KB-4AD3

LEGO Pilot Slice 0 — R2-B2 Planning Bundle Execution Report (design-only, 2026-06-18)

15 min read Revision 1
laws-newlego-pilot-slice-0R2-B2execution-reportchannel-decisiontd-readinessstagingverification-plandesign-onlyread-onlynon-authorizing2026-06-18

LEGO Pilot Slice 0 — R2-B2 Planning Bundle Execution Report

Date: 2026-06-18 · Workstream: LEGO-PILOT-SLICE-0-R2-B2-PLANNING-BUNDLE-2026-06-18 (Deliverable E of five) · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: execution report for the Pilot-Slice-0 R2-B2 planning bundle · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING.

Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. AgentData storage revision and content_length are authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time; not pinned in this body.


0. Status

STATUS: PASS — engineering / design-only. The Pilot-Slice-0 R2-B2 planning bundle is complete: exactly five files — one channel decision packet (R2-D2), one B2 TD-readiness packet, one staging/kho-tạm IO contract, one bad-input/delete-fast/verification plan, and this execution report. All four planning deliverables stay strictly design-only: a channel is compared but not selected as authority, B2 readiness is specified but not met (aggregate No-Go), staging is an IO contract only (no schema/SQL/corpus), and the verification plan runs no test. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Nothing was built, queried, mutated, or authorized. Default disposition: HOLD.

This bundle is larger than a single-block task (one primary block B2 + one channel decision R2-D2 + one staging IO contract + one verification plan) but stayed LEGO: B2 remains the only primary block; B5 (backlog) and B7 (GUC policy) remained dependencies only, never opened; the channel decision remained recommendation-only; staging remained IO-contract-only; delete-fast remained a verification plan only.


1. Files created

Exactly five files, no others. No schema/registry/corpus/staging-surface file; no sixth file; no source/prior-report patched.

File Editorial revision AgentData metadata convention Status
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/r2-d2-b2-channel-decision-packet-lego-2026-06-18.md rev1 storage revision + content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time (not pinned in body) created
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/r2-b2-technical-design-readiness-lego-2026-06-18.md rev1 storage revision + content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time created
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/lego-pilot-slice-0-staging-io-contract-2026-06-18.md rev1 storage revision + content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time created
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/lego-pilot-slice-0-bad-input-delete-fast-verification-plan-2026-06-18.md rev1 storage revision + content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time created
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/reports/lego-pilot-slice-0-r2-b2-planning-bundle-execution-report-2026-06-18.md rev1 storage revision + content_length authoritative in AgentData metadata at read time created (this file)

Re-read after writing. All five files were re-read in full from AgentData KB after creation, as the closing verification step of this run. Bodies confirmed complete (all required sections present per the mandated structures); the metadata convention honored (no volatile storage revision/content_length pinned in any body); exactly five files; no sixth/registry/schema/corpus/staging-surface file.


2. Sources read (direct, sequential, bounded — no sub-agents)

19 required sources, each read first-hand from AgentData KB by the main process, one document per batch_read call (full: true), in sequence. None SOURCE_NOT_READ. One oversized source (the modular LEGO scoping doc) was decoded locally by the main process only to render its already-fetched bytes readable — no reading was outsourced to any sub-agent.

# Source (prefix knowledge/dev/ omitted) Status
1 laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/r2-b2-inspect-producer-td-prep-lego-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
2 laws-new/newlaws/reports/r2-b2-inspect-producer-td-prep-lego-execution-report-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
3 laws-new/reports/codex/codex-review-r2-b2-inspect-producer-td-prep-lego-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
4 laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/registries-pivot-lego-interface-td-prep-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
5 laws-new/reports/codex/codex-review-registries-pivot-lego-interface-td-prep-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
6 laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/r2-b-block-contract-packet-lego-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
7 laws-new/reports/codex/codex-review-r1-k-r2-b-block-contract-packets-lego-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
8 laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/r1-r2-modular-lego-architecture-scoping-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
9 laws-new/reports/codex/codex-review-r1-r2-modular-lego-architecture-scoping-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
10 laws-new/newlaws/reports/r2a-birth-inspection-runner-cron-log-root-cause-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
11 laws-new/reports/codex/codex-review-r1a-r2a-runner-cron-log-root-cause-2026-06-18.md READ (full)
12 laws-new/newlaws/reports/r2-birth-certify-canonical-stamp-readiness-scope-2026-06-17.md READ (full)
13 laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/phase1b-runtime-truth-blocker-decision-packet-2026-06-17.md READ (full)
14 architecture/birth-registry-law.md (Điều 0-G v1.0) READ (full)
15 laws-new/newlaws/notes/dieu4-birth-process-compatibility-note.md (rev1) READ (full)
16 laws-new/newlaws/notes/dieu32-approval-owner-gate-compatibility-note.md (rev1) READ (full)
17 laws/dieu32-approval-law.md (v1.1) READ (full)
18 laws-new/newlaws/notes/dieu35-dot-governance-compatibility-note.md (rev1) READ (full)
19 ssot/operating-rules.md (v7.58) READ (full)

