KB-3766

F0 Source / Authority / Evidence — Read-only Execution Report — 2026-06-16

28 min read Revision 1
laws-newmatrix-assemblystamp-governancef0source-authority-evidenceexecution-reportread-onlynon-authorizingfreeze-candidatecons-004cons-005partial2026-06-16

F0 Source / Authority / Evidence — Read-only Execution Report

Ngày: 2026-06-16 · Soạn: Claude Code CLI (read-only AgentData KB + read-only local filesystem) · Track: knowledge/dev/laws-new/ Program basis: f0-source-authority-evidence-program-package.md rev3 (Codex PASS_WITH_COSMETIC_NOTES, accepted by GPT/Owner) · Control basis: technical-slice-framework.md rev56. Run authorization: GPT/Owner authorized F0 read-only execution only (this run). No Phase-1, no live DB/runtime, no implementation, no authority-order resolution, no baseline freeze.


0. STATUS (one line at top)

STATUS: PARTIAL — F0 read-only execution is complete and honest; all 12 pinnable mandatory sources (S1–S11 + R1) and the F0 package are pinned current-pass (PROVEN) at revisions matching the EXPECTED list exactly. PARTIAL (not PASS) for two non-blocking reasons only: (R2) the framework-rev56 Codex review artifact is NOT_FOUND in KB current-pass and stays PRIOR_SESSION_EVIDENCED (Owner relay), carried as an obligation; and (env) the checkout existence check is environment-limited to /Users/nmhuyen and must not be generalized. Neither blocks the next Owner gate. No forbidden action performed.


1. Owner View — 3 câu hỏi reuse-first (control surface, simple)

Đọc riêng mục này là đủ để Owner/GPT biết F0 đã làm gì / không làm gì. Chi tiết kỹ thuật ở §3 trở xuống. Mục này KHÔNG ủy quyền bất cứ điều gì. Documentary ≠ live proof · Prior-session ≠ current proof · Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS.

Owner question Answered? Summary (from current-pass evidence)
Q1 — Hiện có gì dùng lại được ngay? (reuse now) ✅ Yes AgentData KB là nơi giữ nguồn thực tế hiện hành cho laws-new — tất cả 12 nguồn bắt buộc đọc được, revision khớp đúng EXPECTED, đã pin rev+length+sha256 current-pass. Tái dùng được ngay cho việc lập kế hoạch/thực thi F0: bộ document governed (constitution rev44, OR rev51, framework rev56, de-bai rev33, catalog rev82, required-stamps rev6, checker-spec rev11, addendum rev14, quick-rules rev8, plan rev5, roadmap rev1, codex catalog review rev1); cách inline-evidence (không manifest); bộ từ vựng evidence (PROVEN/DOCUMENTARY_ONLY/UNKNOWN/CONFLICT/BLOCKED/DEFER/PRIOR_SESSION); mẫu freeze-candidate; completion-contract + stop-conditions + adversarial-checks. Trung thực: "reuse-now" = dùng lại được cho F0, KHÔNG có nghĩa "đã chứng minh live/runtime". Đọc 1 KB revision chỉ chứng minh KB revision đó.
Q2 — Có gì phải sửa/kiểm chứng mới dùng lại được? (repair / verify before reuse) ✅ Yes 7 mục (xem §10): (1) Thứ tự authority KB-vs-checkout-vs-runtime chưa ban hành → CONS-004 OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED; (2) Baseline freeze mới ở mức candidate → CONS-005 Owner-only; (3) Codex review rev56 (R2) không tìm thấy file KB riêng → còn PRIOR_SESSION_EVIDENCED, cần Owner xác nhận relay là bản ghi chính thức; (4) Catalog rev82 vs header self-label = CONFLICT cosmetic, không chặn; (5) Checkout absence chỉ kiểm theo môi trường này, không tổng quát hóa; (6) required-stamps KB→runtime delivery = UNKNOWN, phải Owner-gated runtime read; (7) current-pass vs prior-session phải verify trước khi mark PROVEN. Không mục nào chặn chấp nhận report; (1)(2)(6) chặn pha sau cho tới khi Owner quyết.
Q3 — Cần làm thêm gì nữa? (add later — chỉ khi reuse không đủ) ✅ Yes 6 mục, không làm ở đây, không được run này ủy quyền, chỉ future Owner-gated (xem §11): Owner quyết CONS-004; Owner quyết CONS-005; runtime config-delivery check (SRC-009/010); Phase-1 substrate survey (HOLD-1, iu_staging_*); package F1/F2; (và KHÔNG dựng source-manifest system trừ khi Owner ra exception). Mỗi "add-new" KHÔNG tự biến thành authorization.

