Macro-RS1-PATCH1 — Required Source Coverage Completion and Impact Assessment

Mission: R2-B2-MACRO-RS1-PATCH1-REQUIRED-SOURCE-COVERAGE-COMPLETION-AND-IMPACT-ASSESSMENT-2026-06-20 Class: read-only coverage-completion + impact assessment addendum to Macro-RS1 · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NOT a rewrite of RS1 · NOT RS2 · NO blocker resolved · NO runtime mutated. Date: 2026-06-20 · Editorial revision: rev1 (AgentData storage revision / content_length authoritative at read time). Patches (does not replace): knowledge/dev/laws-new/reports/macro-rs1-registration-substrate-trust-survey-and-design-entry-gate-2026-06-20.md (RS1, rev1). Scope: complete coverage for the sources RS1 itself recorded as PARTIAL / anchor-extracted / summary / header-only (or never listed), then assess whether RS1's conclusions survive the fuller reading. Nothing else. Authorizes nothing. Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS. KB admission ≠ runtime registration. Default = HOLD.

---

1. STATUS

PASS_WITH_CAVEATS — the required source-coverage completion is done. All 15 required sources were read directly from the AgentData KB (14 FULL_READ, 1 COVERAGE_READ of a 145 K precedent log). The fuller reading confirms and reinforces every substantive RS1 conclusion and surfaces zero contradictions. Two genuine defects were found, both inside RS1's §4 source map (not in its reasoning): wrong paths for the R2-B2 trio, and two primary-SSOT documents never consulted. Neither changes any RS1 conclusion.

Mutation footprint this patch: ZERO beyond writing this one KB report. No query_pg/runtime read was even needed (this is a KB-coverage patch); no DDL/DML, no manual SQL, no psql, no Directus mutation, no validator re-run, no registration, no schema, no gate flip, no owner row, no Đ32/Đ35 patch.

2. VERDICT

RS1_PATCH1_READY_FOR_CODEX_WITH_WORDING_CAVEATS

RS1 is substantively correct and ready to hand to Codex now. The fuller reading of de-bai-cai-tien.md and the LEGO/matrix/handbook/R2-B2 corpus did not reveal any drift from de-bai principles, any LEGO-boundary violation, any DOT-only violation, any mega-system, any mutation proposal, or any improper use of /laws/ to override laws-new/newlaws/. No RS1 conclusion needs revision (this is not RS1_PATCH1_NEED_RS1_REVISION and not RS1_PATCH1_REJECT_SCOPE_DRIFT). All required sources were read (this is not RS1_PATCH1_SOURCE_NOT_FULLY_READ).

Resolution for §11: READY_FOR_CODEX. Three source-hygiene wording caveats (C1–C3, §10) are listed for Codex/RS2 to absorb — they tighten RS1's source map; they do not move its verdict.

3. SOURCE COVERAGE PATCH MAP

Read directly from AgentData KB. PATCH1 status ∈ {FULL_READ · COVERAGE_READ · SOURCE_NOT_FOUND · SOURCE_NOT_FULLY_READ}. ("RS1 prior status" quoted from RS1 §4; "—" = RS1 never listed it.)

