Law Revision Workstream D1 — Pointer Layer & LAW_READING_INDEX Re-point — Execution Report

Status: PASS (pointer/navigation re-point complete; nothing enacted, nothing consolidated, no current corpus, no blocker resolved). READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING. Created: 2026-06-17 · Law Revision Workstream D1 · rev1. Mission: the narrow follow-up to D0/E0 — create a non-enacting pointer layer and re-point LAW_READING_INDEX.md so the reading map reflects the already-created 5 AMEND drafts + 1 REWRITE draft, resolving the navigation gaps confirmed by E0 (E0-M1/L1/L2/L3). No current corpus; no enactment; no edit to knowledge/dev/laws/; no technical design; no Phase-1; no live DB/runtime query; no implementation; no blocker resolved; no authority-order change; no v0.1/v0.2 change. Outputs: patched LAW_READING_INDEX.md (rev1→rev2) · created consolidation/current-understanding-pointer-layer-2026-06-17.md (rev1) · this report (D1.3). Standing rule carried: Codex/GPT/Council PASS ≠ Owner authorization. Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS. Default disposition: HOLD.

1. Files patched / created

Exactly one file patched, two files created. All under allowed paths. Nothing else moved, copied, or edited. knowledge/dev/laws/ untouched.

1.1 Patched

File	Old rev	New rev	Old content_length	New content_length	Status
`newlaws/LAW_READING_INDEX.md`	1	2	19,017	28,225	patched (pointer/navigation only)

Old metadata (rev1): title "LAW READING INDEX — Which Law Source to Read After Law Merge (2026-06-17, read-only, non-authorizing)"; tags [laws-new, newlaws, law-merge, reading-index, keep-amend-rewrite-defer, read-only, non-authorizing, safety-lock, 2026-06-17]. New metadata (rev2): title "LAW READING INDEX — Which Law Source to Read After Law Merge (2026-06-17, rev2 D1 pointer re-point, read-only, non-authorizing)"; tags add d1-pointer-repoint, non-enacting.

1.2 Created

File	Path	Rev	content_length	Status
Current-Understanding Pointer Layer (D1.2)	`newlaws/consolidation/current-understanding-pointer-layer-2026-06-17.md`	1	34,944	created
D1 Execution Report (D1.3, this)	`newlaws/reports/law-revision-workstream-d1-pointer-layer-index-repoint-execution-report-2026-06-17.md`	1	(this report — see KB metadata)	created

The newlaws/consolidation/ folder already existed (created by D0); D1 added one document to it. No new folder of any kind was created.

2. Sources read (read-only, first-hand for this workstream)

All read from the agent-data KB (the corpus is absent from the local checkout). Nothing was written to any source. laws/ referenced by path only.

Source	Revision / evidence	Used for
`LAW_READING_INDEX.md`	rev1, 19,017 chars (read in full for re-point)	The file patched; baseline for the D1 re-point
`reports/workstream-e0-new-law-consistency-conflict-audit-2026-06-17.md`	rev1, PASS_WITH_MEDIUM_FINDINGS, 43,167 chars (full)	The exact E0 findings to address (E0-M1/L1/L2/L3, L4 carried)
`consolidation/law-revision-consolidation-planning-packet-2026-06-17.md`	rev1, 39,859 chars (full)	The authoritative 53-record matrix, 5 reading rules, AMEND/REWRITE/note maps, 17 future notes, source-recovery caveats, blockers, lock
`consolidation/owner-decision-matrix-law-revision-2026-06-17.md`	rev1, 11,706 chars (full)	Option B scope (this D1 track) + Options A/C/D for "next decision options"; CONS-004/005 framing
`reports/law-revision-workstream-d0-consolidation-planning-execution-report-2026-06-17.md`	rev1, 11,569 chars (full)	Report format; metadata consistency; matrix-completeness wording
`law-merge-catalog-2026-06-16.md`	rev1 (53 records) — totals cross-checked via D0 + E0 (both confirm identical)	53-record disposition/order corroboration
`amendments/dieu22-self-healing-amendment-draft.md`	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting; target `law-22-self-healing.md` v1.2 BAN HÀNH	AMEND pointer #2 — AMEND_ENACTED
`amendments/dieu33-postgresql-law-amendment-draft.md`	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting; target `dieu33-postgresql-law.md` v2.1 BAN HÀNH	AMEND pointer #3 — AMEND_ENACTED
`amendments/dieu36-collection-protocol-amendment-draft.md`	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting; target v5.0 DRAFT (v4.0 last enacted)	AMEND pointer #4 — REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION
`amendments/l4-birth-gate-extension-amendment-draft.md`	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting; target DỰ THẢO	AMEND pointer #5 — REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION
`amendments/dieu38-normative-document-law-v3-amendment-draft.md`	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting; target v3.0 DRAFT	AMEND pointer #6 — REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION
`rewrites/dieu37-governance-organization-law-rewrite-draft.md`	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting; catalog record #1; target v3.3 BAN HÀNH (immutable)	REWRITE pointer #1
`notes/` (8 compatibility notes)	rev1 each; self-declared records #14/15/8/11/12/23/13/16 (corroborated, match D0 §7)	8 note pointers (§4 of pointer layer)
`reports/source-recovery-dieu0-dieu0b-dieu0g-2026-06-17.md`	rev1, COMPLETE-as-navigation	Source-recovery caveats (§8 of pointer layer); carried open
`list_documents` of `newlaws/`	30 documents (29 substantive + 1 folder anchor)	Inventory confirmation; exact draft/note paths; no current corpus exists

