Phase-1B Runtime Truth & Blocker Decision Packet — Execution Report (2026-06-17, read-only, non-authorizing)
Phase-1B Runtime Truth & Blocker Decision Packet — Execution Report
Date: 2026-06-17 · Workstream: Phase-1B · Revision: rev1 READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING. This report documents how the decision packet was produced. It resolves no blocker, enacts nothing, runs no query.
0. Status
STATUS: PASS (decision-bridge complete; C1–C15 satisfied; nothing enacted; no runtime touched).
The mission — convert the accepted Phase-1 read-only runtime verification into an Owner-facing blocker decision matrix + remediation macro roadmap — is complete. The output is a planning/decision/scoping packet plus this report; exactly two KB documents were created, both under allowed paths. No live DB/runtime query was run; no source law/draft/note/prior report was patched.
Two control corrections were applied to the Phase-1 findings (mandated by the task as the GPT/control caveat step): C-1 relabels PH1-F1's surface to Đ39/KG provenance (keeping HIGH), and C-2 splits PH1-F3 severity into HIGH (birth-dependent TD) / MEDIUM (non-birth scopes). These are corrections to labeling/severity, not to evidence — no Phase-1 evidence was altered, and the Phase-1 report itself was not patched.
1. Files created
| File | Rev | content_length | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
consolidation/phase1b-runtime-truth-blocker-decision-packet-2026-06-17.md |
1 | ~25,800 | created |
reports/phase1b-runtime-truth-blocker-decision-execution-report-2026-06-17.md |
1 | (this) | created |
No other document was created, patched, moved, or deleted. (Both target paths were confirmed non-existent before writing, so these are creates, not overwrites.)
2. Sources read
All read first-hand from the agent-data KB this run (the corpus is absent from the local checkout). The Phase-1 baseline was read in full by the orchestrator; the navigation/audit/anchor documents were read in full via parallel read-only sub-agents and returned as structured, verbatim-quoted extracts.
| Source | Revision / Evidence | Used for |
|---|---|---|
reports/phase1-readonly-runtime-blocker-verification-2026-06-17.md |
rev1, len 37,588, STATUS=PARTIAL (read in full) | runtime truth baseline (§2), findings (§4), documentary-lag (§3), verdict matrix |
LAW_READING_INDEX.md |
rev2, len 28,225 (53/53 mapped; 6 AMEND/REWRITE re-pointed by D1) | confirm rev2; §4 bad-readings #5/#6/#10 (old runtime claims); disposition classes |
consolidation/current-understanding-pointer-layer-2026-06-17.md |
rev1, len 34,944 | §9 OLD documentary blocker claims (documentary-lag table source) |
reports/law-revision-workstream-d1-pointer-layer-index-repoint-execution-report-2026-06-17.md |
rev1, len 17,356, STATUS=PASS | confirm D1 produced rev2 + pointer layer KB-only (never live) |
reports/workstream-e0-new-law-consistency-conflict-audit-2026-06-17.md |
rev1, len 43,167, PASS_WITH_MEDIUM_FINDINGS | §15 "no live DB query; all reads AgentData KB" caveat; open-blocker consistency |
consolidation/law-revision-consolidation-planning-packet-2026-06-17.md |
rev1, len 39,859 | 53-record matrix; "blockers stay open"; "still forbidden"/"allowed after accept"; Options A/B/D |
| 5 amendment drafts (Đ22/Đ33/Đ36/L4/Đ38 v3.0) | all rev1 | map each amendment to remediation packages + deferrals (R1–R5 grounding) |
rewrites/dieu37-governance-organization-law-rewrite-draft.md |
rev1, len 46,462 | One-Roof-over-ledgers; reuse fix_repair_dot pattern; authority spine |
| 6 compatibility notes (Đ35/Đ39/Đ4/Đ32/constitution/terminology) | all rev1 | blocker-surface mapping; Đ39 provenance, Đ35 readiness-FAIL, birth split, Owner-gate, CONS-003 |
| 10 source laws (constitution v4.6.3, Đ32 v1.1, Đ35 v5.2, Đ39 v2.3, law-04, law-22 v1.2, Đ33 v2.1, Đ38 v3.0 DRAFT, birth-registry Đ0-G v1.0, operating-rules v7.58) | enacted/draft as noted | comparison anchors: Đ39 provenance-quarantine invariant, Đ35 §10 criteria, Đ32 quorum, Đ0-G certify chain, default-HOLD/Owner-gate |
SOURCE_NOT_READ: none. All required sources were readable. (Note: owner-decision-matrix-law-revision-2026-06-17.md Option C text was not separately required and was not re-read; it does not affect this packet's matrix.)
