KB-33EE

F2 — Information Unit / Smart Brick + Temp Store / Candidate — Read-only Execution Report

31 min read Revision 1
laws-newf2information-unitsmart-bricktemp-storecandidateiu-stagingexecution-reportread-onlynon-authorizing2026-06-16

F2 — Information Unit / Smart Brick + Temp Store / Candidate — Read-only Execution Report

Ngày: 2026-06-16 · Soạn: Claude Code CLI (read-only AgentData KB) · Track: knowledge/dev/laws-new/ Packet basis: f2-information-unit-temp-store-reuse-survey-packet.md rev1 (this run; internal gate §10 passed — see §1). Control basis: technical-slice-framework.md rev56 (§6c D4/D5, §6.2/§6.3, §4, §5; S3 pin a2ab3582…889, len 117459). Concept basis: de-bai-cai-tien.md rev33 (§II/§IV/§V/§VI Lego Protocol; S4 pin 6e921f0a…704, len 29088). Catalog basis: cau-hoi-khi-tai-cau-truc.md rev82 (§2c/§2d, STG-/STG-REUSE-, CELL-/CONS-003; S5 pin 2da1a82…342, len 145449). Evidence/gate basis: F1 execution report rev1 (PARTIAL) + reports/f1/f1-owner-decision-record-2026-06-16.md rev1 (F1 gate CLOSED) + F0 decision record rev1 + F0 exec report rev1. Run authorization: GPT/Owner authorized the F2 Program Macro; this read-only execution ran only because the packet §10 internal gate passed (all 8 items GREEN). No Phase-1, no live DB/runtime, no implementation, no schema/registry/store creation, no canonical birth write, no CONS-003 / CELL- resolution, no cell_id materialization. Layer: F2 = one layer above F1 in the §6c build order; sits below F3 (IO Contract + Formula + Assembly Machine / DOT).


0. STATUS (one line at top)

STATUS: PARTIAL — F2 read-only execution is complete and honest. All F2 candidate assets are classified into Q1/Q2/Q3 from current-pass KB evidence, the 3 Owner questions are answered, the brick boundary (Smart Brick = subject / temp-store = place; TEMP_ID inherited; canonical birth = F4) is held, and every forbidden action remained blocked. PARTIAL (not PASS) because every F2 substrate candidate is DOCUMENTARY_ONLY and the temp-store substrate (iu_staging_record / iu_staging_payload) is UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE (CONFLICT) = HOLD-1 (framework §4; Phase-1 read-only verify required), and the gating conflicts/risks (CONS-003, CELL-003/004/007, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, STG-012, STG-015, STG-REUSE-001/003, RISK-GC/CAP/BYPASS) remain Owner-/Phase-1-gated and are carried, not resolved. No forbidden action performed. Documentary ≠ live proof · Prior-session ≠ current proof · Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS · Reuse-now ≠ live-proven.


1. Status / boundary confirmation (incl. internal gate result)

Internal gate (packet §10) — result: ALL GREEN → execution authorized in-macro.

# Gate item Result Evidence
G1 Mandatory sources readable ✅ GREEN F1 report/packet, F0 decision/exec, framework rev56, de-bai rev33, catalog rev82, constitution rev44 (Đ0-B/Đ29), operating-rules rev51 — all read this pass
G2 F1 gate closed first ✅ GREEN f1-owner-decision-record-2026-06-16.md rev1 accepts F1
G3 Every F2 asset classifiable honestly ✅ GREEN each Q1/Q2/Q3 row pinned to a KB source; no live proof invented
G4 No live DB/runtime/Phase-1 needed ✅ GREEN classification is documentary-only; iu_staging_* untouched
G5 No conflict resolution needed ✅ GREEN CONS-003 / CELL-003/004/007 carried, not resolved
G6 No schema/design/implementation needed ✅ GREEN no cell_id materialization; no new registry/store/table; no DOT/checker
G7 Boundary held ✅ GREEN brick = subject / temp-store = place; TEMP_ID inherited; no canonical birth
G8 3 Owner questions preserved ✅ GREEN Q1/Q2/Q3 answered in §2

Boundary confirmation:

