KB-17E0

dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — P0 Implementation Planning Report

13 min read Revision 1
dot-iu-cutterimplementation-planningreportp0gate-statusno-executionno-ddlrev5d

dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — P0 Implementation Planning Report

Date: 2026-05-15 Status: IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING — REPORT (FINAL OF THIS PHASE) Scope: PLANNING ONLY. No code, no DDL, no SQL, no migration, no PG mutation, no execution. Master: implementation-planning/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-implementation-planning-master-2026-05-15.md


1. Purpose

Final report for the Implementation Planning phase. Lists files created, summarizes planning decisions, classifies remaining blockers, and emits the explicit gate status for the next phase.

The expected stance — confirmed in this report — is that implementation execution must remain blocked after this phase, and the next gate is a Final Execution Readiness Review, not immediate execution.

2. Files Created in This Phase

All under knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/implementation-planning/:

# Slug Purpose Revision
1 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-implementation-planning-master-2026-05-15.md Implementation planning phase master (scope, boundaries, lanes, gates, execution preconditions) 1
2 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-cross-cutting-resolution-plan-2026-05-15.md Resolution plan for 7 cross-cutting decisions (X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4, X-6, X-7, X-8) 1
3 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-migration-sequence-plan-2026-05-15.md Migration sequence plan for 6 P0 items (P0-5 → P0-1 → P0-2 → P0-6 → P0-3 → P0-4) 1
4 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-preflight-and-backup-plan-2026-05-15.md Preflight + backup + snapshot + dry-run + failure-stop requirements 1
5 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-rollback-test-plan-2026-05-15.md 26-scenario matrix covering rollback / verify / signature surface (X-8 authoring) 1
6 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-canonicalization-rule-v0.1-planning-note-2026-05-15.md Prose plan for canonicalization_rule_v0.1 (X-7 authoring; Đ24 ratification pending) 1
7 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-operational-seat-naming-plan-2026-05-15.md G-1..G-5 placeholder plan; Đ37 dependency mapped 1
8 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-implementation-planning-report-2026-05-15.md this report 1

Total: 8 files. No phase-prior file modified. No DDL/SQL/migration script written. No PG/Qdrant/Directus mutation. No execution.

3. Planning Decisions Made

3.1 Cross-cutting decisions (file 2)

ID Title Selected approach Blocks execution
X-1 schema placement new schema class cutter_governance; P0-1 stays in TAC yes
X-2 primary ID form uuid + human aliases no
X-3 JSONB validation policy application-layer v0.1; PG jsonb_check FUTURE no
X-4 enum implementation Đ24 lookup FK yes
X-6 dot_pair_signature polish shared table + revocation lifecycle (revoked_at, revocation_reason, revoked_by, prior_signature_id) + exactly-one cross-reference rule yes
X-7 canonicalization rule prose full prose Đ24-ratified before execution; planning prose authored in file 6 yes
X-8 rollback test plan 26-scenario matrix authored in file 5; dry-run before execution yes

X-A (closed_with_notes earlier today): byte source_span + canonical_token drift + canonicalization rule v0.1 placeholder (NFC + LF + trim). No re-opening here.

3.2 Migration sequence (file 3)

Sequence accepted: P0-5 → P0-1 → P0-2 → P0-6 → P0-3 → P0-4.

Each step has documented preconditions, validation checks, rollback notes, and dependency checks before proceeding to the next step. No SQL / DDL written.

3.3 Preflight + backup + dry-run (file 4)

Specifications for: directus full backup, schema snapshot, row-count snapshot, dry-run environment, rollback verification prerequisite, failure-stop rule. None executed.

3.4 Rollback test plan (file 5)

26 scenarios covering rollback_key behavior, cut_change_set state transitions including invalid_drift, before_state_snapshot fidelity, verdict semantics (PASS/FAIL/NEEDS_HUMAN), dual-signature validation, revocation, exactly-one cross-reference rule, rollback failure recovery, signature timeouts, canonicalization rule consistency and immutability. None executed.