#	Source	RS1 prior status	PATCH1 status	Rev / len	Sections read	Key finding	Impact on RS1
1	reports/macro-rs1-…-2026-06-20.md (RS1 itself)	(anchor)	FULL_READ	rev1 / 46040	all §1–§15	Self-declares its own partial sources (§4)	n/a (the object under patch)
2	laws-new/de-bai-cai-tien.md	READ (anchors)	FULL_READ	rev33 / 29088	§I–§VII full	12 principles confirmed; RS1 aligns with all (see §4)	CONFIRMS / reinforces RS1
3	laws-new/matrix-refactor-implementation-plan.md	— (never read)	FULL_READ	rev5 / 27905	§1–§15 full	reuse-first; "no new registry"; gov = route into One-Roof, not a new machine; production gates stay locked; DRAFT-not-enacted	REINFORCES RS1; no contradiction
4	laws-new/matrix-refactor-quick-rules.md	READ (anchors)	FULL_READ	rev8 / 6057	rules 1–32 + S1–S14 full	anti-bloat 18–23; "No lane before checker" (32); "don't mutate production / laws/" (28–31)	REINFORCES RS1
5	laws-new/matrix-stamp-governance-addendum.md	READ (anchors)	FULL_READ	rev14 / 26474	§1–§12 full	default 0 new tables; reuse inspect_*/existing ledgers; new ledger only via §9 with 3 hard conditions + M3 lane	BACKS RS1 DEFER of governance_dot_admission
6	laws-new/cau-hoi-khi-tai-cau-truc.md	PARTIAL (summary)	COVERAGE_READ	rev82 / 145449	status/scope, QCM method, reuse-first/Nhóm-0, Owner-checkpoint, newest entries (2026-06-15); grep-confirmed absence of RS1/RS2 terms	QCM precedent + reuse-first/Nhóm-0 + "PASS ≠ authority" all confirmed; predates RS1/RS2 (no RS1-specific precedent)	CONFIRMS RS1 method-grounding
7	laws-new/README.md	— (never read)	FULL_READ	rev4 / 2290	full	SSOT = the 3 matrix files; Module-Contract-First superseded/archived; everything DRAFT; don't edit laws/	CONFIRMS two-corpus / DRAFT posture
8	newlaws/LAW_READING_INDEX.md	READ FULL	FULL_READ (re-confirm)	rev2 / 28225	§0–§7 full	two-corpus rule; RISK-BYPASS still listed OPEN (bad-reading #10); "PASS ≠ Owner authorization"; HOLD default	CONFIRMS RS1 framing
9	newlaws/dot-manage/README.md	PARTIAL (metadata)	FULL_READ	rev1 / 1047	full	DOT-only; "No confirmed authorized DOT for run-scoped disposable staging schema"	CONFIRMS RS1 §5 Q6
10	newlaws/dot-manage/dot-usage-handbook.md	READ (targeted §15/§18)	FULL_READ	rev11 / 115013	§0–§18 full	all 5 RS1 claims CONFIRMED; §18 register: DOT + 4 guards MISSING; banner "REGISTRATION_HOLD"	CONFIRMS RS1
11	newlaws/collections-manage/README.md	READ FULL	FULL_READ	rev1 / 1646	full	DOT-only; no disposable workbench; sandbox_tac persistent/read-denied/owner-unknown	CONFIRMS RS1
12	newlaws/collections-manage/collections-usage-handbook.md	READ (targeted §16/§19)	FULL_READ	rev11 / 94267	§0–§19 (full narrative; §5 row-table interior is data, not a section)	all 5 RS1 claims CONFIRMED; §19 gap = DOT-created run-scoped schema, not a reuse	CONFIRMS RS1
13	newlaws/consolidation/r2-b2-inspect-producer-td-prep-lego-2026-06-18.md	PARTIAL (header) · wrong path in §4	FULL_READ	rev1 / 47732	full	B2 = inspect-producer only; single-block lock; B2-AC-1…14 (anti-fuse, no mega-birth, no second SSOT); PO-1…9; no RS1/RS2/registration mention	CONFIRMS B2 out-of-slice
14	newlaws/consolidation/r2-b2-technical-design-readiness-lego-2026-06-18.md	PARTIAL (header) · wrong path in §4	FULL_READ	rev1 / 27230	full	actual B2 TD = aggregate NO-GO; PO-1…9 unsatisfied; F-5 owner = 0; all blockers OPEN; Owner-gated	CONFIRMS RS1 owner/channel/staging gaps
15	newlaws/consolidation/r1-r2-modular-lego-architecture-scoping-2026-06-18.md	PARTIAL (header) · wrong path in §4	FULL_READ	rev1 / 57692	full	LEGO invariant (isolation/replaceable/contract-only); 22-block map; explicit No mega-pipeline / mega-graph / mega-registry; birth ≠ canonical	REINFORCES RS1 LEGO/anti-mega posture

Coverage statement. No SOURCE_NOT_FOUND (the trio resolved once the /newlaws/ path segment was restored — see C1). No SOURCE_NOT_FULLY_READ. cau-hoi is honestly marked COVERAGE_READ (its required themes were captured; only the interior of its question-row tables — data, not a section — was sampled rather than read line-by-line). The 0.5 "already-full-read" set (Codex report, Macro-9B contract/guards/validator/matrix/evidence/admission, Đ4/32/35/39 notes, required-stamps, promote-checker) was not re-read; RS1's FULL reads of those stand.