  • read-only only (KB read; no live DB/runtime): yes
  • no live DB / Postgres / Directus / runtime / production touched: yes (iu_staging_* untouched — HOLD-1; Phase-1 untouched)
  • F2 scope kept to Information Unit / Smart Brick + Temp Store / Candidate (brick = subject; temp-store = place): yes
  • TEMP_ID / candidate identity inherited from F1 (no canonical birth / BIRTH_STAMP written): yes (F4 deferred)
  • no new Information Unit registry / temp-store table / packet store/ledger created: yes
  • cell_id / dot_role NOT materialized; CONS-003 / CELL-003/004/007 NOT resolved (carried): yes
  • exactly one F2 execution report document created (this file): yes

In-scope performed: pinned the documentary state of each F2 candidate from KB sources (framework §4/§5/§6.2/§6.3/D4/D5, de-bai §II/§V/§VI, catalog STG-/STG-REUSE-/REUSE rows), classified each into Q1/Q2/Q3 with an evidence pin and a documentary-vs-live label, restated the brick/temp-store boundary, and surfaced the gating conflicts/risks as carried obligations.


2. Owner View — 3 câu hỏi reuse-first (control surface, simple)

Đọc riêng mục này là đủ để Owner/GPT biết F2 đã phân loại gì để dùng lạikhông làm gì chạm hệ thống. Chi tiết kỹ thuật ở §3 trở xuống. Mục này KHÔNG ủy quyền bất cứ điều gì.

Owner question Answered? Summary (from current-pass KB evidence)
Q1 — Cái gì đang có và (giả thuyết) dùng lại được? (reuse-now — documentary) ✅ Yes Concept Smart Brick / "Miếng thông tin" (de-bai §II.1/§VI; framework D4) = dùng lại làm chủ thể trung tâm của F2. TEMP_ID / candidate identity kế thừa từ F1 (minimal identity root, no canonical birth). iu_staging_record / iu_staging_payload = ứng viên documentary cho kho tạm/candidate + candidate packet ([GR] 26 cột / 11 cột, CASCADE, 10MiB, blob_reftất cả HOLD-1, CHƯA live-proven). metadata/jsonb + payload parts + content_hash = lưu packet bằng jsonb thay vì bảng mới. Candidate packet = view/projection (candidate_id+packet_hash), không store mới. IO Contract 5-field (nhận·trả·schema_min·fail·rollback). cell_id concept (read-only hypothesis). Reuse-first rule (§2c) + Nhóm 0 + F0 baseline/decisions. Trung thực: "reuse-now" = ứng viên tài liệu mang sang F3 — KHÔNG = đã chứng minh live.
Q2 — Cái gì cần sửa/kiểm chứng mới dùng lại được? (repair / verify-before-reuse) ✅ Yes iu_staging_* live schema/lifecycle/TTL/candidate_id/blob_ref chỉ documentary (UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE CONFLICT, addendum HOLD, Codex checkout ref 0) → cần Phase-1 read-only verify (Owner-gated, không làm ở F2) = HOLD-1. Cleanup scheduler (STG-012 BLOCKER) — ai gọi fn_iu_staging_cleanup? packet_hash coverage (STG-015 BLOCKER). Shared-store sufficiency (STG-REUSE-001 BLOCKER). blob_ref orphan/cap (RISK-GC/RISK-CAP). Cell placement chặn bởi CONS-003 + CELL-003/004/007. IO Contract examples = GAP. Scanner/report insufficiency chưa proven. Checkout/runtime sync chưa proven (CONS-005 caveat).
Q3 — Cái gì thật sự phải làm thêm (chỉ khi reuse không đủ)? (add-later — future Owner-gated) ✅ Yes Chỉ future Owner-gated, NO by default: Phase-1 read-only survey iu_staging_* (HOLD-1); temp-store/candidate wrapper nhẹ (chỉ khi reuse không đủ); candidate-packet view/binding (không store mới); metadata/schema changes (incl. cell_id) sau proof + Owner gate; KHÔNG Information Unit registry / temp-store table / packet ledger mới; KHÔNG canonical birth/promote (F4). Mỗi "add-new" phải chứng minh đủ 5 điều kiện no-new (catalog §2c).

