dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — CTE-02 / CTE-03 / CTE-04 Batch Closure Report
dot-iu-cutter v0.1 — CTE-02 / CTE-03 / CTE-04 Batch Closure Report
Date: 2026-05-15 Status: BATCH CLOSURE REPORT — 3 conditions-to-execute closed_with_notes Trigger: GPT review of HB-07 returned
PASS; user explicitly authorized CTE-02 + CTE-03 + CTE-04 small engineering-support closure batch. Scope: BATCH REPORT ONLY. No code, no DDL, no SQL, no migration, no PG mutation, no Directus mutation beyond HB-07 dot_tools rows already existing, no Qdrant/vector mutation, no backup, no snapshot, no dry-run, no signal emitted, no signature generated, no execution.
1. Files Created in This Batch
All under knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/blocker-closure/:
| # | Slug | Closure | Revision |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-cte-02-signal-routing-closure-2026-05-15.md |
CTE-02 signal routing | 1 |
| 2 | dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-cte-03-canonicalization-library-closure-2026-05-15.md |
CTE-03 canonicalization library scaffold | 1 |
| 3 | dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-cte-04-signing-scheme-closure-2026-05-15.md |
CTE-04 signing scheme v0.1 | 1 |
| 4 | dot-iu-cutter-v0.1-cte-02-03-04-batch-closure-report-2026-05-15.md |
this report | 1 |
Total: 4 files. No phase-prior file modified.
2. Status per CTE
CTE_02_status: closed_with_notes
rationale: routing convention + signal coverage + emission binding documented; G-2 channel ownership attributed; v0.1 interim sink path convention bound; FUTURE sink (decision_backlog_entry post P0-5) bound; capability proof deferred to HB-05 dry-run
not_blocked_requires_design: TRUE — no architecture is missing; the deferred items are runtime wiring (after signal emitters exist) and capability proof (via HB-05 dry-run)
channel_owner: G-2 = GPT (primary); Opus (backup); User / anh Huyên (escalation)
signals_covered:
- dot_pair_drift (executor_tool_revision ≠ verifier_tool_revision)
- signature_failure (missing/invalid signature + tool_revision_mismatch)
- signature_revoked (lifecycle revoked transition; out-of-CTE-02-but-uses-same-channel)
- rollback_failed (separate kind; uses same channel; out of CTE-02 scope)
no_signal_emitted: TRUE
no_PG_trigger_or_Directus_flow_installed: TRUE
no_row_written_to_any_sink: TRUE
CTE_03_status: closed_with_notes
rationale: reference implementation (pseudo-code + tokenization rule + determinism properties) scaffolded inside the closure record; aligned with HB-04 ratified canon-md-v0.1.0 prose; ready to be transcribed to engineering tree at execution-phase deployment
not_blocked_requires_design: TRUE — HB-04 prose is complete and the v0.1 scope (markdown only) is bound; only deployment is deferred
scaffold_form: pseudo-code in closure record (no repository file committed)
behavior_specified:
- NFC unicode normalization
- CR / CRLF → LF
- trailing whitespace trim per line (space U+0020 + tab U+0009 only)
- exactly one trailing LF
- canonical_token stream (per-line, whitespace-split; (line_index, intra_line_token_index) position form)
- byte_span → canonical_token_position mapping
- axis_1_drift_count under canonical_token unit
- canonicalization_rule_used = "canon-md-v0.1.0" returned per output
determinism_idempotency_properties: specified for HB-05 dry-run scenarios S19 + S20 to verify
no_code_committed_to_repository: TRUE
no_canonicalization_run_in_production: TRUE
CTE_04_status: closed_with_notes
rationale: reference implementation (pseudo-code) scaffolded inside the closure record; aligned with HB-03 X-6 polished shape + HB-07 DOT-pair registration; ready to be transcribed to engineering tree at execution-phase deployment with G-4 oversight
not_blocked_requires_design: TRUE — HB-03 shape and HB-07 DOTs are bound; only deployment is deferred
scheme_form: hash-based pseudo-signature (SHA-256 over canonical-JSON-serialized payload_envelope); SIGNING_SCHEME_VERSION = "v0.1.0-hash-based-pseudo"
required_fields_covered:
- payload_hash (SHA-256 of canonical JSON)
- tool_revision (signer_tool_revision; drift rule binding inherited from HB-07 §6)