4. DE-BAI-COMPLIANCE CHECK

RS1 assessed against the 12 control points of de-bai-cai-tien.md (rev33, full body). RS1 operates one altitude below the matrix model — it governs the registration of one DOT (DOT_R2_B2_STAGING_SCHEMA_SHELL, which is the "kho tạm" substrate de-bai §II.4 calls the key accelerator) — so de-bai compliance is about not violating the model, which RS1 satisfies.

#	De-bai principle	de-bai locus	RS1 behaviour	Verdict
1	System turns on Tầng × Loài × Kho × Miền	§II.2	RS1 does not redesign the matrix; stays within it	COMPLIANT
2	Each cell: Công thức + DOT + Governance state + IO Contract	§II.2	The DOT has contract + guards + validator + admission (governance)	COMPLIANT
3	Kho tạm is the accelerator	§II.4	RS1's whole object is the run-scoped staging schema; delete-fast/rollback kept as proof obligations	COMPLIANT (directly serves it)
4	Never write straight to the main store	§II.4, §III.5	Production-untouched (Guard 3); gates locked; zero prod write	COMPLIANT
5	Governance in 3 levels (workspace/promote/canonical)	§II.5	Registration touches dot_tools (canonical/registry) → RS1 holds it to the heavy M3 lane (Owner + Đ32 quorum)	COMPLIANT
6	No new module/lane/registry if matrix/DOT/IO suffices	§III.2	DEFERs governance_dot_admission; reuse-first over dot_tools+APR/Đ32+law_dot_enforcement+dot_config	COMPLIANT (directly implements)
7	Governance ≠ a new administrative machine	§IV (title)	"no new mini-governance island" (RS1 §11)	COMPLIANT
8	DOT = a small machine that adds/verifies ONE governance fact	§IV.3	RS1 §5 Q8 minimal DOT = single bounded responsibility, consumes already-authoritative evidence	COMPLIANT
9	Stamp = a confirmation mark, not its own approval workflow	§IV.4	RS1 invents no new stamp/approval workflow; routes through existing Đ32 APR	COMPLIANT
10	No new stamp ledger/registry/workflow before it is needed	§IV.5–6	DEFER + reuse existing primitives	COMPLIANT
11	On error, delete in kho tạm; don't drag the whole system	§III.5, §V.4	Slice = registration substrate only; staging = DROP SCHEMA CASCADE; no whole-system pull	COMPLIANT
12	Scanner only lists/reports, never auto-fixes	§V.17	RS1 is itself a read-only survey that lists blockers and fixes nothing	COMPLIANT

Conclusion: RS1 phù hợp (fits) — all 12 points COMPLIANT. No DE_BAI_SCOPE_CONFLICT. The fuller read of impl-plan §1.9/§4.3/§9 ("no parallel governance," "One-Roof is the only roof," "production stays locked") and the addendum §9/§11 ("0 new tables by default," anti-bloat) strengthens RS1's DEFER stance rather than challenging it. Only wording caveats (§10) apply.

5. LEGO BOUNDARY CHECK

Against the LEGO invariant in r1-r2-modular-lego-architecture-scoping (rev1, full): "each block isolated; clear contract; testable alone; replaceable/deletable without breaking the whole; integration through explicit contracts, not hidden coupling."

LEGO obligation	RS1 status	Evidence
No whole-system backfill	HELD	RS1 §13 "no full-system backfill"
No whole-system detailed design	HELD	RS1 §10 = design-entry criteria only, not design
No mega-registry	HELD	RS1 §11/§13; DEFER governance_dot_admission
No mega-graph	HELD	RS1 cites Đ39 note "KG runtime-EMPTY; no KG backfill"
No mega-birth pipeline	HELD	RS1 §13; matches trio "No mega-pipeline / fused INSERT"
Each block its own boundary	HELD	registration substrate = the slice; B2 / Macro-9A / snapshot / validator each separate
register / staging / validator / snapshot / owner / rollback split apart	HELD	RS1 §10/§12 sequences RS2 · RS3 · RS-Validator · RS4 · RS5 as distinct blocks
Join by contract	HELD	RS1 §5 Q8 proof-obligation/IO-contract framing
rollback / delete-fast kept as proof obligations	HELD	RS1 §6 item 19 (registration rollback proof) + staging delete-fast

No LEGO_BOUNDARY_CONFLICT. RS1's slice discipline matches the architecture-scoping invariant block-for-block.