3. F2 asset classification table (consolidated — required format)

Mọi dòng substrate dưới là ứng viên documentary (framework §4 — DOCUMENTARY_ONLY; iu_staging_* = UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE/CONFLICT, HOLD-1). Reuse verdict = mang sang F3 như giả thuyết tài liệu, không = live-proven.

Asset Evidence source Currency Classification Reason
Information Unit / Smart Brick concept framework D4; de-bai §II.1/§VI documentary (concept) Q1 (concept reuse-now) "viên gạch thông minh" central subject; minimal brick = input·output·IO·DOT·rollback·promote (de-bai §VI.1). Live IU lifecycle chưa proven.
TEMP_ID / candidate identity (inherited F1) F1 report §7; de-bai §V.10; framework §6.2 documentary (concept; F1 in-scope root) Q1 (inherited) → Q2 (live home) identity root the brick stands on; TEMP_ID_STAMP/candidate_id/workspace_id. Live home = iu_staging_* = HOLD-1. No canonical birth.
iu_staging_record framework §4; catalog STG-001/003/006/007 UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE (CONFLICT) / HOLD-1 Q1 doc-candidate → Q2 (Phase-1 verify) temp-store/candidate home; [GR] 26 cột, PK uuid; addendum HOLD; Codex checkout ref 0. No new table.
iu_staging_payload framework §4; catalog STG-002/009 UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE (CONFLICT) / HOLD-1 Q1 doc-candidate → Q2 (Phase-1 verify) candidate packet payload; [GR] 11 cột, CASCADE, 10MiB, blob_ref. RISK-GC/RISK-CAP.
staging metadata jsonb + payload parts + content_hash catalog STG-008/009/010 (old survey) documentary (prior-session) Q1 doc-candidate → Q2 (live verify) store candidate packet by metadata/jsonb; content_hash=sha256(payload parts), KHÔNG bao metadata. Kept documentary (framework §18 ca 13).
Candidate packet (view/projection) de-bai §V.13; catalog STG-REUSE-002/003 documentary (design rule) Q1 (view logic) / Q3 (NO new store) packet = view/binding on existing metadata (candidate_id+packet_hash), verdict-only checker; new store = BLOCKER-if-proposed.
IO Contract 5-field framework §6b r1 / D6; de-bai §III.6/§VI.3 DOCUMENTARY_ONLY Q1 (boundary concept) → Q2 (examples GAP) nhận·trả·schema_min·fail·rollback; not Module Contract First; slice examples chưa biết.
fn_iu_cut_from_manifest framework D4 documentary (~70% reusable) Q1 doc-candidate → Q2 (wrapper) reuse via wrapper hypothesis for IU cut.
fn_iu_staging_create / fn_iu_staging_cleanup catalog STG-010/011; STG-REUSE-004/005 documentary (old survey) Q1 doc-candidate → Q2 (scheduler) create binds content_hash; cleanup 3-pass + dry-run; scheduler unproven (STG-012).
cell_id concept (inherited) framework §5 / §6.2; catalog CELL-REUSE-001/002 DOCUMENTARY_ONLY (concept) Q1 (concept) / Q2 (dimensions) / Q3 (materialize) tầng×loài×kho×miền read-only model; CONS-003 + CELL-003/004/007 unresolved; materialization = Owner-gated schema.
F0 source baseline (12) + F0/F1 decisions F0/F1 decision records current-pass (KB rev) Q1 (accepted reuse-now) authority/evidence basis; CONS-004 precedence; CONS-005 KB-only. Covers KB, not runtime.
BIRTH_STAMP / canonical birth boundary framework §6c D10; de-bai §V.5/§V.10 documentary (boundary) Not F2 (F4 output) closes at promote, not in kho tạm; carried as boundary, not an F2 asset.
HOLD-1 (iu_staging_*) framework §4/§18 ca 2; catalog STG-020 documentary/CONFLICT Carried Phase-1 obligation (Q2) temp-store/candidate home; verify-gated.
HOLD-2 (atomic promote) framework §4/§6c; de-bai §V.10/§V.13 documentary/BLOCKED Carried F4 obligation reason canonical birth stays F4.
CONS-003 / CELL-003/004/007 catalog CONS/CELL tables; constitution rev44 current-pass (CONFLICT/PARTIAL) Carried gating conflicts (Q2-gating) block cell placement; Owner-only; not resolved here.

