RS-TKT-1-PATCH1 · 00 — Codex Blocker Closure Map

Lane: RS-TKT-1 — Phase 1 TKT Base Design Package · PATCH1 (design-only / proof-doc-only) Date: 2026-06-22 Gate: REGISTRATION_HOLD · REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO · 0 runtime mutations Authority: NON_AUTHORITY · may_gate=false · decision_effect=NONE Closes: Codex NEED_RS_TKT_1_PATCH1_NEGATIVE_FIXTURE_MATRIX_INCOMPLETE (knowledge/current-state/reports/codex-review-rs-tkt-1-phase1-tkt-base-design-package-2026-06-22.md).

PATCH1 is additive under phase1-design/patch1/. It edits no Phase-1 base file. Where a base file carried a premature completeness claim (16/17/18/19/22), PATCH1 additively supersedes the outcome/claim (those files stay revision 1) — see §3.

---

1. Blocker closure map

#	Codex finding (§8/§9)	why Phase 1 failed	patch file that closes it	proof method	zero-defect count required	status
F1	Status/outcome conflation (SAFE_REJECT in status column, 17 §1)	06 limits status to PASS/FAIL/HOLD/N/A; 04 §7 defines SAFE_REJECT as an outcome	01 §1.1 R1, 01 §2, 01 §4.1	separate expected_check_status from expected_probe_outcome/canonical_outcome_code; enum-validate	invalid_status_values = 0	CLOSED
F2	Dual L3 outcome/code (BAD-L3-001: FAIL / design REJECT)	one fixture mixed two layers + two codes	01 §1.1 R2/R4, 01 §4.5	split into BAD-L3-001 (design-static, REJECT_MEGA_SYSTEM_DRIFT) + BAD-L3-002 (runtime, FAIL_L3_CROSS_BRICK_INTERNAL_READ)	dual_outcome_codes = 0	CLOSED
F3	Two validator namespaces in one fixture (BAD-NVSZ-002: ESCROW_E9 / ROOT_E4)	escrow + root-provisioning namespaces conflated	01 §1.1 R3, 01 §4.4, 01 §4.7	Phase-1 fixture expects only ESCROW_E9; root case split to BAD-NVSZ-003 (ROOT_E4, Phase 3)	dual_outcome_codes = 0	CLOSED
F4	Missing/prose-only canonical codes (BAD-RS-001, BAD-PROP-001/002)	prose/config-error instead of one exact code	01 §3 (DESIGN_LINT namespace), 01 §4.7	define FAIL_RS5B_DRAFT_PROMOTED/FAIL_HOLD_TREATED_AS_PASS/FAIL_NA_UPGRADES_AGGREGATE and apply	prose_only_outcome_codes = 0 · missing_outcome_codes = 0	CLOSED
F5	Coverage assertion not proven (no brick→pos→neg→code ledger)	12 §3 requires ≥1 pos + ≥1 neg per brick; 17 omitted it	02 (total brick coverage ledger)	enumerate 14 bricks (03 §6 ∪ 08 §6) each with pos+neg+code	uncovered_bricks = 0 · missing_positive_controls = 0 · missing_negative_fixtures = 0	CLOSED
F6	Per-brick contract completeness not mechanical (§5)	03 §1 20 fields not proven for every brick	03 (contract completeness ledger)	14×20 = 280 field checks, matrix + source per field	missing_mandatory_contract_fields = 0	CLOSED
F7	Traceability overclaim / no per-row effects (§7)	16 claimed determinism contradicted by 17; effects only in headers	04 (regenerated traceability matrix)	derive each row from canonical fixture; show effects per row	traceability_missing_rows = 0 · compatibility_hold_rows = 0	CLOSED
F8	Self-validation prose not count-based (§9)	18/19/22 asserted completeness without counting	06 (count-based self-validation)	paste all zero-defect counts + adversarial probes mapped to fixtures	all counts = 0	CLOSED
F9	Dry-run readiness not proven by classified inputs/permissions/decisions	not previously enumerated	05 (dry-run readiness register)	classify every input/permission/decision; rollup unclassified = 0	dry_run_*_unclassified = 0	CLOSED

2. Scope discipline (what PATCH1 does NOT touch)

Not reopened (Codex PASS): P1 fail-closed (§11), LEGO split (§12), authority/registration boundary (§13), construction-blueprint paper-only (§6).
Not created: implementation, .py/.sh, CLI, runner, validator, registrar, DOT runtime, Owner/scope/APR/register_dot, PG/Directus/registry mutation, NVSZ root, raw logs.
Not claimed: Phase 2 opened, dry-run executed, implementation/runtime/production PASS, semantic Text-as-Code PASS, IU traceability PASS, release bundle PASS, registration can proceed.

3. Additive supersession (the premature completeness claims — Codex §9/§15.7)

PATCH1 retracts-by-supersession (does NOT edit) the premature "complete / deterministic / single result" phrasing in:
  17 §5 "negative-fixture matrix COMPLETE"     → superseded by patch1/02 (coverage proven by count).
  16 §3 "compatibility matrix COMPLETE"        → superseded by patch1/04 (per-row canonical fixture + effects).
  18 §4 / 19 §5 design/blueprint "PASS"        → superseded by patch1/06 (count-based, not prose).
  22 §7/§8/§9/§14 "complete / single result"   → superseded by patch1/06 + patch1/07; the canonical proof is patch1/01–06.
All of 16/17/18/19/22 remain revision 1. The authoritative fixture/oracle proof is now patch1/01–06.
Phase 2 remains unauthorized; REGISTRATION_HOLD remains active; CAN_PROCEED = NO.

4. Result

All nine findings CLOSED with a numeric proof. The required zero-defect counts are all 0 (patch1/06 §2).
Verdict carried in patch1/07: RS_TKT_1_PATCH1_READY_FOR_GPT_CODEX_REVIEW.
This closes the blocker for review; it does NOT authorize Phase 2 or any runtime/dry-run/registration movement.