2. F0 SCOPE CONFIRMATION (§16)

  • read-only only: yes (KB read + local filesystem existence checks only)
  • no live DB / Postgres / Directus / runtime / production touched: yes
  • no manifest / schema / registry / table / DOT / index / checker / scanner / pilot created: yes
  • authority order NOT resolved (CONS-004 carried as obligation): yes
  • baseline NOT frozen (CONS-005 freeze-candidate proposal only): yes
  • exactly one report document created (this file): yes
  • enacted laws under knowledge/dev/laws/ not patched; no code/migration/DDL/DML written: yes

3. Source pin table — freeze-CANDIDATE baseline (inline, no manifest)

Method. content_length = KB-reported character length (matches get_document metadata exactly where cross-checked). content_sha256 = SHA-256 over the UTF-8 encoding of the exact content retrieved this pass from AgentData KB (batch_read full=true). For multi-byte (Vietnamese/em-dash) docs the byte length exceeds char length (e.g., F0 package: 37427 chars / 38849 bytes; framework: 117459 chars / 128591 bytes); the hash anchors the exact retrieved content for tamper/drift detection. This is a freeze-CANDIDATE proposal for Owner (CONS-005), NOT an enacted/frozen baseline.

# Source KB rev (current-pass) EXPECTED rev (§2 pkg) Match content_length content_sha256 Read status Currency
S1 knowledge/dev/laws/constitution.md 44 44 19132 579c8fb1a92762708f275a76a5c858bebee0172a356fbe8eb3d8a999df87d2c6 PROVEN current-pass
S2 knowledge/dev/ssot/operating-rules.md 51 51 5400 d7e6230e03305591966cb0b0ad8404ae520a7aa3c678067811fa950c21cef4f4 PROVEN current-pass
S3 knowledge/dev/laws-new/technical-slice-framework.md 56 56 117459 a2ab35827956b9b7a16e46e4f66d6edae28e2651a73b01a9cc249a86894ff889 PROVEN current-pass
S4 knowledge/dev/laws-new/de-bai-cai-tien.md 33 33 29088 6e921f0a9026bc66bc24f147610064cf6f7de61b289c9a6a1a6a072d56411704 PROVEN current-pass
S5 knowledge/dev/laws-new/cau-hoi-khi-tai-cau-truc.md 82 82 145449 2da1a823a2a0305bb06491f3a83efbb7cddc1c2c241d0c03bcef9b962cf1e342 PROVEN current-pass
S6 knowledge/dev/laws-new/required-stamps.v0.1.json 6 6 3111 ed6edf20f2c4bd21fdd191860638c1ace6bd449c8133bc24147a9cf2f085f48c PROVEN (valid JSON) current-pass
S7 knowledge/dev/laws-new/promote-checker-v0.1-spec.md 11 11 6028 3e7bb498ced58db8b549cc62897a3a8eea95dae4028d07b5670f8653ad94b579 PROVEN current-pass
S8 knowledge/dev/laws-new/matrix-stamp-governance-addendum.md 14 14 26474 0cbff3db696de5ef66d8e63efd288930783133ba3dbb90a0c4f3c084cef8974f PROVEN current-pass
S9 knowledge/dev/laws-new/matrix-refactor-quick-rules.md 8 8 6057 85a1be76f3054e162be95a8d0a47d50ebbbc59000781bfbff58513545b08e15c PROVEN current-pass
S10 knowledge/dev/laws-new/matrix-refactor-implementation-plan.md 5 5 27905 d17c0dac3da0e9bc273b143b76ad504077b0811b010e2e400efee14e35dd4046 PROVEN current-pass
S11 knowledge/dev/laws-new/roadmap-cai-tien.md 1 1 15107 e4ef1bcfeb70e3f68c652173a2acdf7bead64d6f025c417b0b8280b04f62787c PROVEN current-pass
R1 knowledge/dev/laws-new/reports/codex/codex-final-question-catalog-approval-review-2026-06-15.md 1 1 7880 73be6ecdf65a8f7efc7a41a6ebb381825facf2c5b560df1ac320cd1b4e59b4b6 PROVEN current-pass
R2 Codex review of framework rev56 PRIOR_SESSION_EVIDENCED NOT_FOUND in KB (current-pass search + listing) prior-session (relay)
pkg knowledge/dev/laws-new/f0-source-authority-evidence-program-package.md 3 3 37427 edb3de83b895d238e131285d88a2e2f42762750f46078294b762a44b500fa0d7 PROVEN current-pass

