered by Đ24 group 11 Step 2/Step 3
  dieu32: required (risk_class per sub-kind; HIGH for wrong_audience_result) — covered by Council Ratification Outcome G-5
  dieu37: required (owner field + routing channels) — covered by Council Ratification Outcome (G-1, G-2, G-5)
  dieu38: required (event-as-code) — authoritative

Notes / follow-ups:

Umbrella family with event_kind sub-class discriminator — accepted as recommended in §5.5 of the closure package.
wrong_audience_result_event as HIGH-risk first-class — Đ44 confirms HIGH risk must be a first-class governance-state field, NOT inside JSONB findings. Cross-link: Council Ratification Outcome §5.3 (G-5 fail-closed default).
P0-blocking ratification covers only review_decision + decision_backlog_entry sub-kinds. Other sub-kinds (P2/P3) are proposed for forward consistency but not P0-gated.
Owner field shape (text vs FK) — deferred to P0 Migration Design as an open decision in P0-5 §5.5.
JSONB acceptance for findings field — pending Đ44 cross-family decision #3 (see §A.6).

A.5 Step 4 — `semantic_thread` ⚠️ deferred to P2

step_id: dieu44_step_4
family: semantic_thread
outcome: deferred_to_P2
ratification_phase: parallel to P2 schema design phase (FUTURE)
not_blocking_p0_migration_design: true
oqc_check_at_design_time: PASS
maturity_proposed: M0 (concept; awaiting operational pilot)
cross_law_signatures_required_at_P2_phase:
  dieu24: thread_kind, classification_labels (deferred to Đ24 group 11 Step 3 + future Đ24 ratifications)
  dieu32: HIGH-risk for legal/governance/code-impact threads
  dieu37: G-1 Threading Domain Owner (covered by Council Ratification Outcome G-1)
  dieu39: universal_edges-first for membership (authoritative)

Notes / follow-ups:

semantic_thread_membership schema decision — Đ39 universal_edges first rule. P2 phase must audit universal_edges capability and decide: edge_kind='thread_member' extension vs separate table. NOT a P0 issue.
Expected lifecycle chain JSONB shape — deferred to P2 schema design.
Negative knowledge persistence — sub-family or part of governance_event extension — Đ44 P2-phase decision.
semantic_thread does NOT gate P0 Migration Design.

A.6 Open Cross-Family Decisions (Đ44 follow-ups; do NOT block P0 gate)

These cross-family decisions surface from the closure package §7 and remain open at Đ44 governance:

#	Open decision	Where addressed	Block P0 gate?
1	OQC composite identity pattern acceptance	A.2 manifest_unit_block	NO — accepted at outcome level; operational Family Registry entry records composite allowance
2	DOT-pair dual signature schema shape	A.3 cut_change_set + verify_result	NO — conceptual ratify done; shape decision deferred to P0 Migration Design
3	JSONB acceptance for G5/G6 group fields	A.2, A.3, A.4 (findings, evidence, expected_chain)	NO — accepted at outcome level (JSONB IS acceptable for G5/G6 in v0.1); future Đ44 may tighten
4	Umbrella vs separate governance_event sub-families	A.4	NO — umbrella confirmed at outcome; future Đ44 may split high-risk sub-kinds (e.g., `wrong_audience_result_event`) into a separate family for clarity
5	First-class column vs profile JSON policy	A.2 manifest_unit_block	NO — per Decision 5 (child rows + JSONB hybrid); Đ44 may publish overall policy later, no P0 blocker
6	Maturity ladder semantics (M0–M4)	A.2–A.5 maturity_proposed values	NO — proposed M0/M1/M2 at design level; Đ44 future formal definition does not block P0

All 6 decisions are recorded as Đ44 follow-up entries in the Decision Backlog (G-2 custodian tracks once operational). None block the P0 gate.

