F5 — Scanner / Observability / Heartbeat + Runtime / Config / Operational Safety — Read-only Execution Report
F5 — Scanner / Observability / Heartbeat + Runtime / Config / Operational Safety — Read-only Execution Report
Ngày: 2026-06-16 · Soạn: Claude Code CLI (read-only AgentData KB) · Track: knowledge/dev/laws-new/
Packet basis: f5-scanner-observability-runtime-safety-reuse-survey-packet.md rev1 (this run; internal gate §10 passed — all 8 items GREEN — see §1).
Control basis: technical-slice-framework.md rev56 (§6c F5 = D11 + D12; D11 Scanner/Observability/Heartbeat "chỉ liệt kê … no auto-fix scanner / no full-system backfill"; D12 Runtime/Config/Operational Safety "required-stamps KB→runtime delivery … operational risks vẫn là survey/design gates"; §19 STOP; §20 self-check).
Concept basis: de-bai-cai-tien.md rev33 (§IV.6/§IV.7 · §V.4 · §V.6 · §V.9 · §V.17 · §VI.4 · §VI.7 · §12 · §16).
Catalog basis: cau-hoi-khi-tai-cau-truc.md rev82 (L7 + L5b; SCAN-001..015 + SCAN-REUSE-001/002; Nhóm R RISK-AP/IDX/STL/GC/CELL/RUN/BYPASS/CRASH/CAP/TIME; STG-012/015; DOT-006; DOT-CAP; OP-1..12).
Spec basis (documentary): required-stamps.v0.1.json rev6 (DRAFT — runtime delivery not defined) · promote-checker-v0.1-spec.md rev11 (DRAFT — verdict-only) · matrix-stamp-governance-addendum.md rev14 (§6 scanner = assemble 3 existing read-only; §7b atomic promote HOLD-2; §7c TTL/cleanup fail-safe; §8 birth_registry documentary).
Evidence/gate basis: F4 owner decision record rev1 (F4 gate CLOSED) + F4 execution report rev1 (PARTIAL) + F4 packet rev1 + F3/F2/F1/F0 decision records + constitution v4.6.3 + OR v7.58 (reused under CONS-004).
Run authorization: GPT/Owner authorized the F5 Program Macro; this read-only execution ran only because the packet §10 internal gate passed (all 8 items GREEN). No Phase-1, no live DB/runtime/production, no implementation, no schema/registry/index, no scanner/heartbeat/checker/promote build or run, no canonical birth, no dashboard.
0. STATUS (one line)
STATUS: PARTIAL. The F5 read-only documentary survey is complete and honest: every F5 candidate (scanner, missing-stamp scan, orphan/candidate scan, heartbeat/freshness, observability output, runtime/config delivery, the F4 lanes to observe) is classified into Q1/Q2/Q3 from current-pass KB evidence + carried-pinned F0–F4 lineage; the 3 Owner questions are answered; the F5 boundary held; every forbidden action stayed blocked. PARTIAL (not PASS) because every F5 asset is DOCUMENTARY_ONLY / GAP / UNKNOWN / HOLD and the gating conflicts/risks (CONS-002/003, CELL-003/004/007, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, STG-012/015, STG-REUSE-001/003, DOT-CAP-001/004/006/010, RISK-GC/CAP/BYPASS and the full Nhóm R set) are carried, not resolved.
1. Status / boundary confirmation
F5 = framework §6c D11 + D12 — the operational "roof" (mái), built last, cross-cut by FX (Governance One Roof). This execution ran because the §10 internal gate was all-8-GREEN: (G1) sources readable; (G2) F4 gate closed (f4-owner-decision-record-2026-06-16.md rev1); (G3) every asset classifiable to a KB pin without inventing live proof; (G4) no live DB/runtime/Phase-1 needed; (G5) no conflict resolution needed; (G6) no schema/design/implementation needed; (G7) boundary held; (G8) 3 Owner questions preserved.
