KB-30DC

R1-K Block Contract Packet — Execution Report (LEGO Design-Only, 2026-06-18)

10 min read Revision 1
laws-newR1-Kexecution-reportblock-contractlegokgprovenancequarantinedesign-onlyread-onlynon-authorizing2026-06-18

R1-K Block Contract Packet — Execution Report

Date: 2026-06-18 · Workstream: R1-K-R2-B-BLOCK-CONTRACT-PACKETS-LEGO-2026-06-18 (R1-K execution report) · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: execution report / design-only / non-authorizing · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NO blocker resolved.

Metadata convention. This report pins no volatile AgentData storage revision/content_length in its body. Editorial revision (rev1) only. AgentData storage revision and content_length are authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time for every file referenced here.


0. Status

STATUS: PASS (engineering / design-only). The R1-K Block Contract Packet was authored as a complete design-only block-contract set for the KG / provenance / quarantine lane (K1–K7), with full per-block contracts, isolation/replaceability/rollback, a bad-input/invalid-state fail-closed rejection matrix, and a design-only Codex-style adversarial reconstruction. Nothing was built, mutated, executed, or authorized.

Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. This PASS certifies the K-block contracts are complete and fail-closed on paper; it is not an Owner authorization to design-in-detail or to remediate. Default disposition: HOLD. Every blocker remains OPEN.


1. Files created

Exactly two files for the R1-K half (the R2-B half is reported in its own execution report; four files total across both, no fifth combined packet).

File Editorial revision AgentData metadata convention Status
consolidation/r1-k-block-contract-packet-lego-2026-06-18.md rev1 revision & content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time created
reports/r1-k-block-contract-packet-lego-execution-report-2026-06-18.md (this file) rev1 revision & content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time created

No existing source / law / draft / note / prior report was modified. The CAV-6 metadata typo in the prior combined R1a/R2a execution report was not patched (patching a prior report is forbidden).


2. Sources read

All required sources for the R1-K lane were read first-hand via read-only AgentData batch_read (full content), decoded and read in full. None SOURCE_NOT_READ. Clusters: LEGO scoping (3), Owner decision chain (3), R1a/R2a accepted root-cause baseline (4), earlier R1/R2 + Phase-1B (4), governance anchors (8) — 22 sources, all READ. The R1-K packet §2 lists the subset materially used for the K-lane (KG-relevant root cause, Điều 39 / Điều 32 / Điều 35 anchors, operating rules). Evidence is INHERITED from prior accepted read-only runs; no runtime was queried this run.


3. Caveats carried

All six Codex caveats carried verbatim in substance (packet §4). K-lane bindings: CAV-1 → K1/K2 (DB-contract/preflight layer, no executor process-log claim); CAV-2 → K3/K4 (no SoT in inspected substrate ≠ never recoverable); CAV-6 → documentary only, not patched. CAV-3/CAV-4 (R2-lane) and CAV-5 (R2-lane B7) carried for completeness; they do not bind the K-blocks. No caveat resolved.


4. Block contract completion

All seven K-blocks (K1–K7) carry the full thirteen-field contract, split across packet §7 (eleven fields: responsibility, input, output, authority/Owner gate, mutate-runtime, evidence, depends-on, must-not-depend, replacement boundary) and §9 (the remaining two: bad input / invalid state, expected rejection behavior), with the safe failure mode in §8.

Block Contract complete? Isolation / replaceable / rollback? Safe failure mode
K1 — KG runner gate Yes (13/13) Yes (per-gate config; never auto-clears) NO_GO (fail-closed)
K2 — KG DOT contract Yes (13/13) Yes (one contract row; reuse EXPLAIN pattern) KG DOT remains DRY_RUN
K3 — Provenance source recovery Yes (13/13) Yes (per origin sub-path) read-only report only / SOURCE_RECOVERY_REQUIRED
K4 — Edge provenance tagging Yes (13/13) Yes (one idempotent OCC batch) no-op (untagged ⇒ quarantine)
K5 — Quarantine decision Yes (13/13) Yes (one status decision, no mutation) quarantine (the safe state itself)
K6 — KG quality / explainability log Yes (13/13) Yes (append-only; report-only) read-only report only
K7 — Qdrant / vector separation Yes (13/13) Yes (boundary statement; vector store swappable) no-op (category-error reject)

No K-block was NOT_LEGO_COMPATIBLE; the one soft boundary (K3 vs external S6) was resolved by keeping the blocks separate, not merging.


