RS-TKT-1-PATCH1B · 00 — Codex Findings Full Closure Map

Lane: RS-TKT-1 — Phase 1 TKT Base Design Package · PATCH1B (dry-run readiness preflight / proof-doc-only) Date: 2026-06-22 Gate: REGISTRATION_HOLD · REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO · 0 runtime mutations Authority: NON_AUTHORITY · may_gate=false · decision_effect=NONE Closes / confirms: Codex NEED_RS_TKT_1_PATCH1_NEGATIVE_FIXTURE_MATRIX_INCOMPLETE (knowledge/current-state/reports/codex-review-rs-tkt-1-phase1-tkt-base-design-package-2026-06-22.md, rev 1, read in full).

PATCH1B is additive under phase1-design/patch1b-dryrun-readiness/. It edits no prior file. It reuses and strengthens RS-TKT-1-PATCH1 (phase1-design/patch1/00–07, validated in 08) and raises it to the new standard:

Claude must self-check, self-count, self-break, self-fix, and self-prove.
Codex should only confirm the proof, not discover basic defects.

This file is the audit spine: it maps every finding in the Codex review — the closure findings, the PASS/preserve judgments, and the carry-forward caveats — to the exact PATCH1B file that closes or carries it, with a required count and an actual count.

---

1. Closure findings (the blocker) — F1…F9

Codex §8 (blocker table) + §5/§7/§9/§15 enumerate nine closure obligations. Each is closed by a PATCH1B file with a numeric proof. (PATCH1 already closed these; PATCH1B re-closes them mechanically and self-proves them so review is confirmation, not discovery.)

#	Codex finding (§)	Codex quote / paraphrase	root cause	PATCH1B file that closes it	proof mechanism	required count	actual count (07)	closed
F1	§1.3, §8 row 1, §15.1	"17 §1 uses SAFE_REJECT as expected status; 06 defines status only as PASS|FAIL|HOLD|N/A"	status column conflated with probe outcome	01 §1/§2, 02 (every row)	separate expected_check_status (enum) from expected_probe_outcome + canonical_outcome_code; enum-validate every row	invalid_status_values = 0	0	YES
F2	§8 row 2, §15.2	"BAD-L3-001: FAIL / design REJECT; one fixture, two layers, two codes"	design-static and runtime cases fused in one fixture	01 §3.5, 02 §4.5	split into BAD-L3-001 (design-static → REJECT_MEGA_SYSTEM_DRIFT) and BAD-L3-002 (runtime → FAIL_L3_CROSS_BRICK_INTERNAL_READ)	dual_outcome_codes = 0	0	YES
F3	§8 row 3, §15.2	"BAD-NVSZ-002: ESCROW_E9 / ROOT_E4 — two validator namespaces in one cell"	escrow validator vs root-provisioning validator fused	01 §3.4, 02 §4.4/§4.7	Phase-1 fixture expects only ESCROW_E9; root case split to BAD-NVSZ-003 (ROOT_E4, Phase 3, deferred)	dual_outcome_codes = 0	0	YES
F4	§8 row 4, §15.2	"BAD-RS-001, BAD-PROP-001/002 carry prose/config-error, not one exact code"	RS-group and propagation lints had no canonical code namespace	01 §3 (DESIGN_LINT + RS_PROFILE registries), 02 §4.6/§4.7	define one stable code per fixture; RS_* and FAIL_*/REJECT_* lint codes; no blank, no prose	prose_only_outcome_codes = 0 · missing_outcome_codes = 0	0 · 0	YES
F5	§1.1, §8 row 5, §15.3	"12 §3 requires ≥1 positive + ≥1 negative per brick; 17 omits a total brick→pos→neg→code ledger"	no enumerated coverage ledger	03 §1 (14-brick ledger)	enumerate all 14 bricks (03 §6 ∪ 08 §6), each with positive control + negative fixture + canonical code	uncovered_bricks = 0 · missing_positive_controls = 0 · missing_negative_fixtures = 0	0 · 0 · 0	YES
F6	§5, §15.4	"03 §1 requires 20 mandatory fields per brick; no single auditable per-brick completeness ledger exists"	contract completeness was inferential	03 §2/§3 (280 field checks + 5 boundary checks)	14×20 = 280 (brick,field) checks + birth/test/change/rollback/composition boundary present-checks per brick	missing_mandatory_contract_fields = 0	0	YES
F7	§7, §15.5	"16 claims deterministic traceability contradicted by 17; effects are global headers not per-row"	matrix not derived from canonical oracle; effects not per-row	04 §1 (regenerated map)	derive each row from a canonical fixture id; show authority_effect/registration_effect per row; add dryrun_relevance per row	traceability_missing_rows = 0 · compatibility_hold_rows = 0 · compatibility_no_rows = 0	0 · 0 · 0	YES
F8	§9, §15.6	"18/19/22 assert completeness without counting; do not detect conflation/dual/missing codes"	self-validation was prose, not count-based	06 (adversarial probes) + 07 (machine counts)	actively attack the design with 15 mandatory probes; paste all 23 zero-defect counts with definition + method	all 23 counts = 0	all 0	YES
F9	§16, macro §2.1	dry-run readiness not previously made unambiguous/launchable	launch scope, paths, permissions, stop states not consolidated into one packet	05 (dry-run launch readiness packet) + 07 (dry-run counts)	name the future dry-run, fix safe-default source/output prefixes, permission model, stop states, launch gates; classify DR-1..DR-17	dryrun_*_unresolved = 0 · dryrun_owner_decision_gaps = 0	0	YES