3. Phase-1 findings normalized
All Phase-1 findings were copied into the packet's corrected findings register (§4) and the blocker decision matrix (§5):
- 5 surface verdicts: RISK-BYPASS=PARTIAL, HOLD-1=LIVE (pilot), HOLD-2=PARTIAL, Đ39=REGISTERED_NOT_EXECUTED, Đ35=NOT_PRODUCTION_READY.
- 10 findings + 4 caveats: PH1-F1…F10, PH1-C1…C4 — each given runtime truth, severity, TD-impact, impl-impact, Owner-decision flag, remediation type, package, and priority.
- Documentary lag (PH1-C1…C4) was listed separately (§3) from the true runtime blockers (§5), per the task's C6 requirement.
- Carried structural blockers (CONS-002/003, CELL-003/004/007, GOV-016/017, GOV-REUSE-001) were included as gating context, explicitly marked out-of-Phase-1-runtime-scope.
No finding was dropped; no finding was marked resolved.
4. Codex caveats applied
| Caveat | Applied? | Where |
|---|---|---|
C-1 — PH1-F1 surface relabel: universal_edges 0-provenance is Đ39/KG provenance, not RISK-BYPASS; severity stays HIGH |
Yes | Packet §4 (register row PH1-F1 + caveat C-1), §5 (matrix), §7 (R1) |
| C-2 — PH1-F3 severity split: HIGH for birth-dependent technical design, MEDIUM for non-birth scopes | Yes | Packet §4 (register row PH1-F3 + caveat C-2), §5 (matrix), §6 (TD gate), §7 (R2) |
| PH1-F2 = MEDIUM (170 unvoted-applied residue) | Yes | §4, §5, R4 |
| PH1-F4 = MEDIUM (Đ35 metadata/paired-DOT readiness) | Yes | §4, §5, R3 |
| PH1-F5 = MEDIUM (critical backlog mostly quality debt; readiness still fails) | Yes | §4, §5, R3 |
| PH1-F6 = LOW (approve-time gap mitigated by apply-time quorum) | Yes | §4, §5, R4 |
| PH1-F7 = MEDIUM (warn-mode + unreadable GUC) | Yes | §4, §5, R4 (immediate/parallel GUC-confirm) |
| PH1-F8 = LOW (1 admin-fallback accountability gap) | Yes | §4, §5, R4 |
| PH1-F9 / F10 / C1–C4 = INFO | Yes | §4, §5 |
Note on provenance of the "Codex caveats": the Phase-1 report (rev1) has not yet been Codex-reviewed (its §15 recommends that as a next step). The caveats C-1 and C-2 are the control corrections this Phase-1B task was explicitly instructed to apply when normalizing the findings; they are carried into the packet as such, and the Phase-1 report is left unpatched for its own GPT→Codex chain.
5. Decision matrix completeness
The blocker decision matrix (packet §5) covers, for every row: runtime truth · severity · blocks-TD? · blocks-implementation? · Owner-decision-required? · remediation-required? · remediation-type (READ_ONLY_SCOPING / WRITE_ENABLED_REMEDIATION / DOC_REFRESH / OWNER_DECISION_ONLY) · recommended package · priority. Rows: 5 surfaces + PH1-F1…F10 + PH1-C1…C4 + the carried structural-blocker group. The technical-design gate is stated separately and precisely in §6 (blocked / scoped-open / never-allowed). No row is marked resolved.