- signer_dot (DOT-IU-CUTTER or DOT-IU-CUTTER-VERIFY; dot_tools id 991 or 992)
- signature_kind (executor_cut, verifier_cut, executor_verify, verifier_verify; Đ24 ratification pending per HB-02)
- signature_status (validation_state ∈ pending, valid, invalid, revoked; Đ24 ratification pending per HB-02)
- timestamp (signed_at; ISO-8601 UTC)
contract_functions:
- build_payload_envelope() — enforces exactly-one cross-reference rule
- compute_payload_hash() — deterministic; SHA-256
- build_signature_payload() — deterministic concatenation
- sign() — orchestrates above; returns dot_pair_signature row payload matching HB-03 polished shape
- verify_signature() — returns {valid | invalid_payload_hash | invalid_payload_envelope | invalid_signature_payload}; emits signature_failure on invalid
no_code_committed_to_repository: TRUE
no_signature_generated: TRUE
cryptographic_upgrade_FUTURE: PEF-04 via G-3 D4 capability intake
3. Mutations Performed in This Batch
files_or_code_changed: NONE
system_mutations:
pg_mutation: NONE
directus_mutation: NONE
qdrant_or_vector_mutation: NONE
business_data_writes: NONE
repository_code_changes: NONE
schema_changes: NONE
trigger_installation: NONE
flow_installation: NONE
signal_emission: NONE
signature_generation: NONE
artefacts_produced_in_this_batch: 4 markdown closure records under knowledge/dev/laws/dieu44-trien-khai/blocker-closure/
nothing_outside_the_4_markdown_files_was_touched: true
HB_07_dot_tools_rows_991_and_992_state: unchanged (no mutation by CTE-04)
4. Downstream Effects
hard_blockers_status_delta:
hb_05: still blocked (terminal)
waits_on_remaining: HB-08, HB-09
note: CTE-02 + CTE-03 + CTE-04 were three prerequisites; all now closed_with_notes; HB-05 still cannot close until HB-08 + HB-09 also close
hb_06_hb_07_hb_01_hb_02_hb_03_hb_04: unchanged (closed_with_notes from earlier sessions)
hb_08_hb_09: unchanged (operational; ready_to_close; separate sessions per user prompt)
cte_status_delta:
cte_01: planning_closed (unchanged from implementation planning phase)
cte_02: blocked → closed_with_notes (THIS BATCH)
cte_03: blocked → closed_with_notes (THIS BATCH)
cte_04: blocked → closed_with_notes (THIS BATCH)
post_batch_aggregate:
hard_blockers_closed: 6 of 9 (HB-01, HB-02, HB-03, HB-04, HB-06, HB-07)
hard_blockers_still_open: 3 (HB-05, HB-08, HB-09)
cte_completely_closed_with_notes: 3 (CTE-02, CTE-03, CTE-04)
cte_planning_closed: 1 (CTE-01)
cte_remaining_open: 0
pef_status: 9 deferred (do not block first DDL); unchanged
4.1 HB-05 Dependency Status (Post Batch)
HB_05_dependencies_per_workstream_C_§5:
HB_06_G_4_named: closed_with_notes (HB-06)
HB_06_G_2_named: closed_with_notes (HB-06)
HB_03_X_6_polish_signed: closed_with_notes (HB-03)
HB_07_DOT_pair_registered: closed_with_notes (HB-07)
HB_09_dry_run_environment: ready_to_close (operational; separate session)
HB_04_canonicalization_prose: closed_with_notes (HB-04)
CTE_02_signal_routing_wired: closed_with_notes (THIS BATCH; capability proof at dry-run)
CTE_03_canonicalization_library_scaffolded: closed_with_notes (THIS BATCH; spec ready for transcription to dry-run env)
CTE_04_signing_scheme_implementation: closed_with_notes (THIS BATCH; spec ready for transcription to dry-run env)
HB_05_remaining_blockers: HB-08 (backup + restore test) + HB-09 (snapshots + dry-run environment)
4.2 Critical Path Update
[1] HB-06 — closed_with_notes
[2] HB-07 — closed_with_notes
[3] HB-01 / HB-02 / HB-03 / HB-04 — closed_with_notes
[4] CTE-02 / CTE-03 / CTE-04 — closed_with_notes (THIS BATCH)
[5] HB-08 — ready_to_close (operational; separate session)
[6] HB-09 — ready_to_close (operational; separate session)
[7] HB-05 — still blocked (terminal); waits on HB-08 + HB-09
└▶ Re-run Final Readiness Review
└▶ Explicit user prompt
└▶ Execution phase (first DDL)
Critical sub-chain into HB-05 has narrowed to just HB-08 → HB-05 and HB-09 → HB-05. Both are operational sessions (backup + restore test; snapshots + dry-run environment). Once both close, HB-05 can execute the 26-scenario rollback test plan dry-run using the spec-prose artefacts from CTE-03 and CTE-04, observing signals via CTE-02's routing convention.
