KB-73F1

dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — P0 Migration Design Risk & Coverage Report

18 min read Revision 1
dot-iu-cuttermigration-designp0riskcoveragereportno-ddlrev5d

dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — P0 Migration Design Risk & Coverage Report

Date: 2026-05-15 Status: P0 MIGRATION DESIGN PHASE — COMPLETE (DESIGN ONLY) Scope: DESIGN ONLY. No code, no DDL, no SQL, no CREATE/ALTER TABLE, no column DDL, no migration execution, no PG mutation, no Qdrant mutation, no implementation planning, no implementation execution.


1. Purpose

Synthesize the P0 Migration Design Package: list all files, confirm dependency-graph integrity, summarize per-item Đ32 risk reviews, consolidate unresolved decisions, verify P0 coverage, list blockers before implementation planning, and explicitly confirm that no executable artifacts were produced.

2. Files Created in This Phase

All under knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/migration-design/:

# Slug Item Risk
1 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-migration-design-master-2026-05-15.md Master
2 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-5-decision-backlog-entry-migration-design-2026-05-15.md P0-5 Standard
3 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-1-canonical-address-migration-design-2026-05-15.md P0-1 Standard
4 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-2-manifest-envelope-unit-block-migration-design-2026-05-15.md P0-2 Standard
5 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-6-review-decision-migration-design-2026-05-15.md P0-6 Standard
6 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-3-cut-change-set-rollback-key-migration-design-2026-05-15.md P0-3 HIGH
7 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-4-verify-result-migration-design-2026-05-15.md P0-4 HIGH
8 this report Risk/Coverage Report

Total: 8 files (master + 6 per-item + 1 risk/coverage report).

3. Dependency Graph Summary

                  [P0-5 decision_backlog_entry]              ← foundational; no upstream
                              │
                              ▼
                  [P0-1 canonical_address]                    ← upstream: P0-5 (governance trail)
                              │
                              ▼
                  [P0-2 manifest_envelope + manifest_unit_block]
                              │                               ← upstream: P0-5, P0-1
                              ▼
                  [P0-6 review_decision]                      ← upstream: P0-2, P0-5
                              │
                              ▼
                  [P0-3 cut_change_set + rollback_key]        ← upstream: P0-2, P0-6, P0-5
                              │
                              ▼
                  [P0-4 verify_result]                        ← upstream: P0-3, P0-2, P0-6, P0-5
                              │
                              ▼
                       [P0 design complete]

Dependency integrity check: Each downstream item has its upstream dependencies explicitly named in its § Dependencies section. No cycles. FK references are forward-only (downstream → upstream).

Shared artifact: dot_pair_signature table is jointly designed in P0-3 §4.3 and referenced by P0-4 §4.1; satisfies Đ44 Step 2 joint ratification (cut_change_set + verify_result).

Joint design pairs:

  • P0-2 envelope + unit_block (composite identity; per Đ44 Step 1)
  • P0-3 + P0-4 (shared DOT-pair signature schema; per Đ44 Step 2)

4. Per-Item Đ32 Risk Review Summary

Item Proposed risk class Đ32 review status Key Đ32 attention
P0-5 decision_backlog_entry Standard NOT_STARTED History preservation across rollback; PII handling for owner_seat; markdown mirror access scope
P0-1 canonical_address Standard NOT_STARTED Backfill data exposure; authority misclassification cross-link Đ0-G; trigram index PII concern (FUTURE)
P0-2 manifest_envelope + unit_block Standard NOT_STARTED Vocabulary leakage (Đ24 discipline); source_span correctness; review_required stickiness
P0-6 review_decision Standard NOT_STARTED AI reviewer independence; cross_signed_by_dot_verifier enforcement; reviewer_identity PII
P0-3 cut_change_set + rollback_key HIGH NOT_STARTED Criterion 28 enforcement; rollback test plan REQUIRED; signing scheme placeholder acceptance; before_state_snapshot granularity; cascade default ERROR
P0-4 verify_result HIGH NOT_STARTED Criterion 28 concurrent with P0-3; verifier independence; canonicalization rule binding; axis-2 advisory boundary; rollback chain test plan

Risk class distribution: 4 Standard, 2 HIGH.

Joint Đ32 review recommendation: P0-3 + P0-4 reviewed together (they share DOT-pair signature schema and dual-signature rule). All HIGH-risk Đ32 review must precede any migration execution.