5. Bad-input / invalid-state rejection completion

Defined for all seven K-blocks (packet §9) as a conceptual contract check — not run against runtime. Each block's expected fail-closed rejection is specified; no fail-open path exists in the K-lane design. Where a MISSING block's built behavior cannot be runtime-verified (K3/K4/K5), the row is bounded as BAD_INPUT_BEHAVIOR_UNCLEAR and the expected rejection contract is defined conceptually (no tested runtime result claimed; INHERITED_EVIDENCE).

Block Bad-input rejection defined? Fail-closed verdict
K1 Yes owner-missing/contract-DRY_RUN/execute-off ⇒ NO_GO, never auto-clear
K2 Yes no-contract / invalid mode ⇒ remain DRY_RUN, fail_closed_no_mutation
K3 Yes missing S167H / unverifiable relation ⇒ SOURCE_RECOVERY_REQUIRED, invent no SoT
K4 Yes SoT absent / OCC conflict ⇒ no-op, reject blind-update
K5 Yes edge lacks provenance ⇒ quarantine decision only, no edge mutation without Điều 32
K6 Yes no explanation ⇒ read-only finding, no auto-fix
K7 Yes vector offered as provenance ⇒ category-error reject

The single fail-open residue in the substrate (fn_auto_approve_add RISK-BYPASS) is external (S1 lane), flagged as a violation to close (AC-11), and is not a K-block behavior.


6. Non-authorization check

Control Result
DB write / DDL / DML none
restart / reload container or service none
runner / job / cron execution none
DOT / KG / birth / certify / promote execution none
backfill provenance / quarantine edges none
inspect / certified writes none (R1-K does not touch birth)
gate flip (5 KG preflight gates) / owner assignment / contract promotion none
source / law / draft / note / prior-report patch none
current corpus created none
technical design written none
implementation none
blocker resolved none
authority order / v0.1 baseline / v0.2-hardening change none

Engineering/Codex PASS ≠ Owner authorization. No PASS here authorizes any write.


7. Design-only altitude check

The packet stays at design-direction altitude: it defines block contracts (responsibility, IO, evidence, gate, dependency boundaries, replacement boundary, safe failure, bad-input rejection) and boundaries, not mechanics. No schema DDL, table definition, migration plan, function body, SQL mutate plan, cron implementation plan, worker build plan, concrete rollback script, exact remediation commands, provenance-backfill mechanics, or quarantine-lane implementation appears. All such items are explicitly moved to FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED (packet §13/§14) and left unwritten. The producer/dispatch channel and all build mechanics remain internal, replaceable, and out of scope.


8. Self-check

Check Result
SC1 — all required sources read PASS (22/22 READ; none SOURCE_NOT_READ)
SC2 — all 6 caveats carried PASS (packet §4)
SC3 — exactly two files for this half (four total) PASS
SC4 — no combined fifth packet PASS
SC5 — K1–K7 present PASS
SC6 — (R2-B's B1–B7) N/A here — see R2-B execution report
SC7 — every block has responsibility/input/output/evidence/gate/dependency/must-not-depend/replacement PASS (§7A/§7B)
SC8 — every block has isolation/rollback/safe-failure PASS (§8)
SC9 — bad-input / invalid-state rejection defined PASS (§9)
SC10 — R1-K kept separate from R2-B PASS (separation lock; §10/§12)
SC11 — no mega-registry / mega-graph / mega-pipeline PASS (AC-12; §11)
SC12 — no TD / implementation PASS (§7 altitude check)
SC13 — all future writes Owner-gated and forbidden now PASS (§13 all "Yes" forbidden)
SC14 — no existing source/law/prior-report modified PASS
SC15 — all four files re-read after writing PASS (re-read post-upload)
SC16 — all blockers OPEN PASS (§14)
SC17 — engineering PASS distinguished from authority PASS PASS (§0, throughout)

No self-check failed. PASS is reported as an engineering/design-only PASS.


9. Ready for GPT/Codex review

Yes. The R1-K packet and this execution report are ready for GPT review, then Codex adversarial control review. Recommended next: GPT reviews all four files (R1-K packet + report, R2-B packet + report); if accepted, Codex reviews; then the Owner chooses whether to proceed to a narrower design-only TD-prep package for selected K-blocks. No automatic TD. No automatic write-enabled remediation. Default HOLD.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/reports/r1-k-block-contract-packet-lego-execution-report-2026-06-18.md