Incomex AI Portal
KB-296F

RS5B-CLOSEOUT-PATCH2 10 — Decision Packet — 2026-06-21

11 min read Revision 1
rs5b-closeout-patch2decision-packetverdictlego-readiness-sealregistration-hold2026-06-21

RS5B-CLOSEOUT-PATCH2 10 — Decision Packet — 2026-06-21

VERDICT: RS5B_CLOSEOUT_PATCH2_LEGO1_READY_FOR_GPT_REVIEW (not forced) Stop state: complete RBP oracle PASS condition + explicit I6 predicate + RBP-2/3/4 disjointness + single-input/single-code XBI (incl. XBI-26/27) + C2-I5 forward coverage + sealed Gate B wording + LEGO #1 Assembly Readiness seal recorded; awaiting independent review. Closes Codex HOLD RS5B_CLOSEOUT_PATCH1_HOLD_ORACLE_PRECEDENCE_I6_AND_GATE_WORDING_REQUIRED. Gate: REGISTRATION_HOLD · REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO Mutations: 0 (KB-only, design-only; no live runtime read) PASS level: narrow Job-B oracle/predicate/XBI/C2-I5/gate-wording correction + LEGO #1 readiness seal, design-review-ready only — not authority / runtime / implementation / registration / activation PASS; not P2 authorization; not rollback-execution authorization. Readiness-for-plan ≠ readiness-to-write. Evidence tier: AgentData KB direct read; controlling Codex HOLD (14085) + all PATCH1 files read full; no chat summary/memory/local prose used as proof; NO_RUNTIME_VERIFICATION.

1. What was decided

PATCH2 is a narrow correction closing the nine Codex blockers B1–B9 (file 01 §2) plus the LEGO #1 Assembly Readiness seal (instruction §1):

  1. Complete PASS formula (file 02): ROLLBACK_CONTRACT_VALID_FOR_REVIEW ⇔ ¬RBP0 ∧ ¬RBP1 ∧ … ∧ ¬RBP10 = "no reject predicate matches" (B1).
  2. Explicit I6 predicate (file 02): RBP-8 ROLLBACK_FORWARD_FAIL_CLOSED_VIOLATED, disjoint from RBP-7 by predicate Q (B2).
  3. Predicate disjointness + precedence alignment (file 03): RBP-2/3/4/5/6/8 mutually precise by "what survives"; fixtures obey precedence (B3).
  4. Single-input/single-code XBI (file 04): XBI-13→13A/13B, XBI-14→14A/14B, XBI-19→19A/19B; XBI-26 (B6), XBI-27 (B7) added (B4/B5).
  5. C2-I5 forward coverage (file 05): I5 covers C2 schema evolution; forward authority weakening ⇒ RBP-6 (B8).
  6. Sealed Gate B wording (file 06): satisfied Gate B opens the named lane only; "Neither gate opens P2" forbidden (B9).
  7. LEGO #1 Assembly Readiness (file 07): definition + L1–L7 checklist, each with proof source/attack/expected rejection/status.
  8. Adversarial self-review (file 09): A1–A20 all rejected before any PASS.

2. Explicit closeout assertions

  • Job A remains accepted and is not reopened (Codex §2 carried; file 08 §6).
  • All nine blockers B1–B9 closed (files 02–06; map in file 01 §2 / macro rollup §2).
  • Oracle is complete: PASS is the full conjunction; every invalid input matches a reject predicate before PASS (file 02 §2.1; file 09).
  • I6 has a dedicated reject predicate RBP-8 (file 02 §3).
  • Every XBI is single-input/single-code (file 04 §6).
  • C2 schema evolution cannot weaken forward authority (file 05).
  • Gate B wording is non-contradictory and scoped to the named lane (file 06).
  • LEGO #1 Assembly Readiness is defined with attack-tested L1–L7 (file 07).
  • No P2 opened. P2 remains NOT_OPENED · NOT_AUTHORIZED.
  • No runtime. 0 mutations; RBP-0 short-circuits any observed write.
  • REGISTRATION_HOLD retained; REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO.

3. NOT accepted / NOT authorized

No runtime proof; no live runtime verification; no implementation; no Owner / scope / APR / register_dot / approval / handler created; no canonical-operation runtime vocabulary; no registrar/validator patch; no RS-VALIDATOR; no registration; no activation; no rollback execution (contract-validity ≠ execution authorization, I10); no P2-open; no named lane opened; no Chairman authorization asserted to exist; no REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED. The oracle PASS code is not runtime permission.