Đ32 review authority per item (all in NOT_STARTED state):

p0_5: Đ32 + Registry Custodian (G-2) co-sign
p0_1: Đ32 + Đ24 vocab owner + Đ0-G birth-gate owner
p0_2: Đ32 + Đ44 family registry custodian + Đ24 vocab owner
p0_6: Đ32 + Đ44 + Đ37 + G-5 (PII handling)
p0_3: Đ32 (HIGH) + G-4 DOT Registry Custodian + Đ44 + Đ37
p0_4: Đ32 (HIGH) + G-4 DOT Registry Custodian + Đ44 + Đ24 + Đ37

5. Unresolved Decisions (Consolidated)

Aggregated from each per-item design's open-decisions section. None block design completion; all gate Đ32 review and/or migration execution.

5.1 Cross-Cutting Decisions

ID Decision Affects Recommendation
X-1 Schema placement: TAC schema vs new schema class P0-2, P0-3, P0-4, P0-5, P0-6 New schema class for governance/manifest family; Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43 confirm
X-2 Primary ID form: uuid vs bigserial vs deterministic text All items uuid for global uniqueness; human-readable aliases where useful (e.g., decision_id_human in P0-5)
X-3 JSONB schema validation: PG jsonb_check vs application-only All items with JSONB fields application-layer v0.1; PG jsonb_check FUTURE
X-4 Enum implementation: PG enum type vs Đ24 lookup table FK All items with enum fields Đ24 lookup FK for vocabulary discipline
X-5 Markdown mirror generator location & cadence P0-5 sweep-triggered batch; implementation FUTURE

5.2 P0-5 Specific Open Decisions

P0-5 §9 items 1–10: schema placement, primary ID, enum implementation, owner_role shape, dependency cycle detection, priority field placement, closure_evidence JSONB validation, mirror generator location, re_opened state distinctness, history granularity.

5.3 P0-1 Specific Open Decisions

P0-1 §9 items 1–10: uniqueness scope, mutation policy, indexing strategy, alias storage, birth_gate_class field, backfill strategy, format extensions, address for non-law artifacts, constraint enforcement, NULL on legacy rows.

5.4 P0-2 Specific Open Decisions

P0-2 §9 items 1–11: schema placement, composite identity enforcement, source_revision shape, source_span unit (cross-link P0-4 §6), source_span as integers vs JSONB, confidence shape, block_state/state enum elevation, cut_reason_tags shape, manifest diff materialization, report_summary JSONB shape, decision_backlog_root_entry_id semantics.

5.5 P0-6 Specific Open Decisions

P0-6 §9 items 1–10: schema placement, verdict enum elevation, reviewer_identity validation, re-review handling, reviewer independence enforcement, AI/Human/Council distinction, escalation_ref cardinality, findings completeness, PII handling, cross_signed_by_dot_verifier semantics.

5.6 P0-3 Specific Open Decisions (HIGH risk)

P0-3 §9 items 1–12: schema placement, signing scheme placeholder, rollback_key format, cascade rules, before_state_snapshot granularity, affected-row tracking shape, shared dot_pair_signature, payload_envelope strictness, state enum extension, idempotency key, rollback authority, signature revocation.

5.7 P0-4 Specific Open Decisions (HIGH risk)

P0-4 §12 items 1–10: axis_1_drift_unit (joint with P0-2), canonicalization rule, axis_2_coverage_score formula, axis_2_advisory_findings validation, drift_threshold non-zero allowance, verdict_rationale enforcement, disagreement-handling races, signature collection timeout, multiple VERIFY runs chain, rollback chain cycle.