Cross-validation (independent corroboration): R1 (the Codex catalog review) records in its own body "AgentData KB revision 82; content length 145449" for the catalog — which matches the S5 current-pass read exactly (rev 82, len 145449). This independently corroborates the S5 pin.

Anchor facts re-verified current-pass inside the retrieved bodies (so downstream claims are evidence-grounded, not relayed): constitution = "v4.6.3 BAN HÀNH", NT10 (PG vs text), NT13 (PG First / PG Native / PG-driven), NT14 "THỰC THI ĐƯỢC NGAY" present; operating-rules §0.3 "VPS = SSOT code/runtime", §0.4 "PG/Directus là đường dữ liệu chuẩn", "Assembly First" present; catalog rev82 contains CONS-004 (×3), CONS-005 (×1), SRC-001/007/009/010, "Nhóm S (source/runtime gates)"; required-stamps.v0.1.json is valid JSON (config-as-metadata; keys _meta/core_stamps/lifecycle/…); de-bai carries "quan hệ/relationship completion"; roadmap rev1 is DRAFT — KHÔNG PHẢI BAN HÀNH.

Honest note: the package §6.1 quotes NT10 verbatim as "Text = documentation. PG = truth." In rev44 the principle is present and labelled "NT10 (PG vs text)" plus NT13 "PG First/PG Native/PG-driven"; treat the exact package wording as a documentary paraphrase of the present-and-confirmed PG-over-text principle.


4. Checkout existence table (read-only, per-environment — NOT generalized)

Environment id: host=Nguyens-MacBook-Air.local · cwd=/Users/nmhuyen · git: NOT a repository (fatal: not a git repository). A partial local knowledge/ tree exists (667 files under dev/{design,lark,planning,reports,requirements}) but contains no dev/laws, dev/laws-new, or dev/ssot subtree.

Path / group checkout_present? Environment Notes (current-pass)
dev/laws/ dir No /Users/nmhuyen dir absent
dev/laws-new/ dir No /Users/nmhuyen dir absent
dev/ssot/ dir No /Users/nmhuyen dir absent
S1 constitution.md (canonical path) No /Users/nmhuyen absent at knowledge/dev/laws/constitution.md
S2 operating-rules.md (canonical path) No /Users/nmhuyen absent at knowledge/dev/ssot/operating-rules.md
S3–S11, R1, F0 pkg (canonical laws-new/* paths) No (all 12) /Users/nmhuyen every file absent at canonical path
any local constitution.md at all Different doc only /Users/nmhuyen only copies found are stale cursor backups .cursor-environment-backup/**/memory_log/constitution.md = "Hiến Pháp Hạ Tầng Agent Data v1.11e" (Dec 2 2025) — a different, older document, NOT the enacted v4.6.3 rev44

Current-pass conclusion (this environment only): the laws-new/* track, the enacted laws (dev/laws), and dev/ssot are absent from any working checkout here; AgentData KB is the de-facto sole holder for the laws-new governance track. This re-verifies current-pass the framework §1 / package §6.1 observation that was previously PRIOR_SESSION_EVIDENCED. Do NOT generalize: absence here ≠ absence in other environments (e.g., the VPS or a CI checkout were not inspected and are out of F0 scope).


