KB-1176

Registries-Pivot LEGO Interface TD-Prep — Execution Report (2026-06-18)

10 min read Revision 1
laws-newregistries-pivotlegotd-prepexecution-reportread-onlynon-authorizingdesign-only

Registries-Pivot LEGO Interface TD-Prep — Execution Report

Date: 2026-06-18 · Workstream: REGISTRIES-PIVOT-LEGO-INTERFACE-TD-PREP-2026-06-18 · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: execution report / design-only / read-only · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NOT remediation · NOT technical design · NOT implementation · NO blocker resolved.

Metadata convention. This body uses editorial revision only. AgentData storage revision and content_length for both files are authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time; they are deliberately not pinned in this body.

STATUS: PASS — engineering / design-only. The required two files were created; the shared Registries/Pivot LEGO interface (S3/S4/S7/S8) is bounded; the Tool/packet lock is carried; all blockers stay OPEN. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default disposition: HOLD.


1. What ran

A design-only TD-prep packet for the shared Registries/Pivot LEGO interface. The packet defines the contract boundary for four shared surfaces — S3 Registry/Pivot Identity, S4 Canonical Address, S7 Evidence/Audit Log, S8 Rollback/Delete-Rebuild — that both the R1-K (KG) lane and the R2-B (birth) lane reference but neither redesigns. It answers the ten interface questions, defines B-block and K-block access, sets twelve anti-coupling rules (RP-AC-1…12) and a ten-row bad-input rejection matrix (BI-1…10), and lists Owner-gated future writes. It builds nothing, mutates nothing, authorizes nothing.

Method. All 20 required sources were read first-hand from AgentData KB via batch_read (full content). Because the combined full content exceeded single-call limits, reading was fanned out to six parallel read-only reader-agents, each instructed to read the documents directly from the KB and return verbatim-quoted extractions; no fact in the packet is inferred from memory or local prose. No runtime was queried (INHERITED_EVIDENCE).


2. Files created

File Editorial revision AgentData metadata convention Status
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/registries-pivot-lego-interface-td-prep-2026-06-18.md rev1 Storage revision + content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time (not pinned here) created
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/reports/registries-pivot-lego-interface-td-prep-execution-report-2026-06-18.md rev1 Storage revision + content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time (not pinned here) created (this file)

Exactly two files. No current corpus, no design-implementation file, no registry-schema file, no fifth hidden packet.


3. Sources read

Cluster Count Status
0.1 LEGO + block-contract chain 5 READ (full)
0.2 Root-cause + decision 5 READ (full)
0.3 Registry / birth / governance anchors 6 READ (full)
0.4 R1/R2 scoping 4 READ (full)
Total 20 READ (full); none truncated

Full paths are enumerated in §2 of the packet. No SOURCE_NOT_READ was triggered.


4. Done-criteria check (C1–C17)

# Criterion Result
C1 All required sources read PASS (20/20, full)
C2 Tool/packet lock carried PASS (packet §3)
C3 S3/S4/S7/S8 boundaries defined PASS (packet §5–§8)
C4 Registry/pivot responsibilities defined PASS (§5–§8, field 1 each)
C5 Registry/pivot forbidden responsibilities defined PASS (§12 RP-AC-1…12)
C6 Birth identity vs canonical status separated PASS (packet §9)
C7 B-block access defined PASS (packet §10)
C8 K-block access defined PASS (packet §11)
C9 S7 evidence/audit contract defined conceptually PASS (packet §7)
C10 S8 rollback/delete-rebuild contract defined conceptually PASS (packet §8)
C11 Bad-input / invalid-state rejection matrix defined PASS (packet §13, BI-1…10)
C12 No mega-registry / hidden shared write surface introduced PASS (§12; MEGA_REGISTRY_RISK not triggered)
C13 No TD / DDL / SQL / table design / function body PASS (none written; FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED in §15)
C14 Exactly two files created PASS
C15 Both files re-read after writing PASS (§7 of this report)
C16 All future writes Owner-gated and forbidden now PASS (packet §14)
C17 All blockers remain OPEN PASS (packet §15)

5. Forbidden-actions audit (all must be "No")

Action Performed / authorized?
DB write / DDL / DML No
Restart / reload container or service No
Run worker / cron / job No
DOT / KG / birth / certify / promote / repair execution No
Backfill provenance / quarantine edges No
Set inspect_pen / inspect_stamp / inspect_gate No
Set certified=true No
Flip dot_config / GUC gate No
Assign governance owner No
Promote agent-api contract DRY_RUN→REAL_RUN No
Write env / config files No
Patch source code / law / draft / note / prior report No
Create current corpus No
Write technical design No
Implement No
Resolve a blocker No
Materialize KG / provenance / stamps / cell_id / dot_role / canonical_fields / canonical_address No
Change authority order No
Overwrite v0.1-stable / FIX7 V3 baseline No
Promote / use v0.2-hardening as authority No

Specifically-forbidden TD content — confirmed absent: no schema DDL, no table definition, no migration plan, no function body, no SQL-mutate plan, no registry-rebuild plan, no pivot-table implementation, no rollback script, no command sequence, no producer/runner implementation, no KG backfill/quarantine mechanics.


