Law Revision Workstream B0+B1 — Execution Report

STATUS: PASS (engineering/review-complete; nothing fabricated; no source-access failure). All four deliverables created under knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/. The B0 source-recovery report is complete as a navigation report and surfaces five Owner-gated reconciliation items (by design — surfacing them is its job, not a defect). The two amendment drafts are non-enacting and preserve the old-law goals while reframing only the unsafe rollout mechanism. READ-ONLY · NON-AUTHORIZING. 2026-06-17, rev2. Output confined to knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/. Basis: accepted Workstream A package + Law Merge basis (catalog/execution-report/administrative-phase-gate) + the old-law/source corpus (constitution.md, existing-law-references.md, architecture/ Đ0/0-B/0-G, law-22-self-healing.md, dieu33-postgresql-law.md, dieu32-approval-law.md, dieu35-dot-governance-law.md, ssot/operating-rules.md).

---

1. Files created (4)

File	Revision	content_length	Status
reports/source-recovery-dieu0-dieu0b-dieu0g-2026-06-17.md	1	13,256	created
amendments/dieu22-self-healing-amendment-draft.md	1	15,702	created
amendments/dieu33-postgresql-law-amendment-draft.md	1	15,488	created
reports/law-revision-workstream-b0-b1-execution-report-2026-06-17.md	2	12,646	created

content_length and revision figures are the exact values returned by the KB at the read taken before this metadata-consistency patch. The execution report's own row necessarily reflects the metadata observed before this patch was written, since writing the value into the document changes the document; the live post-patch revision and content_length are reported to Codex in this run's final response.

2. Sources read (first-hand, in full unless noted)

Source	Revision / Evidence	Used for
newlaws/LAW_READING_INDEX.md	rev1, len 19,017	Catalog dispositions (Đ22 #2 AMEND, Đ33 #3 AMEND), §2 source-location caveat, §4 bad-readings
newlaws/reports/birth-embedded-…-check-2026-06-17.md	rev1, len 9,486	B0 birth findings; Đ4 stays KEEP+NOTE; AMEND pressure = L4/Đ38 v3.0
newlaws/reports/law-revision-workstream-a-execution-report-2026-06-17.md	rev1, len 7,832	Workstream A scope, completion checks, safety lock
newlaws/law-merge-administrative-phase-gate-2026-06-17.md	rev1, len 1,794	Authorization scope (amendment drafts allowed; technical design / Phase-1 / live query / schema / editing laws/ NOT authorized)
laws/constitution.md	rev44 (v4.6.3), len 19,132	B0-Q1 (MỤC LỤC refs for Đ0/0-B/0-G), supremacy, NT2/3/5/12/13/15, Mức-3 framing
laws/existing-law-references.md	rev1, len 3,412	B0-Q4 (architecture/ = "tham khảo chi tiết" under Constitution as "tài liệu CHÍNH")
architecture/information-atom-law.md (Đ0)	rev18, len 17,712	B0-Q3/Q5; managed-entity 5 conditions, conservation
architecture/composition-level-law.md (Đ0-B)	rev22, len 12,146	B0-Q3 + CONS-003 (6-Lớp enum first-hand) + version drift
architecture/birth-registry-law.md (Đ0-G)	rev2, len 11,681	B0-Q3; certified=false at INSERT, later PEN→STAMP→GATE certify
laws/law-22-self-healing.md (Đ22)	rev22 (v1.2), len 14,108	B1 Đ22 amendment targets (§1 loop, §1.1 auto-close, §4.3 detect_and_fix, §4.4 HC-TRIGGER auto-attach, §4.2 carve-out)
laws/dieu33-postgresql-law.md (Đ33)	rev5 (v2.1), len 28,721	B1 Đ33 amendment targets (§11.4 auto-ALTER, §12.2 Loại 2, §11.5 canonical_fields, §13 E1)
laws/dieu32-approval-law.md (Đ32)	rev2 (v1.1), len 5,601	Owner/Mức-3 gate (high-risk = ≥1 president + ≥2 ai_council; no self-approve; amend_law RESERVED) referenced by both amendments
laws/dieu35-dot-governance-law.md (Đ35)	rev13 (v5.2), len 36,904	The fix_repair_dot safe path (§6.2) the Đ22 amendment routes into; §3 (Cấp B never auto-approved) vs live RISK-BYPASS
ssot/operating-rules.md	rev51 (v7.58), len 5,400	Discipline preserved (Assembly First; PG/Directus = data path; read-only = no DDL/DML; "không chắc đúng = sai")

No required source failed to read. No subtask hit a source-access PARTIAL/BLOCKED.