No source could not be read. No section is PARTIAL or BLOCKED for missing input. (The corroboration reads of the 5 amendments / 1 rewrite / 8 notes were truncated-head reads sufficient to confirm each file's existence, non-enacting banner, target-enactment status, and self-declared record number; the full mappings were taken from the D0 packet read first-hand.)

3. Exact E0 findings addressed

Finding	Severity	Addressed?	Where / how
E0-M1 — `LAW_READING_INDEX.md` stale for the 6 AMEND/REWRITE records; no forward-pointer	MEDIUM	YES	Index rev2: D1 banner added near top; §3.3/§3.4 re-pointed all 6 records at the actual draft files; stale "no amendment/rewrite exists yet — read old as background only" replaced with "draft exists — read old + draft as DRAFT/PENDING_OWNER (not enacted)"; §0 category meanings updated; pointer layer §2/§3 give the full draft pointers
E0-L1 — CONS-004/005 lumped with open blockers in the index	LOW	YES	Index §7 now separates "Open blockers (NOT resolved)" from "Decided at F0 (NOT open blockers, NOT reopened): CONS-004, CONS-005"; pointer layer §9 mirrors the separation; authority order unchanged
E0-L2 — reading-rule label divergence (index vs D0)	LOW	YES	Index made the D0 labels primary (READ_OLD_AS_IS / READ_OLD_WITH_NOTE / READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER / READ_REWRITE_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER / DEFER_DO_NOT_USE) throughout §0/§3; the older WS-A labels (READ_NEW_AMENDED_VERSION_PENDING / READ_NEW_REWRITE_VERSION_PENDING / READ_OLD_WITH_COMPATIBILITY_NOTE / DEFER_DO_NOT_USE_FOR_NEW_DESIGN) retained only as a "Historical WS-A alias" column; pointer layer uses D0 labels only
E0-L3 — "AMEND" applied to 3 non-enacted draft targets	LOW	YES	Both docs add the AMEND_ENACTED vs REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION distinction: Đ22/Đ33 = AMEND_ENACTED; Đ36/L4/Đ38 v3.0 = REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION (their old targets are themselves draft/non-enacted). Index §3.3 precision note + pointer layer §3.3
E0-L4 — gate-naming interchange + proliferating stamp vocabulary not glossary-anchored	LOW	CARRIED (not done, per task)	Recorded as future Owner-gated glossary work: index §7 + pointer layer §12 ("Owner / Mức 3 / Điều 32" relationship + stamp family normalization, already scoped by the terminology note). Explicitly not part of D1
E0-I1 — "canonical (F4)" vs current-corpus distinction	INFO	preserved	Pointer layer §1 keeps "canonical birth = output at promote (F4)" distinct from "the current reading" (this non-enacting pointer layer); not conflated
E0-I2 / E0-I3 — report-revision asymmetry; source-recovery/version-drift caveats	INFO	carried	Source-recovery caveats carried open in pointer layer §8; no drift introduced; nothing silently resolved