6. DOT-ONLY CHECK

Against dot-manage/README (rev1), collections-manage/README (rev1), and both handbooks (rev11/rev11, now FULL_READ):

DOT-only obligation	RS1 status	Confirmed by
PG/schema/Directus = DOT-only zone	AFFIRMED (RS1 §5 Q2)	DOT handbook §3; collections README
No manual SQL / psql / docker exec psql	AFFIRMED (RS1 §13)	DOT handbook §3/§13; collections handbook §3
No Directus generic create	AFFIRMED (RS1 §13)	both handbooks §3
No reusable workbench collection exists	AFFIRMED (RS1 §3.7/§8)	collections handbook §8/§16/§19 (sandbox_tac fails SB-4)
DOT_R2_B2_STAGING_SCHEMA_SHELL unregistered/unwired/unrun	AFFIRMED (RS1 §3.1, 0/309)	DOT handbook §18 "MISSING" + banner "REGISTRATION_HOLD"
Existing DOTs cannot make a run-scoped schema	AFFIRMED (RS1 §5 Q6)	DOT handbook §15 (~30 DOT_SCHEMA_*_ENSURE write prod public)

No DOT_ONLY_CONFLICT. Both handbooks independently CONFIRMED all five of RS1's load-bearing handbook claims and the two candidate catalogs (dot_operator_catalog, collection_operator_catalog) as candidate-on-paper — matching RS1 §11.

7. REUSE-FIRST / NO-MEGA-SYSTEM CHECK

This is where RS1's most consequential decision lives (DEFER DOT_GOVERNANCE_DOT_ADMISSION). The fuller reading makes the DEFER better-grounded, not weaker:

• de-bai §IV.5–6 / §VI.7 — reuse existing registry/metadata first; "Không tạo registry mới, stamp ledger mới, hay workflow approval mới chỉ để chứa thêm một loại thông tin."
• addendum §9 / §11 — "Khuyến nghị cho v0.1: KHÔNG tạo bảng mới"; a new ledger only if §9's two needs appear AND after exhausting (a) sandbox-local and (b) governance_candidate_state, and only via the M3 lane; risk row: "Stamp biến thành registry mới phức tạp."
• quick-rules 18–23 — no new module/lane/registry if expressible by existing books; "Mọi khái niệm mới phải có giải trình rất chặt vì sao 7 thành phần nền không biểu diễn được."
• cau-hoi (rev82) — the mandatory anti-new-build gate: "Không được đề xuất tạo registry / table / ledger / workflow / DOT mới nếu chưa chứng minh đủ cả 5 điều"; REUSE-006 = BLOCKER on any new-build proposal; Nhóm-0 / L0 Reuse Baseline must be answered before any "design something new."
• architecture-scoping AC-12 — "No mega-registry / mega-graph / mega-pipeline"; design-filter #6 "Assembly First — extend an existing ledger/field/pattern; do not stand up a parallel SSOT, store, or registry."

RS1 §11 cites the anti-bloat rule and DEFERs exactly to avoid "a new mini-governance island that would own admission + approval + registration + evidence + execution at once." This is verbatim-aligned with every reuse-first/anti-bloat source. No mega-registry/graph/birth-pipeline is proposed anywhere in RS1 (§13 confirms). No conflict; RS1 strengthened.

8. R2-B2 BOUNDARY IMPACT

Answering the four mandated questions from the R2-B2 trio (all now FULL_READ):

1. Did RS1 accidentally open B2 producer TD/build? NO. RS1 §10 explicitly lists "B2 producer TD" as starting only after Macro-9A, "Out of registration slice; no mega-pipeline." The trio independently confirms B2 TD is a separate, downstream, Owner-gated, aggregate-NO-GO effort (TD-readiness §14; inspect-producer "TD-prep, not TD" + single-block lock; "Write-enabled remediation / producer build remains forbidden").
2. Did RS1 accidentally pull whole-system KG / scanner / promote-checker in? NO. RS1 uses promote-checker and Đ39-KG only as analogs/provenance (HOLD-2 rollback analogy; KG "runtime-EMPTY, no backfill"). The architecture-scoping doc's "No mega-graph" and "scanner = list-only" rules are respected; RS1 builds none of them.
3. Did RS1 keep B2 out-of-slice? YES, explicitly and consistently (RS1 §2 slice line, §10 design-entry table, §13 must-not list).
4. Does the RS2 recommendation drift from the B2 boundary? NO. RS2 (RS1 §12) is registration-path authority-trust reconciliation, read-only/KB-design — it touches dot_tools registration trust and the Đ32/Đ35 gate, not the B2 inspect-producer. It opens no producer TD, no build, no channel wiring.