5. Evidence currency table (§7)

Fact Currency class Status Note
KB revisions + length + sha256 of S1–S11, R1, F0 pkg current-pass PROVEN read this run; proves the KB revision only — not checkout/runtime
Checkout absence of laws-new/* + enacted laws @ /Users/nmhuyen current-pass PROVEN (per-env) test -f/find this run; not generalized (§15 #3)
All EXPECTED revisions match observed current-pass PROVEN 12/12 pinnable sources match §2 EXPECTED exactly
Framework-rev56 Codex verdict = PASS_WITH_COSMETIC_NOTES prior-session (relay) PRIOR_SESSION_EVIDENCED relayed by GPT/Owner; no distinct KB artifact found current-pass (R2 obligation)
laws-new/* exist only in KB (cross-environment) prior-session re-verified only for /Users/nmhuyen other environments not inspected
required-stamps KB→runtime delivery documentary DOCUMENTARY_ONLY / UNKNOWN runtime read out of F0 scope (obligation SRC-009/010)
Any "live/GOVERNED/row-count/substrate" assertion documentary DOCUMENTARY_ONLY never promoted to live proof (hostile case "row13")
KB-vs-checkout-vs-runtime authority order documentary CONFLICT / OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED CONS-004; not resolved here

6. F0 evidence table (framework §13 columns + provenance)

Claim / Area What would prove it Evidence currently present Evidence still missing Provenance Status Blocks next phase?
KB rev/len/hash of each mandatory source Read KB current-pass §3 table, 12/12 pinned, match EXPECTED current-pass PROVEN No
laws-new/* + enacted laws present in checkout test -f current-pass per env §4 table: all absent @ /Users/nmhuyen per-env re-check elsewhere (VPS/CI) current-pass (this env) + prior-session (others) CONFLICT/UNKNOWN until other envs checked Yes if a sync/export is required
KB→checkout sync/export process (SRC-003) Evidence of a sync pipeline none located current-pass sync-process evidence documentary UNKNOWN → obligation Possibly (if checkout must mirror KB)
Authority order KB vs checkout vs runtime Owner ratifies an order §7 observed facts + conflict Owner CONS-004 decision documentary OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED (CONS-004) Yes
required-stamps KB→runtime delivery Owner-authorized runtime read KB config rev6 only (valid JSON) runtime delivery check (SRC-009/010) documentary DOCUMENTARY_ONLY → obligation Yes if checker (downstream)
Codex rev56 review artifact (R2) Locate KB file OR Owner confirms relay task/Owner relay = PASS_WITH_COSMETIC_NOTES distinct KB report file (not found) prior-session/relay PRIOR_SESSION_EVIDENCED No
Catalog rev vs header self-label Compare index vs header KB index rev82; header self-labels rev3/rev4 (per Codex cosmetic note) current-pass + documentary CONFLICT (cosmetic, non-blocking) No
Freeze baseline Owner freeze (CONS-005) §3 freeze-candidate (proposal) Owner freeze decision current-pass (candidate) proposal — not enacted Yes

7. CONS-004 evidence bundle (authority order — NOT resolved)

F0 gathers evidence only. The Owner resolves CONS-004. No winner is picked here.

Observed facts (current-pass where marked; provenance explicit):

  • laws-new/*, enacted laws, and dev/ssot are absent from the checkout at /Users/nmhuyen (current-pass, this env) → KB is the de-facto sole holder for the laws-new track. (Not generalized to other environments.)
  • Operating-rules §0.3 (enacted, rev51, current-pass): "VPS = SSOT code/runtime nếu đụng hệ thống đang chạy."
  • Operating-rules §0.4 (enacted, rev51, current-pass): "PG/Directus là đường dữ liệu chuẩn."
  • Constitution (enacted, rev44, current-pass): NT10 (PG vs text — PG = truth over documentation); NT13 (PG First / PG Native / PG-driven).

The conflict (why CONS-004 is real): the enacted authority statements cover code/runtime (VPS=SSOT) and machine-enforced data (PG=truth), but do not cover governance documents that live only in KB and exist in neither checkout nor runtime. There is no enacted single KB-vs-checkout-vs-runtime orderCONFLICT / UNKNOWN.