5. Execution Gate Status
execution_gate_status: closed (unchanged)
execution_authorized: false
p0_migration_allowed: false
ddl_allowed: false
code_written: false
ddl_written: false
sql_written: false
migration_executed: false
pg_mutation: false
qdrant_mutation: false
directus_mutation: false (HB-07's dot_tools rows 991/992 remain; CTE batch did NOT mutate them or anything else)
data_writes: false
backup_taken: false
snapshot_taken: false
dry_run_executed: false
signal_emitted: false
signature_generated: false
canonicalization_run: false
production_use_authorized: false
phase_prior_file_modified: false
self_advance_to_execution: prohibited
6. Recommended Next Steps (NOT executed by Agent)
- GPT review of this CTE batch (4 files including this report).
- If PASS → open the two remaining operational sessions:
- HB-08 (G-4 + operational DBA: Directus PG full backup + restore test). Separate explicit-prompt session.
- HB-09 (operational DBA + G-2: pg_dump --schema-only + per-table row-count snapshot + dry-run environment provisioning). Separate explicit-prompt session.
- After HB-08 + HB-09 close → engineering transcription session for CTE-03 + CTE-04 reference implementations into the dry-run environment (separate explicit prompt; G-4 oversight for CTE-04).
- HB-05 (Đ32 + G-4: 26-scenario rollback test plan dry-run + sign-off). The terminal closure; uses CTE-02 routing convention, CTE-03 scaffold, CTE-04 scheme.
- Re-run Final Readiness Review with all closure artefacts attached.
- If verdict transitions to
authorizeorauthorize_with_conditions→ explicit user prompt authorizing execution. - Only then: execution phase (FIRST DDL on cutter_governance schema).
Each numbered step above is a separate phase or session, not part of this CTE batch.
7. Hard Boundaries Confirmation
no_signal_emitted_in_this_batch: true (CTE-02)
no_pg_trigger_installed: true (CTE-02)
no_directus_flow_installed: true (CTE-02)
no_canonicalization_run_in_production: true (CTE-03)
no_canonicalization_library_deployed_to_repository: true (CTE-03)
no_signature_generated: true (CTE-04)
no_signing_scheme_deployed_to_repository: true (CTE-04)
no_dot_tools_row_mutated: true (HB-07 rows 991/992 remain unchanged)
no_other_directus_collection_mutated: true
no_cut_change_set_row_written: true (table doesn't exist)
no_verify_result_row_written: true (table doesn't exist)
no_dot_pair_signature_row_written: true (table doesn't exist)
no_decision_backlog_entry_row_written: true (table doesn't exist)
no_schema_created: true
no_ddl_written: true
no_sql_written: true
no_migration_script_written: true
no_migration_executed: true
no_pg_mutation: true
no_qdrant_mutation: true
no_directus_mutation: true
no_data_writes: true
no_rollback_dry_run_executed: true (HB-05 remains blocked)
no_backup_taken: true (HB-08 remains ready_to_close)
no_snapshot_taken: true (HB-09 remains ready_to_close)
no_deploy: true
no_p0_schema_created: true
no_tac_logical_unit_mutated: true
no_production_cut_executed: true
no_production_verify_executed: true
no_execution_gate_opened: true
no_phase_prior_file_modified: true
output_form: cte_batch_closure_report_in_markdown_only
8. Status
cte_batch_closure_status: COMPLETE (pending GPT review)
files_in_batch: 4 (3 CTE closures + this report)
cte_closed_in_this_batch: 3 (CTE-02, CTE-03, CTE-04)
hard_blockers_unlocked_to_ready_to_close: 0 (CTE batch contributes prerequisites to HB-05 but HB-05 still waits on HB-08 + HB-09)
execution_authorized: false
P0_migration_allowed: false
code_written: false
ddl_written: false
sql_written: false
migration_executed: false
pg_mutation: false
phase_prior_file_modified: false