Boundary held throughout: scanner = list-only documentary concept (de-bai §V.6/§V.17 "chỉ liệt kê"); no scanner/heartbeat implemented or run; runtime / config delivery UNKNOWN; the checker/promote lane observed as documentary / HOLD-2 (not live; "No checker, no lane"); the pre-promote staging store is HOLD-1; canonical birth is an output at promote (D10), observed by its absence, never written; no auto-fix, no full-system scan, no new subsystem, no schema change. Documentary ≠ live proof · Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS · Codex PASS ≠ Owner phase-authorization.
2. Owner View — 3 câu hỏi reuse-first
Q1 — Cái gì đang có và dùng lại được? (reuse-now = documentary candidate, NOT live-proven)
The scanner/observability concept is well-specified and reusable on paper: a read-only "máy quét đơn giản" that only lists (missing-stamp / orphan / promote-blocked), an orphan/candidate scan built on existing inverse-check (Đ23) + birth_registry predicates + Đ0-G §2.5 orphan/phantom, a minimal scoped heartbeat/freshness concept, and observability output via the existing system_issues / fn_log_issue warning table and event_outbox. The F4 stamp lifecycle vocabulary is the documentary contract a missing-stamp scanner checks against; the F4 checker/promote/canonical boundary is the documentary lane to observe; the F0→F4 accepted lineage is the authority/evidence basis. Addendum §6 confirms the reuse-first stance: "Không tạo cơ quan mới. Ghép 3 nền sẵn có." All Q1 items are documentary — none is implemented or proven running.
Q2 — Cái gì đang có nhưng cần sửa/kiểm chứng mới dùng lại được?
No scanner is implemented; no live runtime/DB verification has occurred (substrate counts are documentary); required-stamps KB→runtime delivery is UNKNOWN; the checker lane does not exist live (DRAFT, never built); the promote lane is HOLD-2; the pre-promote staging store is HOLD-1; birth_registry/fn_birth_* are documentary only; STG-012 cleanup scheduler and STG-015 packet_hash binding are unknown; RISK-GC/CAP affect orphan/blob/payload observability; RISK-BYPASS affects gate observability; CONS-002/003 + CELL-003/004/007 affect stamp/cell/IO observability (RISK-CELL BLOCKERs); DOT-CAP-001/004/006/010 block trusting DOT-based validation/observability; runtime/checkout sync is not proven. Each needs an Owner decision and/or a Phase-1 read-only survey before reuse.
Q3 — Cái gì thật sự phải làm thêm? (future, Owner-gated, default-NO) A real scanner implementation; a live heartbeat/runtime monitor; built missing-stamp and orphan scanners; runtime config-delivery proof (KB→runtime); a dashboard/reporting UI; a Phase-1 read-only runtime/substrate survey (OP-1..12; RISK-RUN/SRC liveness preflight); and any technical design — all are future, Owner-gated, default-NO. Each add-new must first prove all 5 no-new conditions (catalog §2c) and that assembling existing substrate is insufficient. Forbidden regardless: auto-fix scanner, full-system backfill, full-table-scan of large tables, new config-delivery subsystem/manifest, uncontrolled bypass, any schema change.