Non-binding candidate framing (DOCUMENTARY_ONLY · OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED · NOT enacted by F0):

Candidate (pending CONS-004): for the laws-new/* governance track, KB is de-facto authoritative pending Owner ratification; for code/runtime, VPS = SSOT (OR §0.3); for machine-enforced data, PG = truth (NT10/NT13). Cross-class precedence when these overlap remains an Owner decision.

Disposition: CONS-004 = OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED. F0 stops at evidence.


8. CONS-005 freeze-candidate baseline (proposal — NOT frozen)

The freeze-CANDIDATE baseline is the §3 source pin table (path + kb_revision + content_length + content_sha256 + checkout_present + currency + status), held inline (no manifest, SRC-005 NO-BY-DESIGN). It is a proposal for Owner. F0 does not declare a frozen/enacted baseline. CONS-005 = OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED (accept / adjust the candidate, then freeze).


9. Authority questions (§4) — answered with evidence or carried as obligation

Q Catalog id F0 answer (current-pass) / obligation Status
A1 single authoritative source per file SRC-001 KB is de-facto sole holder (checkout absent here); order not enacted partial → CONS-004 obligation
A2 do files exist in checkout SRC-002 No — all 12 absent @ /Users/nmhuyen (per-env) PROVEN (per-env)
A3 KB→checkout sync process SRC-003 no sync process evidenced current-pass UNKNOWN → obligation
A4 canonical rev/hash baseline SRC-004 §3 table inline (rev+len+sha256) PROVEN
A5 manifest of file+rev+location? SRC-005 NO BY DESIGN — inline evidence only; manifest not created answered (NO)
A6 are Codex/Claude/Agent reading same rev SRC-006 R1 (Codex) cites catalog rev82/len145449 = matches current KB; Claude(this run)=same revs; other consumers documentary partial — PROVEN for R1 consistency; drift elsewhere = documentary
A7 if KB and checkout disagree, who wins SRC-007 / CONS-004 not resolved — evidence gathered (§7) OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED
A8 source-sync preflight required? SRC-008 Yes — this F0 run IS that read-only preflight answered (YES, done)
A9 config KB→runtime delivery SRC-009 not read (runtime out of scope) DOCUMENTARY_ONLY → obligation
A10 fail-closed if config stale SRC-010 downstream checker design obligation obligation (BLOCKER-if-checker)
A11 authority order if docs conflict CONS-004 not resolved (§7) OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED
A12 Owner freeze needed before slice survey? CONS-005 Yes — §8 candidate proposed; Owner freezes answered (YES)
A13 stamps carry rule_version/config_hash? RISK-STL-001 documentary/design only (catalog Nhóm R/STL) obligation (source-currency relevance only)

F0 answered A2/A4/A5/A8/A12 with current-pass evidence; carries A1/A3/A7/A9/A10/A11/A13 as Owner-decision / runtime / downstream obligations. No F0 answer authorizes a phase transition.


10. Repair / verify-before-reuse list (Q2 detail)

# Cái đang có Sai/không chắc Phải verify/repair Chặn chấp nhận report? Chặn pha sau?
1 Authority order KB-vs-checkout-vs-runtime chưa ban hành Owner ratify (CONS-004) No Yes
2 Baseline freeze mới ở mức candidate Owner freeze (CONS-005) No Yes
3 Codex rev56 review (R2) không có file KB riêng (NOT_FOUND current-pass) Owner confirm relay là bản ghi chính thức, hoặc định vị artifact No No (currency obligation)
4 Catalog rev82 vs header self-label rev3/rev4 lệch cosmetic ghi CONFLICT, Owner awareness No No
5 Checkout absence chỉ đúng cho /Users/nmhuyen re-check per environment khác (VPS/CI) khi cần No Yes (per-env / if sync required)
6 required-stamps KB→runtime delivery UNKNOWN Owner-gated runtime read (SRC-009/010) No Yes (downstream/runtime)
7 current-pass vs prior-session dễ nhầm verify current-pass trước khi PROVEN (đã áp dụng run này) No Yes

