KB-3A1A

Codex Review — Macro-8 Owner Five-Gate Decision R2-B2 Staging Workbench (2026-06-19)

9 min read Revision 1
codex-reviewmacro-8R2-B2five-gateowner-decisionstaging-workbenchread-onlynon-authorizing2026-06-19

Codex Review — Macro-8 Owner Five-Gate Decision R2-B2 Staging Workbench (2026-06-19)

STATUS: PASS_WITH_CAVEATS

OFFICIAL REPORT: knowledge/dev/laws-new/reports/codex/codex-review-macro8-owner-five-gate-decision-r2-b2-staging-workbench-2026-06-19.md

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • Verdict: ACCEPT the single Macro-8 Owner/Delegate Five-Gate Decision Record as a valid replacement for the proposed 80-file Macro-8 package.
  • The artifact records the five decisions at authority-record / paper-decision level only and keeps EXECUTE not started.
  • §6 patch is acceptable: Macro-9 is limited to dedicated run-scoped staging schema + minimal empty/synthetic shell objects + no-production-touch/delete-fast proof.
  • The artifact does not launch Macro-9 and does not authorize runtime enactment now.
  • Caveats remain: inherited Macro-7 baseline, same-cluster directus DB risk, Điều 0-G production-source gap, agent-api not wired, governance owner row not written, and Macro-9 still requires a separate explicit launch and fresh preflight.

FILE / METADATA AUDIT

Check Verdict Issue
Target file exists PASS Exact KB path read: knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/macro8-owner-five-gate-decision-r2-b2-staging-workbench-2026-06-19.md.
Target KB revision is 2 PASS AgentData list/readback observed storage revision 2.
content_length present PASS Target readback observed content_length 10716 and has_more=false.
Single KB artifact PASS knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/macro8- returned exactly one item.
80-file Macro-8 package not produced PASS Artifact states it replaces the proposed 80-file sprawl; inventory shows one Macro-8 artifact.
Macro-9 not launched PASS macro9- consolidation and report prefixes returned 0 items.
Editorial rev1 marker PASS Harmless; artifact states AgentData storage revision/content_length are authoritative.

FIVE-GATE DECISION AUDIT

Gate Recorded decision Verdict Issue
P1 Owner build approval Conditional GO for Macro-9 to build exactly one disposable staging workbench shell PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Authority-record only; no build occurs now.
P2 / GATE-4 channel agent-api staging-only, directional only PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Not wired, bound, or promoted.
P3 / GATE-5 S2 owner Role accepted: R2-B2 Staging Workbench Owner; accountable Owner/User, GPT orchestrator, Claude Code execution steward PASS_WITH_CAVEATS No governance_object_ownership row written.
P4 / GATE-3 Điều 0-G accept-with-caveat, staging-only, provisional/candidate only PASS_WITH_CAVEATS No source patch; production/certify recovery still required.
SB-4 isolation separate run-scoped schema inside directus DB, zero production data, delete-fast mandatory PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Same-cluster risk remains; separate DB safer but deferred.

REQUEST / GRANT / EXECUTE AUDIT

Check Verdict Issue
REQUEST complete PASS Artifact states five-gate question is fully specified and answered.
GRANT recorded 5/5 PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Recorded at paper/authority level only.
Runtime GRANT/enactment avoided PASS Artifact says runtime status remains default HOLD on all runtime mutation.
EXECUTE not started PASS No schema/table/corpus/workbench object created.
Macro-9 not launched PASS Artifact states Macro-9 is not launched; inventory confirms no Macro-9 KB artifact.
REQUEST/GRANT/EXECUTE separation PASS Table in §5b keeps all three separated.

