Law Revision Workstream D0 — Consolidation Planning Execution Report

Status: PASS (planning & decision-support complete; nothing enacted, nothing consolidated, no current corpus created). READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING. Created: 2026-06-17 · Law Revision Workstream D0 · rev1. Mission: produce a consolidation-planning packet + Owner decision matrix for the completed Law-Revision drafting work (Workstreams A / B0 / B1 / B2 / C) — planning and decision-support only. No current corpus; no enactment; no edit to knowledge/dev/laws/; no technical design; no Phase-1; no live DB/runtime query; no implementation; no blocker resolved. Outputs: consolidation/law-revision-consolidation-planning-packet-2026-06-17.md (D0.1) · consolidation/owner-decision-matrix-law-revision-2026-06-17.md (D0.2) · this report (D0.3). Standing rule carried: Codex/GPT/Council PASS ≠ Owner authorization. Engineering PASS ≠ Authority PASS. Default disposition: HOLD.

---

1. Files created

Exactly three, all under allowed paths. Nothing else created, moved, copied, or edited.

File	Path	Revision	content_length	Status
D0.1 Consolidation Planning Packet	newlaws/consolidation/law-revision-consolidation-planning-packet-2026-06-17.md	1	39,859	created
D0.2 Owner Decision Matrix	newlaws/consolidation/owner-decision-matrix-law-revision-2026-06-17.md	1	11,706	created
D0.3 Execution Report (this)	newlaws/reports/law-revision-workstream-d0-consolidation-planning-execution-report-2026-06-17.md	1	(this report — see KB metadata)	created

The newlaws/consolidation/ folder was created fresh by D0.1/D0.2 (no prior documents existed under that prefix — confirmed by a full list_documents of newlaws/ returning 26 items, none under consolidation/).

---

2. Sources read (read-only, first-hand for this workstream)

All read from the agent-data KB (the corpus is absent from the local checkout). Heavy reads were performed via parallel read-only reader-agents that returned structured digests; the spine (catalog + reading index) and all reports were read first-hand. Nothing was written to any source.

Source	Revision / evidence	Used for
law-merge-catalog-2026-06-16.md	rev1, 48,223 chars; all 53 main rows cross-checked vs the 5 summary tables	The 53-record matrix (§3 of D0.1)
LAW_READING_INDEX.md	rev1 (Workstream A)	The reading-rule categories + mapping (§4 of D0.1); the "index is pre-amendment, now partially stale" finding
law-merge-execution-report-2026-06-16.md	rev2, STATUS PASS	Class totals + membership lists + conflict/HOLD log
reports/law-revision-workstream-a-execution-report-2026-06-17.md	STATUS PARTIAL (honest, non-blocking)	Workstream-A summary; the 8 notes produced; birth-embedded-check outcome
reports/source-recovery-dieu0-dieu0b-dieu0g-2026-06-17.md	COMPLETE as navigation; B0	Source-recovery caveats (§9 of D0.1); the 5 Owner-gated open items
reports/law-revision-workstream-b0-b1-execution-report-2026-06-17.md	rev8, STATUS PASS	B0 + B1 (Đ22, Đ33) summary; control status
reports/law-revision-workstream-b2-execution-report-2026-06-17.md	rev10, STATUS PASS	B2 (Đ36, L4, Đ38 v3.0) summary; first-hand source re-verification (Đ0-B = 6 Lớp first-hand)
reports/law-revision-workstream-c-dieu37-rewrite-execution-report-2026-06-17.md	STATUS PARTIAL (honest, non-blocking)	Đ37 rewrite PRESERVE/RETIRE/REPLACE; control status
amendments/dieu22-self-healing-amendment-draft.md	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting	AMEND mapping (§5 of D0.1) — record #2
amendments/dieu33-postgresql-law-amendment-draft.md	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting	AMEND mapping — record #3
amendments/dieu36-collection-protocol-amendment-draft.md	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting	AMEND mapping — record #4
amendments/l4-birth-gate-extension-amendment-draft.md	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting	AMEND mapping — record #5
amendments/dieu38-normative-document-law-v3-amendment-draft.md	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting	AMEND mapping — record #6
rewrites/dieu37-governance-organization-law-rewrite-draft.md	rev1, DRAFT/non-enacting	REWRITE mapping (§6 of D0.1) — record #1
notes/constitution-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping (§7 of D0.1) — record #14
notes/terminology-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping — record #15
notes/dieu1-foundation-principles-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping — record #8
notes/dieu32-approval-owner-gate-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping — record #11
notes/dieu35-dot-governance-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping — record #12
notes/dieu39-knowledge-graph-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping — record #23
notes/dieu4-birth-process-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping — record #13
notes/dieu38-text-as-code-appendix01-compatibility-note.md	rev1, KEEP+NOTE	Note mapping — record #16

