Incomex AI Portal
KB-504A

dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — P0 Final Readiness Report

10 min read Revision 1
dot-iu-cutterfinal-readinessreportp0execution-gateno-executionno-ddlrev5d

dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — P0 Final Readiness Report

Date: 2026-05-15 Status: FINAL EXECUTION READINESS REVIEW — REPORT (FINAL OF THIS PHASE) Scope: REVIEW DOCUMENTATION ONLY. No code, no DDL, no SQL, no migration, no PG mutation, no execution. Master: final-readiness/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-final-execution-readiness-review-2026-05-15.md

1. Purpose

Final report for the Final Execution Readiness Review phase. Lists files created, the readiness verdict, the execution gate status, exact reasons execution remains blocked, exact conditions under which the gate could become conditionally openable, and the explicit status flags required by the user's instructions.

2. Files Created in This Phase

All under knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/final-readiness/:

# Slug Purpose Revision
1 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-final-execution-readiness-review-2026-05-15.md Review master (checklist + per-check status + classification + recommendation) 1
2 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-final-readiness-blocker-register-2026-05-15.md Enumerated blocker register (9 hard / 4 conditions-to-execute / 9 post-execution follow-ups) 1
3 dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-final-readiness-report-2026-05-15.md this report 1

Total: 3 files. No phase-prior file modified. No DDL/SQL/migration script written. No mutation. No execution.

3. Readiness Verdict

readiness_verdict: do_not_authorize
rationale_summary:
  - 9 hard blockers remain open (HB-01 .. HB-09)
  - 4 conditions-to-execute remain open (CTE-01 .. CTE-04); CTE-02/03/04 are de-facto prerequisites for HB-05 dry-run
  - none of the hard blockers can be safely discharged inside the execution window
  - per the expected stance: "unless every hard blocker is demonstrably closed, recommend do_not_authorize_execution_yet or authorize_with_conditions_but_execution_still_requires_explicit_prompt"
recommendation: do_not_authorize_execution_yet

4. Execution Gate Status

execution_gate_status: closed
gate_can_be_conditionally_openable_when:
  ALL of the following are true simultaneously:
    - every hard blocker HB-01 .. HB-09 is demonstrably closed (sign-off / ratification / artefact recorded)
    - conditions-to-execute CTE-02, CTE-03, CTE-04 are physically present (channels wired, scaffolding present, signing scheme present)
    - rollback test plan dry-run executed and 100% of 26 scenarios pass (HB-05 closure depends on it)
    - GPT review of this final readiness package returns PASS
    - explicit user prompt authorizing execution (separate prompt, similar pattern to prior phase opening prompts)
gate_does_not_open_implicitly: true
no_self_opening: this phase does NOT open the execution gate; the gate opens only after a separate authorization session

5. Exact Reasons Execution Remains Blocked

Each reason maps to a specific blocker in the register.

reasons_execution_is_blocked:
  - HB-01: cutter_governance schema class is not signed off by Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43; no table can be created
  - HB-02: Đ24 ratification + lookup table population missing for the enum sets referenced by every P0 step
  - HB-03: dot_pair_signature shape polish not signed off by G-4 + Đ44 (cascades from HB-06 G-4 seat naming)
  - HB-04: canonicalization_rule_v0.1 full prose not Đ24-ratified; verify_result.canonicalization_rule_used cannot reference a real identifier
  - HB-05: 26-scenario rollback test plan dry-run not executed; Đ32 + G-4 sign-off not recorded
  - HB-06: operational seats G-2, G-4, G-5 not named under Đ37
  - HB-07: DOT-pair (executor + verifier) not registered in the DOT registry
  - HB-08: Directus PG backup not taken; restore test not performed
  - HB-09: schema snapshot, row-count snapshot, dry-run environment all missing

6. Exact Conditions for Conditional Openness

If GPT, User, or a future operational session demonstrably closes every hard blocker above, the gate becomes conditionally openable subject to:

conditional_openness_conditions:
  pre_authorization_conditions (must be demonstrably true BEFORE any authorization is granted):
    - HB-01 sign-off file under ratification/ — link from this report
    - HB-02 Đ24 ratification artefacts + operational lookup-population artefact
    - HB-03 sign-off file under ratification/
    - HB-04 Đ24 ratification file under ratification/ (canonicalization_rule_v0.1 prose binding)
    - HB-05 dry-run execution closure file + Đ32 + G-4 sign-off file
    - HB-06 Đ37 operational artefacts naming G-2, G-4, G-5
    - HB-07 DOT registry entries observable
    - HB-08 backup file + restore-test artefact
    - HB-09 snapshot artefacts + dry-run environment provisioning artefact

  execution_time_conditions (must be true AT execution time; not pre-authorization):
    - CTE-01 failure-stop rule actively enforced in the execution tool
    - CTE-02 signal channels live to G-2 backlog (verifiable via synthetic emission)
    - CTE-03 canonicalization rule library scaffolding live (acts on input deterministically)
    - CTE-04 signing scheme v0.1 (hash-based pseudo-signature) live (produces a valid dot_pair_signature row in dry-run)

  authorization_form:
    - explicit user prompt authorizing execution (separate prompt; not implied by closure of the above)
    - that prompt must reference this report by path