11. Add-later-only-if-needed list (Q3 detail)

# Cần làm thêm Trạng thái trong run này
1 Owner quyết CONS-004 (authority order) not done · not authorized here · Owner-only
2 Owner quyết CONS-005 (freeze baseline) not done · not authorized here · Owner-only
3 Runtime config-delivery check (SRC-009/010) not done · future Owner-gated runtime read
4 Phase-1 substrate survey (HOLD-1, iu_staging_*) not done · future Owner-gated
5 Package F1 / F2 not done · future Owner-gated
6 Source manifest system NOT to be built unless Owner issues an exception proving inline-evidence insufficient

Every Q3 item: not executed, not authorized by this run, future Owner-gated. An "add-new" never self-converts into authorization.


12. Obligations carried forward (§16)

id Obligation Needs
OBL-R2 Locate the framework-rev56 Codex review KB artifact, OR Owner confirms the GPT/Owner relay is the authoritative record Owner confirmation / artifact location (NOT_FOUND in KB current-pass)
OBL-SRC-003 Determine/record the KB→checkout sync/export process (or confirm none) read-only discovery; out of this run's located evidence
OBL-SRC-009/010 required-stamps.v0.1.json KB→runtime delivery + fail-closed-on-stale behavior Owner-authorized runtime read (downstream, NOT F0)
OBL-CONS-004 Resolve KB-vs-checkout-vs-runtime authority order Owner decision (evidence bundle §7 ready)
OBL-CONS-005 Freeze (accept/adjust) the source authority/revision/hash baseline Owner decision (candidate §3/§8 ready)
OBL-ENV Re-run checkout existence in other environments (VPS/CI) before treating absence as global per-environment read-only checks when an environment becomes in-scope
OBL-RISK-STL-001 Verify stamps/verdicts carry rule_version/config_hash (staleness detectable) downstream design (catalog Nhóm R)

13. STOP / blocker log (§14)

item status reason
Live DB / Postgres / Directus query STOPPED (not performed) Phase-1/runtime, Owner-gated; F0 ≠ Phase-1
Runtime config-delivery read (SRC-009/010) STOPPED (not performed) touching runtime needs Owner authorization → obligation
Resolve CONS-004 authority order STOPPED (not resolved) Owner-only; evidence gathered, no winner picked
Freeze CONS-005 baseline STOPPED (candidate only) Owner-only; proposal emitted, not enacted
Create source manifest system STOPPED (not created) SRC-005 NO-BY-DESIGN; inline evidence only
Create schema/table/registry/index/DOT/checker/scanner/pilot STOPPED (none created) forbidden (§10); STOP-before-schema-change
Patch enacted laws knowledge/dev/laws/ STOPPED (untouched) forbidden
R2 rev56 review artifact BLOCKED (NOT_FOUND in KB) no distinct KB file; carried as OBL-R2 (non-blocking)
Checkout check in other environments DEFERRED per-env; only /Users/nmhuyen in scope this run (OBL-ENV)

No blocker prevents producing an honest report; the run proceeds as PARTIAL.


14. Adversarial check result (§15)

# Bad assumption Rejected? Evidence in this run
1 "Last-session KB rev is still current." ✅ Rejected re-read all revs current-pass this run; 12/12 match EXPECTED, marked PROVEN only after current-pass read
2 "Documentary row-counts / 'LIVE/GOVERNED' labels prove substrate." ✅ Rejected no substrate touched; all live/runtime assertions kept DOCUMENTARY_ONLY
3 "Checkout absent here ⇒ absent everywhere." ✅ Rejected env id recorded (/Users/nmhuyen); absence NOT generalized; OBL-ENV carried
4 "When KB/checkout/runtime disagree, use the convenient one." ✅ Rejected CONS-004 marked OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED; no winner picked (§7)
5 "F0 should build a source-manifest file/system." ✅ Rejected inline evidence only; no manifest created (SRC-005)
6 "Reading runtime config is read-only so it's fine." ✅ Rejected runtime not read; carried as OBL-SRC-009/010
7 "Codex/Owner PASS on framework = authority to run/freeze." ✅ Rejected Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS; freeze + phase = Owner-only
8 "A source I couldn't read can be assumed unchanged/PROVEN." ✅ Rejected R2 NOT_FOUND → BLOCKED/obligation, never silently PROVEN
9 "F0 can pin AND freeze the baseline itself." ✅ Rejected §8 candidate only; CONS-005 Owner-only
10 "F0 resolves authority order so downstream can proceed." ✅ Rejected evidence only; CONS-004 unresolved
11 "F0 can query live DB (iu_staging_*) to verify a source." ✅ Rejected no DB; Phase-1 HOLD-1 untouched
12 "Revision alone is enough; hash/length is overkill." ✅ Rejected recorded rev + content_length + sha256 inline for every readable source
13 "F0 is small, so it can peek at one substrate table." ✅ Rejected scope = KB + checkout existence only; zero substrate