3.5 Canonicalization rule v0.1 prose plan (file 6)

Prose plan covers: scope (markdown source_kind v0.1), step ordering and idempotency, BOM handling, mixed line endings, trailing newline at file end, consecutive blank lines, canonical token boundary, byte-offset → token-position algorithm, per-source_kind extension policy. Đ24 full prose ratification remains pending.

3.6 Operational seat plan (file 7)

G-1..G-5 placeholders mapped with Đ37 dependency. No role created, no seat named, no Đ37 mutation. P0-execution-blocking subset: G-2 (signal channel), G-4 (DOT-pair + sign-offs), partial G-5 (PII boundary).

4. Unresolved Blockers Before Execution

Aggregated from all 7 lane files.

4.1 Cross-cutting closures pending

cross_cutting_pending:
  - X-1 sign-off: Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43
  - X-4 ratification: Đ24 per remaining enum set + lookup table population
  - X-6 sign-off: G-4 Custodian + Đ44
  - X-7 prose ratification: Đ24
  - X-8 dry-run execution + sign-off: Đ32 (HIGH-risk path) + G-4

4.2 Operational seat naming pending (Đ37 dependency)

operational_seats_pending:
  - G-2 Backlog Custodian (BLOCKER for signal routing)
  - G-4 DOT-Pair Signing Authority (BLOCKER for DOT-pair registration + sign-offs)
  - G-5 Access-Control Authority (PARTIAL BLOCKER for PII boundary)
  - G-3 Capability-Intake Reviewer (SOFT BLOCKER; not for v0.1 execution)
  - G-1 Threading Roles (NON-BLOCKER for P0; P2+ scope)

4.3 Infrastructure pending

infrastructure_pending:
  - DOT-pair (executor + verifier) registered via G-4
  - signing scheme v0.1 implementation
  - signal routing for dot_pair_drift / signature_failure
  - canonicalization rule library scaffolding (v0.1)
  - directus full backup + restore test (per file 4)
  - schema + row-count snapshots (per file 4)
  - dry-run environment provisioned (per file 4)
  - rollback test plan dry-run executed (per file 5)

4.4 Final review pending

final_review_pending:
  - Final Execution Readiness Review (Đ32 HIGH-risk path + Đ44 + Đ37 + G-4 Custodian)
  - explicit user prompt to authorize execution (separate prompt)

5. Implementation Execution Gate

implementation_execution_gate_status: closed
gate_open_condition:
  ALL of the following must be true:
    - planning package GPT-reviewed and PASSed
    - all 7 cross-cutting closures (§4.1) completed
    - all operational seats (§4.2) named per Đ37
    - all infrastructure (§4.3) provisioned
    - rollback test plan dry-run executed and signed off
    - Final Execution Readiness Review signed
    - explicit user prompt authorizing execution
gate_does_not_open_by_phase_completion: true
expected_next_phase: Final Execution Readiness Review (NOT immediate execution)

6. Explicit Status Flags

implementation_planning_phase: complete_pending_review
implementation_execution_allowed: false
code_written: false
ddl_written: false
sql_written: false
migration_executed: false
pg_mutation: false
qdrant_mutation: false
directus_mutation: false
data_writes: false
deploy: false
phase_prior_file_modified: false
migration_design_file_modified: false
risk_review_file_modified: false
ratification_file_modified: false
review_file_modified: false

7. Migration Sequence Summary (Compact)

Step P0 ID Item(s) Risk Joint?
1 P0-5 decision_backlog_entry (+ history, dependency, sweep_log) Standard
2 P0-1 canonical_address (+ alias) on tac_logical_unit Standard
3 P0-2 manifest_envelope + manifest_unit_block Standard Đ44 Step 1 joint
4 P0-6 review_decision Standard
5 P0-3 cut_change_set + rollback_key + dot_pair_signature HIGH Đ44 Step 2 joint (with P0-4)
6 P0-4 verify_result (shared dot_pair_signature) HIGH Đ44 Step 2 joint (with P0-3)
sequence_decision: accepted per migration sequence plan §3
joint_pairs_preserved: true (P0-2 envelope+block; P0-3+P0-4 shared dot_pair_signature)
high_risk_steps_with_special_attention: [step 5, step 6]