3. No-parallel-reader-agents check

Check Result
Sources read directly from AgentData KB by the main process Yes (19/19)
Reading outsourced to sub-agents / Task agents No
Parallel reader-agents used No
Background reader-agents used No
Reads bounded & sequential (one document per batch_read call, full: true) Yes
Any fact inferred from local prose / memory instead of first-hand KB read No
Oversized-source handling Decoded locally by the main process to render already-fetched bytes; no reading outsourced
Prior interface packet's reader-agent process caveat repeated No (explicitly avoided per the Codex caveat)

4. Tool/packet lock

Item Status
v0.1-stable / FIX7 V3 baseline Carried; not overwritten; reproducibility/comparison/regression fixture only
FIX7 Recheck-9 / current Codex packet use of v0.1 Carried; no promotion or modification
Tool-Kiem-Thu v0.2-hardening Carried; separate dev track on a separate dev surface; not FIX7 authority until regression + Owner/User promotion
v0.2 authority confusion Rejected across the bundle (Deliverable A §3; Deliverable D bad-input BAD-10): v0.2 offered as authority → reject until promotion

5. Deliverable completion table

Maps the five deliverables to the mandated completion criteria (C1–C19).

Deliverable Required structure Status Key result Criteria
A — R2-D2 Channel Decision Packet §0–§17 (18 sections) created host cron + agent-api executor = candidate; pg_cron + job_queue = risky/future-gated; manual one-shot = reject as standing channel; no channel selected as authority; recommendation-only C5, C11
B — R2-B2 TD Readiness §0–§15 (16 sections) created readiness fully specified; aggregate No-Go (Đ0-G source, channel, S2 owner, staging all open); no actual TD written C6, C12
C — Staging / Kho-tạm IO Contract §0–§16 (17 sections) created disposable workshop mirroring the B3 shape; candidate results separated from production; delete-fast = one disposal unit; IO contract only — no schema/SQL/corpus C7, C17
D — Bad-input / Delete-fast / Verification Plan §0–§14 (15 sections) created BAD-1…BAD-15 (all 15 required cases) + fail-open conditions + rejection/delete-fast/rollback/no-touch evidence; no test run C8
E — Execution Report §0–§9 (10 sections) created (this file) reports + self-checks the bundle C9
# Completion criterion Result
C1 All required sources read directly and sequentially/bounded PASS (19/19)
C2 No parallel/background reader-agents PASS
C3 Tool/packet lock carried PASS (§4)
C4 Exactly five files created PASS (§1)
C5 Deliverable A channel decision packet created PASS
C6 Deliverable B B2 TD-readiness packet created PASS
C7 Deliverable C staging/kho-tạm IO contract created PASS
C8 Deliverable D bad-input/delete-fast/verification plan created PASS
C9 Deliverable E execution report created PASS
C10 All five files re-read after writing PASS (§1)
C11 No channel selected as authority PASS (A §15)
C12 No actual B2 TD written PASS (B writes readiness only)
C13 No implementation / no SQL / DDL / runner / cron spec / command sequence PASS
C14 B2 remains inspect-only PASS
C15 B5 backlog remains separate and not opened PASS
C16 B7 gate policy remains separate and not opened PASS
C17 No staging corpus/schema created PASS
C18 Future writes remain Owner-gated and forbidden PASS
C19 All blockers remain OPEN PASS

6. Non-authorization audit

  • no DB write / DDL / DML: confirmed none
  • no restart / reload: confirmed none
  • no runner / job / cron / worker execution: confirmed none
  • no DOT / KG / birth / certify / promote / repair execution: confirmed none
  • no inspect_pen / inspect_stamp / inspect_gate writes: confirmed none
  • no certified=true writes: confirmed none
  • no app.birth_gate_mode / dot_config gate flip: confirmed none
  • no governance-owner assignment: confirmed none
  • no agent-api contract promotion (DRY_RUN→REAL_RUN): confirmed none
  • no pg_cron / extension install; no queue-worker / master-switch enable: confirmed none
  • no env / config file write: confirmed none
  • no source-code / law / draft / note / prior-report patch: confirmed none
  • no current corpus: confirmed none
  • no staging corpus / staging schema: confirmed none
  • no actual technical design (no schema/DDL/table/migration/function-body/SQL-mutate/scheduler/runner/command-sequence/rollback-script/backlog-execution/staging-schema): confirmed none
  • no implementation: confirmed none
  • no blocker resolved: confirmed — all OPEN
  • v0.1-stable / FIX7 V3 baseline overwritten: no
  • v0.2-hardening promoted / used as authority: no