6. Remediation packages defined
Five macro packages defined (packet §7), each with objective · blockers covered · why it matters · allowed first move · forbidden actions · expected output · write-enabled-approval-required-later flag:
- R1 — Điều 39 KG Provenance / Quarantine / Execution Readiness (Đ39 surface, PH1-F1).
- R2 — Birth Certify Pipeline / Canonical Stamp Readiness (PH1-F3, HOLD-2 birth/stamp path).
- R3 — Điều 35 DOT Governance Readiness (Đ35 surface, PH1-F4, PH1-F5, PH1-F9).
- R4 — Authority Residue / Birth-Gate Policy (RISK-BYPASS surface, PH1-F2, PH1-F6, PH1-F7, PH1-F8).
- R5 — HOLD-1 Staging Production Readiness (HOLD-1 surface, HOLD-2 IU-lineage).
Recommended order (packet §8): R1 → R2 → R3 → R4 → R5, with two evidence-based adjustments noted — (a) R4's GUC-confirmation sub-item should run immediately/in parallel; (b) R2 is co-priority/foundational and may be scoped in parallel with R1. None of the packages is opened, scoped, or executed here; "allowed first move" is gated behind the Owner opening that package.
7. Non-authorization
This packet and report authorize nothing. Reaffirmed (packet §0, §11): no runtime query, no DDL/DML, no runtime patch, no source/draft/note/report patch, no current corpus, no draft adoption, no technical design, no implementation, no blocker resolved, no authority-order change, no v0.1 baseline change, no v0.2 promotion. The five remediation packages are described, not opened. Engineering/Codex PASS ≠ Owner authorization.
8. Folder policy
- Both files were created under allowed paths only: the decision packet under
newlaws/consolidation/, the execution report undernewlaws/reports/— mirroring the established D0/D1/E0/Phase-1 layout. - No
current/folder was created; no current corpus (no copied/moved law text) was created. A consolidated reading layer remains a future Owner-gated, pointer-only act (D0 Option B), not performed here. knowledge/dev/laws/(source laws) and all amendments/rewrite/notes/prior reports were read-only; none was edited, moved, or renamed.
9. Self-check
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| SC1 Read Phase-1 report in full | Yes (orchestrator read full 37,588 chars) |
| SC2 Read LAW_READING_INDEX rev2 + D1 pointer layer | Yes (rev2 confirmed; pointer layer §9 + D1 report read) |
| SC3 Avoided runtime queries | Yes (no query_pg/pg_schema/Directus/VPS; KB reads only) |
| SC4 Avoided all writes except the two allowed KB docs | Yes (only the two upload_document creates) |
| SC5 Kept PH1-F1 HIGH but corrected surface to Đ39/KG provenance | Yes (caveat C-1) |
| SC6 Split PH1-F3 by scope (HIGH birth-dependent / MEDIUM non-birth) | Yes (caveat C-2) |
| SC7 Kept all blockers open | Yes (no row marked resolved) |
| SC8 Avoided full technical design | Yes (§6 states the gate; packages are scoping-only) |
| SC9 Defined remediation macro packages without implementing them | Yes (R1–R5, "allowed first move" gated behind Owner) |
| SC10 Stated Owner decisions required | Yes (§9 OD-1…OD-8) |
| SC11 Created only the two allowed files | Yes |
| SC12 Re-read both files after writing | Yes (verified post-write via get_document) |
| C3 All Phase-1 findings in a normalized findings table | Yes (§4) |
| C6 Documentary-lag listed separately from runtime blockers | Yes (§3 vs §5) |
| C7 Blocker decision matrix created | Yes (§5) |
| C10 Technical design gate stated clearly | Yes (§6) |
| C11 Non-authorization stated clearly | Yes (§0, §11) |
No self-check failed. STATUS is reported as PASS on that basis.
10. Ready for GPT/Codex review
YES. The decision packet is ready for GPT review, then Codex adversarial control review.
NEXT ACTION:
- GPT reviews Phase-1B.
- If accepted, Codex reviews.
- Owner chooses the first remediation macro package (default R1; R1∥R2 parallel scoping supported) and decides OD-1…OD-8.
Default disposition: HOLD. No blocker resolved; technical design remains gated; PASS ≠ Owner authorization.