3. F5 asset classification table
| Asset | Currency | Classification | Reason / evidence pin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scanner "chỉ liệt kê" concept | current-pass | Q1 — DOCUMENTARY_ONLY | framework D11; de-bai §V.6/§V.9/§V.17; "no auto-fix scanner" |
| Missing-stamp scan | current-pass | Q1 — DOCUMENTARY_ONLY | de-bai §V.4 (UNSTAMPED/MISSING_STAMP); addendum §6.1 (1 SQL on birth_registry, read-only) |
| Orphan / candidate scan | current-pass | Q1 — DOCUMENTARY_ONLY | Đ23 inverse-check; Đ0-G §2.5 orphan/phantom; birth_registry certified=false/inspect_* IS NULL; SCAN-REUSE-001 idx_birth_uncertified |
| Heartbeat / freshness / report | current-pass | Q1 concept / Q2 verify | framework D11; catalog L7 "minimal scoped scanner/heartbeat evidence là blocker trước pilot"; no heartbeat run |
Observability output (system_issues/fn_log_issue) |
current-pass | Q1 reuse / Q2 verify | addendum §6; SCAN-005/006/010/012 (severity); documentary, not queried live |
event_outbox register-before-emit |
current-pass | Q1 reuse / Q2 verify | framework D12; RISK-CRASH-005 (outbox in/after txn) |
| F4 stamp lifecycle vocabulary (scan target) | carried-pinned (F4) | Q1 — DOCUMENTARY_ONLY | required-stamps rev6; F4 report §4; the contract a missing-stamp scanner checks |
| F4 checker lane (to observe) | carried-pinned (F4) | Q2 — DOCUMENTARY (not live) | checker-spec rev11 DRAFT; "No checker, no lane"; nothing to observe live |
| F4 promote lane (to observe) | carried-pinned (F4) | Q2 — HOLD-2 / BLOCKED | addendum §7b; no transaction/rehearsal; lane not open |
| Canonical birth (to observe by absence) | carried-pinned (F4) | Q3 — output-at-promote only | framework D10; orphan/freshness substrate; never written by F5 |
required-stamps KB→runtime delivery |
current-pass | Q2 — UNKNOWN | framework D12; required-stamps rev6 has no runtime-delivery field; RISK-RUN-005/006, SRC-009/010 |
| Runtime liveness (Agent Data MCP / PG / Qdrant / Directus) | current-pass | Q2 — DOCUMENTARY / UNKNOWN | framework D12; RISK-RUN-001..004; not checked live |
| Config load/parse/version-pin/fail-closed | current-pass | Q2 — UNKNOWN | RISK-STL-001/005/006/007; RISK-RUN-005; de-bai §12 (config in metadata, not hardcode) |
Orphan / blob_ref / payload garbage |
current-pass | Q2 — OPEN (RISK-GC/CAP) | RISK-GC-001..006; RISK-CAP-001..003; addendum §7c fail-safe |
| Delete-fast / TTL / cleanup observability | current-pass | Q2 — TODO (STG-012 / SCAN-007) | de-bai §VI.4; addendum §7c; no pg_cron; scheduler unknown |
| Bypass / write-permission gate (observe) | current-pass | Q2 — OPEN (RISK-BYPASS) | RISK-BYPASS-001..006; framework D10 app.bypass_birth_gate; pilot-gated |
| Crash / retry / outbox consistency | current-pass | Q2 — survey gate (RISK-CRASH) | RISK-CRASH-001..006; read-only detector only |
| TTL / clock skew / time source | current-pass | Q2 — BLOCKER (RISK-TIME) | RISK-TIME-001..003; clock source undefined |
| Atomic-promote lock/transaction observability | carried-pinned (F4) | Q2 — HOLD-2 (RISK-AP) | RISK-AP-001..006; documentary; lane not open |
| JSONB / index / full-scan risk | current-pass | Q2 — BLOCKER (RISK-IDX) | RISK-IDX-001..004 (full-scan on birth_registry ~1.2M forbidden); -007 scanner v0.1 limited to candidate/cell |
| Stale verdict / config drift | current-pass | Q2 — BLOCKER (RISK-STL) | RISK-STL-001/005/006/007 |
| Real scanner / heartbeat / dashboard / runtime monitor | current-pass | Q3 — future, Owner-gated | framework D11/D12 forbidden-in-framework; de-bai §VI.7 (no auto-fix); default-NO |
| Phase-1 runtime/substrate survey | current-pass | Q3 — separate Owner gate | OP-1..12; RISK-RUN/SRC; not opened |
| F0→F4 accepted lineage | carried-pinned | Q1 — ACCEPTED | F0–F4 decision records; observability evidence, not runtime proof |
4. Scanner / missing-stamp analysis
The scanner concept is fully documentary and explicitly list-only. De-bai §V.6: "một cơ quan quét đơn giản, nhiệm vụ không phải là sửa toàn bộ hệ thống, mà chỉ liệt kê: Object nào chưa khai sinh? … thiếu dấu bắt buộc? … nên bị quarantine hoặc chặn promote?" §V.17 fixes the boundary: scanner "chỉ liệt kê thiếu dấu, orphan, promote-blocked; không tự sửa toàn hệ; không thay thế promote checker; không trở thành macro governance mới." §V.9 nguyên tắc chốt: "Scanner chỉ liệt kê phần chưa đủ dấu, không làm vỡ hệ."