SECTION 6 PATCH AUDIT

Check Verdict Issue
Dedicated run-scoped staging schema only PASS §6 limits Macro-9 to dedicated run-scoped staging schema.
Minimal empty/synthetic shell only PASS §6 limits objects to minimal empty/synthetic shell required to represent workbench.
No-production-touch proof PASS §6 requires proof.
Delete-fast readiness proof PASS §6 requires proof.
No agent-api wiring/binding PASS §6 explicitly forbids wiring/binding staging contract.
No governance owner row PASS §6 explicitly forbids writing governance_object_ownership/S2 owner row.
No Điều 0-G patch/adoption PASS §6 explicitly forbids patch/adopt source.
No PEN/STAMP/GATE logic PASS §6 explicitly forbids implementation.
No production inspect/certify/promote/backlog PASS §6 explicitly forbids all.
No bad-input tests PASS §6 explicitly forbids.
Later macro separation PASS §6 routes channel wiring, owner-row write, source recovery/adoption, and B2 logic to later separately authorized macro after shell proof.

NON-AUTHORIZATION AUDIT

  • DB write/DDL/DML performed/authorized? no
  • schema/table/corpus created/authorized now? no
  • runtime build executed? no
  • staging object created? no
  • Macro-9 launched? no
  • channel wired/bound/promoted? no
  • S2 owner/governance row written? no
  • Điều 0-G source patched/adopted/recovered? no
  • PEN/STAMP/GATE implemented? no
  • bad-input test run? no
  • actual B2 TD opened? no
  • B2 algorithm implemented? no
  • production inspect_* write? no
  • certified/promote/backlog? no
  • KG/universal_edges write? no
  • blocker falsely resolved? no

LEGO / SCOPE AUDIT

Check Verdict Issue
B2 only primary PASS Scope remains R2-B2 disposable staging workbench shell.
B5/B7 dependency-only PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Backlog/gate policy remain caveats, not opened work.
R1/KG cross-check-only PASS_WITH_CAVEATS KG write prohibited; Điều 39/provenance remains unresolved context.
No mega-registry PASS No registry build or expansion authorized.
No mega-graph PASS KG/universal_edges write prohibited.
No mega-birth pipeline PASS No backlog/certify/promote path authorized.
One disposable unit PASS Macro-9 scope is one shell only.
Boundary separate schema PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Separate schema chosen, but within same directus DB.
Delete-fast mandatory PASS Explicitly mandatory with abort if not provable.
Production untouched mandatory PASS Explicitly mandatory with abort if not provable.
IO contract boundary PASS Macro chain keeps IO contract as integration boundary; §6 does not add coupling.
Future larger work slice-by-slice PASS §6 routes later work to separate authorization after shell proof.

CAVEAT AUDIT

Caveat Verdict Impact
No fresh runtime re-verification in Macro-8 PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Artifact correctly relies on inherited Codex-accepted Macro-7 baseline.
Same-cluster isolation risk PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Separate schema is inside directus DB; production blast-radius risk remains.
Điều 0-G source recovery PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Required before production/certify; accept-with-caveat is staging-only.
agent-api staging contract not wired PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Directional decision only; runtime work deferred.
governance_object_ownership row not written PASS_WITH_CAVEATS Role is accepted on paper only.
Macro-9 requires separate launch/fresh preflight PASS Artifact states Macro-9 is not automatic and requires explicit Owner launch plus fresh preflight.

NEXT-STEP DECISION

  • Is the Macro-8 decision artifact accepted? yes, with caveats.
  • Is further Claude/Agent patch required? no.
  • Can Owner/GPT use this as the final five-gate authority record? yes.
  • Does this authorize Macro-9 automatically? no.
  • Is a separate explicit Macro-9 launch still required? yes.
  • Recommended next action: GPT/Owner may decide whether to launch Macro-9 as a separate write-enabled shell-only macro with fresh preflight and strict §6 bounds.

FINAL RECOMMENDATION

  • Proceed to GPT/Owner Macro-9 launch decision? yes, as a separate decision only.
  • Do not implement confirmation: no runtime mutation, no DDL/DML, no schema/table/corpus, no staging object, no Macro-9 launch, no channel wiring, no owner row, no Điều 0-G patch, no PEN/STAMP/GATE, no bad-input, no actual B2 TD, no production inspect_*, no certify/promote/backlog, no KG write.
Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/reports/codex/codex-review-macro8-owner-five-gate-decision-r2-b2-staging-workbench-2026-06-19.md