If any closed cell were NO, or any actual count nonzero, the final verdict could not be READY (see 09).

2. PASS / preserve judgments (Codex §10–§13) — confirmed, NOT reopened

These Codex judgments are already PASS. PATCH1B preserves them unchanged and proves it did not weaken them (08 non-regression map; 07 drift counts).

Codex §	judgment	PATCH1B stance	proof
§10	Owner decision register PASS; the fixture defect must not be moved into the Owner register as a caveat	the fixture/oracle defect is closed as an internal patch (F1–F9), never reclassified as an Owner input	05 §4 keeps the only remaining items = Owner Phase-2 open + Codex confirmation
§11	P1 fail-closed PASS (six conjuncts preserved)	preserved verbatim from PATCH2 01; re-proven by adversarial probes	06 probes (bare PASS / SEMANTIC token / CAN_PROCEED=YES / artifact / exit-0 / missing-surface); fail_closed_unresolved_findings = 0
§12	LEGO boundary PASS (four-way L3 split; thin combiner; no mega-*)	preserved; the four L3 bricks stay independent; aggregate is a thin combiner	03 (4 L3 bricks each covered); mega_system_drift_findings = 0 (07)
§13	Authority/registration boundary PASS (NONE/NONE, may_gate=false)	preserved on every fixture/row; constant NONE/NONE	07: authority_overclaim_findings = 0 · registration_drift_findings = 0

3. Carry-forward caveats (Codex §14) — unchanged, non-blocking for Phase 1/Phase-2-readiness

caveat	meaning	PATCH1B treatment
MCB-1	RS5B has no external Codex review → SELF_REPORTED_RS5B_DRAFT	unchanged; BAD-RS-001 (FAIL_RS5B_DRAFT_PROMOTED) keeps it draft; non-blocking
MCB-5	NON_VECTOR_ROOT undesignated → blocks Phase 3, not Phase 2	unchanged; BAD-NVSZ-003 (ROOT_E4) deferred to Phase 3; never invent a root
MCB-6	no enacted laws-new architecture baseline	unchanged; Tier-1 > Tier-2 > Tier-3 hierarchy remains mandatory meanwhile
§14	"0 runtime mutations" is a package attestation, not a live PG/Directus inspection	unchanged; PATCH1B writes KB design-doc markdown only; no live runtime read/write claimed

4. Additive supersession (no prior file edited)

PATCH1B supersedes-by-addition only PROOF/READINESS defects. It does NOT edit Phase-1 00–22, patch1/00–07, or patch2/00–04.
The premature completeness claims already retracted-by-supersession in patch1/00 §3 (17 §5, 16 §3, 18 §4, 19 §5, 22 §7/§8/§9/§14)
remain retracted; PATCH1B 08 re-states the full supersession + non-regression map. All prior files stay at revision 1.
Authoritative dry-run-readiness proof after PATCH1B = patch1b-dryrun-readiness/01–09 (which themselves inherit patch1/01–07).

5. Result

All nine closure findings F1–F9 CLOSED with a numeric proof (actual counts all 0 — see 07).
All four PASS/preserve judgments (§10–§13) confirmed and not reopened.
All four caveats (§14) carried unchanged and non-blocking for Phase-1 / Phase-2-readiness.
Verdict carried in 09: RS_TKT_1_PATCH1B_READY_FOR_GPT_CODEX_CONFIRMATION.
This closes the blocker for confirmation; it does NOT authorize Phase 2, dry-run execution, or any runtime/registration movement.