Owner Decision Packet R1a/R2a — Execution Report (2026-06-18, read-only, non-authorizing)
Owner Decision Packet R1a/R2a — Execution Report
Date: 2026-06-18 · Workstream: Owner Decision Packet for R1a/R2a root-cause baseline · Revision: rev1 Class: execution report / decision bridge / Owner-decision-prep · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NOT remediation · NOT technical design · NOT implementation · NO blocker resolved.
0. Status
STATUS: PASS — the Owner Decision Packet for the accepted R1a/R2a root-cause baseline is complete. It was built read-only from the accepted R1a/R2a reports and the official Codex PASS_WITH_CAVEATS review; it carries all six mandated caveats, completes both decision matrices and the cross-package dependency matrix, lists the five Owner options, and recommends one (Option D, with C as the resource-constrained fallback) without authorizing any write.
This run created exactly the two allowed documents and nothing else. It ran no DB write/DDL/DML, no restart/reload, no worker/cron/job, no DOT/KG/birth/certify/promote execution, no backfill/quarantine, no inspect/certified write, no gate flip, no owner assignment, no contract promotion, no source/prior-report patch, no current corpus, no technical design, no implementation, and resolved no blocker. Engineering/Codex PASS ≠ Owner authorization. Every blocker remains OPEN; default disposition HOLD.
1. Files created
Exactly two new documents (no source/law/draft/note/prior-report patched):
| File | Revision | content_length | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
consolidation/owner-decision-packet-r1a-r2a-root-cause-2026-06-18.md |
1 | 36751 | created · re-read · verified |
reports/owner-decision-packet-r1a-r2a-root-cause-execution-report-2026-06-18.md |
1 | (this document) | created · re-read |
No other file was created, and no existing KB document was modified.
2. Sources read
All read first-hand via read-only AgentData batch_read; none unreadable (so no SOURCE_NOT_READ; STATUS is not PARTIAL on that ground).
- Accepted R1a/R2a root-cause reports (0.1):
reports/r1a-kg-runner-log-provenance-source-root-cause-2026-06-18.md(rev1),reports/r2a-birth-inspection-runner-cron-log-root-cause-2026-06-18.md(rev1),reports/r1a-r2a-runner-cron-log-root-cause-execution-report-2026-06-18.md(rev2/14798). - Official Codex review (0.2):
reports/codex/codex-review-r1a-r2a-runner-cron-log-root-cause-2026-06-18.md(PASS_WITH_CAVEATS). - Earlier accepted baseline (0.3):
consolidation/phase1b-runtime-truth-blocker-decision-packet-2026-06-17.md(rev1),reports/r1-d39-kg-provenance-quarantine-execution-readiness-scope-2026-06-17.md(rev1),reports/r2-birth-certify-canonical-stamp-readiness-scope-2026-06-17.md(rev1),reports/r1-r2-parallel-readonly-scoping-execution-report-2026-06-17.md(rev1). - Governance anchors (0.4):
notes/dieu39-knowledge-graph-compatibility-note.md,notes/dieu4-birth-process-compatibility-note.md,notes/dieu32-approval-owner-gate-compatibility-note.md,notes/dieu35-dot-governance-compatibility-note.md,laws/dieu39-knowledge-graph-law.md(v2.3),architecture/birth-registry-law.md(Đ0-G v1.0),laws/dieu32-approval-law.md(v1.1),ssot/operating-rules.md(v7.58).
All 18 required sources READ. The official Codex review was read from reports/codex/… (not a summary). The combined execution report's metadata (rev2/14798) was observed directly and reconciled against its body text (rev1/14799) — see CAV-6.
3. Caveats carried
All six mandated caveats are carried in substance in the packet's §4, and each is used to constrain specific decision wording:
| Caveat | Carried? | Where / how applied |
|---|---|---|
| CAV-1 (no executor process-log proof; proven at DB-contract/preflight/config layer, not process-log) | Yes | Packet §4 CAV-1; constrains §3.1 and R1-D1/D2 ("not missing/broken at the DB-contract layer") |
| CAV-2 (no provenance SoT = in the inspected substrate; future S167H/Directus recovery possible) | Yes | Packet §4 CAV-2; constrains §3.1 and R1-D5 (source-recovery path), §10 out-of-band |
| CAV-3 (manual one-shot bootstrap supported by dot_origin + script; old 2026-03-21 logs unavailable) | Yes | Packet §4 CAV-3; constrains §3.2 and R2-D3/D4 wording |
CAV-4 (producer scripts from synced local mirror, not live /opt/incomex/dot/bin; no byte-for-byte claim) |
Yes | Packet §4 CAV-4; constrains §3.2 and R2-D4 (pattern reuse) wording |
| CAV-5 (GUC conclusion limited to no persisted bypass/default; transient session unreadable) | Yes | Packet §4 CAV-5; constrains §3.2 and R2-D6 (GUC/warn→block), §10 out-of-band |
| CAV-6 (combined report metadata typo: body rev1/14799 vs metadata rev2/14798; non-material) | Yes | Packet §4 CAV-6; reflected in §2 source table and §10 optional cosmetic patch |
4. Decision matrices completed
- R1 decision matrix (packet §5): R1-D1 … R1-D7 complete — each with decision, options, recommended option, reason, risk if chosen, forbidden-until-separately-authorized, and requires-write-enabled-later. Covers: keep-read-only vs open write-enabled R1; the five preflight gate clears + order;
dot:kgowner assignment; agent-api contract coverage extension; provenance source-of-truth path (DIRECTUS / LEGACY|S167H / both / defer); quarantine semantics design; and the CONS-002/003 + CELL gate. - R2 decision matrix (packet §6): R2-D1 … R2-D7 complete — same column structure. Covers: keep-read-only vs open write-enabled R2; standing producer channel (host cron / pg_cron / agent-api executor / job_queue worker / other / defer); 1,211,557-uncertified-birth disposition; reuse-vs-redesign of
dot-inspect-pen/dot-birth-backfill; BIRTH_STAMP/PROMOTE_STAMP mapping direction; GUC / warn→block policy; and the Đ0-G source-recovery + CONS/CELL gate. - Cross-package dependency matrix (packet §7): answers R1-before-R2, R2-before-R1, R1∥R2 parallel, independent decisions, shared Owner/Điều 32 gates, CONS/CELL dependencies, and source-recovery dependencies.
