KB-79D1
RS-TKT-1 (Phase 1) · 09 Future Construction Blueprint — Package Layout
4 min read Revision 1
tool-kiem-thulegolaws-newrs-tkt-1phase1-designfuture-construction-blueprintpackage-layoutnon-executable2026-06-22
RS-TKT-1 (Phase 1) · 09 — Future Construction Blueprint: Package Layout
NON_EXECUTABLE_DESIGN_EXAMPLE
FUTURE_CONSTRUCTION_BLUEPRINT_ONLY
NOT_IMPLEMENTED
NOT_AUTHORIZED_FOR_RUNTIME
Lane: RS-TKT-1 — Phase 1 TKT Base Design Package (design-only)
Date: 2026-06-22
Gate: REGISTRATION_HOLD · REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO · 0 runtime mutations
Authority: NON_AUTHORITY · may_gate=false · decision_effect=NONE
This document describes how a future implementation could be laid out. It is a paper blueprint. It does not create any folder, file, or artifact outside this design document. Construction blueprint is not construction.
1. Hard reading rule
The tree below is a DRAWING of a future layout. It is NOT created by Phase 1.
No folder named tkt_base/ exists or is created. No file below is written.
If any reader treats this tree as "created folders," that is a misreading; see 19 for the guard.
2. Proposed future layout (drawing only)
tkt_base/ # future root of a would-be implementation (NOT created)
contracts/ # the design contracts from 01–08, frozen as data (schemas, not code)
output_schema.contract # the shared output record shape (03 §3)
level_policy.contract # L0–L3 dependency + pass/fail/hold (02)
failclosed.contract # 6-conjunct predicate + token floor (04)
l3_split.contract # four sub-brick contracts (05)
status_truth_table.contract # propagation + 10-row table (06)
nvsz.contract # escrow schema + ESCROW_E*/ROOT_E* (07)
rs_profile.contract # profile_id/scope_class + groups A–G (08)
checkers/ # one would-be module per brick (10) — NO logic in Phase 1
file_checker/
packet_reconstructor/
fail_closed_detector/
authority_firewall/
claim_auditor/
identity_checker/
nvsz_checker/
rs_profile_checker/
aggregator/
report_writer/
fixtures/ # would-be positive controls + negative fixtures (12/17)
positive/
negative/
reports/ # would-be JSON/MD report outputs (13) — written only in Phase 2+ under an authorized output folder
schemas/ # JSON schema files validating contracts/ and reports/
nvsz/ # would-be NVSZ run-packet staging (14) — raw logs NEVER here in vector KB
3. What each top-level folder is for (paper)
contracts/ : the accepted design, expressed as inert data; the single source the checkers read.
checkers/ : LEGO modules (10); each born/tested/changed/rolled-back separately; compose via output_schema only.
fixtures/ : inputs for tests; positive controls prove not-trivially-always-fail; negatives prove fail-closed.
reports/ : machine + human verdict records (13); advisory; authority_effect/registration_effect = NONE.
schemas/ : validators for contracts/ and reports/; structural only.
nvsz/ : staging pointer into the designated no-vector root (14); summary+hash+pointer+regen only in KB.
4. LEGO discipline encoded in the layout
- contracts/ is data, not authority: a contract file grants nothing; it only states a rule.
- checkers/ are siblings: no module imports another module's internals; all I/O is the output schema.
- reports/ is advisory output, never a gate; nothing in this tree clears REGISTRATION_HOLD or sets CAN_PROCEED=YES.
- nvsz/ never stores raw logs in the vector KB; the real artifact lives under the owner/operator-designated root.
5. Forbidden in Phase 1 (restated for this file)
Phase 1 creates NONE of these folders as implementation artifacts.
No .py / .sh / runnable module is written. No CLI. No runner. No validator binary.
This file is a layout drawing only. NOT_IMPLEMENTED · NOT_AUTHORIZED_FOR_RUNTIME.