KB-3A0F
C1-W7 APR-0415 Approval Round — 04 AI Council Approval Proof
2 min read Revision 1
04 — ai_council approval: channel ABSENT (proof of non-availability + non-fabrication)
Required
Two rows apr_approvals(apr_id=415, approver_type='ai_council', decision='approve', rationale=<scoped>)
cast by two distinct real ai_council seats through their own authenticated identities.
What actually happened
| question | answer |
|---|---|
| Real ai_council seats present/voting this session? | NO |
| Council votes cast through real authenticated council channels? | NO |
| Agent-runnable council-approval CLI/API available? | NO (none exists) |
| Did the agent record a council vote? | NO — would be fabrication; forbidden |
| ai_council approvals on apr_id=415 (live) | 0 (need ≥2) |
Why no vote was recorded
- The proposing agent (Claude) is not an ai_council seat. The council seats are distinct
identities (e.g.
gemini,gpt,ai_council_1/2). The agent impersonating any of them and writing an approve row is fabrication — explicitly forbidden by the macro hard-lock. - "Operator root writes all votes as a convenience" is forbidden; capability ≠ authority.
- No automated council path: auto-approve disabled 2026-06-06 (
fn_auto_approve_add). - Even a single agent-cast council vote would also violate proposer/self-exclusion intent and the "3 distinct real approver identities" rule.
Evidence the mechanism is real (missing approvers, not missing mechanism)
apr_approvals has live approver_type='ai_council' rows from prior governed APRs; the council
seats are real and have voted before. They are reachable by the real council members through
their own channels — not by the agent, and not in this session.
Result
HOLD for this seat: APR_0415_APPROVAL_HOLD_NO_REAL_AI_COUNCIL_CHANNEL.
0 of 2 required ai_council approvals recorded. No fabrication. No self-approval.