- Missing-stamp scan maps to de-bai §V.4 object states (UNSTAMPED / MISSING_STAMP / ORPHAN / QUARANTINE / PROMOTE_BLOCKED) and addendum §6.1 (one read-only SQL on
birth_registry). It checks against the F4 stamp lifecycle vocabulary — butCELL_STAMP/IO_STAMPcannot be scanned against a resolved cell because CONS-003/CONS-002/CELL-* are unresolved (RISK-CELL-001..004 BLOCKER). - Reuse-first is mandated: SCAN-REUSE-001 "orphan-scan +
idx_birth_uncertified+system_issues… assemble, no new scanner"; SCAN-REUSE-002 is a BLOCKER if auto-fix is proposed ("list/report only; ban full-system auto-fix"). - Scheduler: SCAN-007 (= STG-012) is TODO/REQUIRED — no
pg_cron; how/when a scanner runs is unknown. - Full-scan risk: RISK-IDX-004 is a hard BLOCKER — the scanner is forbidden to full-table-scan
birth_registry(~1.2M); RISK-IDX-007 limits scanner v0.1 to candidate/cell scope. - Status: DOCUMENTARY_ONLY / GAP — "scanner chưa implementation" (framework D11). No scanner was built or run; no
birth_registry/system_issueswas queried live.
5. Observability / heartbeat / freshness analysis
- Output substrate: observability reuses the existing
system_issues/fn_log_issuewarning table (severity supported — SCAN-012) andevent_outboxregister-before-emit. Addendum §6: "Kết quả là bảng cảnh báo, KHÔNG sửa hệ ngay." A red warning table, processed piecewise, is the intended observability surface — not a dashboard and not a macro audit. - Heartbeat / freshness: catalog L7 — "minimal scoped scanner/heartbeat evidence là blocker trước pilot; broad/full-system scanner coverage có thể DEFER." Freshness/liveness measurement is read-only and slice-scoped. The terms "heartbeat"/"freshness" enter via framework D11/D12 and catalog L7/Nhóm R, not de-bai verbatim.
- Caveat on a non-existent scanner view: addendum §6 warns "DOT One-Roof
dot_governance_coverage_scan…CHƯA tồn tại … không được giả định có; dùng Đ23 + truy vấn birth_registry cho v0.1." F5 does not assume it exists. - Status: concept reusable (Q1); measurement is Q2 — no heartbeat was run; freshness depends on a clock source that is undefined (RISK-TIME-001 BLOCKER) and on runtime liveness that is UNKNOWN (RISK-RUN).
6. Runtime / config-delivery analysis
- KB→runtime delivery = UNKNOWN.
required-stamps.v0.1.jsonrev6 is a KB-side static config (DRAFT — not enacted) with no runtime-delivery field; its pre-promote store note is itself "HOLD FOR SYSTEM CHECK". Framework D12 lists "required-stampsKB→runtime delivery" as UNKNOWN and D8 states "stamp config runtime delivery unknown." Delivery is not inferable from the file. De-bai §12 only fixes that the required-stamp set "phải khai trong metadata, KHÔNG hardcode" — it does not prove delivery. - Config load/parse/version-pin/fail-closed: RISK-STL-001/005/006/007 + RISK-RUN-005 — a checker must fail-closed if
required-stamps/config won't load/parse/version-pin, and if rules change afterPROMOTE_OK. These are survey/design gates, undefined today. - Runtime liveness: RISK-RUN-001..004 — which runtimes (Agent Data MCP / Postgres / Qdrant / Directus) must be live for a pilot, how to read-only healthcheck them, and what happens if one dies — all open BLOCKERs/REQUIRED. No liveness check was performed.
- §19 STOP: STOP before a Phase-1 read-only survey while RISK-RUN/SRC preflight is undefined; runtime-delivery + atomic-promote are hard BLOCKERs where a slice touches runtime-config/promote.