4. Why this verdict (not another)

  • Not …_HOLD_CODEX_MODE_RECONSTRUCTION_MISSING: Codex-mode reconstruction recorded (file 01 §0) and B1–B9 reconstructed from governed sections (file 01 §2).
  • Not …_HOLD_SOURCE_READ_FAILED: Codex HOLD (14085) and all PATCH1 files read full, truncated=false (file 01 §1/§3).
  • Not …_HOLD_PASS_FORMULA_INCOMPLETE: PASS includes ¬RBP1 and all eleven negations (file 02 §2).
  • Not …_HOLD_I6_PREDICATE_INCOMPLETE: RBP-8 is explicit and disjoint from RBP-7 (file 02 §3).
  • Not …_HOLD_PRECEDENCE_CONFLICT: RBP-2/3/4/5/6/8 are mutually precise; the hash-deletion fixture obeys precedence (file 03 §2/§4).
  • Not …_HOLD_XBI_NOT_SINGLE_CODE: every fixture is single-input/single-code (file 04 §6).
  • Not …_HOLD_C2_I5_COVERAGE_INCOMPLETE: I5 covers C2; XBI-27 present (file 05; file 04 §5).
  • Not …_HOLD_GATE_B_WORDING_AMBIGUOUS: the sealed wording is internally consistent; "Neither gate opens P2" forbidden (file 06 §2).
  • Not …_HOLD_LEGO1_READINESS_UNDEFINED: L1–L7 defined with proof source + attack + rejection + status (file 07).
  • Not …_HOLD_ADVERSARIAL_SELF_REVIEW_FAILED: A1–A20 all rejected before PASS (file 09).
  • Not …_REJECT_SCOPE_DRIFT: only Job-B oracle/predicate/XBI/C2-I5/gate-wording touched; Job A untouched; I1–I10 not weakened.
  • Not …_REJECT_RUNTIME_MUTATION: 0 mutations.
  • Not …_REJECT_AUTHORITY_OVERCLAIM: no authority/P2/runtime/rollback-execution claimed; oracle PASS necessary-not-sufficient.
  • Not …_REJECT_P2_OPENED_EARLY: P2 not opened; no named lane opened; Gate B requires a separate scoped Chairman token not asserted to exist.

The verdict is not forced: had the PASS formula stayed incomplete, I6 lacked a predicate, any XBI stayed multi-coded, C2 weakening been admissible, the gate wording stayed contradictory, the readiness been undefinable, or any attack reached PASS, the corresponding HOLD/REJECT above would have been emitted.

5. Must-not-do compliance (all held)

No P2 opened; no named lane opened; no Job A reopened; I1–I10 not weakened; no carriers merged; no mega-registry/mega-graph/mega-birth pipeline; Gate B not executed; no Chairman authorization asserted; no rollback executed; no Owner/scope/APR/register_dot/approval/handler created; no runtime rows; no registrar/validator patch; no RS-VALIDATOR opened; no DDL/DML; no runtime mutation; no implementation; no registration; no activation; REGISTRATION_HOLD not cleared; REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED not asserted; oracle PASS not treated as runtime permission; readiness-for-plan distinguished from readiness-to-write; accepted dependency-safe carrier patterns reopened only for predicate-consistency clarification (C2-I5, hash identity-vs-payload).

6. Carried blockers (UNCHANGED)

G2–G7 + STATUS_DOMAIN_NOT_DB_ENFORCED + U3_PARTIAL_UNIQUE_SURFACE_ABSENT + OWNER_MINT_PATH_FAIL_CLOSED + QUORUM_EFFECT_BINDING_INSUFFICIENT + QUORUM_APPROVER_IDENTITY_UNVERIFIED + BOOTSTRAP_AUTHORITY_UNRESOLVED + CANONICAL_PRINCIPAL_SURFACE_REQUIRED_NOT_PRESENT. No new blocker. No new runtime reject code — ROLLBACK_FORWARD_FAIL_CLOSED_VIOLATED is a new classifier label (oracle code), not a runtime blocker, and resolves nothing.