No source could not be read; no section is PARTIAL or BLOCKED for missing input. (The two PARTIAL workstream reports, A and C, are their own honest-non-blocking statuses, faithfully carried — not a read failure here.)

---

3. Matrix completeness

• 53 of 53 records mapped, in catalog order, each with: old-law identity, short title, disposition, reading rule, and consolidation artifact (if any).
• Class totals verified, sum = 53: KEEP 6 · KEEP+NOTE 25 · AMEND 5 · REWRITE 1 · DEFER 16. (6 + 25 + 5 + 1 + 16 = 53.)
• Reading rules assigned to all 53: READ_OLD_AS_IS (6) · READ_OLD_WITH_NOTE (25) · READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER (5) · READ_REWRITE_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER (1) · DEFER_DO_NOT_USE (16).
• 5 AMEND drafts mapped to old-law records #2 (Đ22) / #3 (Đ33) / #4 (Đ36) / #5 (L4) / #6 (Đ38 v3.0) — §5 of D0.1.
• 1 REWRITE mapped to old-law record #1 (Đ37 v3.3) — §6 of D0.1.
• 8 written notes mapped to KEEP+NOTE records #8/#11/#12/#13/#14/#15/#16/#23 — §7 of D0.1.
• 17 not-yet-written KEEP+NOTE notes identified as future Batch-A work (records #7/9/10/17/18/19/20/21/22/24/25/26/27/28/29/30/31) — §8 of D0.1. (8 written + 17 future = 25 KEEP+NOTE.)
• Source-recovery caveats (Đ0/0-B/0-G in architecture/; broken law-00*.md Constitution refs; Đ0-B v3.0/v3.1 drift; CONS-003 6-vs-7; 5 Owner-gated open items) recorded — §9 of D0.1.
• Blockers that must stay open enumerated (RISK-BYPASS, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, CONS-002, CONS-003, CELL-003/004/007, GOV-016/017, GOV-REUSE-001, Đ39 runtime-EMPTY, Đ35 production-readiness FAIL, source-recovery; carried context gates) — §10 of D0.1.

A key consolidation finding recorded in the packet: LAW_READING_INDEX.md (rev1) was written in Workstream A before the amendment/rewrite drafts existed, so it still routes the 6 AMEND/REWRITE records to "no new version exists yet — read old as background." Now that the drafts exist, the current reading rule advances to READ_AMENDMENT_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER / READ_REWRITE_DRAFT_PENDING_OWNER. D0 records this advanced rule without editing the index (re-pointing the index is a later Owner-gated step).

---

4. Folder policy

Branch	Expected	Observed	Verdict
newlaws/consolidation/ (D0.1, D0.2)	allowed	used	✅ PASS
newlaws/reports/ (D0.3)	allowed	used	✅ PASS
knowledge/dev/laws/	forbidden	not touched (referenced by path only)	✅ PASS
laws-new/laws/, laws/newlaws/	forbidden	not touched	✅ PASS
newlaws/current/, laws-new/current/, laws-current/, current/	forbidden (no current corpus)	not created	✅ PASS
laws-new/newlaws/ root	forbidden (output)	not used for output	✅ PASS

No output leaked outside the allowed paths. No current-corpus folder of any name was created.