- Status: UNKNOWN (config delivery) · DOCUMENTARY_ONLY (runtime). No runtime/config query was performed.
7. Orphan / rollback / delete-fast observability analysis
- Orphan / blob garbage: RISK-GC-001..006 — where
iu_staging_payload.blob_refpoints, whetherfn_iu_staging_cleanupis DB-only or emits an event, and whether orphan blob/cache/vector survives cleanup. RISK-CAP-001..003 — retention/cardinality and backpressure for packets/verdicts/system_issues/event_outbox. All OPEN; observability of orphans depends on resolving them (Phase-1). - Delete-fast / TTL: de-bai §VI.4 — "Không sửa lâu trong kho tạm nếu xóa và làm lại nhanh hơn"; "Candidate/kho tạm phải có TTL hoặc điều kiện cleanup rõ"; "Kho tạm không được trở thành production trá hình." Addendum §7c fail-safe: cleanup deletes only
draft/expired/quarantined, neverchecking/promote_ok-unconsumed/approved; "nghi ngờ thì KHÔNG xóa." Theiu_staging_*lifecycle is "HOLD FOR SYSTEM CHECK" (HOLD-1). - Scheduler: STG-012 / SCAN-007 — who calls cleanup and on what schedule is unknown (no
pg_cron). - Rollback observability:
ROLLBACK_STAMPis a pre-promote precondition (F4); rollback/delete-fast observability depends on STG-012 + RISK-GC/CAP. - Status: Q2 — OPEN/TODO; nothing scanned or cleaned; no live
iu_staging_*touched.
8. Checker / promote lane observability analysis
F5 can only observe these lanes as documentary, because they are not live:
- Checker lane:
promote-checker-v0.1-spec.mdrev11 is DRAFT — KHÔNG PHẢI BAN HÀNH, never written/selftested. Hard rule: "No checker, no lane. A paper lane is no lane." The checker is verdict-only:PROMOTE_OKis a verdict, not a mutation; it does not sign birth / write canonical / closeBIRTH_STAMP/PROMOTE_STAMP. There is no live checker to observe. - Promote lane: the Atomic Promote Contract is HOLD-2 / BLOCKED — "Chưa có atomic promote transaction + rehearsal proof … thì CHƯA được mở pilot promote thật." RISK-AP-001..006 (transaction scope, lock scope/time, deadlock fold, EXPLAIN/lock rehearsal) and RISK-CRASH-001..006 (crash/retry/double-promote/partial state) are all open. A read-only detector for partial state (RISK-CRASH-006) is the only F5-shaped observability — and it is a survey/design gate, not built.
- Canonical birth: observed by absence only — it is the output at promote (D10); F5 wrote none and called no
fn_birth_*.birth_registry/fn_birth_register/fn_birth_gateare documentary (framework §4 downgrades reported-LIVE; RISK-BYPASS on the birth gate's warning+bypass surface). PROMOTE_BLOCKED: observed as a verdict/state to list, never written (F4 boundary).- Status: Q2 — DOCUMENTARY / HOLD-2; no lane is live; nothing observed live.