B. Đ24 Vocabulary Ratification Outcome

B.1 Summary

dieu24_ratification_summary:
  total_steps: 3
  step_1_p0_blocking_outcome: ratify_with_notes (6 groups)
  step_2_high_risk_g5_gating_outcome: deferred_to_G5_operational_handoff (3 groups)
  step_3_p2_p3_outcome: deferred (multiple groups)
  dieu24_status_after_outcome: existing_authority_with_proposed_extensions_recorded
  no_silent_invention: true
  no_parallel_taxonomy: true
  skos_conceptual_only: true
  audience_vocabulary_access_control_critical: preserved
  wrong_audience_result_high_risk: preserved

B.2 Step 1 — P0-blocking batch (ratify_with_notes)

step_id: dieu24_step_1
outcome: ratify_with_notes
ratified_groups:
  - section_type / unit_kind (group 2)
  - body_source_policy (group 3)
  - risk_class (group 4 — cross-law with Đ32)
  - collision_status (group 5)
  - authority values (group 10 — cross-law with Đ0-G)
  - P0 subset of event/signal names (group 11 P0 subset)
ratified_event_signal_names_P0_subset:
  - sweep_overdue
  - dot_pair_drift
  - signature_failure
risk_class: Standard
cross_law_signatures:
  dieu32: required for risk_class (group 4) — PASS (3-level enum [low, standard, high] confirmed)
  dieu32: required for signature_failure HIGH-risk class — PASS
  dieu0g: required for authority values (group 10) — PASS (3-value enum [enacted, draft, runtime])
  dieu38: required (vocabulary backs manifest-as-code section_type/unit_kind/body_source_policy) — PASS

Ratified enum values:

Vocabulary	Enum values
`section_type`	(Đ24 existing list confirmed + cutter-specific additions per D2 §4.2 / D6 §4.8); explicit list deferred to Đ24 operational publication
`unit_kind`	same as section_type (Đ24 maintains list)
`body_source_policy`	`[inline, container, referenced, generated]`
`risk_class`	`[low, standard, high]` (cross-law confirmed with Đ32)
`collision_status`	`[none, prior_cut_present, supersedes]`
`authority`	`[enacted, draft, runtime]` (cross-law confirmed with Đ0-G)
`sweep_overdue` event-kind	controlled term added
`dot_pair_drift` event-kind	controlled term added
`signature_failure` event-kind	controlled term added (HIGH-risk class confirmed via Đ32)

Notes / follow-ups:

section_type / unit_kind explicit enumerated list publication is an Đ24-operational task; planning-phase ratification confirms vocabulary discipline + cutter-specific extension acceptance, not the exact list. Cutter MUST emit vocabulary_gap to Decision Backlog if a needed term is missing — never silently invent (criterion 39).
risk_class 3-level enum confirmed for v0.1; future expansion (e.g., critical) requires Đ24 + Đ32 joint ratification.
authority 3-value enum aligns with Đ0-G base/draft/runtime distinction (rev5d §13.2.3).
signature_failure is HIGH-risk class; routes via Đ32 escalation; Đ24 ratification records the class but Đ32 owns runtime handling.
Đ24 group 1 (Manifest enums umbrella) is satisfied by Step 1 (groups 2, 3, 4, 5 are its sub-groups).

B.3 Step 2 — HIGH-risk G-5 batch (deferred to G-5 operational handoff)

step_id: dieu24_step_2
outcome: deferred_to_G5_operational_handoff
deferred_groups:
  - audience classes (group 6)
  - visibility tiers (group 7)
  - wrong_audience_result event-kind (group 11 HIGH-risk subset)
risk_class: HIGH
not_blocking_p0_migration_design: true (P3 schema territory; not P0)
gates: G-5 operational handoff (when actual seats are named and access-control runbook activates)
cross_law_signatures_required_at_g5_operational_handoff:
  dieu32: HIGH-risk class confirmation
  dieu37: existing escalation queue routing
  g5_access_control_authority: signature
  user_re_acknowledgement: required per Council Ratification Outcome §6 (re-acknowledge at operational handoff)

Proposed values (recorded but NOT ratified at this outcome):

Vocabulary	Proposed values (await Đ24 Step 2 ratification at G-5 operational handoff)
`audience` class	`[AI-Agent, Employee, Partner, Customer]`
`visibility` tier	`[public, partner, employee, internal, restricted]` (ordering invariant: cumulative permissive → restrictive)
`wrong_audience_result` event-kind	controlled term proposed; HIGH-risk class first-class field on `governance_event` per Đ44 outcome A.4 note #2

Notes / follow-ups:

