KB-384F

RS5A-05 — Candidate Owner-of-record Decision Matrix — 2026-06-21

5 min read Revision 1
rs5ag2candidate-ownerdecision-matrixgovernance-registry2026-06-21

RS5A-05 — Candidate Owner-of-record Decision Matrix — 2026-06-21

Macro: RS5A · Mục tiêu D · Deliverable: 05 of 15 · design-only (designates no owner). Candidate source rule: candidates are drawn only from live governed surfaces. No person, no email, no caller text may be invented as a candidate. Surface result: an Owner-head surface is provengovernance_registry (9 codes, [[rs5a-02]] §3). Therefore the result is not NO_CANDIDATE_SURFACE_PROVEN. But no candidate is a bound accountable head (governance_object_ownership = 0), so every candidate is at best acceptable to bring to the Owner decision, never already the Owner.

1. Matrix — governed candidates (from governance_registry)

candidate_ref source surface scope fit authority fit conflict risk least-privilege rollback path auditability can sign register_dot now? caveat verdict
GOV-DOT (Quản trị DOT, system, active) governance_registry high — domain monitoring.dot matches DOT registration candidate accountable head for DOT_REGISTRATION_AUTHORITY / DOT_ARTIFACT_ADMISSION medium — same body monitors DOT health (separate audit head advised) fits if scoped to registration only, not activation per-row rollback_ref; supersede via lifecycle approval_ref/audit_ref columns exist No — no ownership row + no register_dot action not yet bound; needs scope + action authored OWNER_CANDIDATE_ACCEPTABLE_FOR_DECISION
GOV-SIV (Toàn vẹn Hệ thống, system, active) governance_registry high — monitoring.integrity matches DOT_HEAD_UNIQUENESS / DOT_AUDIT_SINK candidate head for integrity/audit scopes low good separation from GOV-DOT as above as above No best as audit/integrity head in a split (Option B) OWNER_CANDIDATE_ACCEPTABLE_FOR_DECISION
GOV-COUNCIL (Hội đồng Kiến trúc, council, active) governance_registry medium — governance council; maps to quorum ai_council body candidate approval/quorum authority, not day-to-day head low over-broad if made sole head as above as above No suited to high-risk approval, not registrar ownership OWNER_CANDIDATE_ACCEPTABLE_FOR_DECISION (approval role)
GOV-NRM-SYS (normative, active) governance_registry medium — policy/DOT_STATUS_DOMAIN candidate policy head low scope to status/policy only as above as above No narrow fit OWNER_CANDIDATE_UNPROVEN (until scope authored)
GOV-KG-SYS (kg, active) governance_registry low — knowledge graph, not registrar No wrong domain OWNER_CANDIDATE_UNPROVEN
GOV-MOIT/MOT/MOUT/MOW (factory, draft) governance_registry low No draft status; assembly domain OWNER_CANDIDATE_REJECTED_NO_ACCOUNTABLE_HEAD

2. Matrix — non-governed pseudo-candidates (must be rejected)

pseudo-candidate source why rejected verdict
caller asserting "I am owner" request payload self-assertion ≠ authority OWNER_CANDIDATE_REJECTED_CALLER_TEXT
dot_tools.owner = system / claude_ai / null dot_tools varchar uncontrolled free text; 212 null / 93 system / 4 claude_ai OWNER_CANDIDATE_REJECTED_FREE_TEXT
Directus Administrator / tac-admin / any of 13 users directus_roles/users RBAC ≠ governance ownership; not bound to governance_object_ownership OWNER_CANDIDATE_REJECTED_OPERATOR_ONLY
registrar runtime / operator job registrar artifact executes, never authorises OWNER_CANDIDATE_REJECTED_OPERATOR_ONLY
APR proposer / reviewed_by text approval_requests proposer self-excluded from quorum OWNER_CANDIDATE_REJECTED_CALLER_TEXT

3. Result

  • Surface: OWNER_CANDIDATE_SURFACE_PROVEN (governance_registry).
  • Strongest acceptable-for-decision candidate(s): GOV-DOT (registration/admission), with GOV-SIV (integrity/audit) and GOV-COUNCIL (high-risk approval) as the natural split partners — feeding Option B in [[rs5a-10]].
  • Bound accountable head today: none (governance_object_ownership = 0) ⇒ NO_ACCOUNTABLE_HEAD_BOUND.
  • Can any candidate sign register_dot today: No — both the binding row and the register_dot action are absent, and the owner-mint path is fail-closed ([[rs5a-02]] §7).

RS5A does not pick the Owner. It establishes that a defensible candidate set exists and that the act of choosing + binding is the Owner decision (G2), reserved to the Owner.