3. Completion checks (task C1–C12)

Check	Result	Evidence
C1 Source Recovery report under newlaws/reports/	PASS	reports/source-recovery-…-2026-06-17.md rev1
C2 Đ22 amendment draft under newlaws/amendments/	PASS	amendments/dieu22-self-healing-amendment-draft.md rev1
C3 Đ33 amendment draft under newlaws/amendments/	PASS	amendments/dieu33-postgresql-law-amendment-draft.md rev1
C4 Execution report under newlaws/reports/	PASS	this file rev2
C5 no output outside knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/	PASS	only newlaws/** written (see §4)
C6 laws/ untouched	PASS	no create/edit/move/rename/delete under laws/ (read-only)
C7 no Constitution patch	PASS	constitution.md read-only
C8 no technical design	PASS	none written
C9 no Phase-1 / live DB/runtime query	PASS	only KB read/list used
C10 no implementation/schema/table/registry/index	PASS	none
C11 amendment drafts say DRAFT / not enacted	PASS	each header + §0 + closing line
C12 drafts preserve goals, reframe only unsafe rollout	PASS	each §1 (preserved) + §3 (reframe)

4. Folder policy (E4)

Branch	Expected	Observed	Verdict
knowledge/dev/laws/	no output	no create/edit/move/delete (read-only)	PASS
knowledge/dev/laws-new/laws/	no output	not created; not written	PASS
knowledge/dev/laws/newlaws/	no output	not created; not written	PASS
knowledge/dev/laws-new/ root	no output	nothing at root; all 4 under newlaws/**	PASS
knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/	the 4 outputs	2 in reports/, 2 in amendments/	PASS

The amendments/ subfolder is new but lives inside newlaws/, which the administrative phase gate authorizes ("Create amendment drafts under knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/"). reports/ already existed (Workstream A).

5. Source-recovery summary (B0)

Question	Answer	Evidence
Q1 Constitution refs for Đ0/0-B/0-G	law-00-entity.md / law-00b-composition.md / law-00g-birth.md	constitution.md MỤC LỤC → Nền tảng table
Q2 present under laws/?	No — only law-00h-5layer-sync.md exists; the three are absent	list_documents prefix laws/law-00 returns 1 item
Q3 found under architecture/?	Yes — information-atom-law.md (Đ0), composition-level-law.md (Đ0-B), birth-registry-law.md (Đ0-G), all read in full	three full reads + list_documents titles/versions
Q4 existing-law-references.md supports architecture/ as detailed reference?	Yes — designates architecture/ as "tham khảo chi tiết" under Constitution as "tài liệu CHÍNH"	existing-law-references.md header + Đ0/0-B/0-G mappings
Q5 architecture/ as temporary working source?	Yes — for the text of Đ0/0-B/0-G, subordinate to the Constitution	Q4 + files present/consistent
Q6 architecture/ as supreme/enacted?	No — Constitution is supreme ("Văn bản tối cao"); architecture/ is reference, not enacting authority	constitution.md supremacy + Q4 subordination
Q7 what should LAW_READING_INDEX say?	Keep §2 caveat: read architecture/ for Đ0/0-B/0-G; architecture/ = temp working source, not supreme; Owner-gated recovery pending	B0 §1.Q7
Q8 what future Birth/L4/Đ36/Đ38 work depends on	resolved source-recovery + CONS-003 + Workstream A birth findings (Đ4 KEEP+NOTE; AMEND = L4/Đ38 v3.0) + HOLD-2/RISK-BYPASS	B0 §1.Q8
Q9 unresolved	broken Constitution refs; v3.0/v3.1 drift; CONS-003 (6 vs 7); authoritative-current question; law-00sml-amendments.md absent — all Owner-gated	B0 §1.Q9 / §3

6. Amendment draft summary (B1)

Law	Draft path	Preserved goal	Unsafe mechanism reframed	Status
Điều 22 v1.2	amendments/dieu22-self-healing-amendment-draft.md	detect / list / propose / confirm / learn; double-entry; expose-all; silent-fail ban; two-engine philosophy; metrics	auto-fix from scanner (§1 step③); issue auto-close/reopen (§1.1); detect_and_fix/auto_fix_action (§4.3); HC-TRIGGER auto-attach (§4.4); regex auto-rewrite carve-out (§4.2) → all proposal-only, mutation via checker + Owner/Mức 3/Điều 32 (fix_repair_dot path)	DRAFT / non-enacting
Điều 33 v2.1	amendments/dieu33-postgresql-law-amendment-draft.md	PG = enforcement/truth foundation; 4-DB; 3-layer Não/Kho/Cổng; naming; canonical-field discipline; migration discipline; E1–E5 (bounded); GSM access control; CI hooks	auto-ALTER (§11.4); DDL-as-Loại-2 (§12.2); canonical_fields/cell_id/dot_role materialization (§11.2/§11.5); "AUTO 100%"-as-auto-DDL (§1); E1 over-read (§13.1) → schema change via design-before-execution + checker + Điều 32 + Điều 30; materialization deferred pending CONS-003 + CELL	DRAFT / non-enacting