Deferral rationale: Step 2 vocabulary is access-control critical and HIGH risk. v0.1 hooks for visibility/readiness/publication metadata can be designed during P0 Migration Design referencing placeholder values; final Đ24 ratification of audience/visibility/wrong_audience binds at G-5 operational handoff (when retrieval surface activates).
No P0 blocker — P0 Migration Design phase may proceed with audience/visibility values marked proposed_pending_dieu24_step_2_ratification. Implementation of retrieval access-control enforcement is a separate FUTURE phase that cannot begin until Step 2 ratifies.
Visibility ordering invariant (public ⊂ partner ⊂ employee ⊂ internal ⊂ restricted) recorded as policy proposal; Đ24 governance may adjust at operational ratification.
User re-acknowledgement at operational handoff required per Council Ratification Outcome §6 — Đ24 governance must verify acknowledgement before stamping Step 2.

B.4 Step 3 — P2/P3 batch (deferred)

step_id: dieu24_step_3
outcome: deferred
deferred_groups:
  - readiness_state (group 8)
  - publication_state (group 9)
  - P2/P3 subset of event/signal names (group 11 P2/P3 subset)
deferred_event_signal_names:
  - user_ai_disagreement (P2)
  - expected_artifact_missing (P2)
  - noisy_retrieval / noisy_thread (P3)
  - weak_thread / missing_thread (P3)
  - search_gap (P3)
  - high_similarity_unlinked / co_retrieval_no_edge / cited_without_edge (P2)
  - overbroad / too_narrow / stale (thread) (P2)
  - co_citation / co_edit / co_retrieval / edge_density_overlap / context_pack_dependency / orphan_or_underused_unit / misclassification_signal (P3 — instrumentation gated)
  - length_drift / overlap_growth / user_complaint (P1/P2)
  - reviewer_rejection / retrieval_noise / contradiction (P2)
  - ai_reviewer_drift (P2)
risk_class: Standard (mixed within deferred batch)
not_blocking_p0_migration_design: true
ratification_phase: parallel to P2/P3 schema work (FUTURE)

Notes / follow-ups:

Deferral rationale: P2/P3 vocabulary is for threading + retrieval + instrumentation surfaces — none P0-gated. Đ24 governance ratifies these in batches aligned with P2 and P3 schema phases respectively.
readiness_state and publication_state are P3 fields; cutter v0.1 metadata hooks may reference placeholders during P0 Migration Design without blocking.
Event/signal names in Step 3 batch are instrumentation-dependent (cross-link D8 §8 missing instrumentation) — vocabulary ratification + instrumentation must align.

B.5 Preservation Statements (binding for all 3 Steps)

preservation:
  no_silent_vocabulary_invention: true (criterion 39 binding)
  no_parallel_taxonomy: true (criterion 39 binding)
  skos_conceptual_only: true (rev5d §13.1.2 binding)
  audience_vocabulary_is_access_control_critical: true (rev5d §14.2 + G-5)
  wrong_audience_result_is_HIGH_risk: true (Decision 6 + G-5)
  vocabulary_gap_routing: Decision Backlog Registry (G-2) — no Đ24 parallel channel

B.6 Open Cross-Vocabulary Decisions (Đ24 follow-ups; do NOT block P0 gate)

From Đ24 closure package §9:

#	Open decision	Block P0 gate?
1	Umbrella vocabulary class vs distributed per Đ24 class	NO — distributed per existing class recommended; future Đ24 publishing
2	Cardinality limits (multi-valued labels first-class vs profile JSON)	NO — D2 §4.2 hybrid accepted; Đ24 may publish formal cardinality policy later
3	Version policy (supersession / deprecation across cutter versions)	NO — assumed yes via Đ24 standard versioning; recorded in Decision Backlog
4	Vocabulary gap routing confirmation	RESOLVED — Decision Backlog (G-2) is the channel; no parallel
5	Cross-law signature semantics (co-signature vs hierarchical)	NO — co-signature pattern accepted for v0.1; future Đ24 governance refinement

All 5 are Đ24 follow-up entries in the Decision Backlog (G-2 custodian tracks once operational).