No R2_B2_SCOPE_DRIFT. Notably, the trio carries the same blocker set RS1 relies on (CONS-002/003, CELL-003/004/007, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, RISK-BYPASS, GOV-016/017, GOV-REUSE-001, Đ39 runtime-EMPTY, Đ35 production-readiness FAIL) and the same owner gap (governance_object_ownership=0), corroborating RS1 §6/§9 from an independent 2026-06-18 source.

9. IMPACT ON RS1 CONCLUSIONS

Decision ∈ {KEEP · DOWNGRADE · REMOVE · NEED_RS1_REVISION · ESCALATE_TO_CODEX}.

#	RS1 claim	After PATCH1	Decision	Why
1	RS1_HOLD_REGISTRATION_PATH_UNPROVEN	Unchanged	KEEP	Handbooks (no run-scoped staging DOT), trio (B2/owner/channel/staging all blocked), LAW_READING_INDEX (blockers open) all corroborate
2	REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED = NO	Unchanged	KEEP	No newly-read source supplies an authorized DOT-registration path; all default HOLD
3	fn_auto_approve_add RISK-BYPASS is a SOURCE_CONFLICT for Codex	Unchanged; corroborated	KEEP / ESCALATE_TO_CODEX	Newly-read sources (LAW_READING_INDEX bad-reading #10; trio blocker lists) all still carry RISK-BYPASS OPEN — the "stale" side — and none is a fresh live read; the conflict RS1 flagged is real and still Codex's to reconcile. RS1 correctly does not clear it and does not depend on it
4	DOT_GOVERNANCE_DOT_ADMISSION = DEFER	Strengthened	KEEP	de-bai §IV.5–6, addendum §9/§11, quick-rules 18–23, cau-hoi anti-new-build gate, architecture-scoping AC-12 all mandate reuse-first / no-new-registry
5	RS2 (read-only/KB-design) is the correct next macro	Unchanged	KEEP	Every design-only doc prescribes a further read-only/design-only, Owner-gated step; none mandates build/registration
6	No Macro-9A (no CREATE SCHEMA)	Unchanged	KEEP	DOT handbook §15 NO-GO; trio TD/build forbidden now
7	No registration (no dot_tools write)	Unchanged	KEEP	contract §7 "not written by hand"; no path proven
8	No schema created	Unchanged	KEEP	DOT-only zone; gates locked
9	No mutation (read-only)	Unchanged	KEEP	PATCH1 itself added zero substrate mutation
10	No mega-system (registry/graph/birth-pipeline)	Strengthened	KEEP	architecture-scoping + addendum + quick-rules + cau-hoi all forbid it; RS1 §13 confirms none built
11	RS1 QCM + reuse-first + Nhóm-0 method grounding	Confirmed accurate	KEEP	cau-hoi rev82 defines exactly this QCM schema and the Nhóm-0/reuse-first gate RS1 invokes
12	B2 producer TD is out-of-slice	Confirmed accurate	KEEP	trio (3 docs) independently treat B2 TD as separate/downstream/NO-GO/Owner-gated
13	RS1 §4 cites the R2-B2 trio at …/consolidation/…	Wrong path (real: …/newlaws/consolidation/…)	DOWNGRADE (wording)	list_documents on laws-new/consolidation/ = empty; trio lives under laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/. Source-map defect only; conclusions unaffected (RS1 read them header-only and correctly scoped them out)
14	RS1 §4 implies adequate matrix-track source coverage	Two primary SSOT docs unread (matrix-refactor-implementation-plan.md, laws-new/README.md)	DOWNGRADE (wording)	Both are now FULL_READ and only REINFORCE RS1; but a registration-trust survey should list them. No conclusion changes

Net: 12 KEEP (2 strengthened) + 2 wording DOWNGRADES inside the source map. 0 REMOVE, 0 NEED_RS1_REVISION on any conclusion.

10. PATCHED / UNCHANGED / DOWNGRADED CLAIMS

UNCHANGED (all substantive conclusions): verdict RS1_HOLD_REGISTRATION_PATH_UNPROVEN; REGISTRATION_CAN_PROCEED=NO; RISK-BYPASS as Codex SOURCE_CONFLICT; DEFER governance_dot_admission; RS2 as next macro; the full must-not set (no Macro-9A/9C, no registration, no schema, no mutation, no mega-system, no /laws/ override). The fuller reading moved none of these.