- Owner options (packet §8) + recommendation (packet §9): Options A–E stated; Option D recommended (design-only / decision-design, not write-enabled), with Option C as the resource-constrained fallback and Option E rejected.
Every "recommended option" is a recommendation only; none authorizes a write. The requires write-enabled later? column in §5/§6 distinguishes design-only items from items that will need a separate write-enabled Owner gate.
5. Non-authorization
This report and the Owner Decision Packet authorize nothing. No DB write/DDL/DML; no restart/reload; no worker/cron/job; no DOT/KG/birth/certify/promote/repair execution; no provenance backfill / edge quarantine; no inspect_* / certified write; no dot_config gate flip (including the five KG preflight gates and birth_gate_mode→block); no governance-owner assignment; no agent-api contract promotion; no env/config write; no source-code or source-law/draft/note/prior-report patch; no current corpus; no draft adoption; no technical design; no implementation; no blocker resolved; no KG/provenance/stamp/cell_id/dot_role/canonical_fields materialization; no authority-order (CONS-004) change; no v0.1 baseline change; no v0.2-hardening promotion. R1 and R2 remain root-cause-accepted, not opened for remediation. CONS-002/003 + CELL-003/004/007 (and Đ0-G source recovery for R2, LEGACY|S167H recovery for R1) remain prerequisites to any materialization. Default disposition: HOLD.
6. Self-check
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| SC1 Read R1a/R2a reports | PASS (R1a rev1, R2a rev1, combined exec rev2/14798 — all full) |
SC2 Read official Codex review from reports/codex |
PASS (codex-review-r1a-r2a-runner-cron-log-root-cause-2026-06-18.md, PASS_WITH_CAVEATS, full) |
| SC3 Carried all 6 caveats | PASS (packet §4 CAV-1..CAV-6; §3 of this report maps each to a decision) |
| SC4 Completed R1 decision matrix | PASS (packet §5, R1-D1..R1-D7, all 7 fields each) |
| SC5 Completed R2 decision matrix | PASS (packet §6, R2-D1..R2-D7, all 7 fields each) |
| SC6 Completed cross-package dependency matrix | PASS (packet §7) |
| SC7 Listed Owner options | PASS (packet §8, Options A–E) |
| SC8 Recommended an option without authorizing writes | PASS (packet §9 — Option D design-only; C fallback; E rejected; no write authorized) |
| SC9 Created only two files | PASS (this report + the packet; nothing else created or modified) |
| SC10 Re-read both files | PASS (packet re-read — content_length 36751 confirmed; this report re-read after write) |
| SC11 Did not remediate | PASS (no write/restart/execution/backfill/inspect/certify) |
| SC12 Did not write technical design | PASS (design-direction items flagged as gated, not designed) |
| SC13 Did not resolve blockers | PASS (all blockers remain OPEN) |
No self-check failed → STATUS PASS.
7. Ready for GPT/Codex review
Yes. Recommended chain: GPT reviews the Owner Decision Packet → if accepted, Codex adversarial control review → Owner chooses the package/design path (recommended Option D — R1 ∥ R2 design-only; Option C — R2 design-only first — if resources are constrained) and confirms or overrides the per-decision recommendations in packet §5/§6.
Headline for the Owner: both root causes imply net-new governed build/design, not a restart. R1 is a healthy KG runner held deliberately fail-closed (five owner-gates) with no provenance source-of-truth in the inspected substrate; R2 is a manual one-shot bootstrap that was never turned into a standing producer while the uncertified-birth backlog grows live. The recommended next move is design-only scoping behind a further Owner gate — no write-enabled remediation, technical design, blocker resolution, or implementation is authorized. Default disposition: HOLD; PASS ≠ Owner authorization.