C. P0 Gate Outcome

C.1 Status Declaration

p0_migration_design_gate_status: OPEN_PENDING_EXPLICIT_PROMPT_APPROVAL

C.2 What This Means

The P0 Migration Design gate is OPEN — i.e., the prerequisites for proposing P0 schema migration design have been satisfied at the planning-phase governance level:

p0_gate_prerequisites:
  council_ratification_5_governance_gaps: ratified_with_notes ✅ (2026-05-15)
  dieu44_p0_blocking_families: ratified_with_notes ✅ (this outcome, Steps 1, 2, 3)
  dieu24_p0_blocking_vocabulary: ratified_with_notes ✅ (this outcome, Step 1)
  semantic_thread_dieu44_family: deferred_to_P2 ✅ (not P0-blocking)
  high_risk_audience_visibility_dieu24: deferred_to_G5_operational_handoff ✅ (not P0-blocking; gates G-5 operational not P0 design)
  p2_p3_dieu24_vocabulary: deferred ✅ (parallel to P2/P3 schema phases)

But it is PENDING_EXPLICIT_PROMPT_APPROVAL — i.e., P0 Migration Design has NOT started and MUST NOT start until:

explicit_prompt_approval_required:
  authority: GPT (delegated reviewer) AND/OR User
  approval_form: explicit new prompt asking Agent to draft P0 Migration Design Package
  approval_must_specify:
    - which P0 items to design (recommended order from P0 Schema Planning §6.1: P0-5 → P0-1 → P0-2 → P0-6 → P0-3 → P0-4)
    - migration design scope boundary (still DESIGN, not execution)
    - Đ32 risk review integration point
    - whether to design all 6 P0 items in one package or in separate packages
  no_implicit_proceed: Agent MUST NOT begin P0 Migration Design on its own initiative

C.3 What the P0 Gate Does NOT Authorize

not_authorized_by_p0_gate_open_status:
  p0_migration_design_execution: false (planning only when prompted)
  ddl_writing: false
  sql_writing: false
  schema_change: false
  migration_executed: false
  pg_mutation: false
  qdrant_mutation: false
  implementation_planning: false
  implementation_execution: false
  tool_revision_deployment: false
  retrieval_layer_implementation: false
  audience_filter_implementation: false

The P0 Gate being OPEN only removes the governance + vocabulary blockers. It does NOT remove:

The migration-design-must-be-design-only rule.
The Đ32 risk-approval requirement post-design.
The implementation-planning-must-precede-implementation rule.
The hard separation between design phases and execution phases.

4. Remaining Blockers Before Implementation Planning

remaining_blockers:
  immediate_next_step:
    - explicit_prompt_approval_for_p0_migration_design_phase (GPT/User)
  p0_migration_design_phase_internal_followups (will surface during design):
    - composite_identity_pattern_codification (Đ44 follow-up #1)
    - dot_pair_dual_signature_schema_shape (Đ44 follow-up #2)
    - jsonb_acceptance_for_g5_g6_validated_in_specific_dll_design (Đ44 follow-up #3)
    - umbrella_vs_separate_governance_event_split_decision (Đ44 follow-up #4)
    - first_class_column_vs_profile_json_per_field (Đ44 follow-up #5)
    - maturity_ladder_concrete_definitions (Đ44 follow-up #6)
    - per_unit_block_jsonb_subfield_selection (P0-2 design detail)
    - rollback_key_idempotency_semantics (P0-3 design detail)
    - axis_1_drift_count_unit_byte_vs_line_vs_ast (P0-4 design detail)
    - axis_2_coverage_score_shape (P0-4 design detail)
    - owner_field_shape_text_vs_fk (P0-5 design detail)
    - findings_jsonb_schema (P0-4, P0-5, P0-6 design detail)
    - reviewer_identity_shape (P0-6 design detail)
    - per_p0_item_dieu32_risk_review (after design exists)
  post_p0_migration_design_blockers:
    - dieu32_risk_approval_per_p0_item
    - council_co_sign_on_g4_executor_verifier_boundary_via_g3_d4_intake
    - operational_seat_naming_for_5_governance_gaps
  parallel_governance_phases_continuing:
    - dieu24_step_2_HIGH_risk_ratification_at_g5_operational_handoff
    - dieu24_step_3_p2_p3_batch (aligned with P2/P3 schema phases)
    - dieu44_step_4_semantic_thread_family (aligned with P2 schema phase)
    - g5_user_re_acknowledgement_at_operational_handoff
  next_phase_gates:
    p0_migration_design_phase: OPEN_PENDING_EXPLICIT_PROMPT_APPROVAL
    implementation_planning_phase: blocked_until_p0_migration_design_complete_and_dieu32_approved
    implementation_execution_phase: blocked_until_implementation_planning_complete_and_final_risk_review_signed