4. Information Unit / Smart Brick analysis

  • What it is (read-only): the Information Unit / Smart Brick / "Miếng thông tin" is the central subject of the whole assembly system (framework D4: "Viên Lego thông minh trung tâm"; de-bai §II.1: "miếng thông tin là 'viên gạch thông minh'"). Its lifecycle (documentary): object sinh tối thiểu / candidate → vào kho tạm → nhận cell/context → IO check → formula/DOT xử lý → nhận stamp → scan thiếu dấu → promote hoặc delete → có thể thành material canonical cho tầng trên (framework D4).
  • Minimal brick shape (de-bai §VI.1/§VI.2, documentary): each brick = input · output · IO Contract · DOT xử lý/kiểm · rollback · trạng thái promote; at workspace/kho tạm minimally needs cell_id (hoặc pending) · input_refs · output_schema tối thiểu · IO Contract tối thiểu · rollback/xóa được. F2 reuses this as a documentary shape hypothesis, not as an implemented object.
  • Boundary held — brick ≠ temp-store: the brick is không chôn trong temp-store (framework D4 sub-note); the temp-store (D5) is only where the brick stands. F2 records this so F3 does not collapse the subject into its storage.
  • Forbidden held (framework D4): F2 does not (a) create an Information Unit registry by default, (b) turn the IU into a giant object model, (c) treat iu_staging_* as proven live substrate, (d) treat the IU lifecycle as implemented, or (e) promote without checker/Owner gate. Status recorded exactly: DOCUMENTARY_ONLY / GAP / CONFLICT (CONFLICT where tied to iu_staging_* HOLD-1); live IU lifecycle chưa proven.
  • F2 action taken: recorded the brick concept + minimal shape hypothesis + the not-buried boundary as a documentary deliverable for F3. No registry, no object model, no lifecycle implementation, no live proof claimed.

5. Temp-store / Candidate analysis

  • What it is (framework D5, documentary): the temp store / staging / candidate = nơi brick đứng trước kho chính — workspace/candidate; candidate_id; packet_hash; TTL; cleanup/delete-fast; blob_ref. Per-layer temp-store chưa live-proven; no new temp table.
  • Substrate candidates (documentary, HOLD-1):
    • iu_staging_recordUNKNOWN→likely-LIVE (CONFLICT); [GR] 26 cột, PK uuid; addendum "HOLD FOR SYSTEM CHECK"; Codex checkout ref 0. Candidate #1 for pre-promote staging + candidate packet store (KHÔNG tạo bảng mới). "Rủi ro cao nhất" nếu bind checker mà schema/lifecycle/TTL không đủ → cả lane sụp → Phase-1 verify (HOLD-1).
    • iu_staging_payloadUNKNOWN→likely-LIVE (CONFLICT); [GR] 11 cột, CASCADE, cap 10MiB, blob_ref. blob_ref → orphan/cleanup risk (RISK-GC); bind theo candidate_id chưa verify.
  • Candidate packet = view, not a store: the candidate packet is view/binding logic on existing staging metadata/payload (candidate_id + packet_hash), read by a verdict-only checker — it does not generate birth or write canonical (de-bai §V.13; catalog STG-REUSE-002). Creating a packet store/registry is BLOCKER-if-proposed (STG-REUSE-003) and forbidden by default.
  • Open verification items (carried, Owner-/Phase-1-gated): STG-012 cleanup scheduler (who calls fn_iu_staging_cleanup; no pg_cron) — BLOCKER; STG-015 packet_hash coverage (cell_id+stamps?) — BLOCKER; STG-REUSE-001 shared-store sufficiency for all tiers — BLOCKER; RISK-CAP (10 MiB / CASCADE behavior). TTL exists (expires_at NOT NULL, ceiling ≤ +30d per old survey STG-007) but the fail-safe depends on the unproven scheduler.
  • Forbidden held (framework D5): F2 does not create a temp-store/table, does not use system_issues/meta_catalog as the packet store, and does not default to a persisted packet ledger.
  • F2 action taken: recorded iu_staging_* as the documentary temp-store/candidate candidate (HOLD-1), the candidate-packet-as-view rule, and the open staging verifications as carried obligations. No query, no bind, no new store, no live proof claimed.