5.8 Critical Joint Decisions (must resolve together)

Joint decision Items involved Why joint
source_span unit (P0-2) ↔ axis_1_drift_unit (P0-4) P0-2 §9 item 4 + P0-4 §6 + §12 item 1 MARK-span and VERIFY-drift must align or round-trip fails systemically
Schema placement (X-1) P0-2, P0-3, P0-4, P0-5, P0-6 All new tables share schema class decision
Shared dot_pair_signature table P0-3 §4.3 + P0-4 §4.1 Already jointly designed; Đ32 review jointly
Both-signatures + drift rule enforcement P0-3 §7 + P0-4 §9 §10 Criterion 28 binding; enforce together
Primary ID form (X-2) All items Cross-table FK consistency

6. Coverage of Six P0 Items

P0 ID Logical artifact(s) Coverage status Source design refs
P0-1 canonical_address (+ canonical_address_alias) COMPLETE D6 §4.2, D7 §4.3, D8 §6.1, D2 §4.2
P0-2 manifest_envelope + manifest_unit_block COMPLETE D2 §4.1-§4.11, D1 §4.4-§4.6, D6 §4.2-§4.3
P0-3 cut_change_set + rollback_key + dot_pair_signature COMPLETE D1 §4.6, §4.8, §4.14, G-4 closure
P0-4 verify_result (shared dot_pair_signature) COMPLETE D1 §4.7, §4.14, D6 §4.4, G-4 closure
P0-5 decision_backlog_entry (+ history, dependency, sweep_log) COMPLETE D5 §4.1-§4.11, G-2 closure
P0-6 review_decision COMPLETE D2 §4.6-§4.8, D1 §4.5, G-1+G-3 closures

Total: 6 / 6 P0 items covered.

Per-item file skeleton compliance (P0 Master §11):

Section P0-5 P0-1 P0-2 P0-6 P0-3 P0-4
1. Purpose
2. Source design references
3. Logical object/table intent
4. Proposed fields
5. Field ownership / vocab dependency
6. Lifecycle
7. Dependencies
8. Risks
9. Open decisions
10. Đ32 risk review notes
11. Explicit no-DDL confirmation

All 6 per-item files comply with the mandatory skeleton.

7. Cross-Law Dependency Coverage

Law / Authority Items requiring Status
Đ44 Family Registry Step 1 (manifest envelope + unit_block) P0-2 ratified_with_notes
Đ44 Family Registry Step 2 (cut_change_set + verify_result joint) P0-3, P0-4 ratified_with_notes
Đ44 Family Registry Step 3 (governance_event umbrella) P0-5, P0-6 ratified_with_notes
Đ24 Step 1 (section_type/unit_kind/body_source_policy/collision_status/risk_class/authority) All ratified_with_notes
Đ24 Step 1 (event-kind P0 subset: sweep_overdue, dot_pair_drift, signature_failure) P0-5, P0-3, P0-4 ratified_with_notes
Đ32 (risk_class enum + HIGH-risk handling for signature_failure) All; HIGH for P0-3, P0-4 per-item review NOT_STARTED
Đ37 (governance roles via G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, G-5) All ratified_with_notes per Council outcome
Đ38 (manifest-as-code; versioning) All authoritative
Đ39 (universal_edges-first; candidate_edges) P0-2 (candidate_edges field) authoritative
Đ0-G (authority enum) P0-1, P0-2 ratified via Đ24 group 10

No unresolved cross-law conflict surfaced during this design phase.

8. Blockers Before Implementation Planning

Per P0 Master §1 (phase_completion_signals) and Council Ratification Outcome §7:

immediate_next_step:
  - GPT review of this design package
  - if PASS → Đ32 risk review phase per P0 item (separate phase)
  - if revise_required → revise affected per-item file(s)

post_design_review_blockers (before implementation planning):
  - Đ32 risk approval per P0 item (6 reviews total; 2 HIGH-risk reviews for P0-3 + P0-4)
  - Joint Đ32 review for P0-3 + P0-4 (shared DOT-pair signature schema)
  - resolve cross-cutting decisions X-1 through X-5
  - resolve critical joint decisions §5.8 (especially source_span unit ↔ axis_1_drift_unit)
  - Đ24 final ratifications on enum elevations recommended in per-item open decisions
  - operational seat naming for 5 governance gaps (G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, G-5)
  - G-3 D4 capability intake for executor/verifier boundary policy (G-4 dependency)
  - canonicalization rule v0.1 documentation finalized (P0-4)
  - rollback test plan documented (P0-3 + P0-4)

parallel_governance_phases_continuing:
  - Đ24 Step 2 HIGH-risk ratification at G-5 operational handoff (audience/visibility/wrong_audience_result)
  - Đ24 Step 3 P2/P3 batch
  - Đ44 Step 4 semantic_thread family (parallel to P2 schema phase)
  - G-5 User re-acknowledgement at operational handoff

implementation_planning_phase: 
  status: STILL_BLOCKED
  unblocks_when: 
    - this design package GPT-reviewed and PASSed
    - Đ32 risk approval per P0 item
    - cross-cutting + joint decisions resolved
    - implementation planning phase prompt approval (explicit prompt required, similar to P0 Migration Design phase prompt)

implementation_execution_phase:
  status: STILL_BLOCKED
  unblocks_when:
    - implementation planning phase complete
    - final risk review signed
    - operational seats named for all 5 governance gaps
    - rollback test plan executed (dry-run with synthetic data)