4. Matrix completeness

53 of 53 records present in the pointer layer table (§2), in catalog order, each with: record number, old source path (provenance), short title, disposition, D1 reading rule, pointer target, status.
Class totals verified, sum = 53: REWRITE 1 (record 1) · AMEND 5 (records 2–6) · KEEP+NOTE 25 (records 7–31) · KEEP 6 (records 32–37) · DEFER 16 (records 38–53). 1 + 5 + 25 + 6 + 16 = 53.
6 draft pointers (§3 of pointer layer): Đ37 rewrite (#1) → rewrites/dieu37-governance-organization-law-rewrite-draft.md; the 5 amendments (#2–#6) → their amendments/… files; with the AMEND_ENACTED (#2/#3) vs REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION (#4/#5/#6) distinction.
8 note pointers (§4): records #8/#11/#12/#13/#14/#15/#16/#23 → their notes/… files (record numbers corroborated first-hand against the note files).
17 future-note records (§5): #7/9/10/17/18/19/20/21/22/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31 — note not yet written. (8 + 17 = 25 KEEP+NOTE.)
6 KEEP records (§6): #32–#37 → READ_OLD_AS_IS, no artifact.
16 DEFER records (§7): #38–#53 → DEFER_DO_NOT_USE, audit/history only.
Source-recovery caveats (§8) and blockers carried (§9) recorded, none resolved.
Cross-document consistency: the same 53/53 matrix and the same 6/25/5/1/16 totals appear in the re-pointed index (rev2), the pointer layer (rev1), the D0 packet, and E0 — identical to the number.

Re-point check (the 6 records now point at actual draft files):

#	Law	Pointer target	Reading rule (D0)	Type
1	Đ37	`rewrites/dieu37-governance-organization-law-rewrite-draft.md`	READ_REWRITE_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER	—
2	Đ22	`amendments/dieu22-self-healing-amendment-draft.md`	READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER	AMEND_ENACTED
3	Đ33	`amendments/dieu33-postgresql-law-amendment-draft.md`	READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER	AMEND_ENACTED
4	Đ36	`amendments/dieu36-collection-protocol-amendment-draft.md`	READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER	REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION
5	L4	`amendments/l4-birth-gate-extension-amendment-draft.md`	READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER	REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION
6	Đ38 v3.0	`amendments/dieu38-normative-document-law-v3-amendment-draft.md`	READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER	REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION

All 6 targets verified to exist via list_documents of newlaws/.

5. Folder policy

Branch	Expected	Observed	Verdict
`newlaws/LAW_READING_INDEX.md` (patch)	allowed	patched (rev1→rev2)	✅ PASS
`newlaws/consolidation/current-understanding-pointer-layer-2026-06-17.md` (create)	allowed	created (rev1)	✅ PASS
`newlaws/reports/law-revision-workstream-d1-…-execution-report-2026-06-17.md` (create)	allowed	created (rev1)	✅ PASS
`knowledge/dev/laws/`	forbidden	not touched (referenced by path only)	✅ PASS
`laws-new/laws/`, `laws/newlaws/`	forbidden	not touched	✅ PASS
`newlaws/current/`, `laws-new/current/`, `laws-current/`, `current/`	forbidden (no current corpus)	not created	✅ PASS
amendment drafts / rewrite draft / notes / D0 / E0 reports	forbidden to patch	not patched	✅ PASS

No output leaked outside the allowed paths. No current-corpus folder of any name was created. No source law, amendment draft, rewrite draft, note, or D0/E0 report was edited.

6. Matrix summary

Category	Count	Reading rule (D0)
KEEP	6	READ_OLD_AS_IS
KEEP+NOTE	25	READ_OLD_WITH_NOTE (8 notes written, 17 future)
AMEND	5	READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER (Đ22/Đ33 = AMEND_ENACTED; Đ36/L4/Đ38 v3.0 = REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION)
REWRITE	1	READ_REWRITE_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER (Đ37)
DEFER	16	DEFER_DO_NOT_USE
TOTAL	53