7. Non-authorization

• no adopted amendment: confirmed (both drafts non-enacting)
• no rewrite: confirmed (no Điều 37 rewrite; no L4/Đ36/Đ38 v3.0 amendment in this task)
• no technical design: confirmed
• no Phase-1: confirmed
• no DB/runtime query: confirmed (KB read/list only)
• no implementation: confirmed (no schema/table/registry/index; no field/column/trigger materialization)
• no authority change: confirmed (CONS-004 order unchanged)
• no edit/move/delete under laws/: confirmed
• no Constitution patch: confirmed
• no v0.1-stable / FIX7 V3 baseline change: confirmed
• no v0.2-hardening promotion: confirmed
• Codex/GPT PASS ≠ Owner authorization for technical design or adoption. Default disposition: HOLD.

8. Issues / caveats

• B0 surfaces, does not resolve, five Owner-gated reconciliation items (broken Constitution refs; v3.0/v3.1 version drift on Đ0-B; CONS-003 6-vs-7; authoritative-current question; law-00sml-amendments.md absent). Surfacing them is the report's purpose; they are not defects of this run.
• The amendment drafts are drafts: their "Proposed amended wording" (§4 in each) is recommended wording for a future Owner-gated amendment, not enacted clauses.
• RISK-BYPASS (live fn_auto_approve_add, 160 unvoted applies) is reinforced-against by the Đ22 draft's no-auto-mutate principle but not closed — closing it is Owner/Phase-1 work, out of B0+B1 scope.
• The Đ33 draft explicitly forbids materializing dot_role/cell_id/canonical fields while CONS-003 + CELL-003/004/007 are open; it does not resolve those blockers.
• This task did not draft amendments for Đ36 / L4 / Đ38 v3.0 (scope = Đ22 + Đ33 only), and did not rewrite Đ37.

9. Self-check (S1–S10)

#	Check	Result
S1	Re-read all four created files from KB	PASS (re-read; lengths recorded §1)
S2	Verify revisions / content_length	PASS (source-recovery rev1; Đ22 draft rev1; Đ33 draft rev1; execution report rev2; content_length values verified from KB)
S3	B0 says architecture/ is temporary/detailed, not supreme by itself	PASS (B0 §1.Q5/Q6, §2 rule)
S4	Đ22 draft says draft / non-enacting / no auto-fix	PASS (header, §0, §3, §8)
S5	Đ33 draft says draft / non-enacting / no auto-DDL/schema-auto-change	PASS (header, §0, §3, §8)
S6	no output under forbidden paths	PASS (§4)
S7	no change to laws/	PASS (§4, §7)
S8	no technical-design language introduced	PASS (drafts speak of reframing rollout, not designing implementation)
S9	no Phase-1 / live runtime checks run	PASS (§7)
S10	report states "Ready for Codex review: yes/no"	PASS (§10)

10. Readiness & next action

• Ready for Codex review: YES. Engineering/review-complete; all four deliverables created, re-read, and evidenced; nothing fabricated; B0 honestly surfaces the open Owner-gated items; both amendments are explicitly non-enacting and preserve old-law goals.
• Next:
  1. GPT reviews the B0+B1 package.
  2. If accepted, Codex reviews it (adversarial standard: reconstruct from KB; check for hidden authorization / "auto-fix still allowed" / "auto-DDL still allowed" / "architecture/ now supreme" / "draft adopted").
  3. Owner/User then decides whether to (a) accept the drafts for later consolidation, (b) request fixes, (c) open the source-recovery decision (Constitution refs + CONS-003), or (d) sequence the remaining Batch B amendments (Đ36 / L4 / Đ38 v3.0) and Batch C (rewrite Đ37).
• Default disposition until the Owner acts: HOLD. Codex PASS ≠ Owner authorization.

Workstream B0+B1 execution report rev2 | 2026-06-17 | PASS (review-ready) | source-recovery + Đ22/Đ33 amendment drafts | read-only · non-authorizing