Evidence basis: INHERITED_EVIDENCE only — no runtime queried in this run; all runtime facts inherited from accepted read-only reports. The only tool actions taken were AgentData KB reads (19 sources, one large source decoded locally by the main process) and five KB document creations (the five allowed files) + their re-reads.


7. Scope-control audit

Scope control Result
B2 kept inspect-only (read uncertified → write inspect_* only) Yes — never certify/canonical/identity/KG; reaffirmed in every deliverable
B5 backlog kept separate, not opened Yes — referenced as a dependency boundary (the only legitimate residual one-shot); its design not opened (A §10, C §12)
B7 GUC/gate policy kept separate, not opened Yes — referenced as a dependency; warn→block not designed; warn-mode holds (B §13)
Channel comparison conceptual only; no channel selected as authority YesCHANNEL_AUTHORITY_DRIFT avoided (A §15)
Channel comparison written without scheduler/runner specs YesFUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED for all build mechanics
No actual B2 TD Yes — Deliverable B is readiness only (aggregate No-Go)
Staging kept at IO-contract level; no schema/SQL/corpus/extraction YesSTAGING_TD_DRIFT avoided (C §0/§15)
Delete-fast kept as a verification plan; no DELETE/DROP/SQL Yes (D §8)
No mega-birth pipeline / mega-registry introduced YesMEGA_BIRTH / B2_OVERREACH not triggered
Owner gates preserved (not weakened) Yes — every future write OWNER_GATE_REQUIRED
Contingency markers raised, not resolved SOURCE_RECOVERY_REQUIRED (Đ0-G); BAD_INPUT_BEHAVIOR_UNCLEAR (BAD-4/BAD-12); FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED (all build mechanics); OWNER_GATE_REQUIRED (all future writes); CHANNEL_AUTHORITY_DRIFT / STAGING_TD_DRIFT / SCOPE_CREEP / MEGA_BIRTH — not triggered
All blockers OPEN Yes — CONS-002/003, CELL-003/004/007, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, RISK-BYPASS, GOV-016/017, GOV-REUSE-001, Điều 39 runtime-EMPTY, Điều 35 production-readiness FAIL

8. Self-check (SC1–SC17)

# Self-check Result
SC1 Read all required sources directly, no parallel reader-agents? Yes (19/19, sequential, main process)
SC2 Created exactly five files? Yes
SC3 Re-read all five files? Yes (§1)
SC4 Carried the Tool/packet lock? Yes (§4)
SC5 Kept B2 inspect-only? Yes
SC6 Kept B5 backlog separate? Yes
SC7 Kept B7 gate policy separate? Yes
SC8 Avoided choosing a channel as authority? Yes (A §15)
SC9 Kept channel comparison conceptual only? Yes
SC10 Avoided actual TD / implementation? Yes
SC11 Avoided staging schema/corpus? Yes (C: IO contract only)
SC12 Defined staging/kho-tạm IO contract? Yes (C)
SC13 Defined delete-fast proof expectations? Yes (C §9, D §8)
SC14 Defined bad-input adversarial test expectations? Yes (D §4/§5, BAD-1…BAD-15)
SC15 Kept future writes Owner-gated and forbidden now? Yes
SC16 Kept all blockers OPEN? Yes
SC17 Distinguished engineering PASS from authority PASS? Yes (every §0)

No self-check failed.


9. Ready for GPT/Codex review

Yes.

  • GPT reviews the five files.
  • If accepted, Codex performs an adversarial control review.
  • Owner chooses whether to open actual B2 Technical Design (with a selected channel), or a narrower channel decision, or a sibling design-only TD-prep — no automatic TD, no write-enabled remediation.

Default disposition: HOLD. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. No PASS authorizes writes. All blockers remain OPEN. The bundle is larger but stayed LEGO: B2 the only primary block; B5/B7 dependencies only; channel recommendation-only; staging IO-contract only; delete-fast verification-plan only.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/reports/lego-pilot-slice-0-r2-b2-planning-bundle-execution-report-2026-06-18.md