9. Evidence-currency table (deep layer)
| Dimension | Finding | Documentary vs live |
|---|---|---|
| Sources | framework rev56, de-bai rev33, catalog rev82, addendum rev14, required-stamps rev6, checker-spec rev11, F0–F4 records — all KB | DOCUMENTARY (KB-only; checkout/runtime absent) |
| Evidence | every F5 asset pins to a KB source; no asset is implemented/running | DOCUMENTARY |
| Authority | KB = practical authority for laws-new/* (CONS-004, F0); constitution/OR higher for enacted; Owner/GPT = phase authority |
per CONS-004 (decided F0) |
| Conflict | CONS-002 (IO source), CONS-003 (6-vs-7 tầng), CELL-003/004/007 (cell_id dims) carried unresolved; affect stamp/cell/IO observability | CONFLICT — carried |
| Runtime | required-stamps KB→runtime delivery UNKNOWN; runtime liveness UNKNOWN; no runtime query |
UNKNOWN — not live |
| Provenance | scanner reuses Đ23 + birth_registry predicates + system_issues + idx_birth_uncertified + event_outbox (named substrate, documentary) |
DOCUMENTARY |
| Safety lock | scanner list-only / no auto-fix / no full-scan; runtime UNKNOWN; checker/promote documentary/HOLD-2; staging HOLD-1; no schema; §19 STOP respected | LOCK HELD |
10. Conflict / HOLD log
| Item | Status | Blocks what (observability) | Carried to |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONS-002 | TODO / BLOCKER | IO_STAMP observability (which IO source wins) |
Owner decision |
| CONS-003 | CONFLICT / BLOCKER | cell placement / cell_id / CELL_STAMP observability |
Owner decision |
| CELL-003 / 004 / 007 | PARTIAL/CONFLICT / BLOCKER | cell_id dimensions → CELL_STAMP scan |
Owner + Phase-1 |
| HOLD-1 | UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE / CONFLICT | staging observability (iu_staging_* home) |
Phase-1 (separate Owner gate) |
| HOLD-2 | BLOCKED | promote-lane observability (no transaction/rehearsal) | F4 implementation (Owner lifts) |
| STG-012 (= SCAN-007) | TODO / BLOCKER | delete-fast/cleanup + scanner scheduler observability | Phase-1 |
| STG-015 | PARTIAL / BLOCKER | candidate-packet tamper-state observability (packet_hash) |
Owner/spec + Phase-1 |
| STG-REUSE-001 / 003 | TODO / BLOCKER-if-proposed | shared kho tạm sufficiency / no new store | Phase-1 / default-NO |
| DOT-CAP-001/004/006/010 | BLOCKER | trusting DOT-based validation/observability | Owner/spec + Phase-1 |
| RISK-GC / RISK-CAP | OPEN | orphan / blob_ref / payload / retention observability |
Phase-1 |
| RISK-BYPASS (R7) | OPEN / BLOCKER | birth-gate + role/write-permission observability | Phase-1 + controlled+audited pilot |
| RISK-RUN (R6) | BLOCKER/REQUIRED | runtime liveness + config-load fail-closed | Phase-1 |
| RISK-STL (R3) | BLOCKER/REQUIRED | stale verdict / config drift | Phase-1 / spec |
| RISK-IDX (R2) | BLOCKER | full-scan / JSONB index risk (no full-scan birth_registry) |
Phase-1 (EXPLAIN) |
| RISK-AP (R1) | BLOCKER | atomic-promote lock/transaction (HOLD-2) | F4 implementation |
| RISK-CRASH (R8) | BLOCKER | crash/retry/double-promote/partial-state | Phase-1 / spec |
| RISK-TIME (R9) | BLOCKER | TTL/clock source/skew → freshness/expiry | Phase-1 / spec |
required-stamps runtime delivery |
UNKNOWN | trusting stamps are delivered/enforced | Phase-1 (D12) |
| checker / scanner / heartbeat implementation | DOCUMENTARY_ONLY | declaring any lane/scanner exists live | F4/F5 implementation (Owner gate) |
| CONS-004 / CONS-005 | DECIDED at F0 | — | reused (CONS-005 caveat: no runtime/checkout sync proof) |
No item above is resolved by this survey. Each remains Owner / Phase-1 / spec work.
11. Adversarial check result
All 14 packet §9 bad-assumptions were reproduced and all 14 Rejected — no bad assumption led to a PASS-to-act or a forbidden action, so F5 execution is not fail-open:
- required-stamps exists ⇒ runtime delivery → Rejected (UNKNOWN; D12). 2. scanner documented ⇒ scanner exists/runs → Rejected (DOCUMENTARY_ONLY). 3. Closing F4 / Codex PASS ⇒ build/run scanner → Rejected (Owner only; F5 = survey). 4.