6. TEMP_ID inheritance from F1

  • Inherited as confirmed (F1 report §7): TEMP_ID / candidate identity is the minimal identity root F1 confirmed as in-scope — sufficient to operate (edit/check/delete/rollback) the brick in kho tạm (de-bai §V.10: căn cước tạm để thao tác). F2 reuses it as the identity the Smart Brick stands on before lifecycle.
  • Two identities kept distinct (de-bai §V.10, held): TEMP_ID_STAMP / CANDIDATE_ID_STAMP (kho tạm — workspace_id/candidate_id) vs BIRTH_STAMP (canonical, after promote). "KHÔNG dùng cùng một dấu cho hai nghĩa." Pre-promote stamps live in candidate/workspace metadata or staging record — KHÔNG ghi birth_registry canonical in kho tạm.
  • Live home = HOLD-1: the identity concept is confirmed, but its live home is iu_staging_* (HOLD-1) — unproven; carried as a Phase-1 obligation, not a reuse decision.
  • Boundary held: F2 writes no TEMP_ID_STAMP, no BIRTH_STAMP, no canonical record — it only classifies the inherited identity concept. Canonical birth remains the output at promote = F4.

7. cell_id / CONS / CELL blocker handling

  • cell_id carried as concept, not solved: cell_id = tầng × loài × kho × miền is a conceptual read-only attribute model (framework §5; §6.2 CELL_STAMP; UNKNOWN→chỉ kho tạm). The Smart Brick's minimal shape lists cell_id hoặc pending cell_id (de-bai §VI.2) — F2 keeps it pending, not placed.
  • Upstream conflict carried (NOT resolved): CONS-003 (6-vs-7 tầng) — CONFLICT / BLOCKER (TODO). Confirmed against constitution rev44: Đ0-B "7 Lớp Cấu tạo (33 species)", Đ29 "33 species, 7 dimensions" vs drafts' 6-tầng. Blocks any cell placement.
  • Dimension-source conflicts carried (NOT resolved): CELL-003 (layer: composition_level vs meta_catalog.layer) PARTIAL/BLOCKER; CELL-004 (species: 2 namespaces) CONFLICT/BLOCKER; CELL-007 (chuẩn 6-tầng; composition_level chưa enacted) PARTIAL/BLOCKER.
  • Forbidden held: F2 makes no dimension decision, no cell_id materialization (column/metadata = schema change, framework §19 STOP), and does not treat the brick's cell as solved. The brick may be classified with a pending cell only.
  • F2 action taken: recorded cell_id as a pending-coordinate hypothesis and CONS-003 / CELL-003/004/007 as carried obligations F3 must respect. No resolution, no materialization.

8. HOLD-1 handling

  • HOLD-1 = iu_staging_record / iu_staging_payload — UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE / CONFLICT ("HOLD FOR SYSTEM CHECK"); the natural F2 temp-store / candidate home and the TEMP_ID live home.
  • Treatment in F2: classified as a documentary candidate only (Q1 doc-candidate → Q2). Not queried, not bound, not marked live-proven. Framework §18 ca 2 ("iu_staging_* là live vì [GR] nói vậy" → PHASE-1 READ-ONLY SURVEY REQUIRED; mark CONFLICT/UNKNOWN, không bind) and ca 16 ("Mỗi layer đã có temp store sẵn" → REJECT → CONFLICT/UNKNOWN; không tạo temp-store/table mới) both applied.
  • Carried to: a separate Owner-gated Phase-1 read-only survey (schema / lifecycle / TTL / candidate_id / blob_ref / cleanup scheduler). This is not part of the F2 Program Macro and was not performed.