5. Status Block

ratification_outcome_status: RATIFIED_WITH_NOTES (both Đ44 P0-blocking + Đ24 P0-blocking)
dieu44_p0_blocking_steps_outcome: 3_of_3_ratify_with_notes
dieu44_p2_deferred_step_outcome: 1_of_1_deferred_to_P2
dieu24_p0_blocking_step_outcome: ratify_with_notes (Step 1)
dieu24_high_risk_step_outcome: deferred_to_G5_operational_handoff (Step 2)
dieu24_p2_p3_step_outcome: deferred (Step 3)
p0_migration_design_gate_status: OPEN_PENDING_EXPLICIT_PROMPT_APPROVAL
governance_gaps_status: ratified_with_notes (from Council Ratification Outcome 2026-05-15)
implementation_planning_allowed: false
implementation_allowed: false
migration_design_allowed_with_explicit_prompt: true (NOT automatic)
agent_must_not_self_initiate_p0_migration_design: true
preservation_statements_honored:
  no_silent_vocabulary_invention: true
  no_parallel_taxonomy: true
  skos_conceptual_only: true
  audience_vocabulary_access_control_critical: true
  wrong_audience_result_HIGH_risk: true
  dieu44_controlled_draft: true (not enacted)
no_code: true
no_ddl: true
no_sql: true
no_migration: true
no_pg_mutation: true
no_qdrant_mutation: true
no_p0_migration_design_started: true
no_previous_file_modified: true
purpose: ratification_outcome_documentation_only

6. Coverage Check (mandatory sections from prompt)

Required content	Where addressed
A. Đ44 Family Registry outcome — 4 steps with specific outcomes	§A.1–§A.6
A. Đ44 notes: controlled draft / not enacted / no schema / open cross-family follow-ups	§A.1, §A.6
B. Đ24 Vocabulary outcome — 3 steps with specific outcomes	§B.1–§B.6
B. Đ24 notes: no silent invention / SKOS conceptual / no parallel / HIGH risk / access-control critical	§B.5
C. P0 Gate outcome: OPEN_PENDING_EXPLICIT_PROMPT_APPROVAL	§C.1, §C.2
C. Explicit constraints on what P0 gate does NOT authorize	§C.3
Remaining blockers before implementation planning	§4
Hard boundaries	§1

dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — Đ44 + Đ24 P0 Gate Ratification Outcome

1. Hard Boundaries Honored

2. Provenance

3. Ratification Mode

A. Đ44 Family Registry Ratification Outcome

A.1 Summary

A.2 Step 1 — manifest_envelope + manifest_unit_block (joint)

A.3 Step 2 — cut_change_set + verify_result (joint)

A.4 Step 3 — governance_event (umbrella family)

A.5 Step 4 — semantic_thread ⚠️ deferred to P2

A.6 Open Cross-Family Decisions (Đ44 follow-ups; do NOT block P0 gate)

B. Đ24 Vocabulary Ratification Outcome

B.1 Summary

B.2 Step 1 — P0-blocking batch (ratify_with_notes)

B.3 Step 2 — HIGH-risk G-5 batch (deferred to G-5 operational handoff)

B.4 Step 3 — P2/P3 batch (deferred)

B.5 Preservation Statements (binding for all 3 Steps)

B.6 Open Cross-Vocabulary Decisions (Đ24 follow-ups; do NOT block P0 gate)

C. P0 Gate Outcome

C.1 Status Declaration

C.2 What This Means

C.3 What the P0 Gate Does NOT Authorize

4. Remaining Blockers Before Implementation Planning

5. Status Block

6. Coverage Check (mandatory sections from prompt)

A.2 Step 1 — `manifest_envelope` + `manifest_unit_block` (joint)

A.3 Step 2 — `cut_change_set` + `verify_result` (joint)

A.4 Step 3 — `governance_event` (umbrella family)

A.5 Step 4 — `semantic_thread` ⚠️ deferred to P2