Conclusion: no bad assumption led to a PASS-to-act or a forbidden action → F0 execution is not fail-open.


15. Self-check (§7 of task / §18 pkg)

  1. Answered the 3 Owner questions at the top: yes (§1).
  2. Pinned current-pass KB revisions + content_length + sha256: yes (§3, 12/12 readable sources).
  3. Distinguished current-pass / prior-session / documentary: yes (§5).
  4. Did not turn EXPECTED revisions into PROVEN without a current-pass read: yes (all PROVEN rows were read this run).
  5. Avoided live DB / runtime: yes.
  6. Avoided creating a source manifest: yes.
  7. Avoided resolving authority order / freezing baseline: yes (CONS-004 obligation; CONS-005 candidate).
  8. Rejected all bad inputs (§14): yes — incl. "last-session rev is current", "documentary proves live", "checkout absent here ⇒ everywhere", "convenient source wins", "runtime read OK because read-only", "Q1 reusable means live-proven", "Q3 add-later means authorized".

Engineering PASS (report self-verifying complete & honest): achievable — this report meets the §12 quality bar except the two explicitly-flagged non-blocking PARTIAL conditions (R2 + per-env checkout). Authority PASS (permission to move to F1 / Phase-1): NOT granted — Owner-only.


16. Non-authorization confirmation

  • F0 execution only: yes — this run executed the read-only F0 survey and nothing more.
  • no Phase-1: yes — no substrate survey, iu_staging_* untouched.
  • no DB/runtime: yes — no live DB / Postgres / Directus / runtime / production read or write.
  • no source manifest: yes — inline evidence only.
  • no implementation: yes — no code / migration / DDL / DML / schema / table / registry / index / DOT / checker / scanner / pilot.
  • no authority resolution: yes — CONS-004 = OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED.
  • no baseline freeze: yes — CONS-005 = freeze-candidate proposal only.
  • Documentary ≠ live proof · Prior-session ≠ current proof · Freeze-candidate ≠ frozen baseline · Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS.

17. Next-gate recommendation (§17)

  1. This F0 execution report → GPT/Owner. Owner reviews the §3 freeze-candidate baseline + §7 CONS-004 evidence bundle + §12 obligations.
  2. Codex checkpoint (recommended). Owner may route this report to Codex for an independent control review (as with rev56 / the catalog).
  3. Owner decisions unlocked by F0 (framework §14.4/§14.5): accept/adjust + freeze the source baseline (CONS-005); resolve/record the authority order (CONS-004); confirm OBL-R2 (rev56 review relay) is the authoritative record.
  4. Only after Owner freezes the baseline and resolves/records CONS-004 may the program move toward F1 (Birth/Identity root + registries/matrix classification) and/or a separately-authorized scoped read-only Phase-1 substrate survey (HOLD-1).
  5. Nothing downstream is authorized by F0. Default HOLD for everything touching canonical / production / runtime / schema. A clean F0 (or a Codex PASS on it) confirms evidence quality only — it does not open the next phase. Only Owner opens phases.

F0 Source / Authority / Evidence — Read-only Execution Report | 2026-06-16 | STATUS: PARTIAL (honest; non-blocking R2 + per-env checkout). READ-ONLY, NON-AUTHORIZING. Freeze-candidate ≠ frozen baseline. CONS-004 / CONS-005 = OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED. Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/reports/f0/f0-source-authority-evidence-execution-report-2026-06-16.md