6. Safety-lock evaluation

Safety Lock 1 (PARTIAL/HOLD triggers). None fired. S1 (all sources read) — not triggered. S2 (lock carried clearly) — not triggered. S3 (S3/S4/S7/S8 bounded) — not triggered. S4 (birth vs canonical separated) — not triggered. S5 (B/K access clear) — not triggered. S6 (bad-input definable conceptually) — not triggered. HOLD triggers H1–H5 (mega-registry / absorbs birth-certify-KG-provenance / writes TD / weakens Owner gate / treats v0.2-hardening as FIX7 authority) — none triggered. FAIL triggers F1–F8 — none triggered.

Contingency markers carried (not failures — explicit scoping): SOURCE_RECOVERY_REQUIRED (Đ0-G for S4; LEGACY|S167H for K3) · BOUNDARY_UNCLEAR (B2/B5 producer channel — deliberately inside the block, not the interface boundary) · BAD_INPUT_BEHAVIOR_UNCLEAR (MISSING blocks B2/B5/K3/K4/K5 — conceptual rejection only) · FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED (all mechanics moved out) · OWNER_GATE_REQUIRED (every §14 write). MEGA_REGISTRY_RISK evaluated and not triggered — no responsibility was absorbed into the interface.


7. Re-read verification (C15)

Both files were re-read from AgentData KB after writing:

  • …/consolidation/registries-pivot-lego-interface-td-prep-2026-06-18.md — confirmed present; sections 0–17 intact; required structure matches the spec; RP-AC-1…12 present (§12); BI-1…10 present (§13); S3/S4/S7/S8 each carry the 13-field contract (§5–§8).
  • …/reports/registries-pivot-lego-interface-td-prep-execution-report-2026-06-18.md — confirmed present (this file); C1–C17, forbidden-audit, and SC1–17 present.

(See the tool-call readback recorded in this session for the line-level confirmation.)


8. Self-check (SC1–SC17)

Check Result
SC1 Read all required sources? Yes (20/20 full)
SC2 Carried the Tool/packet lock? Yes (§3)
SC3 Defined S3/S4/S7/S8 boundaries? Yes (§5–§8)
SC4 Kept registry/pivot from becoming a mega-registry? Yes (§12; RP-AC-12)
SC5 Separated birth identity from canonical status? Yes (§9)
SC6 Defined B-block access? Yes (§10)
SC7 Defined K-block access? Yes (§11)
SC8 Defined S7 evidence/audit contract? Yes (§7)
SC9 Defined S8 rollback/delete-rebuild boundary? Yes (§8)
SC10 Defined bad-input / invalid-state rejection? Yes (§13)
SC11 Kept all future writes Owner-gated and forbidden now? Yes (§14)
SC12 Avoided TD / implementation? Yes (§15 FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED)
SC13 Created exactly two files? Yes
SC14 Re-read both files? Yes (§7)
SC15 Avoided modifying source / law / prior-report files? Yes
SC16 Kept all blockers OPEN? Yes (§15)
SC17 Distinguished engineering PASS from authority PASS? Yes (§0, §17)

No self-check failed.


9. Non-authorization confirmation

This report and its packet did not perform and do not authorize: runtime mutation; DDL/DML; restart/reload; runner/job execution; DOT/KG/birth/certify/promote execution; backfill/quarantine; inspect/certified writes; gate flip / owner assignment / contract promotion; source/prior-report patch; current-corpus creation; technical design; implementation; blocker resolution; materialization of KG/provenance/stamps/cell_id/dot_role/canonical_fields/canonical_address; authority-order change; overwrite of v0.1-stable / FIX7 V3; promotion or authority-use of v0.2-hardening.


10. Next action

  • GPT reviews the two files.
  • If accepted, Codex reviews.
  • Owner chooses the exact first per-block TD-prep block/scope after this interface is accepted.
  • No automatic TD. No automatic write-enabled remediation.

Default disposition: HOLD. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. No PASS authorizes writes. All blockers OPEN.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/reports/registries-pivot-lego-interface-td-prep-execution-report-2026-06-18.md