PATCHED — source-hygiene caveats for Codex/RS2 to absorb (do NOT change the verdict):

• C1 — trio path correction. RS1 §4 lists the three R2-B2 LEGO docs under knowledge/dev/laws-new/consolidation/…. That folder is empty; the real location is knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/… (rev1 each: inspect-producer-td-prep 47732, technical-design-readiness 27230, modular-lego-architecture-scoping 57692). RS2 should cite the corrected paths.
• C2 — add two primary SSOT docs to the source map. matrix-refactor-implementation-plan.md (rev5, 27905 — one of the three SSOT files per laws-new/README.md) and laws-new/README.md (rev4) appear nowhere in RS1 §4. Both are now FULL_READ and reinforce RS1; RS2 should fold them into the source-authority map for completeness.
• C3 — cau-hoi temporal note. cau-hoi-khi-tai-cau-truc.md (rev82, newest content 2026-06-15) establishes the method RS1 uses (QCM, reuse-first, Nhóm-0, "PASS ≠ authority") but predates and never names RS1/RS2/governance_dot_admission. RS1's "QCM precedent / reuse-first / Nhóm-0 Reuse Baseline" citations are accurate; the caveat is only that it carries no RS1-specific precedent.

DOWNGRADED: only the implicit completeness of RS1's §4 source map (per C1/C2). No analytical claim is downgraded.

11. DECISION: READY_FOR_CODEX or NEED_RS1_REVISION

READY_FOR_CODEX. RS1's registration-substrate trust survey survives the required source-coverage completion intact: it complies with all 12 de-bai principles, holds the LEGO boundary, holds the DOT-only boundary, honours reuse-first / no-mega-system, and keeps B2 out-of-slice. No conclusion requires revision. The three wording caveats (C1–C3) are source-map tidy-ups for RS2 to carry, not blockers.

Recommended handling: Codex reviews RS1 (rev1) + this PATCH1 addendum together; one consolidated Owner decision follows Codex; RS2 (read-only / KB-design) begins only after Codex accepts, and should open with the corrected source map (C1–C2).

12. SELF-CHECK

1. Re-read RS1 official report from KB? YES (rev1, full).
2. Full/coverage-read every source RS1 marked partial/anchor/header? YES — 14 FULL_READ + 1 COVERAGE_READ (cau-hoi); plus the two SSOT docs RS1 never listed.
3. Read de-bai-cai-tien.md carefully (full body)? YES (rev33, §I–§VII).
4. Checked "governance ≠ a new administrative machine"? YES (§4 pt 7, §7) — RS1 complies; DEFER strengthened.
5. Kept kho-tạm / DOT / IO / rollback / promote in the LEGO spirit? YES (§5).
6. Found RS1 opening scope too wide? NO — slice held (§5, §8).
7. Found RS1 creating mega-registry / mega-graph / mega-birth-pipeline? NO (§7, §9 #10).
8. Found RS1 proposing a mutation? NO (§9 #9).
9. Found RS1 using /laws/ to override laws-new/newlaws? NO — two-corpus rule respected (LAW_READING_INDEX re-confirmed).
10. Concluded clearly whether to hand to Codex or revise RS1? YES — READY_FOR_CODEX with wording caveats C1–C3; no revision of any conclusion.
11. Did this patch overwrite RS1? NO — written to a new path.
12. Did this patch mutate runtime / DDL / DML / register / schema / gate / Đ32-Đ35 / APR / owner row / Macro-9A / governance_dot_admission? NO — none; the only write is this KB report.
13. Stop state? READY_FOR_CODEX (no SOURCE_NOT_FULLY_READ, no SOURCE_NOT_FOUND, no DE_BAI_SCOPE_CONFLICT, no LEGO_BOUNDARY_CONFLICT, no DOT_ONLY_CONFLICT, no R2_B2_SCOPE_DRIFT).

End of Macro-RS1-PATCH1 addendum. Read-only · non-enacting · non-authorizing · not a rewrite of RS1 · not RS2. Engineering/coverage PASS ≠ Owner authority PASS. KB admission ≠ runtime registration. Default = HOLD. Next: Codex reviews RS1 + this PATCH1 together → one consolidated Owner decision → RS2 (read-only/KB-design) with the corrected source map.