7. Explicit Status Flags

final_readiness_review: complete_pending_gpt_review
execution_authorized: false
code_written: false
ddl_written: false
sql_written: false
migration_executed: false
pg_mutation: false
qdrant_mutation: false
directus_mutation: false
data_writes: false
backup_taken: false
snapshot_taken: false
dry_run_executed: false
signature_generated: false
dot_pair_registered: false
seat_named: false
role_created: false
dieu37_mutation: false
phase_prior_file_modified: false
migration_design_file_modified: false
risk_review_file_modified: false
ratification_file_modified: false
implementation_planning_file_modified: false
review_file_modified: false

8. Blockers Register Summary (Compact)

hard_blockers (9; all open):
  - HB-01 X-1 schema placement sign-off (Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43)
  - HB-02 X-4 Đ24 ratification + lookup population
  - HB-03 X-6 dot_pair_signature shape sign-off (G-4 + Đ44)
  - HB-04 X-7 canonicalization rule prose ratification (Đ24)
  - HB-05 X-8 rollback test plan dry-run + sign-off (Đ32 + G-4)
  - HB-06 Operational seats G-2, G-4, G-5 named (Đ37)
  - HB-07 DOT-pair registration (G-4)
  - HB-08 Directus backup + restore test
  - HB-09 Schema + row-count snapshots + dry-run environment

conditions_to_execute (4; all open):
  - CTE-01 failure-stop rule enforced at execution time
  - CTE-02 signal routing wired (dot_pair_drift / signature_failure → G-2)
  - CTE-03 canonicalization rule library scaffolding (v0.1)
  - CTE-04 signing scheme v0.1 (hash-based pseudo-signature) implementation

post_execution_follow_ups (9; do NOT block first execution):
  - PEF-01 canonical_address backfill
  - PEF-02 canonical_address NOT NULL enable post-backfill
  - PEF-03 PG-constraint dual-signature enforcement
  - PEF-04 cryptographic signing scheme upgrade
  - PEF-05 per-source_kind canonicalization extensions (ast_node, byte)
  - PEF-06 axis-2 elevation review
  - PEF-07 markdown mirror generator
  - PEF-08 PG jsonb_check rollout
  - PEF-09 DOT-pair separate execution context implementation
  1. GPT review of this Final Readiness Package (3 files).
  2. If PASS → operational closure work on the 9 hard blockers (separate sessions / phases):
    • Đ37 names G-2, G-4, G-5 (HB-06)
    • Đ44 + Đ33/Đ43 sign-off schema placement (HB-01)
    • Đ24 ratification of outstanding enum sets + lookup table population (HB-02)
    • Đ24 ratification of canonicalization_rule_v0.1 full prose (HB-04)
    • G-4 + Đ44 sign-off X-6 polish (HB-03)
    • G-4 register DOT-pair (HB-07)
    • Engineering scaffolds CTE-03 + CTE-04
    • G-2 + G-4 wire signal channels (CTE-02)
    • Operational DBA + G-4 perform backup + restore test (HB-08)
    • Operational DBA + G-2 take schema + row-count snapshots + provision dry-run environment (HB-09)
  3. Execute the 26-scenario rollback test plan dry-run in the dry-run environment (HB-05 execution); Đ32 + G-4 sign off.
  4. Re-run Final Execution Readiness Review with the closure artefacts attached; emit a new report.
  5. If the re-run report's verdict transitions to authorize or authorize_with_conditions → explicit user prompt authorizing execution.
  6. Only then: execution phase authoring of DDL/SQL/migration scripts and execution.

Each numbered step above is a separate phase or session, not part of this Final Readiness Review package.

10. Explicit Confirmation — No Executable Artefacts Produced

no_code_written: true
no_ddl_written: true
no_sql_written: true
no_create_table_statements_written: true
no_alter_table_statements_written: true
no_column_ddl_written: true
no_index_ddl_written: true
no_constraint_ddl_written: true
no_trigger_function_or_rls_policy_written: true
no_migration_script_written: true
no_migration_executable_produced: true
no_migration_executed: true
no_pg_mutation: true
no_qdrant_mutation: true
no_directus_mutation: true
no_data_writes: true
no_backup_taken: true
no_snapshot_taken: true
no_dry_run_executed: true
no_signature_generated: true
no_dot_pair_registered: true
no_seat_named: true
no_role_created: true
no_dieu37_mutation: true
no_deploy: true
no_implementation_execution: true
no_phase_prior_file_modified: true
no_implementation_planning_file_modified: true
no_risk_review_file_modified: true
no_ratification_file_modified: true
no_migration_design_file_modified: true
no_review_file_modified: true
output_form: final_readiness_report_in_markdown_only
phase_complete: true (pending GPT review)
execution_authorized: false
Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/final-readiness/dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-p0-final-readiness-report-2026-05-15.md