RS-TKT-1-PATCH1C · 00 — Codex PATCH1B Blocker Closure Map

NON_EXECUTABLE_DESIGN_DOC
DOT_BOUND_DRYRUN_READINESS_PROOF_ONLY
NOT_IMPLEMENTED
NOT_AUTHORIZED_FOR_RUNTIME

Lane: RS-TKT-1 — Phase 1 TKT Base · PATCH1C (DOT-bound dry-run readiness finalization) Date: 2026-06-22 Gate: REGISTRATION_HOLD · REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO · 0 runtime mutations Authority: NON_AUTHORITY · may_gate=false · decision_effect=NONE Closes: Codex NEED_RS_TKT_1_PATCH1C_DRYRUN_READINESS_UNRESOLVED (knowledge/current-state/reports/codex-confirmation-rs-tkt-1-patch1b-dryrun-readiness-2026-06-22.md) + Owner/GPT hard requirement "100% DOT, even dry-run must run through DOT."

This map closes blockers by resolution and recount, not by re-narrowing a metric. Where Codex demanded "one coherent contract," this patch picks one and counts every classified-but-unresolved required input.

---

1. Blocker closure table

blocker_id	blocking source file(s)	root cause	PATCH1C closure file	proof method	actual closure status	residual risk
PATCH1B-DRYRUN-REQUIRED-INPUT-CONTRADICTION	patch1b-dryrun-readiness/05 §§8,9,12; 06 FIX-4; 07 count 18; corroborated by Phase-1 20 §1 and 21 §§1,4,5	§8/§12 claimed "only GATE-1/GATE-2 remain," yet §9 kept DR-12/DR-13/DR-14 as OWNER_DECISION and required_for=PHASE2. FIX-4 narrowed the count definition (to "unclassified") instead of resolving the prerequisites — a classified-but-unresolved prerequisite is still a prerequisite.	03 (DR-12/13/14 resolution ledger) + 02 (DOT-bound execution contract) + 07 (recount including classified-but-unresolved)	DR-12/13/14 each given an explicit resolved value with governed evidence; readiness recounted without excluding classified-but-unresolved required inputs; dryrun_phase2_required_inputs_unresolved = 0 proven by resolution, not definition	NONE for opening/running the read-report inspector. Live dot_tools registration of the bound DOT remains an Owner authority act folded into GATE-3 (05); this is an expected gate, not a design gap
PATCH1B-DRYRUN-ARTIFACT-CARDINALITY-AMBIGUOUS	patch1b-dryrun-readiness/05 §§3,6,9 (DR-5); Phase-1 13 §§1,2,5; Phase-1 21 §1	"write one KB report only" (05 §3) conflicted with result.json/result.md (13 §1/§2; 05 §2/§6; 21 §1). Artifact cardinality and representation non-deterministic.	04 (single artifact contract + schema supersession)	Exactly one artifact model fixed: SINGLE_KB_MARKDOWN_REPORT, artifact_count=1; the JSON/MD shapes from 13 are folded into the single report as a fenced JSON section + a human-readable section; separate result.json/result.md are superseded	NONE. Any future internal transient JSON must be embedded/transient, never a second persisted KB artifact (04 §5)
DOT_BOUND_DRYRUN_NOT_PROVEN (new — Owner/GPT requirement)	macro §0 (Owner): "All schema/collection/PG/Directus/operational surfaces must use DOT 100%. Even dry-run must run through DOT." Not addressed by PATCH1B (05 §1 named a dry-run with no DOT binding)	The dry-run was specified as a free-standing read/report inspector with no DOT binding; the Owner mandate requires every operational surface to be DOT-bound.	01 (inventory reuse-or-create), 02 (DOT-bound execution contract), 06 (handbook update proof)	Handbook read in full (via §5.3 309-row inventory); no reusable TKT-scoped DOT exists → CREATE_NEW_DOT; DOT_TKT_DRYRUN_READ_REPORT_INSPECTOR (+ _VERIFY) specified, collision-checked, and admitted to the handbook (doc-only); dry-run bound to it	NONE for binding/spec. Live registration deferred to Owner GATE-3 (expected authority gate). Inspector is read-only and KB-zone only — never touches the DOT-only Directus/Postgres/schema zone (handbook §3 vs §12)

2. Codex §8 semantic result — directly answered

Codex §8 independent result, BEFORE PATCH1C:
  dryrun_phase2_required_inputs_unresolved ≥ 3   (DR-12, DR-13, DR-14)
Codex §8 independent result, AFTER PATCH1C:
  dryrun_phase2_required_inputs_unresolved = 0    (DR-12/13/14 RESOLVED in 03, counted in 07)

The fix is resolution + recount, exactly as Codex §14 demanded ("resolve them with explicit safe defaults/decisions and count them in readiness"). PATCH1C does not repeat FIX-4's narrowing.

3. What PATCH1C does NOT touch

Phase-1 00–22, patch1/00–07, patch1b/00–09, patch2/00–04 : UNCHANGED (revision 1). Superseded only by additive clauses (08).
The fixture/oracle/coverage/traceability PASS judgments (Codex §§5–7,9 PASS) : NOT reopened.
REGISTRATION_HOLD / REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED=NO / authority_effect / registration_effect : UNCHANGED (NONE).
dot_tools (309 rows) : UNCHANGED. Only the handbook markdown gained an additive §19 KB-admission spec (06).