7. Self-check (instruction §7 — 26 questions, answered explicitly)

  1. Read official Codex HOLD directly? Yes (14085, truncated=false; file 01 §1).
  2. Reconstructed B1–B9? Yes (file 01 §2).
  3. PASS formula includes ¬RBP1? Yes (file 02 §2).
  4. PASS is exactly "no reject predicate matches"? Yes (file 02 §2).
  5. I6 has explicit reject predicate? Yes — RBP-8 (file 02 §3).
  6. Can a successor exist while the retired value remains active and still PASS? No — RBP-8 ⇒ ¬RBP8 false (file 02 P-B2; XBI-26).
  7. Are RBP-2/RBP-3/RBP-4 disjoint enough? Yes — by "what survives" (file 03 §2).
  8. Is XBI-13 split or corrected? Yes — 13A→RBP-2, 13B→RBP-4 (file 04 §1).
  9. Is XBI-14 split? Yes — 14A→RBP-3, 14B→RBP-5 (file 04 §2).
  10. Is XBI-19 split? Yes — 19A→RBP-10, 19B→RBP-5 (file 04 §3).
  11. Is every XBI one input / one code? Yes (file 04 §6).
  12. Is C2 schema evolution covered by I5? Yes (file 05 §2/§3).
  13. Is XBI-27 present? Yes (file 04 §5).
  14. Is Gate B wording sealed? Yes (file 06 §2).
  15. Is LEGO #1 readiness defined? Yes (file 07 §1).
  16. Does every readiness item have proof source + attack + rejection? Yes — L1–L7 (file 07 §3/§4).
  17. Did self-review run A1–A20? Yes (file 09).
  18. Did any invalid input produce PASS? No (file 09 §5).
  19. Did I avoid opening P2? Yes — NOT_OPENED · NOT_AUTHORIZED.
  20. Did I avoid runtime mutation? Yes — 0 mutations.
  21. Did I avoid rollback execution? Yes — I10; RBP-0.
  22. Did I retain REGISTRATION_HOLD? Yes.
  23. Did I retain REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO? Yes.
  24. Did I avoid asserting Chairman authorization exists? Yes (file 06 §5; file 07 L6).
  25. Did I distinguish readiness-for-plan from readiness-to-write? Yes (file 07 §1).
  26. Did I report files created and readback metadata? Yes (§8; macro rollup §10; final response).

8. Files created (12 in package + 1 rollup)

index, 01-source-register-and-codex-hold-reconstruction, 02-complete-rbp-oracle-pass-condition-and-i6-predicate, 03-rbp-predicate-disjointness-and-precedence-alignment, 04-single-input-single-code-xbi-corrections-and-new-fixtures, 05-c2-schema-evolution-authority-non-weakening, 06-gate-b-wording-clarification-and-non-overclaim, 07-lego-1-assembly-readiness-definition-and-checklist, 08-impact-map-and-superseded-patch1-wording, 09-codex-style-adversarial-self-review, 10-decision-packet, codex-review-packet-rs5b-closeout-patch2-lego-readiness-seal (all under reports/rs5b-closeout-patch2/) + reports/macro-rs5b-closeout-patch2-lego-readiness-seal-2026-06-21.md.

9. Single next step

GPT/independent review of this PATCH2 only (complete oracle + I6 predicate + disjointness + single-coded XBI + C2-I5 + sealed gate wording + LEGO #1 readiness seal). On accept → Codex review. The corrected Job-B wording then carries into the closeout; the accepted closeout becomes the Gate A baseline, and the L1–L7 seal certifies it is ready to prepare a carrier-specific Gate B plan for the first named LEGO carrier. Only after a later independent acceptance of that carrier-specific build plan at Gate B, plus an exact-scoped Chairman authorization, may a named P2 design/build lane open. A still-later separate gate decides P3 registration. No P2 / runtime / registration / rollback-execution is authorized here. Residual ⇒ a future RS5B-CLOSEOUT-PATCH3.

Default HOLD. Deletion ≠ rollback. Validity ≠ presence. Successor-present ≠ forward-fail-closed. Contract-validity ≠ execution authorization. Baseline ≠ P2-open. Satisfied Gate B ≠ registration. Review ≠ Chairman authorization. Readiness-for-plan ≠ readiness-to-write. One input → one code. Engineering/contract PASS ≠ authority/runtime PASS.