KB-3EC5

READY-TO-ASSEMBLE-LEGO1 13 — Final Readiness Decision — 2026-06-22

6 min read Revision 1
ready-to-assemble-lego1final-decisionverdictc1-canonical-operation-vocabularyregistration-hold2026-06-22

READY-TO-ASSEMBLE-LEGO1 13 — Final Readiness Decision — 2026-06-22

VERDICT: READY_TO_ASSEMBLE_LEGO1_PACKAGE (not forced). Chosen LEGO #1: C1 — canonical_operation vocabulary contract carrier. Gate: REGISTRATION_HOLD · REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO · 0 runtime mutations · P2 CLOSED · NOT_OPENED · NOT_AUTHORIZED · no named lane opened · no Chairman authorization asserted.


1. The 17 readiness criteria (instruction §3.13)

# Criterion Status Where
1 chosen carrier specific + justified ✔ C1 file 03
2 read-only inventory complete file 02
3 build plan complete file 06
4 dependency map complete ✔ (in=0, out=E1) file 05
5 carrier boundary complete file 04
6 test matrix complete ✔ (valid/invalid/adversarial/regression) file 07
7 rollback plan complete ✔ (RBP-0..10) file 08
8 preflight plan complete file 09
9 evidence plan complete file 10
10 Gate B packet complete file 11
11 Chairman authorization template complete ✔ (template, not asserted) file 11 §4
12 adversarial self-review passes ✔ A1–A25 file 12
13 no preparation gap remains ✔ (residuals authority/execution only) §2
14 no runtime/write executed ✔ 0 mutations file 02 §8; file 06 §9
15 no authority overclaimed file 11 §5; file 12 §3
16 REGISTRATION_HOLD remains active all files
17 P2/named lane remains closed file 11 §3

All 17 true ⇒ READY is honestly reachable.

2. Preparation-gap check (the decisive test)

A preparation gap would force READY_TO_ASSEMBLE_LEGO1_REJECT_PREPARATION_GAP_REMAINS. Classifying every residual (instruction §5):

Residual Classification Preparation gap?
Gate A / Gate B acceptance execution/authority No — review step, not preparation
Exact-scoped Chairman token AUTHORITY_MISSING_ONLY No — template + exact later check defined (file 09 PF5, file 11 §4)
Runtime/write authorization RUNTIME_ACCESS_MISSING_ONLY No — exact plan/commands/preflight defined (files 06/09)
Execution window execution No
canonical_operation value set execution (governed per-value) No — admission contract prepared; values admitted in build (file 12 §2)

No PREPARATION_INPUT_MISSING, SOURCE_READ_FAILED, or DISCOVERY_FAILED remains. The only remaining work is authority/execution. ⇒ no preparation gap.

3. Why this verdict (not another)

  • Not …_HOLD_CODEX_MODE_MISSING: posture recorded (file 01 §0).
  • Not …_HOLD_SOURCE_READ_FAILED: controlling Codex accept + packages read directly (file 01).
  • Not …_HOLD_REPO_DISCOVERY_FAILED: live read-only inventory complete (file 02).
  • Not …_HOLD_NO_SAFE_CARRIER: C1 is safe and chosen (file 03).
  • Not …_HOLD_CARRIER_BOUNDARY_UNCLEAR: four boundaries defined (file 04).
  • Not …_HOLD_DEPENDENCY_MAP_INCOMPLETE: in/out edges proven (file 05).
  • Not …_HOLD_BUILD_PLAN_INCOMPLETE: steps/surfaces/commands defined, write-labelled (file 06).
  • Not …_HOLD_TEST_MATRIX_INCOMPLETE: matrix fail-closed (file 07).
  • Not …_HOLD_ROLLBACK_PLAN_INCOMPLETE: RBP-0..10 mapped (file 08).
  • Not …_HOLD_PREFLIGHT_PLAN_INCOMPLETE: PF1–PF9 + rerun rule (file 09).
  • Not …_HOLD_EVIDENCE_PLAN_INCOMPLETE: artifacts + tiers + readback (file 10).
  • Not …_HOLD_GATE_B_PACKET_INCOMPLETE: Gate B inputs + Chairman template (file 11).
  • Not …_HOLD_ADVERSARIAL_SELF_REVIEW_FAILED: A1–A25 pass (file 12).
  • Not …_REJECT_SCOPE_DRIFT: only LEGO-1 preparation authored; Job A / I1–I10 not reopened.
  • Not …_REJECT_RUNTIME_MUTATION: 0 mutations.
  • Not …_REJECT_MEGA_REGISTRY: C1 is one isolated LEGO (file 04 §5).
  • Not …_REJECT_AUTHORITY_OVERCLAIM: no authority/Chairman/P2 asserted.
  • Not …_REJECT_P2_OPENED_EARLY: P2 closed; no named lane opened.
  • Not …_REJECT_PREPARATION_GAP_REMAINS: no preparation gap (§2).

The verdict is not forced: had any criterion failed, the corresponding HOLD/REJECT above would have been emitted.

4. Carried blockers (UNCHANGED, none resolved, none added)

G2–G7, STATUS_DOMAIN_NOT_DB_ENFORCED, U3_PARTIAL_UNIQUE_SURFACE_ABSENT, OWNER_MINT_PATH_FAIL_CLOSED, QUORUM_EFFECT_BINDING_INSUFFICIENT, QUORUM_APPROVER_IDENTITY_UNVERIFIED, BOOTSTRAP_AUTHORITY_UNRESOLVED, CANONICAL_PRINCIPAL_SURFACE_REQUIRED_NOT_PRESENT. No new blocker. No new runtime reject code — the C1-specific labels (CANONICAL_OPERATION_VALUE_ABSENT, …_RETIRED_FOR_NEW_USE) are carrier-classifier labels for the future build, not runtime blockers, and resolve nothing now.

5. Single next step

Independent (GPT → Codex) review of this preparation package only. On accept, the prepared C1 plan is the input to a future Gate B evaluation; only a satisfied Gate B (per-carrier rollback proof + current live preflight + exact-scoped Chairman token + independent plan review + no mutation) may open the named C1 lane only and authorize the C1 build. Registration/activation/register_dot/P3 remain separate later gates. Residual ⇒ READY_TO_ASSEMBLE_LEGO1-PATCH1.

Default HOLD discipline retained: readiness-for-assembly ≠ assembly execution; engineering/contract PASS ≠ authority/runtime PASS; baseline ≠ P2-open; satisfied Gate B ≠ registration; review ≠ Chairman authorization; deletion ≠ rollback; validity ≠ presence; one input → one code.

6. Boundary attestation

This file records the decision at design level. It creates no carrier, writes no row, opens no P2/lane, executes no rollback, asserts no Chairman authorization, and clears no blocker. REGISTRATION_HOLD retained; REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO; 0 runtime mutations.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/reports/ready-to-assemble-lego1/13-final-readiness-decision-2026-06-22.md