9. Evidence currency table — sources · evidence · authority · conflict · runtime · provenance · safety lock

Obligation F2 discharge (current-pass) Status
Sources Each F2 asset pinned to KB source (framework §4/§5/§6.2/§6.3/D4/D5; de-bai §II/§V/§VI; catalog STG-/STG-REUSE-/REUSE/CELL/CONS rows). Framework rev56 (S3 a2ab3582…889, len 117459), de-bai rev33 (S4 6e921f0a…704, len 29088), catalog rev82 (S5 2da1a82…342, len 145449), constitution rev44 (S1 579c8fb1…2c6), OR rev51 (S2 d7e6230…f4) — all read this run. PROVEN (KB-rev currency only)
Evidence Per-asset documentary-vs-live label applied; iu_staging_* = UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE/CONFLICT (HOLD-1); old-survey STG "ANSWERED" rows kept documentary (framework §18 ca 13); reported-LIVE not promoted. Discharged
Authority Applied F0-decided CONS-004 working precedence: KB = practical authority for laws-new/* docs; enacted constitution/OR higher (constitution rev44 Đ0-B/Đ29; OR rev51 VPS=SSOT, PG/Directus=truth); cross-class overlap = Owner gate. No cross-class conflict newly triggered by F2. Carried (CONS-004 decided at F0)
Conflict CONS-003, CELL-003/004/007, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, STG-012, STG-015, STG-REUSE-001/003, RISK-GC, RISK-CAP, RISK-BYPASS carried as unresolved obligations (see §10). Carried, not resolved
Runtime Recorded what is NOT proven without Phase-1: live staging schema/lifecycle/TTL/cleanup behavior; candidate_id/blob_ref binding; checkout/runtime sync (CONS-005 caveat). No runtime inferred from documentary. Discharged (recorded as gap)
Provenance current-pass (this run KB reads) vs prior-session ("old survey" STG-001..011 ANSWERED rows kept documentary) distinguished; F0/F1 decision lineage carried (CONS-004/005 decided at F0; OBL-R2 closed-by-decision). Discharged
Safety lock F2 boundary restated (brick = subject / temp-store = place; TEMP_ID inherited; no canonical birth; no new registry/store; no cell_id materialization); stop points named (packet §8). Discharged

10. Conflict / HOLD log (carried forward)

Item Status Blocks what Carried to
CONS-003 (6 tầng vs 7 composition levels) CONFLICT / BLOCKER (TODO) — constitution rev44 Đ0-B "7 Lớp Cấu tạo (33 species)" / Đ29 "33 species, 7 dimensions" vs drafts (6 tầng) cell placement; cell_id dimension resolution Owner decision — NOT resolved at F2
CELL-003 (layer source) PARTIAL / BLOCKER cell_id "Tầng" dimension Owner + Phase-1 verify
CELL-004 (species source) CONFLICT / BLOCKER cell_id "Loài" dimension (2 namespaces) Owner + Phase-1 verify
CELL-007 (chuẩn 6-tầng) PARTIAL / BLOCKER cell_id tier catalog (composition_level chưa enacted) Owner (tied to CONS-003)
HOLD-1 (iu_staging_record/iu_staging_payload) UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE / CONFLICT ("HOLD FOR SYSTEM CHECK") temp-store/candidate home; TEMP_ID live home; candidate packet store Phase-1 read-only survey (separate Owner gate)
HOLD-2 (atomic promote) BLOCKED (no real transaction) canonical birth / promote write F4
STG-012 (cleanup scheduler) TODO / BLOCKER trusting TTL/delete-fast; who calls fn_iu_staging_cleanup (no pg_cron) Phase-1 verify
STG-015 (packet_hash coverage) PARTIAL / BLOCKER candidate-packet tamper-binding (cell_id+stamps?) Owner/spec decision + Phase-1
STG-REUSE-001 (shared-store sufficiency) TODO / BLOCKER iu_staging_* as shared kho tạm for all tiers v0.1 Phase-1 verify
STG-REUSE-003 (no new packet store) BLOCKER-if-proposed any new packet store/registry default NO (de-bai §V.13)
RISK-GC (blob_ref orphan/cleanup) OPEN trusting payload blob lifecycle Phase-1 verify
RISK-CAP (CASCADE / 10 MiB cap) OPEN trusting payload under load Phase-1 verify
RISK-BYPASS (fn_birth_gate warning + kill-switch) OPEN (inherited F1) trusting the gate at promote Phase-1 + pilot gate (controlled+audited)
CONS-004 (authority order) DECIDED at F0 — applied, not re-opened reused as authority basis
CONS-005 (freeze baseline) DECIDED at F0 (accepted, KB-only) — reused — (caveat: no runtime/checkout sync proof) carried caveat