8. Cross-Cutting Decisions Status (Compact)

ID Title Status
X-A source_span ↔ axis_1_drift_unit closed_with_notes (ratified earlier today)
X-1 schema placement planning approach selected; sign-off pending Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43
X-2 primary ID form planning approach selected (uuid + human aliases); no further ratification needed
X-3 JSONB validation policy planning approach selected (application-layer v0.1); no further ratification needed
X-4 enum implementation planning approach selected (Đ24 lookup FK); Đ24 per-enum-set ratification + lookup population pending
X-6 dot_pair_signature polish polish defined; G-4 sign-off pending
X-7 canonicalization rule prose planning prose authored; Đ24 full prose ratification pending
X-8 rollback test plan scenario matrix authored; dry-run execution + Đ32/G-4 sign-off pending

9. Blockers Before Execution (Compact)

blockers_before_execution:
  - X-1 sign-off (Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43)
  - X-4 ratification + lookup population (Đ24)
  - X-6 sign-off (G-4 + Đ44)
  - X-7 prose ratification (Đ24)
  - X-8 dry-run execution + sign-off (Đ32 + G-4)
  - operational seats G-2, G-4, G-5 named (Đ37)
  - DOT-pair registration (G-4)
  - signing scheme v0.1 implementation
  - signal routing wired (dot_pair_drift, signature_failure → G-2)
  - canonicalization rule library scaffolding (v0.1)
  - directus backup + restore test
  - schema + row-count snapshots
  - dry-run environment provisioned + rollback test plan dry-run executed
  - Final Execution Readiness Review signed
  - explicit user prompt authorizing execution
  1. GPT review of this Implementation Planning Package (8 files).
  2. If PASS → Final Execution Readiness Review session authored as a separate phase, drawing inputs from the 7 lane files in this package.
  3. Đ24 ratification of canonicalization_rule_v0.1 full prose (separate ratification file).
  4. Đ24 lookup table population for all enum sets per X-4 (operational).
  5. Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43 sign-off of schema placement per X-1.
  6. G-4 sign-off of dot_pair_signature polish per X-6.
  7. Đ37 operational session naming G-2, G-4, G-5 (and optionally G-3, G-1) per operational seat plan.
  8. DOT-pair registration via G-4 (executor + verifier).
  9. Backup + snapshot + dry-run environment provisioning per preflight plan.
  10. Rollback test plan dry-run executed in dry-run environment per file 5.
  11. Final Execution Readiness Review signed off by Đ32 (HIGH-risk path) + Đ44 + Đ37 + G-4.
  12. Explicit user authorization to begin production execution (separate prompt).
  13. Only then: execution phase authoring of DDL/SQL/migration scripts and execution.

Each numbered step above is a separate phase or session, not part of this Implementation Planning package.

11. Explicit Confirmation — No Executable Artefacts Produced

no_code_written: true
no_ddl_written: true
no_sql_written: true
no_create_table_statements_written: true
no_alter_table_statements_written: true
no_column_ddl_written: true
no_index_ddl_written: true
no_constraint_ddl_written: true
no_trigger_function_or_rls_policy_written: true
no_cryptographic_scheme_specified: true
no_canonicalization_rule_executable_implementation: true
no_migration_script_written: true
no_migration_executable_produced: true
no_migration_executed: true
no_pg_mutation: true
no_qdrant_mutation: true
no_directus_mutation: true
no_data_writes: true
no_backup_taken: true
no_snapshot_taken: true
no_dry_run_executed: true
no_signal_routing_wired: true
no_dot_pair_registered: true
no_seat_named: true
no_role_created: true
no_dieu37_mutation: true
no_implementation_planning_phase_prior_file_modified: true
no_risk_review_file_modified: true
no_ratification_file_modified: true
no_migration_design_file_modified: true
no_review_file_modified: true
output_form: implementation_planning_report_in_markdown_only
phase_complete: true
implementation_planning_allowed: true (this phase)
implementation_execution_allowed: false
Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/implementation-planning/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-implementation-planning-report-2026-05-15.md