9. Phase Output Confirmation

files_created: 8
files_path: knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/migration-design/
p0_items_designed: 6 of 6 (100%)
dependency_graph_consistent: true
joint_design_pairs_honored:
  - P0-2 envelope + unit_block (composite identity)
  - P0-3 + P0-4 (shared DOT-pair signature)
mandatory_skeleton_compliance: 6 of 6 files
risk_class_distribution: 4 Standard + 2 HIGH (P0-3, P0-4)
unresolved_decisions_total: ~60 across all items + 5 cross-cutting + 5 critical joint
cross_law_dependencies_mapped: 10 distinct laws/authorities
no_design_file_modified: true
no_planning_file_modified: true
no_closure_file_modified: true
no_ratification_file_modified: true
no_previous_phase_file_modified: true

10. Confirmation — No Executable Artifacts Produced

no_code_written: true
no_ddl_written: true
no_sql_written: true
no_create_table_statements_written: true
no_alter_table_statements_written: true
no_column_ddl_written: true
no_index_ddl_written: true
no_constraint_ddl_written: true
no_trigger_function_or_rls_policy_written: true
no_cryptographic_scheme_specified: true (deferred per P0-3 §9 item 2)
no_canonicalization_rule_implementation: true (logical reference only per P0-4)
no_migration_executed: true
no_pg_mutation: true
no_qdrant_mutation: true
no_directus_mutation: true
no_data_writes: true
no_implementation_planning: true
no_implementation_execution: true
no_design_file_modified: true (12 design deliverables unchanged)
no_planning_file_modified: true (4 planning files unchanged)
no_closure_file_modified: true (10 closure files unchanged)
no_ratification_file_modified: true (3 ratification files unchanged)
no_review_file_modified: true (review files unchanged)
output_form: logical_design_in_markdown_only
phase_complete: true (design only)
implementation_planning_allowed: false
implementation_execution_allowed: false

11. Phase Status

phase: P0_MIGRATION_DESIGN_PACKAGE
phase_status: DESIGN_COMPLETE_PENDING_GPT_REVIEW_AND_DIEU32
files_in_package: 8
p0_coverage: 6_of_6 (100%)
dependency_graph_consistent: true
risk_high_items: 2 (P0-3, P0-4)
risk_standard_items: 4 (P0-1, P0-2, P0-5, P0-6)
unresolved_decisions_routed_to_dieu32_review_and_open_followups: true
cross_law_authority_alignment_preserved: true
no_executable_artifacts_produced: true
ready_for_gpt_review: true
ready_for_dieu32_review_post_gpt_pass: true
ready_for_implementation_planning: false (Đ32 review + operational seats + cross-cutting decisions resolution required first)
ready_for_implementation_execution: false (implementation planning must precede)
  1. GPT review of this design package (8 files).
  2. If PASS → Đ32 risk review per P0 item (6 reviews; jointly review P0-3 + P0-4).
  3. Per-item Đ32 outputs feed operational decision resolution for cross-cutting + critical joint decisions.
  4. Operational seat naming for 5 governance gaps (separate operational phase).
  5. G-3 D4 capability intake for executor/verifier boundary (post-G-3 operational seat).
  6. Canonicalization rule v0.1 finalization documented (P0-4).
  7. Rollback test plan documented and executed dry-run (P0-3 + P0-4).
  8. Implementation Planning Package prompt approval (separate prompt; similar to P0 Migration Design prompt approval).
  9. Implementation Planning phase produces execution-stage design (still no execution).
  10. Final risk review signs migration execution authorization.
  11. Migration execution begins (FIRST time code/DDL/migration is allowed).

Each numbered step above is a separate phase or session, not part of this design package.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/migration-design/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-migration-design-risk-coverage-report-2026-05-15.md