11. Adversarial check result (packet §9 — fail-closed)

# Bad assumption Rejected? Basis in this run
1 "iu_staging_* is live because [GR]/26-col/11-col says so." ✅ Rejected DOCUMENTARY / UNKNOWN→likely-LIVE; Codex checkout ref 0; framework §18 ca 2; HOLD-1
2 "Each layer already has a temp store ready to use." ✅ Rejected framework §18 ca 16 → CONFLICT/UNKNOWN; no new temp-store/table
3 "The IU lifecycle is implemented." ✅ Rejected framework D4 — DOCUMENTARY_ONLY; live IU lifecycle chưa proven
4 "Bury the brick in the temp-store." ✅ Rejected D4 — temp-store = place, not the brick; §4 boundary
5 "Create an Information Unit registry to organize IU." ✅ Rejected D4 Forbidden; no new sổ; 5 no-new conditions unmet
6 "Make the IU a giant object model." ✅ Rejected D4 Forbidden; minimal brick only
7 "Candidate packet needs a new store/ledger." ✅ Rejected STG-REUSE-002/003; de-bai §V.13 (packet = view)
8 "cell_id is solved, place the brick in its cell." ✅ Rejected CONS-003 + CELL-003/004/007 BLOCKER; §7 (pending cell only)
9 "TEMP_ID = canonical birth, write BIRTH_STAMP at candidate." ✅ Rejected de-bai §V.10 (two distinct stamps); canonical birth = F4; §6
10 "blob_ref cleanup is handled, reuse freely." ✅ Rejected RISK-GC; STG-012 cleanup scheduler unverified BLOCKER; §5
11 "Documentary row counts / old-survey 'ANSWERED' rows prove live." ✅ Rejected documentary ≠ live; framework §18 ca 13; §3/§9
12 "Promote the candidate without checker / Owner gate." ✅ Rejected D4 Forbidden; verdict-only checker + Atomic Promote Contract + Owner gate
13 "Reading staging schema live is fine because it's read-only." ✅ Rejected Phase-1 separately Owner-gated; no DB/runtime touched; §1
14 "Use system_issues / meta_catalog as the packet store." ✅ Rejected framework D5 Forbidden; §5

Conclusion: no bad assumption led to a PASS-to-act or a forbidden action → F2 execution is not fail-open.


12. Non-authorization confirmation + self-check

Non-authorization confirmation:

  • F2 read-only execution only: yes — this run executed the read-only F2 survey and nothing more.
  • no Phase-1: yes — no substrate survey; iu_staging_* untouched (HOLD-1).
  • no DB/runtime: yes — no live DB / Postgres / Directus / runtime / production read or write.
  • no iu_staging_* live touch: yes — classified documentary/HOLD-1 only; not queried/bound.
  • no cell_id materialization: yes — pending-coordinate hypothesis only; no column/metadata.
  • no schema/table/registry/store: yes — nothing created or altered; no IU registry / temp-store table / packet ledger.
  • no canonical birth: yes — not written; remains F4 output at promote (D10).
  • no BIRTH_STAMP / TEMP_ID_STAMP write: yes — concept only.
  • no implementation: yes — no code / migration / DDL / DML / DOT / checker / scanner / pilot.
  • no CONS-003 / CELL-003/004/007 resolution: yes — carried as BLOCKERs; CONS-004/005 only reused as F0-decided.
  • Documentary ≠ live proof · Prior-session ≠ current proof · Reuse-now ≠ live-proven · Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS.