birth_registry~1.2M ⇒ live full-scan for orphans → Rejected (documentary; RISK-IDX-004 forbids). 5. checker spec ⇒ promote lane to observe → Rejected ("No checker, no lane"; HOLD-2). 6. readsystem_issues/dot_tools/iu_staging_*live → Rejected (no live query; Phase-1). 7. scanner can fix what it lists → Rejected (de-bai §VI.7; D11 forbidden). 8. heartbeat proves liveness now → Rejected (no heartbeat run; RISK-RUN survey). 9. RISK-BYPASS observable ⇒ bypass controlled → Rejected (RISK-BYPASS-001/004 BLOCKER; pilot-gated). 10. freshness needs clock ⇒ assume clock source → Rejected (RISK-TIME-001 BLOCKER). 11. cell/IO observability works ⇒ CONS-003/002 resolved → Rejected (carried; RISK-CELL BLOCKERs). 12. documentary scanner = built scanner on paper → Rejected (documentary ≠ implemented). 13. F5 may writePROMOTE_BLOCKED/orphan states → Rejected (observation only; writes forbidden). 14. cross-F matrix may design how to close blockers → Rejected (non-authorizing; no technical design).
12. Non-authorization confirmation + self-check
This execution performed no forbidden action. It ran no Phase-1; queried no live DB / runtime / production; touched no iu_staging_* / dot_tools / birth_registry / system_issues live; called no birth/checker/promote/scanner function; created no source manifest / schema / table / registry / index; materialized no cell_id / dot_role / stamp column; created/ran no DOT / formula / assembly / checker / scanner; ran no promote / heartbeat; wrote no canonical birth / BIRTH_STAMP / PROMOTE_STAMP / PROMOTE_BLOCKED state; created no dashboard; resolved no CONS-002/003/CELL-*; produced no technical design and no implementation prompt.
Self-check: (1) 3 Owner questions preserved — Yes. (2) F5 kept to D11 + D12 only — Yes. (3) Avoided Phase-1 / DB / runtime — Yes. (4) Avoided scanner/heartbeat execution — Yes. (5) Avoided checker/promote/canonical birth — Yes. (6) Kept required-stamps runtime delivery UNKNOWN — Yes. (7) Kept checker/promote lane documentary/HOLD-2 — Yes. (8) Carried CONS-002/003/CELL-* honestly — Yes. (9) Distinguished documentary vs live — Yes. (10) Avoided technical design — Yes. (11) Avoided implementation prompt — Yes. (12) Owner/GPT the only phase authority — Yes.
13. Post-F0→F5 next-gate recommendation
- GPT/Owner read the F4 decision record + F5 packet + this F5 report + the cross-F evidence/readiness matrix.
- Route all four together to Codex for an independent control review (Codex = control verdict only).
- With F0→F5 surveyed and every operational candidate documentary-only / GAP / UNKNOWN / HOLD, the conservative recommendation is: before any F5 observability is built, the Owner should sequence the blocker-clearing work — resolve CONS-002 / CONS-003 / CELL-003/004/007 (Owner decision), then a Phase-1 read-only substrate/runtime survey (OP-1..12; RISK-RUN/SRC liveness preflight; HOLD-1;
birth_registry/dot_tools/iu_staging_*), then the HOLD-2 atomic-promote and checker-build design — because a scanner/heartbeat built on an unproven lane observes nothing trustworthy. - Default = HOLD. Codex PASS ≠ Owner phase-authorization. No scanner/heartbeat build, no checker/promote, no canonical birth, no Phase-1 until a separate Owner gate.
F5 Execution Report | 2026-06-16 | STATUS: PARTIAL (honest). F5 = D11 (Scanner/Observability/Heartbeat) + D12 (Runtime/Config/Operational Safety) surveyed read-only from KB. Every candidate DOCUMENTARY_ONLY / GAP / UNKNOWN / HOLD: scanner list-only & not implemented; runtime/config delivery UNKNOWN; checker/promote lane documentary/HOLD-2 ("No checker, no lane"); staging HOLD-1; canonical birth output-at-promote (observed by absence). CONS-002/003 + CELL-003/004/007 + STG-012/015 + STG-REUSE + DOT-CAP + Nhóm R RISK- carried, not resolved. No forbidden action performed. Documentary ≠ live proof. Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS. Codex PASS ≠ Owner phase-authorization.*