---

5. Non-authorization (explicit)

• No current corpus: none created; no current/ folder of any name exists or was made.
• No adoption / enactment: no note, amendment, or rewrite enacted; Đ37 rewrite is not in force; AMEND drafts are not enacted amendments; KEEP+NOTE notes do not amend their laws.
• No technical design: none written.
• No Phase-1: none run; none authorized by this packet.
• No runtime query: no live DB/runtime query; KB-only; reported-LIVE substrate treated as documentary.
• No implementation: no schema/table/registry/index; no governance_registry; no KG / cell_id / dot_role / canonical_fields / Species-Matrix / BIRTH_STAMP / PROMOTE_STAMP materialization.
• No source-law edit: knowledge/dev/laws/ untouched; Constitution unpatched.
• No blocker resolved: RISK-BYPASS, HOLD-1, HOLD-2, CONS-002, CONS-003, CELL-003/004/007, GOV-016/017, GOV-REUSE-001, Đ39 runtime-EMPTY, Đ35 production-readiness FAIL, source-recovery Đ0/0-B/0-G — all remain open.
• No authority change: CONS-004 authority order unchanged (decided at F0).
• No v0.1 baseline change: v0.1-stable / FIX7 V3 remains the locked baseline.
• No v0.2 promotion: v0.2-hardening remains a separate dev track, not authority.

---

6. Bad readings rejected (carried in D0.1 §13)

The packet explicitly rejects: "Codex PASS = adoption" · "drafts replace laws/" · "current corpus created automatically" · "consolidation planning authorizes technical design" · "runtime blockers resolved" · "source-recovery Đ0/0-B/0-G resolved" · "v0.2 replaces v0.1" · "Đ37 rewrite in force" · "AMEND drafts are enacted amendments" · "KEEP+NOTE notes amend old laws." All FALSE.

---

7. Completion check

Criterion	Result	Evidence
C1 planning packet under newlaws/consolidation/	✅	D0.1 created, rev1, 39,859 chars
C2 owner decision matrix under newlaws/consolidation/	✅	D0.2 created, rev1, 11,706 chars
C3 execution report under newlaws/reports/	✅	D0.3 (this)
C4 53-record matrix complete	✅	D0.1 §3, all 53 rows, totals sum = 53
C5 all 5 AMEND drafts mapped	✅	D0.1 §5 (records #2–#6)
C6 Đ37 rewrite mapped	✅	D0.1 §6 (record #1)
C7 8 notes mapped	✅	D0.1 §7 (records #8/11/12/13/14/15/16/23)
C8 remaining 17 KEEP+NOTE notes identified as future/not yet written	✅	D0.1 §8 (17 records; 8 + 17 = 25)
C9 no current corpus created	✅	§4 folder policy; no current/ of any name
C10 no source law edited	✅	laws/ untouched, referenced by path only
C11 no technical design / Phase-1 / implementation	✅	§5 non-authorization
C12 no blockers resolved	✅	D0.1 §10; §5 above
C13 non-authorization explicit	✅	D0.1 §1, §12, §13; §5 above
C14 ready for Codex review stated	✅	§8 below; D0.1 §16; D0.2 §7

---

8. Readiness for GPT / Codex review

All three D0 documents are read-only, non-authorizing, create no current corpus, and resolve no blocker. The matrix is complete (53/53), the mappings are exhaustive (5 AMEND + 1 REWRITE + 8 notes + 17 future notes), the source-recovery caveats and open blockers are carried, and every build/adopt/resolve action is deferred to an explicit Owner decision (D0.2 Options A/B/C/D).

Ready for Codex review: YES.

Next action:

1. GPT reviews D0 (this packet + decision matrix + report).
2. If accepted, Codex reviews D0.
3. Owner/User then chooses one decision option (A / B / C / D in D0.2). Codex PASS ≠ Owner authorization; default disposition remains HOLD.