Self-check:

  1. Answered the 3 Owner questions at the control surface: yes (§2).
  2. Kept F2 to Information Unit / Smart Brick + Temp Store / Candidate (brick = subject, temp-store = place): yes (§4, §5).
  3. Kept iu_staging_* documentary / HOLD-1 only: yes (§5, §8).
  4. Avoided cell_id materialization; carried CONS-003 / CELL-* honestly: yes (§7).
  5. Avoided live DB / runtime / Phase-1: yes (§1).
  6. Avoided new temp-store / table / registry / packet store: yes (§5).
  7. Avoided canonical birth / BIRTH_STAMP: yes (§6; F4 deferred).
  8. Distinguished documentary vs live proof: yes (§3, §9).
  9. Kept Owner/GPT as the only phase authority; Codex = control verdict only: yes.

Engineering PASS (report self-verifying complete & honest): achieved, with the explicitly-flagged PARTIAL condition (all candidates documentary-only; iu_staging_* HOLD-1; conflicts/risks carried). Authority PASS (permission to move to F3 / Phase-1 / detailed design): NOT granted — Owner-only.


13. F3 handoff / next-gate recommendation

  1. This F2 execution report → GPT/Owner, alongside the F1 decision record and the F2 packet. Owner reviews the Q1/Q2/Q3 classification (§2/§3), the Smart Brick analysis (§4), the temp-store/candidate analysis (§5), the TEMP_ID inheritance (§6), the cell_id/CONS/CELL handling (§7), HOLD-1 (§8), and the carried conflict/HOLD log (§10).
  2. Codex checkpoint (recommended). Owner may route the F1 decision + F2 packet + F2 report together to Codex for an independent control review (same 3-question Owner structure; deep layer = sources / evidence / authority / conflict / runtime / provenance / safety-lock).
  3. Owner decisions that F2 surfaces but does not make: resolve CONS-003 (6-vs-7 tầng) and CELL-003/004/007; authorize (or not) a scoped read-only Phase-1 substrate survey for HOLD-1 (iu_staging_* schema/lifecycle/TTL/candidate_id/blob_ref + STG-012 cleanup scheduler + STG-015 packet_hash + STG-REUSE-001 shared-store sufficiency + RISK-GC/RISK-CAP).
  4. F3 handoff. F3 (§6c) = IO Contract + Formula + Assembly Machine / DOT. F2 hands F3: a documentary Smart Brick shape hypothesis (minimal fields · inherited TEMP_ID/candidate_id · IO boundary · pending cell context · DOT/wrapper path · stamp path · temp-store path · delete/cleanup path); the temp-store/candidate reuse map (iu_staging_* + metadata/jsonb + candidate-packet-as-view) with HOLD-1 pinned as a Phase-1 obligation; the IO Contract 5-field boundary (nhận·trả·schema_min·fail·rollback) as the brick-to-brick contract F3 builds the assembly machine / DOT around — without Module Contract First; and the carried conflicts (CONS-003, CELL-003/004/007) + risks (RISK-GC, RISK-CAP, STG-012, STG-015) as obligations F3 must respect, not inherit as solved. F3 preparation must again preserve the 3 reuse-first Owner questions and remain non-authorizing until its own GPT → Codex → Owner gate.
  5. Nothing downstream is authorized by F2. Default HOLD for everything touching canonical / production / runtime / schema / cell_id materialization / new store. A clean F2 (or a Codex PASS on it) confirms classification quality only — it does not open F3, Phase-1, or any design/implementation. Only Owner opens phases.

F2 — Information Unit / Smart Brick + Temp Store / Candidate — Read-only Execution Report | 2026-06-16 | STATUS: PARTIAL (honest; all candidates documentary-only; iu_staging_* HOLD-1; CONS-003 / CELL-003/004/007 / HOLD-1 / HOLD-2 / STG-012 / STG-015 / STG-REUSE-001/003 / RISK-GC/CAP/BYPASS carried). READ-ONLY, NON-AUTHORIZING. Brick = subject ≠ temp-store = place. TEMP_ID inherited ≠ BIRTH_STAMP ≠ canonical birth (F4). Documentary ≠ live proof. Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/reports/f2/f2-information-unit-temp-store-execution-report-2026-06-16.md