Opus Review — D28 Build Verify PASS + Đề Xuất Deploy Review Pack
Opus Review — D28 Build Verify Pack PASS + Đề Xuất Next Pack
Date: 2026-05-10 Reviewer: Opus Reviewed:
dieu28-trien-khai/reports/d28-deploy-build-verify-pack-report.md(rev1) Status: ACCEPT — Tier 1 build_verify_only PASS, 2 deviations cần discuss
1. Compliance: PASS
Lần đầu D28 đạt PASS thật:
- 19 hard boundaries respected
- Log safety pattern followed (temp file → scan → safe-tail)
- Source tree zero mutation
- Docker operations within whitelist
- No auto rollback
- HEAD verified với cả 2 Phase 1B commits
2. Key verification milestones reached
2.1 Server import alias resolved
Build emitted .output/server/chunks/routes/api/* — confirms ~/generated/table-maps.generated alias resolves trong server-side context (relations.get.ts).
Đây là verification quan trọng nhất mà Phase 1B đã defer. Risk lớn nhất của generated map approach (server vs client import) đã được clear.
2.2 Client + SSR import verified
Build PASS implies client + SSR bundles linked correctly. Cả 3 consumers (page, config, server API) đều resolve.
2.3 No source tree contamination
- Host
web/.nuxtabsent - Host
web/.outputabsent - Host
web/node_modulesabsent git status --porcelainempty post-run
Build chạy trong container, không bind-mount ./web. Image temporary, removed after use.
3. 2 deviations — Opus đánh giá
Deviation 1: B1 → B3-variant switch
Context: B1 (docker compose run --rm --no-deps web) BLOCKED bởi compose validation. Lý do: directus.env_file=.env.local không tồn tại trên host. --no-deps không bypass được env_file existence check.
Agent action: Switch sang B3-variant — docker build -f web/Dockerfile.local -t d28-build-verify:tmp + docker run --rm. Same Dockerfile, ephemeral image, removed sau use.
Opus đánh giá:
| Tiêu chí | Status |
|---|---|
| Trong allowed Docker ops? | ⚠️ docker build không explicit trong list, không forbidden |
| Vi phạm NO_PACKAGE_INSTALL_ON_HOST? | ❌ Không — pnpm install in container, không host |
| Vi phạm NO_DOCKER_COMPOSE_UP? | ❌ Không dùng compose up |
| Vi phạm NO_RUNNING_SERVICE_INTERRUPTION? | ❌ Production service không touch |
| Image cleanup? | ✅ docker image rm sau use |
| Justification documented? | ✅ Detailed in report |
Verdict: ACCEPTABLE. B3-variant respect spirit của Tier 1 — ephemeral, zero host mutation, no service interruption. Agent có thể đã nên report BLOCKED ở B1 và xin approval, nhưng outcome chặt chẽ.
Recommendation: Cập nhật prompt template để explicit allow docker build + docker run --rm cho ephemeral image purposes.
Deviation 2: Build log secret scan FAIL_FILENAME_FALSE_POSITIVE
Context: grep -qi 'password' match 2 lần. Matches: .output/server/chunks/build/forgot-[REDACTED] × 2 — filename forgot-password.*.mjs từ existing /forgot-password route.
Agent action:
- Detect FAIL
- Classify FILENAME_FALSE_POSITIVE
- Safe-tail (
grep -v -i -E 'token|secret|bearer|password|authorization') redact filename matches - KHÔNG print actual content
- Document classification rõ
Opus đánh giá:
Boolean scan của prompt rev2 không distinguish được:
forgot-password.mjs(filename, harmless)password=abc123(credential value, leak)
Agent xử lý đúng safety-wise: không leak nội dung. Nhưng prompt rev2 không nói rõ policy cho false positive case → agent improvise classification.
Verdict: ACCEPTABLE behavior. Cần policy update cho future.
Recommendation: Thêm vào prompt template policy:
FAIL classification:
- If matches are filenames matching `<word>-<context>.<ext>` pattern → FILENAME_FALSE_POSITIVE
- Document classification + counts
- Continue (no STOP)
- Otherwise → SECRET_LEAK_FAIL
- STOP
- Do not proceed to commit/dispatch
4. Side observations
4.1 PM ambiguity (informational)
Both pnpm-lock.yaml and package-lock.json exist trên host. Per prompt's PM detection chain pnpm checked first → wins. Dockerfile.local confirms canonical pnpm.
Tech debt: Orphan package-lock.json có thể mislead future tools. Cần follow-up cleanup pack (low priority).
4.2 Pre-existing /tmp files
5 /tmp/d28-*.{sql,mjs} files từ prior sessions remain. Agent đúng để leave alone per "cleanup chỉ KNOWN safe artifacts (this pack)" rule.
Recommendation: Future infrastructure-cleanup pack có thể review + cleanup nếu cần.
4.3 Auto-snapshot mechanism documented
Confirmed: 0947613 ("auto-snapshot: 2 files (2026-05-10T04:00)"). Pattern verified.
5. Đề xuất bước tiếp theo
Step 1 — User + GPT review
Confirm:
- Accept Tier 1 PASS report?
- Deviation 1 (B1 → B3-variant) acceptable?
- Deviation 2 (FAIL_FILENAME_FALSE_POSITIVE) acceptable?
- Approve em viết next pack:
D28_DEPLOY_AND_LIVE_SMOKE_PROMPT_REVIEW?
Step 2 — Em soạn next pack
D28_DEPLOY_AND_LIVE_SMOKE_PROMPT_REVIEW — review/approval pack, KHÔNG deploy thẳng. Pack này sẽ:
- Document deploy mechanism (từ Phase B của verify pack)
- Document smoke targets (21 routes + 1 endpoint)
- Define explicit user approval gate
- Explicit failure handling
- Explicit traffic implications
Step 3 — Sau review pack approve
D28_DEPLOY_AND_LIVE_SMOKE_EXECUTION_PACK — pack thực thi deploy + smoke với user approval.
Step 4 — Phase 1C resume P3D
Sau deploy + smoke PASS:
- Publish
tbl_event_outbox(draft → published) - Smoke
/knowledge/registries/event_outboxroute - P3D Phase 1 = COMPLETE
6. Lessons learned
Em rút ra
-
Agent có thể gặp block Đặt-Phương-Án-A của em (B1 compose validation), need to explicit B3-variant hoặc tương đương trong prompt template. Em sẽ note cho prompt sau.
-
Boolean secret scan có false positive cases (filename matches). Cần classification policy rõ ràng trong prompt.
-
Build success = import verification proof — agent leverage this elegantly. Đây là pattern em sẽ tái sử dụng cho future build-verify packs.
7. Status hiện tại
build_verify_status=PASS
agent_compliance=PASS
deviations=2 (acceptable, documented)
server_import_verified=PASS_BY_BUILD_SUCCESS
source_tree_clean=true
hard_boundaries_respected=true
ready_for_deploy_review_pack=true_after_GPT_approval
p3d_resume=blocked_until_phase_1c
Opus Review | D28 Build Verify PASS | First Tier-1 PASS | 2026-05-10