7. Non-authorization (explicit)

No current corpus: none created; no current/ folder of any name exists or was made; the pointer layer is pointers + notes, never copied law text.
No law text copied: every cell in the pointer layer is a path + reading rule + status; no law body was copied.
No adoption / enactment: no note, amendment, or rewrite enacted; Đ37 rewrite is not in force; AMEND drafts are not enacted amendments; KEEP+NOTE notes do not amend their laws.
No technical design: none written.
No Phase-1: none run; none authorized.
No runtime query: no live DB/runtime query (no query_pg, pg_schema, Directus, or VPS access); KB-only.
No implementation: no schema/table/registry/index; no governance_registry; no KG / cell_id / dot_role / canonical_fields / Species-Matrix / BIRTH_STAMP / PROMOTE_STAMP materialization.
No source-law edit: knowledge/dev/laws/ untouched; Constitution unpatched.
No blocker resolved: RISK-BYPASS, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, CONS-002, CONS-003, CELL-003/004/007, GOV-016/017, GOV-REUSE-001, Đ39 runtime-EMPTY, Đ35 production-readiness FAIL, source-recovery Đ0/0-B/0-G — all remain open.
No authority change: CONS-004 authority order unchanged (decided at F0); CONS-004/005 recorded as decided, not reopened.
No v0.1 baseline change: v0.1-stable / FIX7 V3 remains the locked baseline.
No v0.2 promotion: v0.2-hardening remains a separate dev track, not authority.

8. Bad readings rejected

Both the re-pointed index (§4.1/§4.2) and the pointer layer (§11) explicitly reject, as FALSE: D1 creates a current corpus · the D1 pointer layer is current law · D1 adopts the AMEND drafts · D1 adopts the Đ37 rewrite · D1 replaces laws/ · D1 authorizes technical design · D1 authorizes Phase-1 · D1 resolves runtime blockers · D1 fixes source-recovery Đ0/0-B/0-G · D1 makes DEFER docs an active source · D1 changes the authority order · D1 promotes v0.2-hardening. The standing carried bad readings (PASS ≠ adoption, draft ≠ enacted, note ≠ amendment, enacted ≠ live/production-ready, INSERT ≠ canonical, newlaws/ ≠ replaces laws/) are retained.

9. Completion check (C1–C15)

Check	Result	Evidence
C1 — LAW_READING_INDEX patched and re-read	✅	rev1→rev2, content_length 19,017→28,225; re-read via get_document
C2 — stale "no amendment/rewrite exists yet" wording gone or marked historical	✅	§0 meanings rewritten; §3.3/§3.4 re-pointed; old labels demoted to a "Historical WS-A alias" column
C3 — all 6 AMEND/REWRITE records point to actual draft files	✅	§4 re-point table; all 6 targets exist in `newlaws/`
C4 — D0 reading-rule labels are primary	✅	§0/§3 use D0 labels as primary; WS-A labels alias-only
C5 — CONS-004/005 separated from open blockers	✅	index §7 + pointer §9: "Decided at F0 (NOT open blockers)"
C6 — Đ36/L4/Đ38 marked revise-draft-direction, not amend-enacted	✅	index §3.3 precision note + pointer §3.3
C7 — pointer-layer document created under `newlaws/consolidation/`	✅	`current-understanding-pointer-layer-2026-06-17.md`, rev1, 34,944 chars
C8 — execution report created under `newlaws/reports/`	✅	this file
C9 — no current corpus or `current/` folder created	✅	§5 folder policy; no `current/` of any name
C10 — no source law edited	✅	`laws/` untouched, referenced by path only
C11 — no adoption/enactment	✅	§7 non-authorization
C12 — no technical design / Phase-1 / runtime query / implementation	✅	§7 non-authorization
C13 — no blockers resolved	✅	§7; pointer layer §9 (all open)
C14 — folder policy clean	✅	§5 all-PASS
C15 — ready for Codex review stated	✅	§10 below

10. Readiness for GPT / Codex review

All three D1 artifacts (re-pointed index rev2, pointer layer rev1, this report) are read-only, non-enacting, non-authorizing; create no current corpus; copy no law text; resolve no blocker; change no authority order; and touch no source law. The 53/53 matrix is complete and consistent across the index, the pointer layer, D0, and E0; the 6 AMEND/REWRITE records are re-pointed at the actual draft files; the D0 labels are primary; CONS-004/005 are separated as decided; the AMEND_ENACTED vs REVISE_DRAFT_DIRECTION distinction is applied; and E0-L4 is carried as explicit future glossary work.

Ready for Codex review: YES.

Next action:

GPT reviews D1 (re-pointed index + pointer layer + this report).
If accepted, Codex reviews D1.
Owner then decides whether to (a) use the pointer layer as the working navigation map, (b) open the glossary work (E0-L4), or (c) open a separate read-only Phase-1 blocker verification (D0 Option D); Option C (fix a named artifact) only if a defect is found. Codex PASS ≠ Owner authorization; default disposition remains HOLD.